Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Poetry analysis figurative language essay
Poetry analysis figurative language essay
Poetry analysis figurative language essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Poetry analysis figurative language essay
Gary Short’s poem Stick Figure is a deeply personal piece that speaks about going through a stage of grief after losing a loved one. The poem evokes the nothingness that one faces and the longing to make the inhuman human once more. Ultimately though, the piece conveys the emotion that makes us human and how even the two-dimensional can be made three-dimensional when the smallest bit of emotion is added. The opening lines of the poem paint a picture of a bright forest in autumn, when the leaves are just turning red and nature is preparing for the coming of winter. However, this forest is empty. The “light in the nothingness” (line 2) is an image describing the way this person feels and the grief that now stares him in the face because of the cremation of his father. His father is now “dull cinders and grit” (line 4), something that is no longer human, and yet the author wants to look at the ashes as though they are still human. When he sees the “round …show more content…
pile of ash” (line 5) after pouring some of the cinders onto the ground, his first thoughts are that of a human head, a drawing and more specifically, a stick figure. He begins to shift through the ashes, pouring more out over the ground and “[trying] to give him human shape”(line 10). In order to deal with the grief, this emptiness he is faced with, the author attempts to make his father human again by using the ashes to create “an ideogram” (line 11) or a symbol to remember his father by. This symbol happens to be “a simple stick-figure of a man” (line 12). However, a stick figure is not human. It is a crude shape, a childish shape, with a head, long arms, and straight legs. This symbol goes further than just making a human out of what is already gone. This symbol shows the son’s own childness in facing death, and the way he begins to coup with the loss. There is nothing human about a sick figure, and yet there is something three-dimensional that this person wants to get out of the shape. However, a stick figure is not three-dimensional. It is the epitome of two dimensions, being a bunch of lines thrown together to make a rough outline of something that represents a human. The author admits to wanting to “have drawn [his father] as a kid” (line 15), but at the time he doesn’t have the supplies to draw, be them literal or figurative.
Instead he drew his father as a child would, as a stick figure, suggesting innocence and the feeling of being a lost child after the loss a parent. Once he is finished with the ashes and has completed the shape, the author wants to add something to the figure in order to give it that depth that he longs for. The depth he could give a picture or drawing if he had “a big lead pencil/ [and] grainy first-grade paper” (line 16-17). And so author decides to “give him a heart” (line 19). In order to add a heart, something stick figures are rarely given, he adds “a fallen red leaf” (line 19) to the ashes. This leaf animates and adds to that depth and the dimension, not only with its texture and color, but with the emotion that is placed behind the leaf. This leaf also ties his father to the earth where together they will fertilize the trees once winter and
passed. Looking back in the poem the author added a dash after his line, “I made an ideogram” (line 11). A dash suggests a change of thought or expanded information on the topic. By the end of the poem, however, another dash is not present, thus a shift back to the original topic never occurred, or the explanation was never closed. So the question remains, was the stick figure there? Did he really create an ideogram for his father? Yes he poured out the ashes, but whether a stick figure was actually formed out of the ash is never clear. This explanation also extends to the leaf, for the dash is never present before or after the last line of the poem. So did he really add the leaf? By adding that leaf to the simple and rather crude stick figure, he proceeds to make this drawing more human than inhuman. This simply goes to show that the depth and dimension of humans goes beyond just being creatures in the third-dimension, it speaks to our emotion, which makes us deeper than any trench and larger than any tree. What it takes for us humans to be humans, to be deep creatures of thought and being, is the emotion with in us. Without emotion we’d be apathetic individuals, running on logic and basic needs for survival, and then what would we truly be? This leaf also shows that nature is what brings out emotion, and also that nature ultimately completes us and ties us with everything around us. And that nature is both the physical words around us, and the inherited traits that pass through our DNA. The fallen autumn leaf represents that emotion, and the tie that it has between all things living and everything that has passed.
As the first poem in the book it sums up the primary focus of the works in its exploration of loss, grieving, and recovery. The questions posed about the nature of God become recurring themes in the following sections, especially One and Four. The symbolism includes the image of earthly possessions sprawled out like gangly dolls, a reference possibly meant to bring about a sense of nostalgia which this poem does quite well. The final lines cement the message that this is about loss and life, the idea that once something is lost, it can no longer belong to anyone anymore brings a sense...
The timeline carries on chronologically, the intense imagery exaggerated to allow the poem to mimic childlike mannerisms. This, subjectively, lets the reader experience the adventure through the young speaker’s eyes. The personification of “sunset”, (5) “shutters”, (8) “shadows”, (19) and “lamplights” (10) makes the world appear alive and allows nothing to be a passing detail, very akin to a child’s imagination. The sunset, alive as it may seem, ordinarily depicts a euphemism for death, similar to the image of the “shutters closing like the eyelids”
I think the main idea the narrators is trying to emphasize is the theme of opposition between the chaotic world and the human need for community with a series of opposing images, especially darkness and light. The narrator repeatedly associates light with the desire to clear or give form to the needs and passions, which arise out of inner darkness. He also opposes light as an idea of order to darkness in the world, the chaos that adults endure, but of which they normally cannot speak to children.
His outside actions of touching the wall and looking at all the names are causing him to react internally. He is remembering the past and is attempting to suppress the emotions that are rising within him. The first two lines of the poem set the mood of fear and gloom which is constant throughout the remainder of the poem. The word choice of "black" to describe the speaker's face can convey several messages (502). The most obvious meaning ... ...
In “Useless Boys” the writer, Barry Dempster, creates a strong feeling of disappointment and shame in himself and society as he looks back on his youth to when him and a friend made a promise to each other to “not be like their fathers”. Dempster expresses a sort of disgust for the capitalist society his world seems to be built around, a life where even if you’re doing something you initially enjoyed you end up feeling trapped in it. The poem is a reflective piece, where he thinks back on how he truly believed he would end up happy if he chose a different path than that of his parents. The author uses simple diction and syntax, but it’s evident that each idea has a much deeper meaning, which assisted in setting a reflective/introspective mood.
The conceit in line 8, “like an iceberg between the shoulder blades” (line 8), illustrates the briskness death emanates whilst taking the life from the warmth of your body. This ice and fire comparison coaxes the reader to pursue the unwelcoming thought of death as the adverse path to travel by. By no means does Oliver attempt to romanticize the idea of a brief and painless endeavor. Furthermore, the recurrence of cessation illustrated by the “hungry bear in autumn” (2) simile suggests the seasonal regularity death’s toll takes on the living. The presence of frequency characterizes the shift in forbearance to the acceptance of the inevitable. Oliver is caught up in reminiscent thought as she employs worldly imagery to describe life. For example, in lines 15-16 Oliver writes “and I think of each life as a flower, as common / as a field daisy.” This line stands out in the fact that it represents the first occurrence of communal thought. Describing each life as a “flower” in a “field” suggests that life is supposed to be about the people whom you surround yourself with, and less about the solidarity that stems from the notion of darkness. Oliver’s implication of poetry and down-to-earth imagery captures not only the progression of thought, but also her feelings towards the concepts of life and
The poem begins by describing, in the first person, a man distraught with grief. In the midnight hours, caught up in a dark and desolate meditation from which he vainly seeks distraction among his books, he suddenly hears a rapping at the door. His mood, already morbid, is excited into terror. Flinging open the door, he finds only the bitter emptiness he had been trying so hard to shut out moments before. Into this darkness he whispers the name of his beloved Lenore. The terror and wonder that he feels, the daring dreams he entertains, are all expresse...
“We pluck and marvel for sheer joy. And the ones still green, sighing, leave upon the boughs…” (14-16). This emphasis on nature reflects the respect and connection to the natural world the culture was trying to convey in their poetry. The colorful and illustrative descriptions of the physical world are indicative of the mindset and focus of these poems. Namely the fact that they were concerned with the world around us and the reality we experience as opposed to that of abstract concept of god or the supernatural as seen in other historical texts. This focus on nature is important because it sets the context in which the major theme of loss and separation originate from. In this poem the poet chooses to emphasize the passing of time in the choice of comparing the two seasons. Spring, in which life begins a new, and fall, in which the leaves begin to fall off and die. The poem reads “And the ones still green, sighing, leave upon the boughs- Those are the ones I hate to lose. For me, it is the autumn hills” (15-18). This juxtaposition of these two
“It was His own, it was not mine, Far be it that I should repine; He might of all justly bereft But yet sufficient for us left.” In the scene after she walks by the place that was once her home she remembers the things she once owned. She expresses her memories with the place that was once her home. “My pleasant things in ashes lie, And them behold no more shall I. Under thy roof no guest shall sit, Nor at thy table eat a bit.” Even though the poet is sad when she sees that all her memories from that house might be gone she realizes that better is coming. She talks about how there is a better home built by God waiting for her in heaven. “Thou hast an house on high erect, Framed by that mighty Architect, With glory richly furnished, Stands permanent though this be fled. It’s purchased and paid for too By Him who hath enough to do.” These few lines show how there is a better house in her future that is made by God, she talks about how it is paid for and is framed by a mighty architect and is nicely
Great poetry is thought to never be fully understood by readers and even by those that devout their career and time to being experts on it. People can spend countless hours analyzing a poem, but may never fully understand exactly what the author was writing about. Readers must both compare and contrast different works and prior knowledge to draw conclusions about poetic pieces. In Emily Dickinson’s poem written in 1862, first published in 1935, “We grow accustomed to the Dark“, and Robert Frost’s 1927 poem, “Acquainted with the Night”, the two poems both convey the unrelenting darkness and night in the world. Although, Frost has often times written about the beauty of nature in his poems, if you take a close look, there can be a dark connotation
He likens his poetry to nature also. He uses "words, like weeds..." (5.9) to envelope himself from the pain. His poem is "this poor flower of poesy" (8.18) but he writes it anyway since it once pleased his dead friend. "I go to plant it on his tomb./ That if it can it there may bloom,/ Or dying, there at least may die" (8.22-24). At this point he is considering the possibility of life continuing, at least through his poetry. Yet he does not seem to care about this possibility strongly. If there is no life within his poetry, then he feels its proper place is dead with his friend. Further into the poem, the immediate frenzy of grief has subsided, and he reflects upon his grief more calmly. "Calm is the morn without a sound,/ Calm as to suit a calmer grief, And only through the faded leaf/ The chestnut pattering to the ground" (11.1-4).
middle of paper ... ... Line thirteen shows how bright, colourful flowers that would be usual at a funeral, are compared to the pain endured by the victim and his family. It highlights how the people are lamenting their loss, and the differences between a funeral on the front line and that of one at home. The patience could also be compared to how the relatives have to wait and see if their brother, father or son returns dead, or alive.
Stevens’ message reveals itself as the poem unravels: there is never one true understanding of a reality outside of one’s interpretation. The author suggests that one can’t help but transfer their own beliefs and ideas onto what they see; in this case, the “listener” is projecting an impression of misery onto the scenery that lies before him. For example, the first two stanzas are filled with decorative language that serves to describe the visual image of a winter landscape. Using phrases such as “crusted with snow” (3) instead of “covered” with snow provides an evocative illustration of the snow’s roughness. Other phrases such as “shagged with ice” (5) and “rough in the distant glitter/Of the January sun” (6-7) force the reader to experience the miserable portrayal of winter. These are not the descriptions of an observer who “beholds nothing that is not there” (14-15), but rather the objective, poetic appreciation for the snowy
Darkness may also symbolize the mystery of the yet to be discovered secrets deep within the woods. (8) The silence makes the speaker feel secluded from all other aspects of reality. (11-12) Stopping by the woods provides the speaker with a temporary escape from reality. Frost does not ever tell what business the speaker is on, but you can assume it may be very stressful. This escape from reality is very important even in today’s world. This poem was written in 1923 and still has aspects of 20th century society.
The first stanza is full of vivid imagery; descriptions of the urn itself. Comparing the urn to a “still unravish’d bride of quietness” serves two purposes; the scenery inscribed on the urn is forever unchanging, unravished, like a bride before consummation of her wedding (Patterson 48). The word “still” also suggests the motionless, silent nature of the urn; it is pure, untouched, perfection, similar to a bride (Bai). Keats crafted his poem in an articulate manner, using point of view to further deepen the poem’s meaning; in the first stanza, the speaker is standing apart from the urn, they are physically only gazing at it, connected only by what they see; a “sylvan historian” speaks from the past, telling of the “leaf-fring’d legend” of gods and mortals. The urn itself is silent, an inanimate object, however, it conveys a detailed account of life and beauty to the speaker. As would anyone, the speaker questions the urn’s depictions and thus Keats introduces the second stanza, where the point of view changes. Now, the speaker is not gazing at the urn from afar, rather engulfed in its beauty, imaginatively encompassed into the scene itself.