Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of social class on educational achievement
Nature vs nurture theory
Analysis n outliers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of social class on educational achievement
Nature versus Nurture is a very debatable topic within our society today. The nature versus nurture debate is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture (Good Therapy, 2014). This debate is concerned with the extent to which particular aspects of behavior that promote intelligence, athletic ability, and overall success are a product of either inherited or acquired characteristics (McLeod, 2007). Nature is often defined in this debate as genetic or hormone-based behaviors, while nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experience (Good Therapy, 2014). Published in 2008, Outliers: The Story of Success written by Malcolm Gladwell begins to tackle this debate standing on the side of nurture. From beginning to end, the Story of Success focuses on this theme and applies it within the context of the …show more content…
book on just about every page. Although the modern day debate emphasizes the scientific evidence and support of newly discovered genes for virtually every behavior, Gladwell produces an entire book of his own evidence and support that allows readers to have a completely new perspective; grasping and understanding the importance nurture, or environment, produces its own stories of success. Outliers deals with the cultural and societal forces that give rise to resourceful individuals. Through a series of case studies, Gladwell insists that we have all too easily bought into the myth that successful people are self-made. Instead, he says they “are invariably the beneficiaries of hidden advantages and extraordinary opportunities and cultural legacies that allow them to learn and work hard and make sense of the world in ways others cannot” (Gladwell, 2008). Gladwell defines an outlier as a person out of the ordinary “who doesn't fit into our normal understanding of achievement” (Gladwell, 2008). According to Gladwell, great men and women are beneficiaries of specialization, collaboration, time, place, and culture. An outlier’s recipe for success is not personal nature, but the synthesis of opportunity and time on task, most commonly defined as nurture. The believed purpose of Gladwell’s book would be to subtly defeat the ideas of nature overcoming the forces of nurture. Science often creates a society that believes people can become “self-made-men”. This means, our genetic make-up and who we are as individuals weighs more heavily on our life outcomes than the people, places, and world existing around us. Without once mentioning this debate, Gladwell is persuasively intriguing his audience into the idea that society is what truly creates the stories of success. Those that may have once believed that victory or achievement is due entirely to individual traits and efforts can begin to focus more clearly on history, culture, wealth, timing, and luck, as Gladwell emphasizes their part to play in determining life outcomes. The effectiveness of Gladwell’s ideas are solely based on his structure of the book.
The structure of Outliers is based on the case studies that Gladwell uses to support his claims. The two parts “Opportunity” and “Legacy” are further divided into chapters that are devoted to particular cases. Within the chapters, Gladwell challenges commonly held beliefs by finding people whose circumstances go against the grain—outliers in a world of ordinary. This allows the reader to undoubtedly believe and buy into the idea that nurture does matter. Gladwell endlessly argues that the story of success largely socially constructed, and that success is due more to factors such as wealth, family background, luck, hard work, cultural capital, etc. than to individual factors such as brains, creativity, or temperament. Gladwell gives an example of Bill Gates, who, for example, was smart, but, according to Gladwell, succeeded as much as he did because he was rich, went to a fancy private high school, and was struck with continuous streaks of pure luck throughout his early
life. Not only is the entire book greatly organized and set up to allow the reader to take on the idea of nurture slowly, Gladwell efficiently writes each story of success with great color and image. The reader is able to bring to life the feeling of success time and time again as each character and their story is explained and described throughout the book. Gladwell uses pertinent characters that every reader is able to recognize. Bill Gates, Michael Jordan, Robert Opperheimer, Mozart and the Beatles are brought into a light that allows the reader to believe, “that could have been me”. The final story within the book is the story of Gladwell’s himself. It can be believed that while persuading the audience to understand the importance of society on an individual, Gladwell is also thanking the world; the same world and society that created the story of success in his own life. Gladwell is able to identify his strengths and talents, but more importantly, realizes he could have never made it alone. No one makes it alone. Finally, Gladwell states that it takes great humility to be honest about where we are from. It is all too easy to allow society to put only ourselves in the spot light, not sharing it with any other factor that played a role in our success. Society aims to focus on our nature, which forgets and discredits the crucial amount of help nurture has played in our lives. Gladwell ends the book, stating the most profound and conclusive statement, summarizing the book’s purpose and major theme into one; “Super star lawyers and math whizzes and software entrepreneurs appear at first blush to lie outside ordinary experience. But they don’t. They are products of history and community, of opportunity and legacy. Their success is not exceptional or mysterious. It is grounded in a web of advantages and inheritances, some deserved, some not, some earned, some just plain lucky-but all critical to making them who they are. The outlier in the end is not an outlier at all” (Gladwell, 2008).
“People don't rise from nothing....It is only by asking where they are from that we can unravel the logic behind who succeeds and who doesn't”(Gladwell 18).
Throughout the book, Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell focuses on using the rhetorical technique of pathos to aid his readers in understanding the formula for success. In one particular part of the book, Gladwell uses experiences and human problems as examples to support his idea that plane crashes and ethnicty are related and the greater idea that success is based on opportunity.
Malcolm Gladwell, in the nonfiction book Outliers, claims that success stems from where you come from, and to find that you must look beyond the individual. Malcolm Gladwell develops and supports his claim by defining an outlier, then providing an example of how Stewart Wolf looked beyond the individual, and finally by giving the purpose of the book Outliers as a whole. Gladwell’s purpose is to explain the extenuating circumstances that allowed one group of people to become outliers in order to inform readers on how to be successful. The author writes in a serious and factual tone for the average person in society of both genders and all ethnicities who wants to become successful in life.
In Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell argues that there is no such thing as a self-made man, and that success is only the result of a person’s circumstances. However, throughout the novel Gladwell points out that your circumstances and opportunities only help you become successful if you are willing to take advantage of them and work hard. From a twelve year old living in the Bronx, to those who were born at just the right time to become millionaires, one thing is the same throughout; these people because successful because they seized the opportunities they were given. The advantages and opportunities that came from their circumstances would not be important if they had not grasped them. Every successful man is self made, because he has seized the
“A statistical observation that is markedly different in value from the others of the sample” (Gladwell 3) or in other words an outlier. In the novel Outliers: The Story of Success, author Malcolm Gladwell holds one of the many secrets to life, the secret to success. Gladwell takes one’s thoughts on an astonishing journey to reveal the keys to success, their patterns, and how to achieve it.
In “Outliers” Malcolm Gladwell organizes his argument for their being a rule for overall success by showing statistics of people who are defined as being successful such as Bill Gates, Billy Joy, and The Beatles. He also uses a Berlin music academy to help prove his rule. He presents an argument that Bill Gates and The Beatles and the violinist attending the music academy may have been born with innate talent but that is not the sole ...
Gladwell gives differing definitions of intelligence. Yet his definition of success is singular—"worldly" success in terms of wealth, power, and fame. Are there also differing definitions of success that Gladwell doesn't consider? If so, what are they, and what does it take to achieve those versions of success? What is your definition of success, and how does it compare to Gladwell’s? Has your definition of success changed at all?
Malcolm Gladwell makes many debatable claims in his book “The Outliers”. One of these controversial topics is brought up in chapter three when he talks about a person’s IQ and how that relates to one’s success. Gladwell says, “The relationship between success and IQ works only up to a point. Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.”After reading “Outliers” I believe that this is the greatest controversial topic. I agree with Malcolm Gladwell because there are a high amount of people who are not incredibly smart that are very successful, success can be viewed differently by different people, and from my own experiences on the U-High
His main points of discussion include, but are not limited to, the importance of effort, the irrelevance of skill, and the tactic of targeting a Goliath’s weakness. Phrases such as “maniacal” and “socially-horrifying” describe the characteristics a David must possess (Gladwell 7, 13). With a tone of inspiration, Gladwell is able to instill in readers the idea that hard work pays off far more than adeptness. The social issue of an underdog’s success in identified in Gladwell’s
Gladwell, Malcolm. Outliers: the story of success. 1st ed. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2008. 1-91. Print.
Einstein was not always an extremely successful man and he had difficulties that would have prevented anyone else from succeeding, but eventually, several of his theories led to scientific advancements. One theory earned him a Nobel Prize, in physics one a PhD and another helped in the development of nuclear fission. If a person were only to take a quick glance at his life without a deeper investigation, they would find it difficult to discover the catalyst that led to his success. However, with the tools Gladwell provides his readers it does become obvious what led to Einstein’s life of success. Gladwell argues that a person needs to devote time to practice their craft; he calls this the “10,000-hour rule” (Gladwell 35). They must also have opportunity to succeed, as well as intelligence; they must at least be, smart enough to do so. He also claims that they must have been born at just the right time for success, too early or too late is a failure; he calls this the “Matthew Effect” (Gladwell 15). Gladwell even goes so far as to say that where they are born has a significant impact on their success; this he calls “demographic luck” (Gladwell 129). These tools provided by Gladwell to identify an outlier can explain if Albert Einstein is truly an outlier.
The most intriguing study in the book Outliers by Malcom Gladwell was, in my opinion, Rice Paddies and Math Tests (Part Two-Chapter Eight). The correlation and connections Gladwell makes between what makes the Asian rice farmers so successful, and how it translated into math was frankly, a very remarkable comparison that changed how I thought of mathematics and success in general. It made a connection between the math we learn in school, how we learn it, and how this can translate into life, especially life as a rice farmer. It was also very fascinating for Gladwell to show the significant differences between how kids in Asian countries learn math versus how kids in Western countries learn math. Conversely Gladwell further strengthened and
“But what truly distinguishes their histories is not their extraordinary talent but their extraordinary opportunities”, is the key to Chapter 2. The narrative in Outliers I chose is about Bill Gates and the Beatles. In this chapter Gladwell’s argument is the way you’re raised in a society can measure your success in the future because of the opportunities you were given. Gladwell is almost envious of people that are born into successful family, he has a negative connotation towards them Bill Gates was given numerous opportunities and he took advantage of every single one. The narrative’s of Bill Gates and The Beatles capture the audience’s emotions and makes the audience understand Gladwell’s argument. With our knowledge we can expand and
For generations, only certain people have achieved success - they are known as geniuses or outliers; however, they did not obtain it on high IQs and innate talents alone. In the book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell, #1 bestselling author of The Tipping Point and Blink, reveals the transparent secret of success behind every genius that made it big. Intertwined with that, Gladwell builds a convincing implication that the story behind the success of all geniuses is that they were born at the right place, at the right time and took advantage of it. To convey the importance of the outlier’s fortunate circumstances to his readers, he expresses a respective, colloquial tone when examining their lives. Gladwell begins his examination of an outlier’s
In Chapter 8 and 9 of Outliers: The Story of Success, Gladwell exams some of the ways that Asian and American students learn math, arguing that some of the principles in the US education system should be reconsidered. I generally agree with Gladwell’s point of view. I believe in two ways, students ' principal spirit and the length of students’ studying, the US education system leaves much to be desired, though an overhaul is in progress.