Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religion in American literature
What is duality in literature
The role of religion in American literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of religion in American literature
Herman Hesse’s novel, Narcissus and Goldmund, explores two individuals’ contrasting search for authenticity, self-knowledge and spirituality, in which can be interpreted in two manners. First, the reader can interpret each character as representing or encompassing elements found within a single human being. The second method of breaking down Hesse’s writings was that of viewing the characters as being separate individuals, continuing to transform and change. The latter of these two methods was my preferred method in analyzing and understanding as I was reading, but upon reflection it was the first method that had the most influence.
The two main characters in this novel reflect two opposing forces in life, the religious and the artistic. These
…show more content…
Narcissus was always confident with his chosen career as a young teacher at the monastery, he had a "capacity to sense the characters and destiny of people, not only my own destiny, but that of others as well” (8). In comparison to Goldmund, Narcissus is an ascetic thinker, ignoring any temptations from his life that will lead him astray from his faith and career. He viewed the world in a broader and more prophetic manner than Goldmund, being fully “awake” and conscious to his own being (61). Narcissus, seeing that Goldmund repressed much of his childhood, works to inspire Goldmund self-evaluate and self-overcome. It was when Narcissus saw that Goldmund had overcome his past and his own self that he encouraged him to continue his journey beyond the boundaries of the monastery, stating that the in Goldmund’s case, "mind and nature, consciousness and dream world lie very far apart" (62). Unlike Narcissus, Goldmund did not enter the monastery due to a calling or desire to pursue religious life, but rather as an act of penance for the actions of his mother. Although not completely genuine, he had intended “to remain in the …show more content…
In comparison, Goldmund represents Dionysian qualities such as irrational, blurred boundaries, will, flow, and feeling. Although opposite, these characters portray a greater, parallel balance. Freud would equate Goldmund’s confusion and fear of commitment back to the trauma he experienced as a child, specifically regarding his parents. His father pushed him to repress his mother’s memory, resulting in dreams in which his mother appears to him saying, “You have forgotten your childhood" (76). With the Freudian technique of dream analysis, Goldmund is able to make his unconscious, conscious and recall the memory of his mother. The ongoing theme of duality represents Jung’s theories regarding polar opposites. Archetypes, specifically that of anima, are portrayed in Goldmund’s character, representing nature and the more feminine mind. His ongoing journey for his mother encourages him to search beyond his biological mother to Eve, the mother of all men. Animus, in comparison, is depicted in Narcissus’s character, representing science, logic, and the more masculine mind. Each of these psychologies encourages individuals to seek individuation and authenticity, strengthening all aspects of oneself in order to become whole and complete as Goldmund attempted to do after his absence from
Hermann Hesse’s novel “Siddhartha” is one of spiritual renewal and self discovery. The novel revolves around the life of one man named Siddhartha, who leaves his home and all earthly possessions in an attempt to find spiritual enlightenment. The novel contains many themes, including the relationship between wisdom and knowledge, spirituality, man’s relationship to the natural world, time, love, and satisfaction. To portray these themes, Hesse employs many different rhetorical devices, particularly diction, symbolism, and point of view. These devices allow us, as a reader, to reevaluate our lives and seek fulfillment in the same way that Siddhartha did.
2) What is the main conflict in the book? Is it external or internal? How is this conflict resolved throughout the course of the book?
At the outset, an insightful reader needs to draft the general boundaries of allegory and symbolism in the story. To put it most simple, the problem of distinguishing between good and evil undergoes a discussion. It is not difficult to notice that the Grandmother stands for good and the Misfit for evil. But such a division would be a sweeping and superficial generalisation, for both the characters epitomize good and evil traits. Moral evaluation is a very complex process and it is not the human who is to decide on that. There are rather various degrees of goodness and evil, both interwoven, also in their religiousness. Th...
works of literature have tremendous amounts of similarity especially in the characters. Each character is usually unique and symbolizes the quality of a person in the real world. But in both stories, each character was alike, they represented honor, loyalty, chivalry, strength and wisdom. Each character is faced with a difficult decision as well as a journey in which they have to determine how to save their own lives. Both these pieces of literatures are exquisite and extremely interesting in their own ways.
...ther they express the realistic conflict there is between the two. Outwardly, the characters conform, but, inwardly, they long to be free. In real life, most people do not sway to a definite side or another on the issue of conformity and rebellion, but rather, as these characters do, experience a complex inward struggle and conflict with the ideas.
In order to understand what changes happen to twist the views of the 2 main characters in both novels, it is important to see the outlook of the two at the beginning of the novels in comparison ...
Human nature has many elements that reveal the growth and personality of a person. In Markus Zusak’s “The Book Thief”, the author successfully portrays various aspects of human nature through Hans’ conflicts that originate from the tough reality that he lives in. Elements of human nature can be seen as a result of Hans’ constant struggles with guilt, kindness, and love.
...me and the Structure of Hermann Hesse's Siddhartha." Symposium 11.2 (Fall 1957): 204-224. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Ed. Thomas J. Schoenberg and Lawrence J. Trudeau. Vol. 196. Detroit: Gale, 2008. Literature Resource Center. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
In Brother Grimm’s “Brother Lustig”, the main character, Brother Lustig, is initially portrayed as an honest, inexperienced and stupid young man, who shares all his possessions with others. For this reason, when analyzing Brother Grimm’s tale form a Jungian psychoanalytic perspective, will become a prime example of a character experiencing individuation, for he eventually becomes a more selfish, cunning and independent person. Through meeting his archetypes, Brother Lustig goes from an honest, stupid and generous person, who shares his wealth and possessions with the less fortunate ones to a cunning, selfish and self-sufficient trickster. Brother Lustig’s burgeoning conscious is demonstrated through an analysis of his Jungian archetypes, with the shapeshifting beggar, acting as his positive shadow, and St. Peter personifying as his symbolic Self.
The role of teachers in Hesse’s exceptional work of fiction is to aid in the achievement of the ultimate knowledge, while not taking the pupil directly there, instead giving him the skill set necessary to achieve what the student, in this case Siddhartha, feels is that ultimate knowledge.
This work documented the human experience in a light that I would not have seen it had I only read the books assigned to me in class. The themes in this book and how they were portrayed helped me to be able learn symbolism a bit better and also to understand my own life more clearly.
The central figures in these three works are all undoubtedly flawed, each one in a very different way. They may have responded to their positions in life, or the circumstances in which they find themselves may have brought out traits that already existed. Whichever applies to each individual, or the peculiar combination of the two that is specific to them, it effects the outcome of their lives. Their reaction to these defects, and the control or lack of it that they apply to these qualities, is also central to the narrative that drives these texts. The exploration of the characters of these men and their particular idiosyncrasies is the thread that runs throughout all of the works.
The characters in this novel entertain conflicting notions of morality and pride. Sometimes, these characteristics are at odds with one another, creating the immoral and "evil" characters. Other times, they cooperate to create realism in these people. The moral characters are good, but still have enough pride to be dignified, yet not arrogant. Sometimes, when the evil twins (or other halves) run amuck, things get out of hand and troubles abound. Though most of the time these troubles spring from the discrepancy between pride and morality, at other points, dignity and morality work hand in hand to create reliable and realistic characters.
The salient ideas in the novel are religion, culture, and materialism. This three are the major struggles through which the protagonist encounters throughout his existence. The auxiliary points are sin, gender inequality, and communication. These ones play a less outstanding, but a substantial part in the protagonist’s life.
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the