Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racism in literature
Problems with racism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With America today people constantly struggle with identity. Especially minorities who are persistently pushing themselves to be a part of the American dream. Everyone wants a piece of the pie; however still many minorities are not treated equally, or respected. Kingsolver in her novel, Pigs In Heaven establishes Annawake as a Cherokee representative. She seemingly portrays her as the predator in the chapters. It is apparent through the novel that Annawake makes all her decisions out of her love for the Cherokee tribe and her brother Gabe, while Taylor commits to her choices through Turtle. Annawake does not appreciate the bond of mother and child;therefore disregarding Taylor's feelings of keeping Turtle. According to the novel ,Pigs In Heaven, Kingsolver portrays Annawake as a person who would stop at nothing to preserve her Cherokee tribe. She finds out through Oprah Winfrey that a little Cherokee girl has been illegally adopted by a white woman name Taylor. Annawake is so enraged that she starts yelling at the T.V. She even states to Jinny the "Indian child welfare act. You can't adopt an Indian kid without tribal permission". (Kingsolver, pg 55) Subsequently leading the readers to predict that she would make it difficult for …show more content…
Taylor to keep Turtle. Annawake is portrayed as a cold hearted monster, because she has detached herself from the bond of mother and child. She is projecting her feelings for the loss of her brother and how the white people took away her other half;therefore she is not able to see the bigger picture. Annawake is so blinded with saving every Cherokee child from the hands of the white people that she doesn't see Taylor as a savior, but an intrusion to her culture.
Taylor was handed Turtle and she even states how "The woman told me Turtle's mother was dead, and that somebody had been hurting Turtle". (Kingsolver, pg 55) Taylor not even wanting to have children, even running away from Kentucky to prevent her from "....having babies up to her ears..." (Kingsolver, pg 54) ended up taking care of Turtle through the act of Maternal Instinct. Annawake now expects Taylor to ask for tribal permission when the tribe wasn't there for Turtle when she was getting abused. The readers and Taylor perceive this unfair and just plain
wrong. Taylor is capable of providing Turtle a loving home. She makes all her decisions through the preferences of Turtle. She even agreed to take a plane to see Oprah, because "she has no choice, but to follow her daughter into this new life she's claimed from a fortune cookie." (Kingsolver, pg 45) This proves that Taylor is always looking for the best interest of her child and would sacrifice almost anything to make her happy. Juxtaposition Annawake who wants to take Turtle back to provide her an identity that would make her stronger in defending herself from the prejudices of society, while taking her away from the unconditional love that Taylor is providing for her. Which leads the readers to villainize Annawake. Taylor's love for Turtle has no limits. She is so blinded like a deer in a headlight.She would fraudulent papers in order for Taylor to adopt Turtle. Which in hindsight may cost her the right to keep Turtle. Annawake is aware of her discretions since she has seen the flaws of the adoption case. Even stating, "I have a mystery parent. Two of them. The transfer of custody was witnessed by a notary in Oklahoma city, who had no business with this kind of placement. The parents are listed as Steven and Hope two-two..." (Kingsolver, pg 67) which leads the readers to distrust Annawake's intentions. Assuming that she very well is too smart for her own good, she must be aware of the emotional bond she is ripping away from Turtle and Taylor. Kingsolver establishes Annawake as an antagonist in Taylor's life, because of her apathetic attitude towards Taylor's relations to Turtle. Annawake makes the drive to Oklahoma to confront Taylor about how her adoption to Turtle is ineligible. Taylor doesn't take the news pleasantly, like no mother would. In that scene Kingsolver establishes how similar Annawake and Taylor are. There is a disparity between both their views; however they both believe that they have the best interest at heart. In essence, they are in cross roads. Annawake eventually loses her cool and retorts "How can you think it's good for a tribe to lose it's children", (Kingsolver, pg 79) leading the readers to understand Anawake; however still sympathizing towards Taylor. Taylor was the one who took Turtle in when she was "a bruised apple", (Kingsolver, pg 79) so it would only be fair for her to continue taking care of her. Annawake had no reason to interfere considering how she decided to take this case on her own, without her boss's approval. Leading the readers to believe Annawake's predatory stance to destroy a relationship between mother and child . In essence, Annawake offers Turtle the knowledge of the Cherokee people; however taking her away from Taylor. Basically Annawake is living a contradiction, because she states “A third of all our kids were still being taken from their families and adopted into white homes. One of three”. (Kingsolver, pg 79.) Yet she is trying to take Turtle from Taylor. Annawake is bias in the sense that she is stuck on the mindset that she is the victim. When actuality she is the one replicating the malevolent actions of the white people, by causing a rift into Taylor’s and Turtle’s life. Kingsolver establishes Annawake as the antagonist perfectly. She even gives the readers second thoughts about her role in the novel with the fact that she loss her brother to a white family; however it does not justified the actions of her taking Turtle away from her mother.
There is a lot of symbolism in the Pigman writing by Paul Zindel. The three monks symbolism means Lorraine, John, and Mr. Pignati friendship. One example of the friendship of Lorraine, John and Mr.pignati is when he has a heart attack Lorraine and John skips school to go see him. The three monkeys symbolism you can find it in the Pigman. My conclusion is that the three monkey symbolism is in the Pigman.
Kingsolver develops the story of a strong young woman, named Taylor Greer, who is determined to establish her own individuality. The character learns that she must balance this individualism with a commitment to her community of friends, and in doing this, her life is immeasurably enriched. Many books speak of family, community, and individuality. I believe, however, that the idea that Barbara Kingsolver establishes in her book, The Bean Trees, of a strong sense of individualism, consciously balanced with a keen understanding of community as extended family, is a relatively new idea to the genre of the American novel.
The novel challenges the contradicting sides of the expectation and reality of family and how each one contains a symbiotic relationship. The ideal relationship within families differ throughout The Bean Trees. Kingsolver focuses on the relationship between different characters and how they rely on each other to fill the missing gaps in their lives. When Taylor and Lou Ann meet, they form a symbiotic relationship and fill the missing gaps in each others lives. Once the two women move in with each other, Lou Ann fills Taylor’s missing gap of motherly experience and opens her eyes to a life full of responsibilities.
Although I wish to assume Barbara Brown Taylor’s intentions here are admirable, I find A Tale of Two Heretics adds to the anti-Jewish negativity rather than detracts from it. Throughout the rest of her sermon, she seemingly presents the Pharisees as legalizers who are incapable of witnessing God’s covenantal plan. Firstly, she does so by presenting the Pharisees as callous individuals who are less concerned with the healing of the blind man and more concerned with the blind man’s potential sin. Taylor juxtaposes the Pharisees inquisition with the blind man’s miraculous healings with the result being the blind man’s expulsion from the community. Taylor represents the Pharisees as arrogant, blind leaders who deem the former blind man to be a
Alastair Norcross in his article “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal cases “expresses the moral dilemma based on factory farming. Norcross gives an example of a man named Fred. Fred has to torture puppies in order to be able to enjoy chocolate. This is because when puppies are brutally tortured and then brutally killed they release a chemical called cocoamone. This chemical enhances the taste of chocolate, so Fred is killing puppies for gustatory pleasure. Any morally sound person would be appalled at what Frank is doing to these puppies and that is the basis of Norcross’s article. He is arguing that raising animals on factory farms and what Fred is doing are both morally wrong, because in both cases we are brutally killing the
Barbara Kingsolver is a part of the characters she creates just as much as her characters are a part of her. The storyline of her novel parallels the storyline of her own life discreetly, yet it's presence is undeniable given Barbaras background. Imagine being Kingsolver , uncomfortably pregnant and unable to sleep from the dreary darkness at dusk until the dully drawn dawn. She finds sanctuary in a clammy cramped closet where she begins to ease her mind by implementing her own distresses and successes through fictional characters with the unfortunate yet fortunate Bean Tree beginnings. Henceforth, an ongoing theme, such as single motherhood, is consistently demonstrated throughout the novel by the main character Taylor Greer, and accented by minor characters such as Lou Anne and Sandi. There are many more predominant themes presiding the literature including child abuse, poverty, homelessness, immigration, and monogamy, all implemented with inspiring strength. "I found my head rights, Mama. They're coming with me (Kingsolver 32)," Taylor declares upon acquiring Turtle. This point marks the movement of the novel henceforth, as Taylor learns the difference between a burden and a blessing.
This passage bothered me. It is probably the part that bugged me the most about this book. There are many African Americans who are better behaved, smarter, more artistic, more athletic, etc. then white children. There are also many African Americans who are less educated and more poorly behaved than white children, but the same for both of these things go with white children. It bothers me that she knows that if the worst child in the class was white she wouldn't care if the best child in the class was white. I think that throughout the book she often generalizes with African Americans and doesn't even realize it. She claims that she is getting better, but I don't think that she really is. She keeps trying to have the African American children become the same as the white children.
In the book Fahrenheit 451 and the book Animal Farm characters who are unaware of their surroundings allow for characters such as Beatty, Mr. Jones, and Napoleon to take over. Often times it is necessary for an oppressive power to be forceful in order to take over. Hitler is a leader who used force to take over the German people. In the case of both of these books the naïveté groups of people are used for their ignorance for the benefit of the leaders, and physical power is not required. Animal Farm and Fahrenheit 451 both have a group of naïve people who share the inability to question power, possess loyalty, and stupidity.
In the 1890’s, somewhere in England “The Story of the Three Little Pigs” was created. In this fairy-tale, an old sow sends out three pigs to find their wealth. Firstly, while establishing their wealth, the pigs came across this man that supplied them with material to build their houses. Therefore each pig begins to build their own house, either out of straw, sticks, or stones. The pigs soon after came across the wolf and he blows down the first two pigs houses and eats the pigs. Secondly, there is one pig left, but his house is too strong to blow down. The wolf then tries to outsmart the pig by sending him to different locations to meet him instead of trying to blow down his house. On the other hand, the pig ends up outsmarting the wolf by showing up an hour early to all the destinations. Lastly at the final destination, the fair, the pig scares the wolf by rolling down a hill in a butter churner out of fear of seeing the wolf coming towards the fair. In the end, the wolf got fed up with the pig and declared to eat the pig by climbing through the chimney. The pig once again outsmarts the wolf by putting a pot of boiling water under the chimney and the wolf ends up falling in. The pig, then proceeded to eat the wolf. The third pig ate the wolf as a survival tactic when the wolf declared to eat the pig by using his wits to outsmart
In Orwell's Animal Farm, the animals revolt against the cruel human leaders and set up a better method of farm management where all animals are equal. As time passes, the new leaders become greedy and corrupt, and the other animals realize conditions are just as miserable as before. There is a major connection between Animal Farm and Russian communism. The pigs are one of the most significant of these connections, representing the communist rulers of Russia, like Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. Their traits, personalities, and actions are similar to the actual men in power. In the novel Animal Farm, the pigs represent the communist leaders of Russia in the early 1900s.
Sarah Macdonald. Australia: Bantam(Transworld Publishers, 61-63 Uxbridge Road, London W5 5SA). ISBN 978-0-553-81601-3, 2002, 320 pp. (references), $18.89 (paper).
In the first chapter of Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches by Marvin Harris, Harris puts across the ideology of the Hindu culture; moreover, with their illogical beliefs and aberrant lifestyles. Culture is merely based off of different traditions and legends that have been passed down through centuries of times, some of which might not make sense to others. The example brought up was the love for the sacred cows in India. In the Hindu culture cows are seen as the divine bounty of earth and have been given a status level of spiritual being. Harris brings up issues of India’s hunger and poverty issues are caused due to the worshiping of the cows. He continues with claims: “that cow worship lowers the efficiency of agriculture,” (p.12) and “that taboo
Overall, the title says it all, by addressing the Virgins, focusing on young women and their desire for new experiences. “To make much of time” implies to make it a longer wait then it should be. In other words, do not waste time on becoming sexually active. Perkins stated, that Herrick realized during the last moments of his life that death is inevitable and time is fleeting, and virgins, should take advantage of the sensual pleasures the speaker reveals to her. To “use your time” wisely by enjoying sexual love. Yet, manages to communicate the cons of persuading pleasure. In addition, Herrick presents challenge to and support of social views, when he encourages youths to open up and embrace their sexuality. (Perkins) In the other hand, Ketteler
Every enduring object or idea lasts because ordinary people focused on their goal and ignored the temptation of taking the easy path that leads to failure. History illustrates that great feats require arduous labor and wise preparation. During World War II, the Allies attacked a less than fully prepared German defense in Normandy on D-Day, which became a foothold in Europe for the Allies. The Chinese spent over 1,700 years developing the 3,700 mile-long Great Wall that successfully protected their country from Mongol invaders. The key difference in the outcomes of these events lies in the determination and preparation of the opposing sides. In the end, the more prepared side exploited the shortcomings of its opposition. Many writers have gained inspiration from the effects strong wills have had on human history, and the fruit of one forgotten author has remained a staple example of the benefits of labor since the Mid-Nineteenth Century.
The satire Animal Farm by George Orwell expresses the idea of self-government through the animals. The animals play the role of humans, in this way using most, if not all, of the human characteristics.