Analysis Of Peter Moskos Cop In The Hood

536 Words2 Pages

On page 1 of Peter Moskos’ investigative novel, Cop in the Hood; Moskos writes, “At a police funeral no one composes eulogizing platitudes of ‘never again.” In short, the public has grown callous to the death of a policeman. It goes unnoticed and unavenged. Given the recent events in Charlottesville in which Heather Heyer was tragically killed and made into a martyr for equal justice, I thought Moskos’ observation was misinformed. It seemed as if the entire nation had composed eulogizing platitudes of never again in the wake of Heyer’s death. Her death was noticed and is soon to be avenged with public outcry for her assailant to see maximum sentencing. What makes Heyer’s death so different from that of a policeman killed in action? Both are symbols of the active pursuit of justice so why did the nation favor one and not the other? …show more content…

On the next page (page 2), Moskos mentioned that when one becomes a cop, one sheds any other forms of identity, such as race, and becomes blue. Later, on that same page, Moskos discusses the dehumanizing and strict “pseudo-military” regime found in police academy. I couldn’t help but wonder if the dehumanizing actions listed above had affected law enforcement’s ability to empathize with civilians. My suspicions were all but denounced when on page 7, Moskos recalls (or fails to recall) a 12 person shooting. While he fails to recall a scene that would no doubt scar the average person, he does manage to remember his tasteless jokes about the horrendous scene laid out in front of him. Therefore, we can conclude that policemen are desensitized to the death/suffering of civilians. Their strict regiment and lack of personal identity has driven a wedge between us and them. However, we have also lost our ability to empathise with

Open Document