In the article “Making the Grade,” published in Newsweek Magazine, Professor Kurt Wiesenfeld states that students in the modern society believe that they should receive grades based on their desires and potential rather than their academic performance and personal effort. It is arguable that students should be allowed to have some leniency based on the fact that there may be obstacles distracting or refraining them from completing their work. I believe that it is the students responsibility to maintain or improve their grades by implementing hard work, consistency and dedication to their studies.
Wiesenfeld mentions that 10 percent of his students are indifferent towards their grades as a sense of personal achievement. Students do not value
…show more content…
their grades as a reflection of themselves, but rather as an opinion of their professor, which leads them to believe that they are able to change their grade by persuading their professor to do so. I support Wiesenfeld in his statement based on personal experience with my peers and colleagues, but I question the accuracy since this judgement is made on only twelve students from his class. Being fresh out of high school, I recall many friends who chose to procrastinate in their work, which caused themselves and their teachers to underestimate their ability to do their best. These are the students that view their grades like cats, who think they deserve everything without effort, unlike dogs who are rewarded for good behavior and hard work. Fortunately, this observation cannot generalize the behavior of all students, since only a small portion of them exhibit this type of attitude. The physics professor claims that students are raised and taught to follow a society that values superficial ways instead of focusing on obtaining true knowledge.
He urges that the students’ attitudes are “not only self-destructive, but socially destructive.” I support this statement with the idea that if the modern students have these values, so will their children and their children’s children, which can cause overall corrosion to the type of society in which most believe that our kids should be raised in. Wiesenfeld complains that it is the students’ fault for having these values, but in my opinion they are raised under the circumstance that their society provides for them. This is not to say that it’s an excuse for their lack of effort, but to give a reason for the belief that minimal work can be enough for them to pass through their education. Anyone who has the motivation and dedication can change their ways for the better, despite what their society has taught …show more content…
them. The author protests against partial credit which is offered by many professors in every college and university.
He lists examples of failures performed by those who just “got by” in their classes, so instead of bettering the community they harm it. I do not deny that partial credit can be harmful for those who choose the easy way out, but many excellent and dedicated students should be offered the opportunity of extra points that may have been lost on a single test or homework assignment. For those who are normally successful, partial credit does not stand alone; it boosts an already high grade such as a B to an A. These students get good grades on their tests, so the partial credit can be seen as a small reward. For example, I think that an F on an assignment or quiz deserves zero points instead of the percentage that they received, because this student showed a lack of understanding of the material. This goes without saying that these students would not graduate unless they put in the needed time and effort into learning the material required to obtain the grades for the professions they desire. The example of the engineer miscalculating the weight capacity of the tower in the Olympic Stadium is misleading because it could not have been the fault of one engineer on the project, but many who worked on it. In addition, a student who got by with partial credit and never had the ambition to do better, would not have been head of such an extensive and important building
project, so once again it would not be the fault of just the one engineer. A majority of the students in both high schools and colleges want to do their best and achieve their educational goal. Unfortunately, there are those few, which the author writes about in his article “Making the Grade,” who show a lack of responsibility and motivation, taking advantage of their professors’ good will and blaming the society for their attitude of entitlement. Hopefully, students will learn that good grades come with hard work and persistency; not with an abundance of excuses and high expectations, as the old saying goes, “you reap what you sow.”
In her article, “The Case Against GRADES”, Alfie Kohn discusses the grading system and its faults. She opens her argument with information from an older psychological study that proves the negative impact of the current grading system, and she reinforces this with the proof that “no” research has contradicted this statement. Also, she gives many key reasons including: “Motivation”, “Achievement”, “Quantification”, and “Curriculum”. Kohn supports these topics with other reasearch for why the system is failing the students. She asserts that, “… the absence of grading is a necessary condition for promoting deep thinking and a desire to engage in it.” As support, she offers other solutions and then debunks them by proving that they would not solve
He seems to force what he says, rather than having a natural tone, causing the reader of the article to be left with a feeling of discontent. Although he only focuses on the negatives that those of the past have done, his argument is direct. No matter what generation you are from, it seems one always suspects the other of either ignorance or reckless abandon. It is easy for someone of the younger generation to point fingers at those who raised them, while taking no responsibility to take control of their lives. He does leave the reader with more awareness of a problem students face upon leaving school. This article is a persuasive piece due to the usage of Brooks principle message and literary
“Making the Grade” by Kurt Wiesenfeld Newsweek magazine, June 27 1996 brings to light an issue that has been glazed over by society for some time, grade inflation. It’s highly disturbing that “we lament that schoolchildren get “kicked upstairs” until they graduate from high school despite being illiterate and mathematically inept, but we seem unconcerned with college graduates whose less blatant deficiencies are far more harmful, if their accreditation exceeds their qualifications”. The issue of grade inflation is not simply an issue of students feeling entitled to higher grades than they have earned, it is a problem that directly impacts our society in a multitude of negative ways. Perhaps the “gold star” mentality started out with the good intentions of creating children with positive self-esteem, however, a direct result is lazy adults with a sense of entitlement for no reason, who lack qualifications to adequately and safely perform their jobs.
In “Grades and Money,” Steven Vogel makes it clear that he is disappointed and frustrated with what grades have become. He believes that grades have become commoditized and that students’ grades suffer because of their relation with money. Vogel also believes that students no longer take any risk with their education. I agree with Vogel that grades are being equated to money by students, that students’ work suffers because of grades, and that students no longer take risks in their educational process.
There is a student Emma, who has recently graduated from Austin High School, where 90/10 grading system is used; 90% of Emma’s grade is knowledge based with scores such as tests and projects, while her practice work such as homework is worth 10% of her grade. Emma, finds school somewhat easy and since homework was only 10% of her grade, so she often did not bother to do her practice work. Even though she did not do her homework through high school she managed to keep above a 3.00 GPA. When Emma enters college, she is shocked to see that she would have to complete homework, and that it would affect her grade drastically if she didn’t complete her homework. Emma is feeling unprepared and overloaded with work. She is not prepared for college,
Because the education system does not relate classwork or homework to the lives of students, they do not see how writing essays or solving math problems can help them in everyday life. “By the time Roadville children reach high school they write off school as having nothing to do with what they want in life, and they fear that school success will threaten their social relations with people whose company they value. This is a familiar refrain for working class children” (Attitude 119). As students begin to realize how low their potential is within school, they chose to cut school out of their life and start working. These students do not understand how they can benefit from what they are learning. “One woman talks of the importance of a ‘fitting education’ for her three children so they can ‘do better’, but looks on equanimity as her sixteen-year-old son quits school, goes to work in a garage, and plans to marry his fifteen-year-old girlfriend ‘soon’” (Attitude 118). Students are settling for less than what they can actually achieve to have, just because they see no purpose of being in school, and believe they can do better without the help of the education system. Even parents are not actually supporting and encouraging their child to stay in school. “Although Roadville parents talk about the value of school, they often act as if they don’t believe it”
Recent high school graduates are not well prepared to face society as it really is cruel, confusing, and tough. In school students are not taught skills they will need out of the classroom, what they are taught is memorization, and multiple choice test taking in which they can guess their way through or just simply cheat. In the article “For Once, Blame the Students” by the author Patrick Welsh he states that “Failure in the classroom is often tied to lack of funding, poor teachers or other skills. Here 's a thought: Maybe it 's the failed work ethic of today’s kids” (Welsh). When teachers teach a new lesson they make students take notes on their textbook and then, they give them multiple choice tests to see if they learned anything. Learning
This idea is absurd! Our educational grading system is a scale of A, B, C, D, F with mastery being an A, average being an C, and complete failing being an F. What we would be saying to our students under his point is no matter how hard you work and how much effort you give something, if you can’t be perfect you are no better than a failure. How many students would there then be that feel like why even try? This would lead to more drop outs which is another alarming issue.
I cannot help but believe that there are some very valid points to Professor X’s article, for example, when he states that some students are simply unfit for the academic level that college requires. The author states, “Everyone wants to triumph. But not everyone can-in fact, most can’t.” (X, par. 47) In other words, Professor X believes that some students desperately want to succeed, however, they are unable to do so regardless of the amount of help offered. Sometimes, no matter how many people are set up for success there is not anything else that can be done, but letting them down gracefully. Professor X writes about his student Ms. L, the professor expresses his frustration with this student and how he knew he would face difficulties with her. The wall had gone up, she was no longer interested in what was being said. X expresses that Ms. L is not smart nor is she a bad person, however, he does elaborate on how she was never a fit for college level academics. Professor X writes, “Ms. L had done everything that American culture asked of her. She had gone back to school to better herself, and she expected to be rewarded for it, not slapped down.” (X, par. 36) This may be exactly how Ms. L was feeling, furthermore, let’s elaborate on why Ms. L expected to be rewarded for work that did not meet the expectations of her assigned
...though their college dreams were to be doctors and lawyers and pharmacists and engineers, will be waiting tables” (269). In today’s competitive world students have less chances to succeed in school and to find a job. He also states that if students should’ve never been cheated, competition between students wouldn’t exist, and education was going to base on intelligence rather than knowledge.
Before we can look at how grading affects learning Farber suggests we look at how it has affected students (333-334). The greatest effect of being graded happens to the individual. Farber asks, “Did you need grades to learn how to drive?” We have become “grade junkies.” Without the grades students can’t learn (333). Vogel agrees that students believe grades are the motivating factor in learning, but only for the money. Students want the grades because high GPA’s equal high paying jobs (338-339). Another negative effect of grades is that students want the best grade with the least amount of learning but this causes conflict with professors because the professor’s goal is different compared to the student’s (339). Grades have positive effects too. Farber believes that grades give us discipline, but not self-discipline. True self-discipline comes from wanting something not coercion (334). Farber defines self-discipline as revising one paragraph all night because one enjoys it (334.)
This misconception will act as a disservice to these students because they believe that they “do not [need to] improve their mastery of a subject.” And once he/she reaches a point where they have to make a decision in the career path that they have chosen which requires said mastery and skill, they will realize that they have been misconceived and that they are not the intellect that they once believed they were. In the end, grade inflation is.
students grades. The goals for all student learning should be on the same level but seems
I have always believed that an education is valued the greatest when deserved. I agree with Kurt Wiesenfeld on the aspects of his article,"Making the Grade." This article sheds light amongst students who would rather get a free ride; rather than meet their goals and accomplish their education with merit. Should these students be held accountable at the end of their semester for the grades they receive, regardless of the outcome? Who should take blame, the students or their professor?
By nature, most students are brought up in an academic environment motivated to get A’s and B’s on their report cards. Those grades sometimes don’t thoroughly report how much a student has learned or gained knowledge in each topic. Some instructors throw in factors totally unrelated to learning, when the main objective of academic institutions is to learn. In order to clearly demonstrate how much a student has learned in the classroom, schools should change their current grading system and teach students how to learn.