Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cruelty within the food industry
Essay meat industry
Essay meat industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cruelty within the food industry
Essay 2 – Present a critique of Direct Action Everywhere’s campaigns against Whole Foods and Chipotle (directactioneverywhere.com). Thoroughly assess its strong points and its shortcomings and explain why you do or do not support this campaign. The campaign against Whole Foods and Chipotle for allowing factory farm to continue that killing of animals is what ‘Direct Action Everywhere’ is fighting against to inform the general population that there is an issue with “humanely” killing animals for consumption. Direct Action Everywhere’s is an organization whose “mission is to empower activists to take strong and confident action wherever animas are being denigrated, enslaved, or killed, and create a world where animals liberation is a reality.” …show more content…
[They] are not afraid to push boundaries and even polarize the debate.” This group of individuals works together to “integrate the latest technology and most innovative research to most effectively advocate for the liberation of our animal friends.” Meanwhile they also “use the power of an open and welcoming community to make all of us more inspired and confident activists.” Direct Action Everywhere has been pivotal in advocating for issues that may seem right on the surface but are deeply flawed underneath. They are a radical organization that goes out of there way to inform people of the choices they are making when purchasing product from stores like Whole Foods and Chipotle. The companies that Direct Action Everywhere target are companies that claim are doing the right method of killing animals but do not realize killing the animal is still doing the crime. Whole foods for example, “seek out the finest natural and organize food available, maintain the strictest quality standards in the …show more content…
In a review the website writes that “Slaughterhouse is the first book in which workers in the meat industry speak publicly about what is actually taking place in America’s slaughterhouses.” This particular book shined light to the graphic and very disturbing facts that factory farms are providing all types of products at the expense of the lives of innocent animals. The book is able to bring forth evidence and enticing information that is hard to miss by the reader because at one point or another, this matter was meant to come to light. The review goes further in illustrating “Eisnitz 's investigation with a single complaint from a United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) worker alleging that cattle there are having their heads skinned while fully conscious. This single complaint becomes a full-scale, groundbreaking investigation.” Slowly but steadily, Eisnitz was able to figure the puzzle out and attract the attention of individuals and organizations who are particularly found of advocating for animal rights. The book itself had testimonies from workers who would deliberately beat, “strangle, boil, or dismember animals alive. Today’s slaughter line does not stop for anything: Not for injured workers, not for contaminated meat, and least of all, not for sick or disabled animals.” This is the driving force of individuals who have no other
PETA is arguably the largest animals’ rights organization in the world with more than 5 million members and supporters. They go further to say they are against the use of animals in food, clothing, research, and entertainment industries and claim to spread their message through public education, cruelty investigations, research, animal rescue, legislation, special events, celebrity involvement, and protest campaigns. This is all according to their website of course; however, a deeper look reveals another meaning filled with hypocrisy, deceit, terror, and greed.
One objection Norcross states in his essay is that “perhaps most consumers are unaware of the treatment of animals, before they appear in neatly wrapped packages on supermarket s...
Over the past few decades, small and medium sized farms have been taken over by large-scale factory farms. These farms house billions of animals used for consumption each year. The conditions on factory farms are filthy, overcrowded and disease ridden. Animals forced to live out their lives on these farms are subject to extremely harsh conditions, such as mutilation, confinement and living spaces piled high with feces. Not only do conditions on factory farms make life for livestock absolutely miserable, but factory farms are also negatively impacting human health and the environment. The production and sale of meat has become a billion-dollar industry based upon the bloodshed of other sentient beings. With this being the case, at the very least, factory farms need to be properly regulated and companies involved need to be held accountable for their abuse.
The food industry in America provides a facade of wholesome farms and pastures where animals are well-fed and left to roam freely before they are humanely slaughtered and packaged for our convenience. However, a closer look at the treatment of these animals reveals that even buying cage-free products, for instance, still supports an industry of inhumane treatment of animals and disgraceful practices. Animals are forced into cruel, unhealthy situations, frequently in cramped pens without enough room to even turn around, and often artificially forced to grow so quickly that they are unable to move. In 2011, a woman named Aliza B. wrote to Farm Aid (founded in 1985 as a grassroots activist organization to provide support for family farmers)
Slaughterhouse workers constantly face the risk of serious injury or even death. Many have dealt with blood, animals, and sharp knives. Along with these conditions, the absurd speed of work further increases the chances for injury. While corporations were regulated in the early twentieth century, lax of control in previous years has caused them to return to dangerous methods of production for efficiency. Animals are in a far greater amount of pain than workers since corporations have bred them for the main purpose of fast food. The inhumane treatment of animals, such as one worker’s method of stomping on live chickens, has caused some to argue for better treatment. However, corporations have fought hard to keep policies the same, and as result, their opponents’ demands are almost never met. These issues are evidence that fast food corporations have grown too powerful and must be regulated.
...h and safety laws have been disregarded in the slaughterhouses, causing a number of deaths. Also, there is a great deal of corruption in the slaughterhouses where workers are being threatened or lied to, especially about their injuries. I couldn’t imagine a factory not providing any type of reimbursement if anybody got hurt on the job.
...event future water and air pollution. In addition, all animal cruelty practices such as 'debeaking' should be outlawed. Practices of keeping animals in confined spaces should be outlawed. Farm animals should be required to have enough space to accommodate all the farm animals at each farm. There should also be mandatory yearly inspection at each place that intends to sell their meat, dairy and egg products to buyers. If an inspection is denied, the farmer should be fined. Animal right groups such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) suggest boycotting meat and dairy products from factory farms to raise more awareness of the cruelty to farm animals. Boycotting these farms is an acceptable response to bring attention to this problem and to get states to pass laws to make animal cruelty not only illegal towards household pets, but also farm animals.
Did you know that 97% of the 10 billion animals tortured and killed each year are farm animals, that mainly come from factory farms? It is said that factory farming is the biggest form of animal cruelty on Earth. In a factory farm in Ohio, workers killed injured pigs by hanging them on a forklift to slowly be strangled; the practice is defended by the pork industry. Many can argue that these animals in these farms are bred a certain way, and that the animals don’t have feelings, but the farming techniques cause stress on all the animals, health risks for both the animal and humans, and many farmers do not even benefit from the animals they raise.
The documentary “Food Inc.” has open my eyes to supply and demand. After watching the film, I have become more conscious about the foods I buy and eat. It has always brought to my attention that the food I eat on a daily basis may affect my health in the future but I never imaged that, vegetables, poultry and livestock where among these dangerous foods. The movie demonstrates that through mass media these corporations have painted an allusion, that the foods they are producing are wholesome. The products that are advertised in the supermarket, on television and in newspapers are displayed as healthy through a spinning of pastoral fantasy, by plastering images of lush farms, when actually, the food I eat may have bacteria which can kill me. The companies that are producing and selling these goods are extremely powerful, for that reason they have been able to develop a mental curtain to how the food makes its journey to the stores. They are so powerful indeed that they have managed obtain seats and have ties to government positions. Before I watched this film I thought so many people in this country where obese or have diabetes because they indulged in over eating when in fact studies show that it can be contributed to the massive amount of corn byproducts being pumped into everything we eat including animals that would not normally consume them. I also came to realization that consumers have a choice we vote, for the foods, companies produce, by the purchases we make “supply and demand”. By choosing not to eat processed food, fast food or food that came from the farms shown in the movie they can choose to eat healthy. Thus forcing the compan...
Peta, the People for Ethical Treatments of Animals, have pushed many ideas that the Pet Industry has been hurting animals. They seem to catch on to the negative things, and blast in on the news. Many are starting the believe that Peta is causing problems that do not actually exist. Peta is known to put out very shocking advertisements to send the message across about animal rights, animal abuse, and many other messages. Matusitz and Forrester stated in his journal that, “the effectiveness of moral shock strategies is well documented in animal rights movement literature. However, animal rights organizations are cautioned that an approach of this nature can potentially offended and alienated some members of the target audience, as well as compromise the organization’s reputation and credibility” (Matusitz and Forrester). The advertisements have positive effects on some, but for others, they end up being offended or laughing because the pictures are so extreme. For this reason, Peta has lost some of their credulities. Many start to believe that the animal problems did not exist in the first place, or that they are trying to create a problem that should not have been there, to begin with. Peta seems to concentrate on only the negative things about pet industries, and never seems to see anything positive. Also, people have been bashing them for
In 2014 the world community tried once more to put an end to the dog meat festival. Eleven million people placed their signatures on a petition to stop this gruesome festival. Millions more tweeted and those actions shook the world. But in the
Improving the treatment of animals in factory farms should not be done because it would lead to negative effects on the environment and raise prices. Many organizations, like ASPCA and PETA, look
In today’s technological society, where negative pictures of agriculture can go viral in a matter of minutes, programs such as Global Animal Partnership (G.A.P.) can be both a benefit and a detriment to the meat industry. Producers use groups such as G.A.P. to help combat the negative publicity of inhumane treatment to the American food supply, but also battle the pressure from these groups to take things a step farther. I will examine the pros and cons of animal activist groups and how they impact the American meat industry, but first, let’s get a further understanding of some of these animal right groups.
In the past two decades, the rapidly growing society has come up with new techniques and methods to grow food more efficiently. Today, a shocking 87 percent of the population owns products that are tested on animals or come from companies that promote animal cruelty. Every day in countries around the world, animals are fighting for their lives. They are enslaved, beaten, and kept in chains for entertainment; they are mutilated and stuck in small cages so that we can kill them and eat them; they are blinded, burned, and cut up alive for “science”; they are strangled and skinned alive so that humans around the world can wear fur coats and shoes.
Can you imagine going through the pain that animals in slaughterhouses went through? Most people don’t think of that part of it but the real fact is that billions of animals went through a painful life to be killed for food every year. Most people like to keep the thought in there heads that these animals live on beautiful green farms where they are treated great and then have a very peaceful death, and never feel any or little pain. Well that is not the case, these animals are treated very unfairly. The animals in slaughterhouses are given a massive amount of antibiotics, hormones, and drugs to keep them alive in conditions that are so bad they would otherwise kill them.