Analysis Of Michael Kimmel's The Gendered Society

718 Words2 Pages

In excerpts from The Gendered Society, Michael Kimmel talks about the biological and socially constructed views placed on gender and its effect on the sexes. Kimmel brings up the findings of anthropologist Margaret Mead,who studied three different tribes. Two of which were equal in relation between the sexes, yet, one is described as passive and the other aggressive in nature. The third culture, the Tchambuli, were vastly different from the previous two. There were differences between the genders, differences which are not familiar to the first two cultures, nor many countries and societies around the world, including the U.S.. In the Tchambuli, the men were passive and take great importance on wearing jewelry and curls, while the women were In our society in the United states, men are regarded as the dominant sex and are given differential treatment in regards to the division of labor. Though there have been various strides from the Women 's Movement, which have historically garnered women the right to vote, to work in their field of choice and leave the home, but also recently, to join the military.(p. 301) Women continue to seek total equality in our society, yet equality cannot be attained while they are constantly regarded as objects and sex symbols. This all can be traced back to the introduction of the market economy and primal warfare, when men would go out and hunt while the women would stay back as harvesters and nurturers. (p. 302) Theorists like Lionel Tiger and Robin Fox use this separation to explain why men perpetuate patrilineal aspects, since men are out “hunting”, they do not form connections with the children like the mother does, so to make up for this connection lost between generations they form it with other men in the hunting group.(p. (p. 326) She begins by pointing out the reason why there is so little talk about the obvious male-created and male-dominated institutions in our society, and her answer is so, it was “so obvious that no debate was needed”.(p. 326) Joan Acker references Moss Kanter when talking about women and their placements in organizations. Kanter explains women in the structural placement as either crowded in dead-end jobs at the bottom, or used and exposed as tokens at the top. (p. 327) This statement is very true in relation to institutions where women tend to occupy the lower tier jobs such as assistants and secretaries. When women do acquire higher tiered positions in these sort of institutions, they are often regarded as using male-like approaches to attaining their position and are referred to by very demeaning

Open Document