Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controverisal presidential powers
Controverisal presidential powers
Role of judiciary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controverisal presidential powers
It can easily be understood that chapters six through nine in our Government book; “American Politics,” are linked with one another in various ways. In fact, chapter six begins with information about Congress, then chapter seven discusses Presidency, chapter eight goes on to describe bureaucracies, and finally chapter nine covers federal judiciary. For starters, chapter six conveys the United States Congress. Congress is made up of two chambers; the Senate and the House of Representatives. These members work closely together to create laws and bills, pass them along to the President of the United States, and work towards approval. The President has a huge role in the passage of laws, as well as, bills; he decides what gets passed and what gets declined. Without the President, laws would not receive approval and Congress would have quite the predicament on their hands. Likewise, chapter seven discusses the United States Presidency. The Presidency has many pro’s and con’s some are more severe than others. An example of a pro is that the President is the commander-in-chief; this is determined by the Constitution. Along with …show more content…
that, he/she is the head of state and the chief executive. As the head of state the President is limited on what he can denote constitutional and unconstitutional, however, he is allowed the ability to veto certain laws using a pocket veto. A con of being President can be that he shares power with Congress and the Bureaucracy agencies. This division of power can create quite a large problem for several people. Furthermore, chapter eight goes into bureaus and the official Bureaucracy.
Over the years it has clearly been seen that the Bureaucracy has slowly, but surely, gained more and more power. This power gain is the result of the President and Congress disputing and refusing to compromise with each other. With that in mind, it has been found that the president uses his ability to appoint and remove bureaucrats to get the things he wants accomplished. On the other hand, Congress uses fire alarms, police patrols, and money flow to get their way if the president disagrees with their wishes. With bureaucracies being sandwiched in the middle they benefit the most because both sides of the “bread” offer them things to get what they want done their way. With that being understood the President has a role in bureaucracies, as well as, the federal
Judiciary. Correspondingly, chapter nine covers federal judiciary and the President's part in it. Federal judiciary is much like bureaus, considering the agencies are under control of the United States President. However, federal judiciary has judiciary rule. This rule was enacted in 1802 after a case between Marbury and Madison. Federal judiciary is made of agencies that are sometimes from bureaus. Bureaus help keep the judicial circuit running smoothly. Which in turn causes the federal judiciary to have different branches; there are 94 district courts and 13 (sometimes 14) appeal courts. In closing, chapters six through nine have quite a few similarities with very little differences. Chapter six discusses Congress, chapter seven covers the Presidency, chapter eight then goes into Bureaucracies, and closing with chapter nine the federal judiciary. These chapters are closely related and deal with one another to get things done in the United States.
power. The first two chapters dealt with how the Federal Government shaped the view of
The United States of America is one of the most powerful nation-states in the world today. The framers of the American Constitution spent a great deal of time and effort into making sure this power wasn’t too centralized in one aspect of the government. They created three branches of government to help maintain a checks and balance system. In this paper I will discuss these three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, for both the state and federal level.
Congress and The Presidency Congress as a whole makes laws. When Bills are addressed they must meet the approval of both the House and the Senate in order to become a Law, and then the President can always veto it. Congress also deals with matters of public concern be it something that needs to be investigated or something that needs to be put before the public to raise awareness. Congress is made up of two parts: The Senate and the House of Representatives. Each is granted different powers and responsibilities.
In order to run more efficiently, there are certain responsibilities that Congress has given to the President over time. But that doesn’t mean Congress is losing any power or authority. It just means that they are giving up a responsibility that they don’t need. One of these responsibilities that were given to the President is the raising and lowering of tariffs. When it came to this issue, Congress can’t act decisively on its own. So even though Congress appropriates funds, they gave the President this fiscal responsibility. Again I want to stress that they didn’t lose any authority or power because of this. All they lost was a responsibility that they no longer have to worry about as it’s the President’s responsibility now. Still, the president has no authority or power regarding this issue. However, when he was given this fiscal responsibility, Congress also gave him staff assistance in the form of the Bureau of the Budget. This department helps the President make up the budget he wants to propose.
The United States Congress is the legislative branch of our government made up by the Senate and the House of Representatives. Our Congress, just as all branches of our government, derives its power from the US Constitution, specifically Article 1 section 8 which outlines the specific enumerated powers of Congress. This Article also outlines the implied powers of Congress. These implied powers include all things which are deemed necessary in order for Congress to carry out the jobs assigned to it by their enumerated powers.
Ken Kollman, The American Political System, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2012), 25, 322-323, 330, 449.
American politics is often defined by a continuing power conflict between the executive and the legislative branches of the government. This struggle for political power between the two stronger branches of the three is inherent in the Constitution, itself. The concepts of separation of powers and checks and balances ensure that the branches of government will remain in conflict and provide a balance that keeps the entire government under control. As it was first established, the executive branch was much smaller and weaker than as we know it today. Consequently, the legislative branch was unquestionably dominant. Over the course of history, the executive branch grew in both size and power to the point where it occasionally overtook the legislative and today rivals the legislative in a much closer political battle. Today both branches have major factors that contribute to their power, but on the whole the legislative remains the lastingly dominant branch.
Transatlantic trade was a subject of great competition between three powerful European nations; England, the Netherlands and France. England in particular, had very strict rules that Parliament passed, from 1651-1733, in order to acquire more money through the colonies. For example, the colonies could not trade with any other country besides England, in addition, they were not allowed to manufacture certain products. Despite the unfairness of these new laws, England's financial goals were accomplished, as the Dutch soon lost superiority in the Atlantic trade and their internal and external economy grew. Not only did these new laws become the catalyst of London emerging as a powerful city, but between 1650 and 1770,
In “Constitutional Democracy and Bureaucratic Power,” Peter Woll states that our system of government, “. . in many ways supported bureaucratic organization and functions independent of the president,” (311). According to Woll, the Framers intended to establish an independent bureaucracy, as they gave Congress substantial power over the administrative “branch.” However, because of the bureaucracy’s independence, Woll asserts that, though he possesses the authority, the president often lacks the power to control the bureaucracy. Naturally, this can lead to the corruption and inefficiency of the administrative process. Also contributing to this inefficiency and corruption, is the very nature of the bureaucracy itself. By definition, a bureaucracy is a “large, complex organization of appointed officials,” (“American Government: Institutions and Politics”); this inherent complexity causes many of the issues of bureaucracy. In discussing bureaucratic agencies’ budgets, James Wilson claims that “. . since measuring the output of a bureau is often difficult. . .the bureau has a great deal of freedom within which to seek the largest possible budget,” (“The Rise of the Bureaucratic State”, Wilson). Essentially, the vastness of each bureaucratic agency makes close scrutiny a time consuming and futile effort. Additionally, Woll contends that “. . the three branches do not always use to the fullest extent their authority to regulate the bureaucracy,” (“Constitutional Democracy and Bureaucratic Power”, 314). This assertion suggests that perhaps the source of the bureaucracy’s problems lie, not within the institution itself, but within the reluctance of the other branches of government to regulate it. Wilson proffers another explanation for the bureaucracy’s inefficiency in his scrutiny of the USPS, arguing that
The United States government braces its power among three powerful branches, legislative, executive and judicial. These branches interact with one another to establish authority that is strong, yet equal to have power over the country. Each branch pursues certain responsibilities and duties to operate in an efficient and effective manner in which society upholds. The executive, legislative and judicial branches all interact amid each other to validate accuracy of the nation’s most powerful law of the land, the Constitution. It is important to know how these branches interact with each other to learn how a bill becomes a law. Reflecting on how the three branches promote a balance of power that is constructive to include the agendas and electoral roles that also plays a vast part in the government’s operation.
In our countries government, Congress plays a major role in decision making. They’re primary role is to pass laws. These laws start off as bills. Bills can only be introduced by members of Congress. Although these bills only come from Congressman, there are many people who influence these bills. Such as the president, regular citizens, offices in the executive branch, and many others. The bills right off the bat do not have a very good chance of passage. Only one out of every ten bills even gets any attention at all. This is because they must go through many tests and hearings before they even have a chance of landing on the president’s desk. These steps in a bill becoming a law are very important, and make sure that all bills passed into law are the best of the best.
The federal bureaucracy as part of the executive branch exercises substantial independence in implementing governmental policies and programs. Most workers in the federal bureaucracy are civil-service employees who are organized under a merit system. A) One key characteristic of the merit system could be businesses hiring or promoting people based on their merit, experiences, or qualifications rather than things like their political connections or standpoints. B) There are many things that contribute to bureaucratic independence. One being *the structure of the federal bureaucracy*. The structure of the Federal Bureaucracy tends to be very large, it is based on merit, and is controlled by independent agencies or independent regulatory commissions. A factor that contributes to bureaucratic independence for the *complexity of public policy problems* would be how they are specialized units with a specific expertise. They also have delegated authority because of the fact that Congress and the president cannot handle everything. This is why they delegate authority to the bureaucracy. C) One way that *Congress* can check the bureaucracy, they have the ability to impeach executive officials. One way that *Courts* can check bureaucracy are Judicial reviews, which can declare bureaucratic actions unconstitutional. On way that * Interest groups* can check the bureaucracy is by using the First Amendment. SO by lobbying, protesting, speeches, and through multimedia usages and
A bureaucracy is a group of nonelected officials that carry out functions connected to a series of policies and programs. “Modern society relies on the effective functioning of government to provide public goods, enhance quality of life, and stimulate economic growth. The activities by which government achieves these functions include—but are not limited to—taxation, homeland security, immigration, foreign affairs, and education” (558). There are five different branches of the American bureaucracy: Cabinet department, Independent executive agencies, Independent regulatory agencies, Government corporations, and Presidential commission. Each branch has a different job to do to help the governmental system run smoothly.
Post (2006) states that if democracy requires that citizens experience their government as their own, as representing them, they must experience the state is some way responsive to their values and ideas (p.27). Moreover, I believe that the democratic governance is the foundation of bureaucratic ethics. Bureaucracy addresses public systems, provides structure, and efficient to establish rules and for the way we operate. However, Goodsell (2004) argues that the diversion of bureaucracy is positive although there is a lot of untrusted amongst the administration. In agreement with Goodsell, (2004) he states that the opposed arguments indicate that the bureaucracy has a poor performance are excessive power, and oppression of the individuals. Lastly, ( article) ) proclaims that the government blocks all forms of communication outside of the
The main purpose a bureaucracy serve is “to carry out the task of government consistent with the law” (Kollman). Bureaucracy are here to do the work of the government, rather than making the big decision. One example can be when President Kennedy made the decision that the USA would launch a man to the moon, it was The National Aeronautics and Space Admission’s job to get the man up there. Since every time when a president goes into office they begin to make decision and since we had a total of 44 presidents that’s means for each decision they make a Bureaucracy is or has an opportunity to be formed and that’s why we have a lot of them. Since bureaucracy can’t really go away, that’s also another reason why we have so much of them. They also waste a lot of