Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of symbolism in the novel
Importance of Symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The use of symbolism in the novel
Ambiguity in Coover's Quenby and Ola, Swede and Carl
Ambiguity occurs often in writing, and readers often choose to fill in the blanks with facts, which are not from the text. By filling in spaces in the story, the reader creates a plot, which fits into their understanding. In Coover's "Quenby and Ola, Swede and Carl," the plot is ambiguous. Many of these ambiguities are subtle and are easily overlooked, leading the reader to make assumptions about the text. Simple words, phrases, or the language leads the reader to a plot, which almost fits the text. As a reader, I was not satisfied that there was no definitive plot in which I could understand the story. I read the story several times and came up with three different realities;
…show more content…
Many of the same discrepancies occur, except in the cases of the sex scenes. As I stated above, the language of both the scenes seem to imply conventional heterosexual male fantasy. In Carl's fantasy about Quenby the language or clue that it may be a fantasy is given by the ambiguity of what Quenby brings to the cabin with her. It is also fantastic the way that clothes simply melt off her and yet she can't wait for him to take his tee shirt off. The whole scenario seems to be a bit too much like the fantasy of a lonely man, "far from his wife." But then the discrepancies in the text begin popping up such as the differing descriptions of the lantern stated previously. The ambiguous description of Swede watching through the window, or perhaps it is Carl's imagination as he is staring, "at the bed, the roughed-up sheets, watched yourself there." (162). Also, why would Carl fantasize about a woman who was not his "type." Similar problems spring up with the possibility that Carl's sex with Ola is simply a fantasy. If it is all simply a fantasy as described above, then why does Carl worry about his missing "underwear" on the boat with Swede? The idea that the two sexual sections are simply fantasies does not fit in with the text. Again, if the reader is to come away with this understanding then they must disregard parts of the …show more content…
So, the discrepancies in the text must have some meaning. Perhaps the reader is meant to fill in the details of the story--similar to the way Carl fills in the missing pieces of Ola's story. We are told that Ola "skipped most of the details, but one could imagine them." (156). In "Imagining" Ola's story Carl fills in pieces of information such as "Quenby wears pants, those relaxed faded blue jeans probably" (154) and "Ola inside setting the table. Or swimming down by the docks" (159) and "What would Quenby talk about? Her garden probably, pie baking, the neighbors . . . Quenby would probably talk about Ola" (158). This is exactly what the reader must do in order to understand what occurs in the story. Except the reader, in creating the details which should be included in the story, must delete the existence of textual evidence. Thus, a theme which is prevalent in Coover's stories emerges, that the ambiguity causes the reader to both create and to destroy a
...onally transposing indirect to direct quotation, putting words into people mouths and blending two separate eye witness's accounts. How can one read a novel for knowledge gaining purposes when the structure appears so flawed? The use of modern and old English are combined in the sentence structure. The highly academic vocabulary not only is confusing, but breaks the flow of the book when that is the evident purpose for the format of the book. The confusing order in which Starkey retells events and the ineffective and useless information that is put in for building character personalities.
Typically, a novel contains four basic parts: a beginning, middle, climax, and the end. The beginning sets the tone for the book and introduces the reader to the characters and the setting. The majority of the novel comes from middle where the plot takes place. The plot is what usually captures the reader’s attention and allows the reader to become mentally involved. Next, is the climax of the story. This is the point in the book where everything comes together and the reader’s attention is at the fullest. Finally, there is the end. In the end of a book, the reader is typically left asking no questions, and satisfied with the outcome of the previous events. However, in the novel The Things They Carried the setup of the book is quite different. This book is written in a genre of literature called “metafiction.” “Metafiction” is a term given to fictional story in which the author makes the reader question what is fiction and what is reality. This is very important in the setup of the Tim’s writing because it forces the reader to draw his or her own conclusion about the story. However, this is not one story at all; instead, O’Brien writes the book as if each chapter were its own short story. Although all the chapters have relation to one another, when reading the book, the reader is compelled to keep reading. It is almost as if the reader is listening to a “soldier storyteller” over a long period of time.
Mitcham wrote to the Chief of Ordnance at Springfield Armory about "the question of automatic small arms is now being taken up seriously in Europe." Not much was done by the U.S. Army until just before and during the U.S. entered the World War I. Many rifles were tested, most of which were tested were attempts to convert the M1903 rifle from bolt-action to semi-automatic. It was during this time that John Garand, then a young man of 30, moved to New York City from Canada after the United States entered World War I. After learning of the arms problem, he decided to try to make a rifle and got financial backing from John Kewish.
...him down. She might have written more paragraphs on each of her main points. There are many more examples in the novel. She had more thoroughly EXPLAINED how each of the direct quotations and situations she used showed that Chato was being let down and how he felt about it. The reader could have gained MORE insight into Chato's life. I wanted to hear more about the relationship between Chato and his family. I wanted to know more about WHY his sister was keeping secrets, and why Chato was so let down by her calling him a little "snitch." It all sounded pretty much like ordinary bickering between a brother and a sister to me. I wanted her to better explain WHY Chato was being let down.Overall, I just wanted to know MORE. She needed to develop each of these examples more fully. She needed to get more "into" the feelings of Chato and explain them to her reader.
... story are just a vehicle that makes the process that turns the feelings of these women into actions whether they were intellectual actions or a physical action such as those taken by Mrs. Mallard and Calixta respectively. When we think realistically we can see that both Mrs. Mallard and Calixta both love their husbands. Mrs. Mallard nearly fainted after hearing the news of her husband premature demise, and Calixta certainly did welcome and was quite pleased with the safe return of her husband and child bearing the shrimps after the storm. These women were thinking and feeling like individuals. One was acting it out as in Calixta's case and our Mrs. Mallard was starting to think about it. It is people like these two, that are hidden in the throngs of humanity to start a ripple in the water and it is the Kate Chopin's that write about these ripples that make the waves.
In ?A Municipal Report? O. Henry tells the story in a first person perspective through a man who thinks he is detached from the world. In O. Henry?s story we see that certain characters stand out among the rest by the details that he gives us. The author?s tone in, ?I stepped off the train at 8 P.M.,? is meant to appear nonchalant to give a feel that the narrator is merely an observer in the story. The characterization in the story is also unrealistically portrayed. Azalea Adair is a poor woman who, despite how needy she is, tells the narrator, ?You must have a cup of tea.? She is depicted as a good character without a single bad bone in her body. That would only be meant for the story since O. Henry could have set her up more realistically than a helpless princess needing to be rescued. Another character that defies human reality is Ceasar. He is shown to be a good character as well, giving Azalea his money and helping her out when she needs him. There is nothing bad about Ceasar that would make the reader dislike him. He is the classic knight in shining armor that could only be set up in a fantasy world. Next is the evil man Caswell. The narrator, who says, ?I have seen few men whom I have so instantaneous...
Readers will find details about almost anything that comes to play in the story, such as the wind and how ferocious it is or how it gives great detail on the sign Johnson goes to look at. “She could see that it had been there for a long time because its original pain was streaked with rust where years of rain and snow had finally eaten the paint off down to the metal and the metal had slowly rusted, making a dark red stain like blood”. This sentence has a lot of detail in it explaining how old the sign is, how long it must’ve been there and how rusty it look, without so much details Petry could have just said the sign was old a rusty but that wouldn’t appeal to many people. The selection of detail helps bring readers in and make them keep reading along with making the story more
...oached. Such as: how the reader is seen as having so many roles, and to which one do they take. This article is well- written and he has some significant points about the novel. Sommer’s tactics of constructing his argument in a logical manner was the right thing to do. It helps the reader to separate their feelings that they may have had when reading the novel, and look at facts. In some parts of the article he used reader-response, which helped you to question what others have said about this novel. Although there were parts where his argument is not clear, it did consist of some valid points.
cocking the hammer. This concept made the five shooter the first practical, fast-firing repeaters when they came out of his Paterson, New Jersey, factory in 1836.” As the author explains this technology was important evolutionary change for firearms, not did it implement the more reliable way of igniting the charge in a guns barrel, the percussion cap, but it allowed for a more rapid and sustained rate of fire which would become very important. This technology of repeating sustained fire rate would not only limited to short range fire arms, but would eventually be implemented in long range weapons as well. According to Firearms an Illustrated History, “there had been attempts to produce a “repeater,” or multiple-shot, rifles and muskets as early as the 16th century. Notwithstanding the success enjoyed by the percussion revolvers of Colt and others, it took the unitary cartridge containing primer, charge, and projectile in one package to make the repeating rifle a satisfactory reality in the mid-19th century.”
...d of detail, causing some of the structure and sequence to be lost. The points he makes are valid, but the reader can lose track of them due to the little sense of organization by category or priority within the chapters.
There are thousands of models of shotguns, who knows how to choose which one for the right job? The most common gauges of shotgun are 10,12,16,20, and 410. This experiment can test any of those gauges against each other, but the two that were tested in this experiment were the 12 gauge and the 20 gauge, as they are often compared for different jobs. If that’s confusing, don’t worry, it won’t be after this paper.
Although it was difficult to convey at first, I recognized my tendency to divide critical thinking into hypothetical rationale and realistic rationale. For example, I was displeased with the story’s lack of action. So, perhaps if I were a female who was a huge fan of plot, setting, and character driven murder mysteries, then I would have enjoyed the story more. As a seasoned reader of the genre, my instincts would have told me to approach the text with apprehensive patience. Throughout my reading I would be taking note of any suspicions. I would have questioned the significance of minor oddities; like Mrs. Hales recollection of Sheriff Peter’s wife. Furthermore, I may have realized how Mrs. Peters being described as, “someone who didn't seem like a sheriffs wife, for she was small, thin, and didn’t have a strong voice” (Glaspell, 1), meant that she had a character defect which would be exploited at some point. Before eventually finding out the meaning of this foreshadowing, there are several occasions where Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are patronized for their efforts. Mr. Hale even mocks the two women saying, “women are used to worrying over trifles” (Glaspell, 6). Given the era this story takes place in, both women take the high ground and respectfully respond
He applied to the doctoral program in physics at MIT, and was accepted. In the summer of 1953 Bell Labs, then IBM offered him a research position. He turned down both offers to build transistors for Philco-a manufacturer of radios and
Muzzleloader were slow to load, heavy, and did not shoot far and performed inefficiently in damp weather. The muzzleloader was greatly used during the American Civil War by both opposing belligerents. The world saw many changes from 1850-1900 in the development of firearms and ammunition muzzleloading was replaced by breech-loading firearms. The breech-loading firearms otherwise known as the modern firearm loaded completely different from the muzzleloader. The modern firearm barrel is loaded from the rear or the breech of the barrel this allows for quicker reloading. The modern ammunition is far more trustworthy than black powder, especially in damp weather conditions. Few things the modern firearm and the muzzle loader had in common was the way it fired the ignition, burning of gunpowder, which creates pressure, and the use of the barrel to propel the projectile. The modern fire uses cartridge ammunition that include a casing which are made from different types of metal such as steel, aluminum, brass, and nickel. The cartridge holds the gunpowder at the end mid section of the casing, a primer is also loaded at the end of the casing. When pulling the trigger the
Ernest did a lot of work before he discovered the atomic theoryanx made a big name for himself. Ernest went to England in 1907 to become Langworthy Professor of Physics in the University of Manchester. In 1919 he accepted an invitation to succeed Sir Joseph Thomson as Cavendish Professor of Physics at Cambridge. He also became Chairman of the Advisory Council, H.M. Government, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research He became the Professor of Natural Philosophy, Royal Institution, London; and the director of the Royal Society Mond Laboratory, Cambridge.