Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lgbt media portrayal
Lgbt media portrayal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lgbt media portrayal
CCT END-TERM
ABSTARCT-
Any serious study of sexuality/ sexualities and the politics perpetually at play in determining the complex diverse connotations of these terms must necessarily start with a consideration of notions of identity and identity formation, sexual or otherwise.
I think the questions of identity per se are themselves very complex to begin with, they become all the more complex when one has to relate the questions of sexual identities or preferences with questions of national specificity. This attempt is further complicated when it coincides with the emerging discourses of nationhood and nationality which views nation in a process of making and unmaking and critique the constructed notion of nationhood itself.
Cultural studies
…show more content…
This forms the basis of Sandip Roy’s essay- “Double minorities- The Experience of the Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Indians in the Diaspora”. He calls them a double minority owing to the fact that in the foreign land they are an ethnic minority as well as queer which makes them doubly displaced. Contemporary South Asian sexual identities can be said are created out of multiplicitous effects and perceptions of tradition, modernity, colonialization and globalization. Sexuality today is at once personal and private and also the most public and political issues that engages us both intellectually and practically. Keeping all this in mind this essay specifically talks about the south Asian gay population and their invisibility to the outside world. The south Asian population sis said to comprise of the people from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Tibet and Bhutan. He makes it very clear in the first paragraph itself that the essay is solely dealing with the concerns of the south Asian gay men and woman in the diaspora. It dwells on homosexuality as an experience. This is what cultural studies I believe is doing on the queer front, it works with the representative identities that the queers have invariably created which conforms them to a certain set of stereotypes, there is a constant battle …show more content…
One should know that firstly coming out is not necessary for every homosexual individual. It is the need for recognition in society, which drives such a coming out. If any individual is comfortable being hidden and avoiding unnecessary problems it’s totally his/her call. But one should also note that coming out is just not confined within a dialogue between you and your loved ones or the society, coming out can be in any way. People have their unique ways of coming out, some could write, some could paint, art itself can be a very suitable medium through which one could come out. I can only think of one such filmmaker who I have in mind and that is Rituparno Ghosh. Ghosh I believe has exemplified that activism can be achieved through art. If one closely sees this auteur figure one would definitely acknowledge its two sides, one where he is considered as the torch bearer of the Bengali art cinema and on the other hand a non normative director with impulses of transgression, who poses serious questions to the society, and raises questions about sex, gender and identity. Middle class sensibilities that his films try to articulate are juxtaposed with his ideas of sex and identity. Sexuality and the process of becoming and presenting himself as queer, and becoming an iconic figure for the LGBT community, though he was never an activist per
Andrew Sullivan, author of, What is a Homosexual, portrays his experience growing up; trapped in his own identity. He paints a detailed portrait of the hardships caused by being homosexual. He explains the struggle of self-concealment, and how doing so is vital for social acceptation. The ability to hide one’s true feelings make it easier to be “invisible” as Sullivan puts it. “The experience of growing up profoundly different in emotional and psychological makeup inevitably alters a person’s self-perception.”(Sullivan)This statement marks one of the many reasons for this concealment. The main idea of this passage is to reflect on those hardships, and too understand true self-conscious difference. Being different can cause identity problems, especially in adolescents.
Rather, more multiple categorized differences are confirmed with various dimensions. By applying the concept of “intersectionality” to the present social situations, the right of the same-sex marriage can be given as an another example. In regard to this, the subject’s identities are subdivided into the multiple existing frameworks, and the aggregation of these characters establishes one unique personality. The examples of what makes people separate from “others” are seen in the dissimilarities of their sex, age, sexual orientation, religion, nationality, and their geographical position, and these categories construct the different personal experiences and standpoints. For example, In Japan, the gay marriage is not authorized under the current law. Also, the amount of exposure about the LGBT in the media is still low, thus a subordinate social movements are not active. As a result, heterosexual people do not recognize the existence of the minority group, and even if they recognize it, people do not try to focus on the situation of them. Thus, the gender minority people are still in the positions of weak. On the other hand, in The USA, the same-sex marriage is legalized, and generally speaking, as a result of the legalization, the LGBT people have more access to the social life like heterosexual people have. This comparison indicates that due to their geographical location,
In the following essay, I will cover the history of how homosexuals has been discriminates and treated different just because of their sexual orientation, the types of prejudices against them and initiatives individuals and government has implemented in the political, sociological and educational aspect to help them reach similar standards of life as straight people; and how population is opening their minds to understand this type of behavior, helping society and job market to open their doors to employment opportunities for the gay community.
"Sexual identity is fundamentally elitist," says Sartre. Cultural theory states that the collective is impossible. It
The community plays a key role when it comes to erotic plasticity, and the person’s sexual identity. Women’s sexual identity is seen as be adventures. Exploring ones sexual attitude, desire, decisions, and behavior. There sexual acts do not defined them, and can go through life without their high sex drive decreasing. However it is different for men when it comes to exploring their sex drive. Male sexuality is evolutionary and biological factor playing key roles in their life course. When a man experience sex with another man it is assumed they will always be gay. The so called deviant act, unlike to women defines their sexually identity. (McElwain, Grimes, & Melissa L. McVicker, 2009, p.
In the Social Identity Theory(SIT), TT, looked at inter groups relations from an identity perspective. They claimed, layered on top, beside and underneath inter group conflict is identity issues. Therefore, group identity becomes a psychological engine that allows us to understand how group conflict emerges. In this essay I will focus on 3 concepts SIT suggests. The first social comparison and distinctiveness are concepts which give insights about person’s psychology in his group’s affect on it. For gay people, it is obvious that they are not in a helathy place with these 2 concepts. After I talk about instability which is a cognitive alternative that shows gays that their relative position in the society can be changed. Later, I talk about 5 stage model which incorporates macro and micro to explain intergroup relations. I
The acceptance of “abnormal” sexualities has been a prolonged, controversial battle. The segregation is excruciating and the prejudice remarks are so spiteful that some people never truly recover. Homosexuals have been left suffering for ages. Life, for most homosexuals during the first half of the twentieth century, was mostly one of hiding: having to constantly hide their true feelings and tastes. Instead of restaurants and movies, they had to sit quiet in the dark and meet each other in concealed places such as bars. Homosexuals were those with “mental and psychic abnormalities” and were the victim of medical prejudice, police harassment, and church condemnation (Jagose 24). The minuscule mention or assumption of one’s homosexuality could easily lead to the loss of family, livelihood, and sometimes even their lives. It was only after the Stonewall riots and the organization of gay/lesbian groups that times for homosexuals started to look brighter.
By analyzing my very own personal investment in the idea that heterosexuality is normal, I have realized that I am currently and that I used to deliberately present myself in a heterosexual persona to the world at large. Personally, when I was young, I used to be uncomfortable with women who broke the social norms of heteronormativity in public. I remember feeling anxious, and believing that one day soon society would perceive me as a divergent towards the norms because I hang out with women who didn’t present a heterosexual persona. I feared unspeakable things that would happen to me once I lost my privileges of being perceived as the ‘good’ heterosexual female. The lost of my social standing in society scared me; I was already a minority,
What is identity? Identity is an unbound formation which is created by racial construction and gender construction within an individual’s society even though it is often seen as a controlled piece of oneself. In Dr. Beverly Daniel Tatum’s piece, “The Complexity of Identity: ‘Who Am I?’, Tatum asserts that identity is formed by “individual characteristics, family dynamics, historical factors, and social and political contexts” (Tatum 105). Tatum’s piece, “The Complexity of Identity: ‘Who Am I?’” creates a better understanding of how major obstacles such as racism and sexism shape our self identity.
Ther theory of tolerance goes in line with certain aspects of the book. In her words, she defines subalterns, as a diversity of identities and the range of practices that cannot be captured within the abbreviation of LGBT.Initially, the concept of tolerance was to protect the rights of religious minorities and ensure their security. However, as the idea of being ‘’different’’ flows in a society, she conveys it is considered foreign . Under that circumstance, she contends that religious foundations would unlikely tolerate sex workers, homosexuals and may continue to deny certain human rights and benefits which heterosexuals are entitled. Through her theory of tolerance I understand, in terms of gender that individuals are able to live a tolerable life if and only their rights are not deviant from the rigid expectation, in regards to race, class and gender. Moreover, looking at the political representation of women, gender, and the LGBT. In continents such as Africa, attitudes towards homosexuality are viewed very negatively. There is no tolerance towards LGBT individuals in Africa. In fact, as an African descendant, laws in many African countries concerning LGBT are much stricter. Thereupon, individuals who are caught engaging in sexual practices and behaviours such as adult and consensual premarital, are publicly harassed, berated and imprisoned. In effect, individuals who identify themselves as gay, hide under until the umbrella of marriage in order to conform to the societal pressure. Such as the life of ashrams friend, in chapter eight. Ali. ‘’Ali, I don’t understand. You told me that you are gay. Why did you get married’’ (PG.51 Laws in many African countries against LGBT are much
Intersectionality is something that is not always addressed within cultures. It is the aspect of life that is not seen nor heard unless need be. Humans like to put everything into neat little boxes, categorizing everything from the color yellow, to the size of a shoe. Intersectionality complicated the categorization by creating a fuller image of the object which is being categorized. When it comes to the identity of a person, the same is done as with objects, splitting aspects of one life and categorizing them. A person’s sexuality, race, gender, disability statues, etc., are just a few aspects that make them who they are as a person. Some identities take over another within the sphere of social life, raising one aspect over another, such as someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. This boxing off created an LGBTQ identity, as well as a community. This creates a cultural and a communal identity based on this shared attribute which shapes someone’s individual identity related to the collective and communal identities. Understanding the difference between the intersections of gender and sexuality, especially the kinds of differences of the body produced through various abilities discourses and practices. One intersection that can be addressed is the intersection of ability and LGBTQ identity. Along with, how sources structure the understanding of identity over time.
In this paper I will examine different psychological theories on binary gender identity and diverse gender identity. My intention is not to argue which set of theories is more accurate but more to provide information and let the reader decide for themselves in the light of their own experiences what theory makes the most sense to them. The psychologically charged debate over gender identity and its presence in society has taken the form of intuitions because of social necessity. On one side, diverse gender identity argues that traditional binary gender norms are no longer relevant nor an accurate reflection of the society that we live in today. The other side argues the more traditional concrete male/female gender identifications are paramount
Choosing a sexual preference is considered one of the biggest decisions of one’s life. Among the human race, heterosexuality (the attraction to persons of the opposite sex) is considered normal. However, over the years, homosexuality (the attraction to persons of the same sex) has become more common. The origin of homosexuality dates back as far as the 5th century B.C. Homosexuality became very popular in ancient Greece. The Greeks approved of same-sex relationships. When homosexuality first became popular though, the relationships were rarely sexual. Most relationships were usually between older men and younger boys. These relationships were more of courtship rituals than anything. In other parts of the world though, homosexuality was kept a secret among couples for many years. Unbelievably, it is still hidden today. It is kept a secret because in society, homosexuality is not considered normal. Therefore, to avoid being judged, ridiculed and belittled, homosexuality is conducted in secrecy. Over the years however, homosexuals have grown tired of not being able to do what they believe in, when and where they pleased. Many homosexuals began to fight for their rights to do as they pleased. What non-supporters of homosexuality thought or said about homosexuals no longer affected the homosexual community. Although many people still disagree with homosexuality, our society today has begun to accept homosexuals as a norm.
Gender and sexuality can be comprehended through social science. Social science is “the study of human society and of individual relationships in and to society” (free dictionary, 2009). The study of social science deals with different aspects of society such as politics, economics, and the social aspects of society. Gender identity is closely interlinked with social science as it is based on an identity of an individual in the society. Sexuality is “the condition of being characterized and distinguished by sex” (free dictionary, 2009). There are different gender identities such as male, female, gay, lesbian, transgender, and bisexual that exists all around the world. There is inequality in gender identities and dominance of a male regardless of which sexuality they fall under. The males are superior over the females and gays superior over the lesbians, however it different depending on the place and circumstances. This paper will look at the gender roles and stereotypes, social policy, and homosexuality from a modern and a traditional society perspective. The three different areas will be compared by the two different societies to understand how much changes has occurred and whether or not anything has really changed. In general a traditional society is more conservative where as a modern society is fundamentally liberal. This is to say that a traditional society lists certain roles depending on the gender and there are stereotypes that are connected with the genders. One must obey the one that is dominant and make decisions. On the other hand, a modern society is lenient, It accepts the individual’s identity and sexuality. There is no inequality and everyone in the society is to be seen as individuals not a part of a family unit...
In order to discuss the biology of gender identity and sexual orientation, it is necessary to first examine the differences between multiple definitions that are often mistakenly interchanged: sex, gender, sexual orientation, and gender identity. Sexual orientation is defined by LeVay (2011) as “the trait that predisposes us to experience sexual attraction to people of the same sex as ourselves, to persons of the other sex, or to both sexes” (p. 1). The typical categories of sexual orientation are homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual. Vrangalova and Savin-Williams (2012) found that most people identify as heterosexual, but there are also groups of people that identify as mostly heterosexual and mostly gay within the three traditional categories (p. 89). This is to say that there are not three concrete groups, but sexual orientation is a continuum and one can even fluctuate on it over time. LeVay (2011) also defines gender as “the ...