Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion on reasons for increase in divorce rates
Negative consequences of higher divorce rate
Divorce rates solution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion on reasons for increase in divorce rates
In this era we live in, we are brought up to think divorce is bound to happen. According to The American Psychological Association, “about 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce” and “the divorce rate for subsequent marriages is even higher.” Many adults decide that it is less messy to just live with one another rather than actually get married. This is beginning to drive the rates of marriage down. Many have speculated that relationships will continue to evolve, especially if the human lifespan continues expand. Fiction writers such as Drew Magary and real world scientists such as Aubrey de Grey have explored this very topic of relationships.
The novel, The Postmortal, by Drew Magary is written in a journal entry
…show more content…
However, according to the information provided by DeGrey in the documentary, The Immortalists, it may actually be something which could come to pass in our lifetime. In the documentary, DeGrey believes he is on his way to finding a way to extend the years of his life. He takes it one step further by putting that thought into action. He believes that if we are on this planet “forever” as apposed to the current life span of roughly 80 years, then we should not have to be stuck with the same partner the entire time. His solution is to introduce polygamy as an acceptable cultural norm. If scientists do discover a cure, it is most likely people will increasingly to embrace all different types of relationships and not resort to only picking a cycle style kind of …show more content…
Even now there are many different types of lifestyles from which people can choose. In this day and age where life doesn’t last forever, the concept of cycle marriage is still in play now with the high divorce rate. Even if it's for 40 more years, people don’t want to stay with the same person. This is our society's version of cycle marriage; it is being played out even now when we are not living with the cure for aging. When it comes down to the idea of marriage and what we want, it is more about who you are as a person and your religious beliefs. In The Immortalists, Aubrey de Grey says: "The cure will lead to the re-evaluation of the value of permanent monogamy." However, this statement does not really make sense because the value of permanent monogamy is a very personal thing. Every person has a different value system that is determined by how they were brought up. Just because in the future we may have the option to live forever doesn't mean that people will be necessarily quick to abandon their moral views on the subject of marriage. There are a lot of people who look forward to the idea of spending the rest of their lives together, no matter the length of time, with the person they love. For these people, just the idea of being able to live forever gives them the option to now be with someone they love for both now and for what might me an
In Richard E. Miller’s essay, The Dark Night of the Soul, he first focuses on two teenage boys, boys who murderously rampaged through Columbine High School in Santee, California. Then he further discusses who was to blame, but most importantly would this event not had transpired if education had a more adamant impact if these young men had read more. Simply, would Eric Harris or Dylan Klebold killed if there was a more proactive approach to the educational system or government to “reduce or eliminate altogether the threat of the unpredictable or unforeseen [the amalgamation of elements that would result in a mass shooting] (Miller 421).”Additionally, if McCandless, a young man who eulogized the idealisms of authors that he used to make sense
Despite the adversity that plagued the children of South Boston throughout the 1970s and 1980s, Southie native Michael Patrick MacDonald often remarked that he grew up in “the best place in the world,” suggesting that while adversity can be crippling, it does not guarantee a bad life. Throughout his childhood, MacDonald and his family suffered from extreme poverty, experienced the effects of drugs on the family structure, and felt the poor educational effects in a struggling neighborhood. Through his memoir, All Souls, readers gain an in-depth perspective of Michael Patrick MacDonald’s life, especially his childhood. Because readers are able to see MacDonald as both a child and an adult, it is possible to see how the circumstances of his childhood
Human beings are not isolated individuals. We do not wander through a landscape of trees and dunes alone, reveling in our own thoughts. Rather, we need relationships with other human beings to give us a sense of support and guidance. We are social beings, who need talk and company almost as much as we need food and sleep. We need others so much, that we have developed a custom that will insure company: marriage. Marriage assures each of us of company and association, even if it is not always positive and helpful. Unfortunately, the great majority of marriages are not paragons of support. Instead, they hold danger and barbs for both members. Only the best marriages improve both partners. So when we look at all three of Janie’s marriages, only her marriage to Teacake shows the support, guidance, and love.
Is marriage really important? There is a lot of controversy over marriage and whether it is eminent. Some people believe it is and some people believe it is not. These opposing opinions cause this controversy. “On Not Saying ‘I do’” by Dorian Solot explains that marriage is not needed to sustain a relationship or a necessity to keep it healthy and happy. Solot believes that when a couple gets married things change. In “For Better, For Worse”, Stephanie Coontz expresses that marriage is not what is traditional in society because it has changed and is no longer considered as a dictator for people’s lives. The differences between these two essays are the author’s writing style and ideas.
More Americans are getting divorced at an astonishing rate, according to the McKinley Irvin Family Law, there are about 16,800 divorces per week. This phenomenon has triggered a general panic among young adults. Therefore, animated by their fear of getting divorced, young adults have elaborated a new solution to avoid divorce which is cohabitation. They see cohabitation as a test to avoid divorce. However, does cohabitation really work? Meg Jay in her text entitled “The Downside of Living Together” defends the idea that seeing cohabitation as a preventive way to avoid divorce leads to increase the chance of divorce. I believe that cohabitation
Wilson makes strong points to show that marriage is good for human interaction, he fails to mention the aspects of marriage that take a toll on someone. He says that “our desire for sexual unions and romantic attachments is as old as humankind, and they will continue forever.”(431), but he does not state that marriage takes hard work and that it is not easy as pie.. The only negative point he focuses on is the financial aspect of marriage, when it is much more than that. When speaking about cohabitation, he states that it is merely a form of being single. He does not touch on the aspects of how it may progress to marriage; he simply says it will end within two years, again with no references to back this up. Wilsons attempts to convince the reader that marriage is the only way they will be able to stay in love because the incentive to stay together is much higher than living in cohabitation because you have invested that much more. He states that living in cohabitation “… I stop loving you; I walk away.” He continues saying that he fails to write about the house they could be renting, or even bought together and many other investments that people are living together purchase and pay for, even if it is
Actually monogamy had developed long before religion became interested. According to Fisher’s estimate, nearly every human society has been monogamous to some degree (69), and she claims that human beings have a biologically natural preference for mo...
Marriage is the legal or formally recognized union of a man and a woman, or two people or the same sex as partners in a relationship. Marriage rates in the United States have changed drastically since the last 90’s and early 2000 years (Cherlin 2004). Marital decline perspective and marital resilience perspective are the two primary perspectives and which we believe are the results from the decline. The marital decline perspective is the view that the American culture has become increasingly individualistic and preoccupied with personal happiness (Amato, 2004). The change in attitudes has changed the meaning of marriage as a whole, from a formal institution
Marriage is a commitment that seems to be getting harder to keep. The social standards placed on an individual by society and influenced by the media inevitably lead some to consider divorce as a “quick-fix” option. “Have it your way” has become a motto in the United States. It has become a country without any consideration of the psychological effects of marriage and divorce. The overwhelmingly high divorce rate is caused by a lack of moral beliefs and marital expectations.
A study shown in the book, “The Millennials: Connecting to America’s largest Generation” by Thom S. Rainer and Jess W. Rainer, show that eighty-six percent of Millennials believe that they will not marry more than once in their lifetime. Due to that fact aforementioned, being with someone for the sake of it, even when there is no future is pointless. Meg Jay says that we are able to pick our families, and when picking your family you have to choose wisely if you plan to have a future with them. This is important to consider, and therefore shouldn’t be treated carelessly. It is also self demeaning when holding a relationship simply for the reason being that the other person chooses you. By keeping this unhealthy relationship, the basic needs to develop a fulfilling healthy self sufficient future are not met. Psychologist, Abraham Maslow, believed in a set of basic needs needed to be fulfilled in order to reach complete self-actualization; one of the basic needs being love and belonging (Simplypsychology.org). Keeping an unhealthy relationship deprives one from reaching their feeling of fulfillment, which will then result in them lowering their standards, and ultimately deny themselves of their right to establish their
Marriage and divorce are culturally ruled, as I have noted from my interviews with friends and family of different cultures who have married, perhaps some have divorced, and with each experience in love they have culturally accepted values that pertain to their overall ideals and values on love, marriage, shared values, etc. The purpose of this paper is to establish a clear understanding of human nature as it relates to the portrait of adulthood and mate selection; institution of marriage, procreation, and even divorce as it relates to acceptance of failed expectations and moving on. I was not surprised to learn that the people I interviewed were traditional in their beliefs that marriage is a serious commitment that should be respected and approached for longevity.
Inside the article “Why Marriage is Good for You”, Maggie Gallagher makes claims that marriage improves many facets of an individual’s life; including both mental and physical health, longevity, finances, and reduced chances of infidelity (Gallagher). The statements made throughout the article reference many statistics and studies conducted by various organizations and individuals, however, Gallagher falls victim to a number of common logical fallacies. While this weakens Gallagher’s argument in the article, it does not necessarily make it false.
In conclusion it is apparent that this is becoming a more prevalent topic among current generations. Current scientific and social research suggest that many are moving towards non-monogamy to pursue a more fitting relationship style that better fits their personal needs and satisfies individual desires. As a culturally constructed phenomenon, we are starting to tests the waters of breaking away from tradition. In a society that prides itself on moving closer towards the future, this one-size-fits-all concept of monogamy is pulling many back into the history books.
Every year approximately 2.4 million marriages occur.Out of those,2.1 millionwill file for divorce in the United States. These marriage and divorce rates have significantly increased since the years past(Coltrane and Adams, 364).According to Schoen, in the 1950’s, 15 out of 1,000 marriages ended in divorce.In the 1970’s, the rates of divorcedoubled,increasing to 40 per 1,000 marriages. Currently, the rate of marriages resulting in divorce remains the same. Most marriages are ending within seven years ofthemarriage for multiple different reasons. Sociologists haveestablisheddivorce as a social problem from the rise in divorcerates due to the early year of marriages (2006).
Is Monogamy the Best Form of Marriage? In the United States, marriage is a commitment two people make for the rest of their lives. The average American marriage lasts seven years. Well over half of all marriages end in divorce (Francouer, 72). Statistics on the infidelity have risen fifty percent since the 1970s and is rising all the time.