Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The necessity of free will
The necessity of free will
The necessity of free will
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The necessity of free will
Have you ever felt the urge to do something good? Or was it quite the opposite, and you wanted to do something…evil. There are a lot of reasons why someone might want to do something evil. Humans are not born to do evil, because they have free will to choose what type of person we want to be, but society and sin can influence a person to be or do something evil.
How can someone do something bad, and not feel guilt or sadness? All evil people have one thing in common as to why they can do something bad, and that is they show no empathy. “A key trait in many evildoers: they lack the capacity for empathy” (“The Roots of Evil”, Begley 2). Empathy is feeling sorry or understanding someone. This is why people do bad things, and are able to without feeling bad. Although evil people are okay with being evil, some people do things they normally would not do because of the situation they are in. Certain situations can make a person who is not evil, do evil things. “When directed by a person in authority, others will act against their own morals if told to do so” (Psychology of Evil, Milgram Experiments). This
…show more content…
shows the affect someone in authority can have on another person and what they can make them do against their morals. Sin is the reason people are evil.
It’s the act of doing something not good. Evil entered this world because of Satan and him not doing anything good. When Adam and Eve ate the fruit that they weren’t supposed to, it brought sin, fear, embarrassment, and other feelings we normally don’t like to feel into the world. “And the woman said. The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat” (Kings James Version, Genesis 1:4). This shows that Satan tricked them to do bad by eating the fruit, but Adam and Eve still could have listened to God. Satan betrayed God and went against him. Satan used to be an angel, but went against God and was sent to Hell, where he vowed to never do any good. “To do ought good never will be our task” (Paradise Lost, l. 159). This shows that the bad things in the world are because of Satan. God gave humans free will to wither do good or
bad. Because of free will, people can choose who they want to be and what they want to do. Adam and Eve chose to not listen to God and eat the fruit. “She took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her, and he did eat” (Kings James Version, Genesis 2:6). Although Satan tricked them into eating the fruit,they had free will and chose to eat the fruit. Although some people choose to be evil, there are the people who do good. The “man in the water” chose to save a person’s life he didn’t even know, over his own. “Like every other person on that flight, he was desperate to live, which makes his final act so stunning” (“The Man in the Water,” Rosenblatt 21). This shows how you can choose to be evil or not. Although society, sin, and being in certain situations can influence people to be evil, they have free will to do good in the world. In certain situations, a person can do evil things. Evil came into this world because of Satan wanting to not do anything good, but because of free will, we can do good things. No one is born to do evil things. We have a choice to do good or be evil.
An Analysis of Peter van Inwagen’s The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy
Claudia Card begins by questioning the difference between wrong and evil. How do we know when something crosses the line between being just wrong, to being an evil act? How does hatred and motive play a part in this? How can people psychologically maintain a sense of who they are when they have been the victims of evil? Card attempts to explain these fundamental questions using her theory of evil; the Atrocity Paradigm (Card, pg.3).
The lines that define good and evil are not written in black and white; these lines tend to blur into many shades of grey allowing good and evil to intermingle with each another in a single human being. Man is not inherently good or evil but they are born innocent without any values or sense of morality until people impart their philosophies of life to them. In the words of John Locke:
“Inside each of us, there is the seed of both good and evil. It's a constant struggle as to which one will win. And one cannot exist without the other” (Eric Burdon). People do not think they are doing good or evil, they just think that they are doing the right thing. Evil comes from within each one of us. You just need to something to bring it out.
There are two kinds of evil, moral and natural. Moral evil is things like murder, rape, stealing, terrorism, etc. Natural evil is things like suffering and unpleasantness typically as a result of moral evil. Evil is that which has no power of its own. Evil is darkness, a negation of light. Its power is in us, in our fear of it, in that we consider it a "something" worth responding to.
“In the long run, we shape our lives, and we shape ourselves. The process never ends until we die. And the choices we make are ultimately our own responsibility.” (Eleanor Roosevelt). This is just one of the infinite examples of how human nature has been explored by so many different people. Each and every human is born with the capability of making their own choices. The decisions that they will make in the future will determine how evil they are viewed by others. Although one’s nature and nurture do affect their life, it is their own free will that determines whether or not they are evil.
One of the many questions Augustine raised is ‘what is evil’? Committing an act of evil is doing something malicious; the act is done with the intent to cause harm. However, there is a problem with this definition
Everyone has personal opinions on the definition of evil, but what is the true definition? Some argue that God can only judge if an act is evil, while some say only certain things are evil. Many philosophers and authors argue over what the most accurate definition is. One psychiatrist, Dr. M. Scott Peck, suspects that Satan lives within people as a lazy and less-disciplined figure, which induces mental illness and criminal activity (Lawhon 1). Author Michael Stone defines evil as specific deeds designed to torture or murder another individual, but “the perpetrator be aware that the victim would suffer intensely, experience agony”. Who do we have to blame for these unthinkable acts of hatred? The only ones capable of them: humans. Humans are the only creatures that can feel emotions, such as shame, and have complex, rational thought (Stone 19). It is hard to tell when bad actions blur into evil acts. True evil is when that person knows what they are doing is wrong, but continue to do so because it gives them pleasure.
Since the dawn of modern civilization the terms good and evil have been used to describe the world and the various things within it. Things ranging from the concepts of the Devil, to the kid the cut in front you in the lunch line in the third grade, evil can be defined in many ways, however, evil is generally defined as something that goes against a single set of moral principles that society has defined. This is not true because evil is something that an individual perceives that they believe will cause them harm and goes against their individual moral beliefs, not some universal concept accepted by everyone.
What drives people to act in an improper way, is not evil, but rather a lack of empathy hardwired into their brain. When a
People have constantly attempted to understand what evil truly is, and, if possible, how to eliminate this evil from their lives. However, first it must be known what it is that is being eliminated. Different people, cultures, and eras have all had a different view of what evil is, and how it affects their lives, and there is no true answer. Because of this, discussing the idea of whether people are born or can be evil is meaningless. The idea of what evil is, and whether people can be evil, is relative and cannot be applied to human nature in a universal way.
The question of evil is a common topic among non-believers. Evil has existed since the beginning of time. In today’s society people have become so desensitized to evil, the true origins become hard to understand. God gave us each the free will and ability to choose right from wrong, although many of God’s creation continue to choose sin. The Holy Bible explains to us the nature and root of sin. This explanation helps us understand why bad things happen and how it might affect our relationships with the Most High.
Theological books describe evil in two broad categories, that is, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is a phenomenon that entails the willful decision to do wrong. It is associated with acts of intentional wrongdoing that includes robbery, murder, rape, and theft. This category of evil is the foundation of sin, and is punishable according to biblical teachings. It is also considered as an offense under the laws of the land. These offenses can occur because of influence, or due to an individual’s willingness to take part in sin.
Nobody in this world is truly and purely evil. In TV shows or movies that depict the life of a murder often tend to explain their thirst for blood is inhumane and evil but we have to remind our selves that they are humans too. Evil people as we consider often have terrible lives in which traumas are caused bringing them to behave in such a way. For example the infamous Night Stalker who grew up with an abusive mother and sister, searching for comfort in his life he turned to his uncle who was an ex military with a dark secret. His uncle was obsessed with the murders and rapes that had occurred during his time in the army. The Night Stalker found it's a way to escape from his conflicts and began to find pleasure in the torturing and killing
The category for discussion will be the view of good and evil. The group is chosen because human beings often rely on a benchmark to distinguish between moral vices and virtues. There is no distinctive mechanism of discerning between vices and virtuous. There are varying approaches with other people focusing on religion paradigms to determine good and evil.