Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on life and death
Essay about death and life
Essay on life and death
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on life and death
What is Heidegger’s view of death? Sartre raises an objection to Heidegger’s account of death. What is this objection? Is Sartre correct?
Camus once said: “There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.”(1991, pp.15) His words reflect the fact that the meaning of life and the relationship between life and death have always been fundamental and significant to philosophical thinkers. This essay is to discuss Heidegger, the famous German philosopher’s view of death, and present one objection from Sartre, and finally analyse the correctness of Sartre’s objection.
Heidegger, in his famous work Being and Time, argues that death is not an event but an existential possibility (1962, pp.294). In this sense, death is a way
…show more content…
It is a matter of which comes first, which second. Heidegger’s point is that recognizing I die rather than merely everybody else implies that I see myself as an individual rather than a member of crowds, thus death individualizes us (Reynolds, 2014, pp.45). However, reading the claim closely one may find that if one can view one’s death separately from others, he/she already possesses the capability to comprehend him/herself as an individual. With this ability, one can not only see death as uniquely one’s own but also many other things in life, such as love, success, and career. As a matter of fact, the idea that everything (including the meaning) in one’s life uniquely belongs to him/herself all originate from subjectivity. Therefore, Heidegger’s authentic apprehension of death is merely the result of subjectivity rather than the cause of it. Death does not individualize us but subjectivity that arises from the inner mind of oneself …show more content…
Then it presents one of Sartre’s objections to his view that death is the key to individualization because subjectivity is already presupposed when saying “Death individualized us.” I personally agree with Sartre on the relationship between death and individualization because it makes sense logically. As Hoy puts, “the philosophers’ reflections on death are to help people to live fuller lives.” Though different on the philosophical ideas, both Sartre and Heidegger encourage an independent and open-minded attitude toward
In the beginning of Death, Nagel presented the question of whether it is a bad thing to die. He furnished two positions on the subject. The first position is that life is all one possesses and to lose life is the greatest loss one can encounter. The second position is that death is a blank, not an unimaginable condition, that has no positive or negative value whatsoever. Stating his aim to be considering whether death is in itself an evil, Nagel clarified that the state of being dead, or nonexistent, is not in itself evil for several reasons. First, death is not an evil that one is able to accumulate more of. A person cannot receive a larger portion of death no matter how long they have been in that state. Secondly, one would not regard temporary life suspension as harmful. In the case of long-term suspended animation or freezing, one can view this as a continuation of their present life. Thirdly, few people regard the long period of time before their birth as a misfortune. From these points, Nagel concluded that humanity does not object to death because it involves indeterminable periods of nonexistence. He then proposed that if death is an evil at all, it can only be because of what it deprives us of, since it has no positive features. He did not, however, agree with the idea that death is bad because it brings an end to all the good things in life. Nagel formulated that if all good and bad life experiences were removed, what i...
Is it possible to live without fear of death? If you can, does it change your life and who you are as a whole? Lindqvist believes so. Early in the book he proposes the idea that with fear of death life has a deeper meaning. That only with the fear of death do...
Thomas Nagel begins his collection of essays with a most intriguing discussion about death. Death being one of the most obviously important subjects of contemplation, Nagel takes an interesting approach as he tries to define the truth as to whether death is, or is not, a harm for that individual. Nagel does a brilliant job in attacking this issue from all sides and viewpoints, and it only makes sense that he does it this way in order to make his own observations more credible.
Kraus, Peter. "Heidegger on nothingness and the meaning of Being." Death and Philosophy. Ed. Jeff Malpas and Robert C. Solomon. New York: Routledge, 1998.
According to Ernest Becker, “The main thesis of this book is that it explains: the idea of death, the fear of death that haunts humans like nothing else; the mainspring of human activity designed to avoid the fatality of death, to overcome it by denying in some way that it is the final destiny for man” (“Becker” ix). The author of this book describes and quotes many other psychological thinkers views on the different kinds of fear and what contributes to the fear of death in man. The author explores several topics like self-worth, heroism, fear, anxiety, depression and many other issues throughout this book.
In E.E. Cummings poem “dying is fine) but Death”, the poet talks about the the ever discussed topic about dying and Death itself. Cummings talks about how dying is something to look forward to and how it is inevitable, from the moment we are born, to the fateful day it occurs. I agree with this analysis and the author’s analysis of the poem. Cummings uses his legendary shape style to form “dying is fine) but Death” to show how life begins. He may have wanted to symbolize the start of life with “o baby” which if you look at the paper version of the book, “o baby” is split up and very small compared to other sentences in the poem, signifying the start of someone’s life. When the middle of the poem starts to appear, the word “why?” pops up. This could signify the middle of someone’s life, or the “why” that many of us began to ask ourselves this question when we realize that not
Death, and people's perception of it are a major part of many philosophies. It could be argued that the questions surrounding death and the afterlife form the basis of many philosophic concepts. To some philosophers, not only is the concept of death itself important, but also how people perceive it, and why they perceive it the way they do. Epicurus's claim that the soul is mortal, is an excellent explanation for why we should not fear death.
The concept of human mortality and how it is dealt with is dependent upon one’s society or culture. For it is the society that has great impact on the individual’s beliefs. Hence, it is also possible for other cultures to influence the people of a different culture on such comprehensions. The primary and traditional way men and women have made dying a less depressing and disturbing idea is though religion. Various religions offer the comforting conception of death as a begining for another life or perhaps a continuation for the former.
In the play “everyman” death is depicted as something that is terribly feared as no one seemed ready for it, death is perceived as something that takes one away from the pleasures of this world.
Death anxiety is the apprehension generated by death awareness (Lehto & Stein, 2009). It is a multi-faced and encompasses concerns related to the denial of death, the dear of death for oneself and for others, avoidance of death, and the reluctance to interact with person who are dying (Quinn-Lee, Olson-McBride & Unterberger, 2014). According to Lehto and Stein (2009), death anxiety is an evolving concept that involves six attributes which are emotion, cognitive, experiential, development, sociocultural shaping, and source of motivation. Although death anxiety is a normal human experience, it can engender paralyzing fear (Iverach et al., 2014). It is also considered as a basic fear underlying the development and maintenance of numerous psychological conditions (Iverach, Menzies & Menzies, 2014).
Human beings often have preconceived notions or fears regarding the abstract idea of death. Two Hellenistic philosophers Epicurus and Epictetus take very different approaches to prove that death is insignificant and nothing to worry about. Epicurus argues that death is the unequivocal end of our existence, and Epictetus claims it is something that we have no control over. Both examine the nature of death in an attempt to achieve ataraxia or a tranquil state of mind. However, Epicurus and Epictetus fail to address the true emotional nature of death and its impact on the human psyche. Accepting these philosophies requires an inherent selfishness that cannot possibly lead to achieving a tranquil and essentially good life.
Existentialism is a philosophy developed chiefly in the 20th century that attempts find meaning in a seemingly meaningless world. The central theme of existentialism is that an individual must assume all responsibilities for his or her acts of free will without any absolute knowledge of what is right or wrong. Existentialism analyzes this somewhat dismal situation mankind has been thrown into, and produces a model for how an individual should live his or her life. However, why should someone attempt to live a life of morals and meaning in a cold and indifferent world? An analysis of existentialist views on death may lead to an answer to this question.
Death does not discriminate; we will all die one day, but is that so bad? Western societies view death as a harbinger of doom. Often personified as a skeletal figure looming around the corner, waiting to take its victim to the unknown. Better known as the Grim Reaper. Research suggests the way a culture personifies death can representative of our attitudes towards death (Bassett 164). In this case our personification of death reflects the negative attitude to the subject. Should we as a society be afraid of death or should we embrace older philosophies into our society in order to cope with our reality? It’s no secret that death has provoked the minds of great spiritual leaders and philosophers. As great leaders of human history, they do not
I will divide it into three parts: In the first part I will discuss Socrate’s life and background. In the second part I will focus Socrates’ beliefs about death. In the third part I will focus on the idea of the soul. My main questions will be: Why is death such an important idea for Socrates in Philosophy and what is his relationship to death? Throughout the paper I will address important questions like: Should we be afraid of death? Is it considered to be a joyous time? What happens to our soul after life? Finally in my conclusion, I will present my closing remarks and personal opinion about this
Throughout time, death has been viewed in a negative light. In general, it is an event to be mourned and is seen by some as the end to existence. People do not usually seek death as an answer to their problems. In various pieces of literature, however, suicide is contemplated by the characters as the only solution to the pain and grief that they experience.