Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inca and aztec empire
Incan and aztec empires
Incan and aztec empires
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Inca and aztec empire
Most civilizations and groups of people are forgotten soon after their destruction. As a society collapses, their role in global history is rarely acknowledged after a few decades. It is only if a society proves to be far bigger and bolder than the surrounding population, that their legacy just may be admired and talked about. Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies tells a tale of how the different peoples came to dominate world history and the factors that made their prosperity prevalent for centauries to follow. From economics to politics to war; the gap of superiority demonstrated by various groups throughout history remains a theme central to this novel. Diamond commences his novel in a way that defines society; …show more content…
The Spanish peoples presented an advantage of experience in cultivation of agriculture, domestication of animals and technology efficient ships and weapons. Diamond also speaks of the various germs and sicknesses that were consistently exposed to the Spanish, which allowed them to form an immunity to diseases not yet encountered by the Inca (Diamond, 1999). These advantages, both environmental and socio-economic, placed the Spanish at an advantage resulting in a dominant force in history, one that would eventually the Incan Empire.
Dimond moves on and extensively discusses the notion of how “guns, germs, and steel” along with many other factors, demonstrate the ability needed to propel a society forward. Factors such as successful agriculture played an important roll in history. The author points to the large strip of fertile land called the “Fertile Crescent,” present in Eurasia. The Fertile Crescent presents ideal conditions for agricultural prosperity including metallic elements and stable environment for food production spread across connected areas of land (Diamond,
…show more content…
Successful food production led to more densely populated towns and with that came primitive independent economies. In order to control the increasing populations and wealth, forms of governance were established (Anrosio, 2011). The societies that stemmed from factors such as these are what Diamond skillfully argues for the entirety of his work.
The domination of societies in history is a discussion of great complexity and knowledge. While Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies tells a complex tale of how different peoples came to dominate world history, its presentation of material is impressive. Jarred Diamond’s work is an effect recount of how the dominant societies that are remembered still today in history. Coupled with the significant amount of research and analyses that are easy to follow, Diamond’s novel resembles the work a true teacher of
Coffin, Judith G., and Robert C. Stacey. "CHAPTER 18 PAGES 668-669." Western Civilizations: Their History & Their Culture. 16TH ed. Vol. 2. New York, NY: W. W. Norton &, 2008. N. pag. Print.
The reason Jared Diamond wrote this book was to answer the question of his politician friend Yali that why did some societies like Eurasia was able to develop Guns, Germs, and
Jared Diamond, author of the Pulitzer Prize Winning, National Best Selling book Guns, Germs and Steel, summarizes his book by saying the following: "History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves." Guns, Germs and Steel is historical literature that documents Jared Diamond's views on how the world as we know it developed. However, is his thesis that environmental factors contribute so greatly to the development of society and culture valid? Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History is the textbook used for this class and it poses several different accounts of how society and culture developed that differ from Diamond's claims. However, neither Diamond nor Traditions are incorrect. Each poses varying, yet true, accounts of the same historical events. Each text chose to analyze history in a different manner. Not without flaws, Jared Diamond makes many claims throughout his work, and provides numerous examples and evidence to support his theories. In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture, and compare and contrast it with what I have learned using the textbook for this class.
The outnumbered Spanish conquistadors were able to so easily defeat the natives of South and Central America for many reasons. These reasons include the spread of disease, the fear the Spanish spread, civil war, and the thought that Cortez was a God. The Natives were not immune to the European disease such as smallpox, influenza measles, typhus, plague, malaria, and yellow fever. This wiped out 85-90% of the Native population in 50 years. This was the largest demographic catastrophe in human history. (Document 4: The American Holocaust)
I first read Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel in the Fall 2003 based on a recommendation from a friend. Many chapters of the book are truly fascinating, but I had criticisms of the book back then and hold even more now. Chief among these is the preponderance of analysis devoted to Papua New Guinea, as opposed to, say, an explanation of the greatly disparate levels of wealth and development among Eurasian nations. I will therefore attempt to confine this review on the "meat and potatoes" of his book: the dramatic Spanish conquest of the Incas; the impact of continental geography on food production; and finally, the origins of the Eurasian development of guns, germs, and steel. In terms of structure, I will first summarize the book's arguments, then critically assess the book's evidentiary base, and conclude with an analysis of how Guns, Germs, and Steel ultimately helps to address the wealth question.
Coffin, Judith G, et al. Western Civilizations: Their History & Their Culture. 17th ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 2011. Print.
The Spanish brought firearms, explosive and steel weapons, of which the Native Americans had not used or seen before. As they saw the Spanish come in with these, they feared them and hid from them. The Spanish also brought horses, pigs and cattle all in which provided superiority against the Indians. The Natives did not have domesticate animals, so the impact of seeing men on horses had a vast psychological effect on them. Although the Natives outnumbered the Spanish, they were not immune to diseases such as smallpox and measles to which the Spanish brought along with them. As a result, the number of Native Americans decimated due to the natives becoming ill and dying off before they could even attack. Due to the native Americans being semi-nomadic and lacking significant fortification, helped the Spanish by easing conquering. One major important aspect was having experience, the Native Americans were always civilized with one other in contrast to the Spanish. The Spanish have a long history of warfare with other rivals over religion or territory, and this gained them enough experience to be prepared and armed for the unexpected.
“Thunder on their ships” can be used to describe Herman Cortes when he landed at what is now Veracruz, Mexico in 1519 A.D. The light skinned and bearded Spaniard led his men into territory occupied by the Aztec civilization. Little did Cortes know, but that happened to be the same year in the Aztec culture when a white and bearded deity was expected to arrive. Montezuma, the Aztec’s ruler, greeted Cortes with honors fit for a God and opened up his empire for Spanish invasion. Cortes and his followers, equipped with the most up to date technology of the time, successfully caused the demise of the Aztec civilization. However, the most contemporary weaponry and technology did not solely destroy the Aztecs. Smallpox, a deadly disease introduced to the Americas by Spanish soldiers, infected the non-immune natives who died rapidly after exposure (Ehrlich, 253). This epidemic swept through the Aztec population, decreasing numbers from twenty-five million to six million (Ponting, 230). The European invasion of the Aztec civilization is just one of many examples of how European expansion affected the world. For centuries, Europeans were the leaders of expansion and exploration to many areas of the world. However, expansion of other, less researched civilizations, such as the Aztecs, occurred on a much smaller scale. The differences between the movement of the Aztec people and the Europeans as well as their effects on the environment are directly correlated to cultural and technological factors of both...
Microbes from Europe introduced new diseases and produced devastating epidemics that swept through the native populations (Nichols 2008). The result from the diseases brought over, such as smallpox, was a demographic catastrophe that killed millions of people, weakened existing societies, and greatly aided the Spanish and Portuguese in their rapid and devastating conquest of the existing American empires (Brinkley 2014). Interaction took place with the arrival of whites and foreigners. The first and perhaps most profound result of this exchange was the imp...
Hause, S., & Maltby, W. (2001). The Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt, Phoenicia and Israel. Essentials of Western Civilization (pp.7-15). California: Wadsworth.
Perry, M., Davis, D., Harris, J., Laue, T. V., & Warren, D. J. (1985). A history of the world (Revised Edition ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
“History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples ' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves” (Jared Diamond). In the book Guns Germs and Steel he accounted a conversation with Yali, a New Guinean politician that had asked “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?”. Diamond tries to answer this by describing the difference in use of government throughout history by bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and states.
Ellis, Elizabeth Gaynor, and Anthony Esler. World History: The Modern Era. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
In Marshall G. S. Hodgson’s article, The Interrelations of Societies in History, the idea of our egocentrism influencing our perception and education of history is more deeply explored and analyzed. The piece outlines how history primarily focuses on Western Civilization, although in reality the studies are usually only on European states. It argues that large scale history should be studied not as individual areas that are separate in nature, but through the interrelations throughout these societies in world history. In other words, that the achievements, declines, successes, and failures of all world societies through history have been connected to one another in some way, and it is impossible to understand a time period without understanding first the connections of societies. Hodgson makes this argument through two main points, first there is critiques of the current models of studying world history for their lack of interrelational studies. Second, he presents his own method of tracing large scale history by comparing societies involved in history. The Interrelations of Societies in History presents a theory on the faults with
The State is a relatively recent phenomenon in human history, emerging somewhere between 6000-3500 B.C. (Ember, Ember, Peregrine, 2005.) Thus a critical issue for anthropology must be: what is the state and why and how did it appear? The most widely accepted definition of the state is an organization which attempts to maintain a monopoly on the use of force and violence in a given territorial area (Rothbard, 2009, p. 11). These powers include the ability to collect taxes, draft men for work or war, and direct and enforce laws (Carneiro, 1970). Another way of looking at the state is by distinguishing the way it acquires wealth. According to Franz Oppenheimer, there are two means for acquiring wealth – the political means and the economic means. The state uses the political means which is the “unrequited appropriation of the labor of others”. The economic means is the exchange of one’s own labor for the labor of others, for the satisfaction of needs (Oppenheimer, 1922, p. 30). States are not to be confused with chiefdoms – which is “a society with centralized but not internally specialized authority” (Spencer, 2010, p. 1). The purpose of this paper is to describe the three frequently discussed theories on the origin of the state: hydraulic theory (irrigation), circumscription, and territory expansion model (local and long-distance trade). I will discuss, critique, and implement all three theories in my own view of the state.