More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of supporting children’s resilience
The importance of supporting children’s resilience
The importance of supporting children’s resilience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Lori Gottlieb’s article, “How to Land Your Kid in Therapy” she provides evidence of how lavishing too much affection on your children can change them eventually. Several references in her article show how not allowing kids to experience unhappiness will in turn land them in therapy. Parents never consider that they can love their children too much and Gottlieb supports that, it is possible. The lack of competition, responsibility, conflict, or pain inhibits a child to become a well-rounded adult. Gottlieb uses expert commentary, analogies, personal experience, emotional appeals, allusions, research, and anecdotes to provide support for her claims. Through adequate evidence, Gottlieb successfully convinces her readers that not allowing children …show more content…
to experience unhappiness will land them in therapy. Gottlieb persuades readers of her conclusion through the expert commentary presented in her article. One of the first experts she speaks to is Paul Bohn, a psychiatrist at UCLA. She establishes his credibility and then moves on to his comments. Bohn states that “avoid having their kids experience ‘anything less than pleasant’ […] as adults they experience normal frustrations of life, they think something must be terribly wrong” (qtd. in Gottlieb). Gottlieb states that Bohn made this observation from his own practice showing his professional observation as a psychiatrist. Bohn and Gottlieb’s discussion answers the question that protecting kids from unhappiness, deprive them of happiness as adults because they never learn how to deal with discomfort or disappointment. Another expert Gottlieb quotes is Dan Kindlon who furthers the idea of psychological immunity. Gottlieb introduces Kindlon as a child psychologist, lecturer at Harvard and author instead of simply Dan Kindlon. Gottlieb acknowledges the occupations of speakers in her article to add validity to their words. When Gottlieb repeats Kindlon “…that if kids experience painful feelings, they won’t develop psychological immunity […] ‘Civilization is about adapting to less-than-perfect situations yet parents often have this instantaneous reaction to unpleasantness, which is I can fix this.’” (qtd. in Gottlieb).Without mentioning his qualifications, the readers are not convinced of the ideas, this leaves room for the audience to ask questions such as “why should we believe him?” When Kindlon talks about his experience with the kid who did not want carpool, parents will believe that their kids do not learn tolerance by them saving them, effecting them as adults. Gottlieb continues on to Wendy Mogel describing her background as a clinical psychologist, author, and adviser to schools all over the country. “Mogel and Dan Kindlon agree that whatever form it takes─ whether the fixation is happiness or success─ parental overinvestment is contributing to a burgeoning generational narcissism that’s hurting our kids.” Both psychologist agree proving that parents are hindering their children by becoming too involved in their lives. Gottlieb favorably combines two forms of evidence as a means of support strengthening her assertions. Including all the expert commentary in her article Gottlieb convinces her readers of her claims. The personal experience incorporated in the article expands Gottlieb’s reasonable argument.
Gottlieb opens her piece with some background information about herself where she explains how her study transpired. As a clinical psychologist, she began to get more patients like “Lizzie”, patients suffering from depression and anxiety among other problems yet they had nearly perfect childhoods unlike the “textbook” patients she studied in training. “Instead, these patients talked about how much they ‘adored’ their parents […] After all, their biggest complaint was that they had nothing to complain about!” (qtd. in Gottlieb) By including her personal experience with her patients, she adds seriousness to the matter for parents who may brush off the truth. This aspect furthers the idea that this is not a rare one in a million case but if they continue the pushover parenting style their kids could possibly end up in therapy. Gottlieb exclaims that she comes across several patients through her career whose parents are obsessed with their kid’s happiness. The story where she hesitates telling her son about her dead friend, sparks emotional appeal and advice to parents struggling to change. “By telling him, I was communicating that I believed he could tolerate sadness and anxiety […] not telling him would have sent a very different message: that I didn’t feel he could handle discomfort.”(qtd. in Gottlieb) Sharing her story to show parent demonstrate to parents how to avoid hindering …show more content…
their child just sheltering them too much. She displays the positive results of her advice and claims making it believable and stronger. The strongest part of Gottlieb’s article is the research gathered from various situations which results in a persuasive article.
Wendy Mogel discusses with Gottlieb “college deans have reported receiving growing numbers if incoming freshmen they have dubbed ‘teacups’ because they are so fragile because they are so fragile that they break down anytime things do not go their way.” Gottlieb to prove her theory, those kids will not know how to deal with problems if they never experience them to learn. By providing research, the readers have no choice but to believe her. As a national adviser to schools, Mogel blocks the disbelief because she observes “teacups” across the country. Barry Schawrtz also conducted a chain of experiments “asked to draw a picture…one group of kids choose from among 24 markers […] the other among three…drawings rated ‘worst’ created by kids in 24-marker group”. (Gottlieb)By explaining, that more choices did not yield better results in the experiment rather than statements parents cannot object when this is a proven fact. Schwartz explains that fewer options help kids to commit to some things and let go of others a skill they will need later in life. “Research shows that people get more satisfaction from working hard a one thing, and others get left behind.” (qtd. in Gottlieb) Gottlieb begins with research to grab the reader’s attention and persuade them to yield fewer choices to their kids now or as adults, they will not be satisfied. People tend to
listen and use facts over opinions Gottlieb is convincing through her undeniable research. The two main concepts in the article included happiness and parenting styles affecting adults. Gottlieb’s article convinces people in that parents spoiling their children in the end produce adults that are unhappy in life and have no idea why. Through Gottlieb’s interviews and personal experience she depicts how overprotective and pushover parents have a negative effect on a child’s self-esteem, happiness and emotional tolerance. From the exert commentary to her personal experience Gottlieb presents a strong convincing argument that there are consequences to overinvestment in a child.
...ild, when he would hide and daydream, up until his first years of college, when he would avoid areas that were difficult, the author recognized that there was important link between challenging the student on a meaningful level and the degree to which the student eventually produced. “I felt stupid telling them I was… well – stupid.” (Rose 43) Here, Rose shows an example of how poor preparation and low standards in the classroom can make a student feel inadequate. Indeed, one can see how many things seemingly unrelated do affect a student’s ability to learn.
Because the education system does not relate classwork or homework to the lives of students, they do not see how writing essays or solving math problems can help them in everyday life. “By the time Roadville children reach high school they write off school as having nothing to do with what they want in life, and they fear that school success will threaten their social relations with people whose company they value. This is a familiar refrain for working class children” (Attitude 119). As students begin to realize how low their potential is within school, they chose to cut school out of their life and start working. These students do not understand how they can benefit from what they are learning. “One woman talks of the importance of a ‘fitting education’ for her three children so they can ‘do better’, but looks on equanimity as her sixteen-year-old son quits school, goes to work in a garage, and plans to marry his fifteen-year-old girlfriend ‘soon’” (Attitude 118). Students are settling for less than what they can actually achieve to have, just because they see no purpose of being in school, and believe they can do better without the help of the education system. Even parents are not actually supporting and encouraging their child to stay in school. “Although Roadville parents talk about the value of school, they often act as if they don’t believe it”
Parents have a tough role raising our world’s next generation. Lori Gottlieb is a psychologist who studied the impact parenting has on children. In her article “How to Land Your Kids in Therapy” Lori explains that when she was in school, she was taught that the worst kind of parenting was when parents neglected their children. Lori then goes on to mention that she has found it increasingly more common to find young adults seeking therapy who had “perfect” parents, but they find themselves unhappy. Parents have adopted a new contemporary style of raising their children; preventing them from growing up with normal human emotions and feelings, which is very destructive to their growth in to adults. These children are just not ready to deal with the real world.
He urges that the students’ attitudes are “not only self-destructive, but socially destructive.” I support this statement with the idea that if the modern students have these values, so will their children and their children’s children, which can cause overall corrosion to the type of society in which most believe that our kids should be raised in. Wiesenfeld complains that it is the students’ fault for having these values, but in my opinion they are raised under the circumstance that their society provides for them. This is not to say that it’s an excuse for their lack of effort, but to give a reason for the belief that minimal work can be enough for them to pass through their education. Anyone who has the motivation and dedication can change their ways for the better, despite what their society has taught
We have movement in today’s society. With lateral movements we remain inactive and with upward movement we upgrade ourselves in getting education, practicing sports, etc. Both movements are caused by many factors in our daily life, yet they are the effects of what we experience in the past. Misguidance, love, affection, neglect and leadership come from our nearest cluster or family. In “Justice: Childhood Love Lessons”, Bell Hooks points out that “when children are overindulged either materially or by being allowed to act out”(463), it is an example of a form of neglect. Mary Phiper also portrays the effects of lack of love, parenting and neglect within our most fundamental base in our society, the family. In “Beliefs about Families”, Pipher argues that “family need not to be traditional or biological” (379). Although, a family does not need to be traditional or biological, it has tremendous effects on communication, love, misguidance and neglect. Thus, if parents do not guide their children well, dysfunctional f...
Have you ever wondered if our education system has flaws? Well in the article “Against School” written by John Taylor Gatto, Gatto once a teacher explains how public education weakens the youth. He starts off the paper by saying how he taught for 30 years, went through a termination, and personally witnessed almost all of the schooling flaws. In Gatto’s article he lists very noticeable names, such as George W. Bush, George Washington, James Bryant Conant, and H.L Mencken to name a few. Having taught children for so long Gatto believes he has the expert rule in this subject. He proposes that to bring out the best qualities in a child you have to let them make decision and let them take their own risks. Gatto’s mission in this article is to make you consider, if school is actually important.
Many people see therapy as something for people who are weak mentally, “Therapy is the art and science of helping children make sense of thei...
Parents, no matter their profession, are eternally in the business of raising their children. From their earliest ages, kids are told who they can play with, what they can eat, where they can go, and even when they have to go to bed. But is there a point where parents go too far? In other words, is there a time when in raising a child, a parent interjects in a child’s life so much that those actions become detrimental to the child’s development? This is the physical moral dilemma that comes out of the Ashley Treatment.
The article, “Why is my 5 year old unhappy?” written by psychologist John Rosemond I feel reflects on a question many parents ask themselves today. Rosemond is a bit controversial in his advice on parenting, tending to reference his own experiences growing up. As a parent and a member of the same generation as he is I can relate to some of his theories. The article stress how a parent of a five year old is concerned because is trying to give his only son everything he wants to make in happy. In return, he gets a moody child who has difficulty getting along with other children. He is a seemingly ungrateful, non- communicative child who is not thankful for anything he has received. The parent is worried that there may be signs of a chemical imbalance or psychiatric disorder that is inherited.
The therapist will then proceed to ask questions such as, “How did the family decide on the story? Did one person just decide and everyone agreed? Were there different ideas another member brought up?” The goal is for the family to be able to see the process in approaching and engaging in this task (Pereira, 2014). Thompson indicated that in order to increase motivation in family therapy, it is imperative to combine family therapy with traditional play therapy techniques (2011). This allows all family members to participate in the therapeutic process and encourage fun into the family dynamics. After spending time with the Hoffmans, the therapist has a better feel for their situation and can now request that Roger and Tina take responsibility for their own lives and initiative in therapy (Smith,
She believes that a child’s feeling and personal goals is locked away, and instead is replaced with their parent’s expectations and desires. The child soon begins to develop narcissistic traits, in which the parent should allow the child to express feelings such as jealously and anger. In the novel Miller (1996) states “he develops something the mother needs…but it nevertheless may prevent him, throughout his life, from being himself” (p. 34). Allowing children to experience feeling such as anger and jealously provides an understanding on the child is not always perfect. However narcissistic disturbance occurs when a parent projects their own narcissistic desires onto their child, unfortunately suppressing their desires and acquiring their parents. Incidentally several students from Princeton University conducted a research in order demonstrate how narcissism is cultivated by the parents’ overvaluation and parental warmth. Eddie Mrummelman and colleagues (2014) stated, “When parents overvalue their child, they see their child as “God’s gift to man”…children might internalize the belief that they are special individuals who are entitled to privileges” (p 2). The article suggested that parents, who prevent their child from experiencing failure, encourage narcissistic attitudes. The important implication from this study demonstrates how a parent can overly evaluate their child’s
Both types of therapies had the specific elements that PCIT wanted to convey. One element was an emotional calm that play therapy produced in work with children. However, the calm play that the therapist and child do inside session, is far from the relationship that the parent and child may have outside therapy. By training the child’s parent to provide behavior therapy, enables treatment benefits to be longer-lasting. The use of play therapy in parent-child interaction strengthens the parent-child attachment and provides the child greater exposure to the calming therapy with their own parent. However, play therapy is not the only appropriate intervention when it comes to disciplining children. Parents get the skills need to deal with the behavioral issues by the live parent training, for setting limits and drawing back from tough discipline (Funderburk,
Jack is now entering therapy for the first time. Jack is new to this process; in fact Jack is new to the world, beyond what he knows in great measures. Jack was born inside of a shed and in the shed he was confined to only playing, sleeping, and eating. Jack was conceived shortly after his mother Joyce was abducted by Jack's father. Jack's father suffers from some type of mental or psychological disorder. So there is a slight chance that Jack could have the same traits. Jack is now five years old and does not really understand what is going on in his life right now. Jack appears to be going through some tough adjustments ever since he made an escape from the "room". I am concerned that Jack may suffer from some type of thought disorder; reasons
There are too many children with anger problems in society and this is in fact proving to show difficulty in the home, in school, and with peers. A variety of behaviours are occurring, such as bullying, acting out, angry outbursts, fighting, harming self, and destruction of objects. These behaviours affect the individual as well as those around them. In order to improve the individual, play therapy needs to be implemented.
In “School is Bad for Children”, John Holt discusses the faults and failures of the education system. According to Holt traditional schooling stifles children’s curiosity and learning, causing them to be ill-equipped as adults. He believes children are smarter before they enter school, having already mastered what he says is the most important thing, language. Holt goes on to describe how children no longer learn for themselves in school. Their learning has become a passive process. Children then come to realize teachers are not there to satisfy their curiosity, and in turn, grow ashamed and accept what they think teachers wants them to believe. School also becomes a place where uncertainty and incorrect answers are forbidden. The students learn how to cheat and pretend to work when the teacher is looking. As a result, they only use a small portion of their brain, and soon they grow bored. Holt suggests this boredom shuts off their brain and is the reason why many students turn to drugs. Drugs he says is the only way many young people can find awareness in the world they once had when they were little. Children John Holt says, are very fascinated