Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the great quizlet
Alexander II and III
Alexander the great administrator of empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alexander the great quizlet
Even though Alexander III of Macedonia, more commonly known as Alexander the Great, only lived to be 32 years old, his accomplishments were so vast it would be impossible to capture them all in a 3-hour Hollywood film. The well-known director, Oliver Stone, spent years studying Alexander and dreaming of making an epic film about his life. Stone's 2004 film, Alexander, was met with reviews that made it sound as if it was mediocre or disappointing, but the problem with it is that in the era of exciting action-driven Hollywood films, Alexander asks viewers to go deeper than they are accustomed. The length of the film was considered too long, but the history of Alexander is so huge that it is actually too short. Since Alexander lived more than 2300 years ago, and much of the information on Alexander's life has been lost over time, it seems to me that Alexander accurately depicts the historical era, Alexander's relationships, battle scenes and the different cultures involved in Alexander's conquests. One of the main complaints of critics was that Alexander was more like a historical documentary than an action film. Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times said, "We welcome the scenes of battle, pomp and circumstance because at least for a time we are free of the endless narration of Ptolemy the historian.” However, the elderly Ptolemy provides key information throughout as he dictates Alexander's story to his scribe. He tells the scribe that Alexander's empire was not a location, but "an empire of the mind." This film is more like an empire of the mind because although the action scenes are intense, the main focus of the story is the relationships of all the characters. Weinstein 2 One of the early scenes, depic... ... middle of paper ... ...talus, the uncle of the bride prayed to the gods that they would produce a legitimate heir. As shown in Alexander, this irritated Alexander who threw a cup at Attalus saying, “'You villain...what, am I then a bastard?' Then Philip, taking Attalus's part, rose up and would have run his son through; but by good fortune for them both, either his over-hasty rage, or the wine he had drunk, made his foot slip, so that he fell down on the floor. At which Alexander said 'See there..the man who makes preparations to pass out of Europe into Asia, overturned in passing from one seat to another'" (Plutarch, Alexander). Alexander left Macedonia with his mother taking her to stay with her brother, King Alexander I of Epirus. However, Alexander returned to Macedonia six months later after Philip sent a family friend to let him know that Philip had not intended to disown him.
Ghost on the Throne began just like I thought any biography would, even though this ended up not being a biography. Romm thoroughly picked apart Alexander the Greats relationships with his wives,...
I enjoyed reading Freeman's book and I think that I would use a similar method if I were to write a book about Alexander. He wrote the book as a story describing what the figures may have been thinking and feeling giving the reader a look into the mind of a Macedonian far from home on campaign in asia. Describing battle scenes he make the reader feel the battle describing pain, fear, anger, and more. Rather than a dry and clinical text book approach to the history of Alexander he gives a more visceral approach similar to a fantasy novel. He also avoids using esoteric and foreign language making the book easy, as well as enjoyable, to read while still accurately conveying the facts and possibilities of Alexander's campaign across Asia.
Life of Alexander the Great of Macedonia is one of the most remarkable Ancient Greece stories that prevail even in this present era. The ancient Greek sources clearly identify the life of Alexander as the one which broaden our understanding about the heroes of the Ancient times. Plutarch parallel lives are one of the sources that equip classical study and any other studies with necessary details of how Alexander manifested his life as an Ancient Greek hero. However the invention of motion pictures (cinema) had created another dimension in analysing Life of Alexander. Firstly Robert Rossen released a life of Alexander a nearly half century ago, which did not make much effort addition to what literature has far reached, and it was argued that his film consist some inaccuracies. Oliver Stone, a screenwriter also wrote a Life of Alexander (2004-2005) and it reached its hype as a cinematic presentation and it also depicts nearly accurate historical information about the life of Alexander the great. Oliver Stone’s Life of Alexander remains the controversial presentation when studying the Life of Alexander. This short essay will critically investigate how Stone went about constructing his ‘biopic’ of Alexander, including a consideration of which episodes were included as well as those which were excluded.
Alexander was a smart man and there was one main person to thank for that, his father. Philip II, knowing that someday his son would be a powerful figure arranged for none other than Aristotle to be Alexander’s tutor. Alexander grew to love his tutor almost as much as his father. Alexander’s favorite book was the Iliad by Homer, it was a story about some of the things he hoped to do when he got older, such as fight in wars. As a youth Alexander also enjoyed hunting and martial arts. Alexander feared that by the time he became king there would be nothing left for him to conquer.
In document E it states “Years that it took Alexander to build his empire-11 Years that Alexander’s empire held together after his death-10” Alexander the “great” doesn’t show any intelligence because he forgot to make a will with an heir for his empire leaving it confused and aggressive because no one knew who was going to rule. Many small government officials took pieces of land changing the laws and affecting the citizens in big ways. Ten years later the empire fell apart leaving people with many burdens. Alexander left his empire after he died in a big mess, hoping someone could help it. This was unsmart because even though death might not be expected, it is always important to create a will with as much at stake as there was in Alexander’s situation. In summary, Alexander was not smart because he wasn’t able to think ahead to help his empire stay strong.
Alexander the Great was a Macedonian Kind who lived between 356 and 323 BC and conquered many settlements during his lifetime including the entire Persian empire. He was extremely successful throughout his career. This success can be put down to his great military power and his persistence and determination. He was also a very brave, confident and capable man which allowed him to lead his army. The sources created at this time give the modern audience a better understanding of what Alexander was like and how these characteristics made him successful.
There are a plethora of historical figures in history, but some of these figures are more acknowledged and discussed about than others. One of these prominent historical figures include Alexander the III, also known as Alexander the Great. There is no question that Alexander is famous for his undefeated streak during his military campaigns. However, many historians are in constant debate over whether or not Alexander was truly a military leader that deserved to be a highly prominent figure in history. They dispute over whether or not he is entitled to his nick name of Alexander the Great. Some historians argue that Alexander’s constant victories on the battle field provide more than enough reason for Alexander to be deemed great. The opposing
Alexander was brought up admiring Homeric heroes, and was inspired by their emotional impulses. Alexander wanted to be seen as braver than brave, the mostly kingly of kings, and the greatest of all generals. Alexander wanted to identify with mythical and divine conquerors, such as Dionysus. Anaxarchus, a Greek philosopher whom accompanied Alexander at the school of Democritus, said that Alexander had better claims to be a god than Dionysus and Heracles, due to Alexander’s grand accomplishments. Alexander was inspired by Homer’s hero Achilles, and his aspiration for greatness – he even saw himself as a reincarnation of this Homeric hero. Alexander’s desire to explore west Egypt hailed from his mystical belief in his destiny, whereas others argue that it was an attempt to strengthen his position with his new subjects. Callisthenes – the official historian – said that it was due to Alexander’s “thirst for glory because he heard Hercules and Peruses had gone there before him” and he wanted to emulate these Homeric heroes. He was motivated by Homeric ideals such as personal achievement and glory, accomplished largely in warfare. Alexander’s siege of Aornus was carried out because Hercules had failed a similar attempt, and Arrian wrote that Alexander crossed the Gedrosian Desert because “no one else with an army had done so successfully” (Anab.
Jarus, Owen. "Alexander the Great: Facts, Biography, and Accomplishments." 27 September 2013. livescience. Document. 27 October 2013.
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
Alexander the Great was the founder of one of the biggest empires in the world as of today. Alexander III was born to Phillip II, king of Macedon, in the year 356 BC during the third year of Phillip’s reign. His mother, Olympias, was the princess of Epirus and Phillip’s fourth wife. He gained his kingship at the age of twenty years old during 336 BC when his father was assassinated by Pausanias, one of Phillip’s own gaurds.(Renault 10) Being the eldest son, he immediately took the throne and began his reign as one of the most well known conquerers in the world. His vast empire fell after his death in 323 BC almost instantly. There are three reason as to why it fell apart so quickly: His troops hated him, after his death there was a major problem
Alexander the Great was most likely the greatest leader ever. His tactics and reasoning are still studied all over the world even after 2,000 years ago. Being a teenager from a divorced family and forced to rule at such a young age intensely impacted Alexander’s Life. According to records, he was said to be a heavy drinker and because of his mother’s excessive praise, believed himself to be a god. His loyalty, ego, and ambitions are a few of his life struggles that are still scrutinized today.
In tradition of the epic, Alexander calls for the aide of an outside power. He doesn’t follow the rules completely, and replaces the muse with Chaos and Night, but does this only to enforce what he’s trying to do with his point and gives you a picture of where he’s going next. In epics, there’s always a battle or a scene that is brazenly described, adding drama, making it a little more important and draws the reader in. When Alexander Pope describes the room as the educators stand before the Goddess, and the scene where Dullness triumphs over everything that breathes life into human creativity, he makes it a point to describe each scene as a play-by-play battle in itself. An advocate of the empr...
In order to “earn his inheritance” (p. 343), Alexander plans to take over Asia. At this point, his friends are exiled and are not to be found. It is said that Alexandros would be the next in line if King Philip dies in battle. Arrabios denies Alexander’s worth when Alexandros sticks up for Alexander. Defending his mother, Alexander plans to kill Attalos in the battle of Asia. Alexander says, “She’s a wronged woman, it’s natural she should want revenge; though of course that’s what has set the King on getting her out of the kingdom before he leaves, and its done me harm enough” (p. 348). King Philip forces Kleopatra, Alexander’s sister, to marry their uncle, King Alexandros of Epirus. Olympias and King Philip divorce. During the wedding, King Philip is pronounced “Twelve Olympians, and divine Philip” (p. 357). Cries from the crowd say, “May the King live!” (p. 360). King Philip decides to enter the stadium without bodyguards. Philip says, “My people are guard enough. Let all these foreigners see it” (p. 361). The guard, Pausanias stabs King Philip in the stadium. Renault says, “He had been eight years in the Guard, and for five of them commanded it” (page 363). Pausanias then is killed by the other guardsmen. Finally, Alexander ascends the throne and Olympias is a proud
Greetings, and thank you all for being able to attend. Lets start out today by asking whom among us have yet to reach the age of 32? Among those raising your hand, has anyone lead a military campaign for over a decade and ruled over an empire. I myself personally have not, so don 't feel too discouraged, nevertheless, the reason behind my question was that Alexander III of Macedon or who is more commonly known as Alexander the Great, did just that back in 334 BCE. His ambitious drive to rule in the largest empire took shape at a young age and he continued his conquest up till the day he passed away.