Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The big effect of bill gates in the world
The big effect of bill gates in the world
Impact of bill gates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The big effect of bill gates in the world
People tend to marvel at the characteristics of successful members of society without ever considering the circumstances that allowed them to achieve such success. In his book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell claims that these over-achievers are only the way they are as a result of the circumstances around them. Furthermore, Gladwell emphasizes that if conditions are not perfect, even the most intelligent can not reach their goals.
Gladwell frequently states that people are a product of the factors around them. One such factor is the amount of time a person dedicates towards a particular skill, craft, art, or activity, and the time required to be the best in a particular field is 10,000 hours. Bill Gates, having a net worth of approximately 90 billion dollars, is generally considered an epitome of success. Gladwell provides precise details about how Gates was able to become a pioneer. Gates gained a head start in the field of computing with access to “real-time programming as an eighth grader in 1968 (Gladwell 51).” In addition, Gladwell explains that a crucial aspect of Gates’ success was that he attended Lakeside School, one of the only high schools in the late ‘60s which has access to a time-sharing terminal. Gates also came from a family that
…show more content…
could “afford his school’s computer fees (Gladwell 54).” The previously-stated factors and many more allowed Bill Gates extra time to practice and soar past ten thousand hours. In addition, my parents are also perfect examples of the 10,000 hour theory. For example, my parents sent me to India for three years when they were initially establishing their restaurant. Let’s say each parent worked 10 hours a day for three years straight. Therefore, by the time I came back to the United States, they had worked a minimum of 10,950 hours. My parents, who could barely pay the rent of $6,000 initially, eventually carried out renovations of approximately a million dollars five years later. Another important factor in being successful is social structure because it influences individuals to act in certain ways. The higher a person is on in the hierarchy, the more likely that they will succeed. Gladwell, when talking about the children of the middle-class, writes, “They acted as though they had a right to pursue their own individual preferences to actively manage interactions in institutional settings (Gladwell 105).” He explains that the sense of entitlement allowed them to survive much better in an increasingly competitive world. Gladwell compares the children to their poorer counterparts, stating, “the working-class and poor children were characterized by ‘an emerging sense of distance, distrust, and constraint’ (Gladwell 105).” Social structure has had an extremely significant factor in my own life. For example, when my parents were not as affluent, I was extremely shy. However, as they moved up the socioeconomic hierarchy, their attitudes towards how independent I should be changed. Therefore, by high school, I developed many valuable social skills which have helped me distinguish myself from many of my peers. In his book, Gladwell makes clear distinctions between talent, preparation, and opportunity.
Talent is the inherent aptitude that a person has, preparation is the development of a skill, and an opportunity is a pathway to success. Talent could be a possible factor for success, but it is often not very significant. For example, as I have stated before, I never really had an inherent ability to communicate with anyone. Only through talking with people did I really develop these skills. Therefore, preparation or just simple practice is far more important than talent. My opportunity to exercise those social skills has allowed me to excel in many of my extracurricular activities, as well as allowing me to form new
friendships. Chris Cherian is an outlier in my community of friends. Like Bill Gates and Joe Flom, he is someone who has worked on a particular talent, which in his case is public speaking, and has gained immense benefits. For example, Cherian has won the prestigious Best Delegate Award several times at Model United Nations conferences. He has also won 1st Place in English Oratory at both the Georgia Junior Classical League Convention and the National Junior Classical League Convention. For these reasons and many others, Cherian has proven himself to be cut above the rest. In Outliers, Gladwell completely rejects the notion that success can be attributed to some basic personality traits, ambition and intelligence alone. Success is much more influenced by the conditions under which one is born and raised than by any other element. The culture, generation, or family one is born into or raised in, and the life experiences that one has, will determine if a person will attain success.
“People don't rise from nothing....It is only by asking where they are from that we can unravel the logic behind who succeeds and who doesn't”(Gladwell 18).
I found Gladwell’s first chapter of Outliers entitled “The Matthew Effect” to be both interesting, confusing, and perhaps somewhat lopsided. Based on Matthew 25:2, Gladwell simply explains, “It is those who are successful, in other words, who are most likely to be given to the kinds of special opportunities that lead to further success.” (Gladwell 2008, pg. 30) The Matthew Effect seems to extend special advantages and opportunities to some simply based on their date of birth.
Throughout the book, Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell focuses on using the rhetorical technique of pathos to aid his readers in understanding the formula for success. In one particular part of the book, Gladwell uses experiences and human problems as examples to support his idea that plane crashes and ethnicty are related and the greater idea that success is based on opportunity.
Malcolm Gladwell, in the nonfiction book Outliers, claims that success stems from where you come from, and to find that you must look beyond the individual. Malcolm Gladwell develops and supports his claim by defining an outlier, then providing an example of how Stewart Wolf looked beyond the individual, and finally by giving the purpose of the book Outliers as a whole. Gladwell’s purpose is to explain the extenuating circumstances that allowed one group of people to become outliers in order to inform readers on how to be successful. The author writes in a serious and factual tone for the average person in society of both genders and all ethnicities who wants to become successful in life.
In Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell argues that there is no such thing as a self-made man, and that success is only the result of a person’s circumstances. However, throughout the novel Gladwell points out that your circumstances and opportunities only help you become successful if you are willing to take advantage of them and work hard. From a twelve year old living in the Bronx, to those who were born at just the right time to become millionaires, one thing is the same throughout; these people because successful because they seized the opportunities they were given. The advantages and opportunities that came from their circumstances would not be important if they had not grasped them. Every successful man is self made, because he has seized the
What would happen if our world today was monotonous, sorrowful, and grey? What if no one was here to form new creations, and think of bold ideas? Would triumph have a definition? Would there be outliers in our world today? We are constantly thinking, always generating new ideas and forming new thoughts. People even proceed by creating inventions, and building objects no one would of thought would be made today. But, what we don’t perceive is how they became successful and how they took advantage of the moment that was given to them. In the novel, Outliers, by Malcolm Gladwell, the author explains that an outlier is one who is given an opportunity and knows how to take advantage. He believes that in order for a person to be successful they need at least ten thousand hours of hard work and effort in order to succeed at a skill. It is clear to me that like Malcolm Gladwell, I believe
Although the author, Malcolm Gladwell did not major in sociology or psychology in college, his credibility for Outliers comes from his background in journalism. His career in journalism began after he was rejected from every advertising agency he applied for. He finally ...
In “Outliers” Malcolm Gladwell organizes his argument for their being a rule for overall success by showing statistics of people who are defined as being successful such as Bill Gates, Billy Joy, and The Beatles. He also uses a Berlin music academy to help prove his rule. He presents an argument that Bill Gates and The Beatles and the violinist attending the music academy may have been born with innate talent but that is not the sole ...
Gladwell gives differing definitions of intelligence. Yet his definition of success is singular—"worldly" success in terms of wealth, power, and fame. Are there also differing definitions of success that Gladwell doesn't consider? If so, what are they, and what does it take to achieve those versions of success? What is your definition of success, and how does it compare to Gladwell’s? Has your definition of success changed at all?
Once in a while, it really hits people that they don’t have to experience the world in the way they have been told to. Gladwell believes that cultural legacies are powerful forces. Cultural legacies are the customs of a family or a group of people, that is inherited through the generations. According to Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Outliers, Cultural legacies is something that’s been passed down for generations to generations. It depends on what type of legacies was passed that will affect a person. If a good legacy was passed down, someone can keep that legacy going by trying hard at keeping the legacies going. If a bad legacy was passed down; I believe that cultural legacies can be altered or changed, by good working habits, determination, and a positive mindset to succeed. Culture can affect either positively or negatively, but we have the power to turn our cultural
Malcolm Gladwell makes many debatable claims in his book “The Outliers”. One of these controversial topics is brought up in chapter three when he talks about a person’s IQ and how that relates to one’s success. Gladwell says, “The relationship between success and IQ works only up to a point. Once someone has reached an IQ of somewhere around 120, having additional IQ points doesn’t seem to translate into any measurable real-world advantage.”After reading “Outliers” I believe that this is the greatest controversial topic. I agree with Malcolm Gladwell because there are a high amount of people who are not incredibly smart that are very successful, success can be viewed differently by different people, and from my own experiences on the U-High
Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers is an extremely informative read about success and the different aspects that attribute to it. Gladwell is able to use many studies and sources that back up his theories of how success is achieved. Although he is biased towards his theories, the only real argument that can be made in opposition to his theories would be a debate over exceptions to the 10,000 Hour Rule. Outliers ultimately has a positive effect on the audience by making them more aware of their own chances at success and how if they may be lacking in one area (education, opportunity, creativity) all hope is not lost. Gladwell’s piece is essentially timeless and will be able to be applied to future generations because he used examples from a few different eras that still make sense to today.
Malcolm Gladwell’s overall purpose of Outliers: The Story of Success is that success is largely determined by an individual’s socioeconomic and sociocultural environment, and individual ambition, effort, or talent, are less significant, contrary to the societal notions associated with success. In other words, success is not something that someone randomly gained; success is earned through opportunities that develop dedication, interest, and skill over time. By doing this, will one become an outlier, or “something that is situated away or classed differently from a main or related body,” (Gladwell 3) that distinguishes great from good and best from great, as exemplified by “The striking thing about Ericsson’s study is that the and his colleagues couldn’t find any “naturals”, musicians who floated effortlessly to the top while practicing a fraction of the time their peers did.” (Gladwell 39) Gladwell also acknowledges societal norms such that “All of the fourteen men and woman on the list above had vision and talent,” (Gladwell 62-63) to assert hard work, ability, et cetera can lead to success, but a social environment that offers such opportunities immensely increases the likelihood of success.
For generations, only certain people have achieved success - they are known as geniuses or outliers; however, they did not obtain it on high IQs and innate talents alone. In the book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell, #1 bestselling author of The Tipping Point and Blink, reveals the transparent secret of success behind every genius that made it big. Intertwined with that, Gladwell builds a convincing implication that the story behind the success of all geniuses is that they were born at the right place, at the right time and took advantage of it. To convey the importance of the outlier’s fortunate circumstances to his readers, he expresses a respective, colloquial tone when examining their lives. Gladwell begins his examination of an outlier’s
In Chapter 8 and 9 of Outliers: The Story of Success, Gladwell exams some of the ways that Asian and American students learn math, arguing that some of the principles in the US education system should be reconsidered. I generally agree with Gladwell’s point of view. I believe in two ways, students ' principal spirit and the length of students’ studying, the US education system leaves much to be desired, though an overhaul is in progress.