Analysis Of Oliver Stone's 'Life Of Alexander'

1740 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: “Alexander the Great: Two Contrasting Views”

Life of Alexander the Great of Macedonia is one of the most remarkable Ancient Greece stories that prevail even in this present era. The ancient Greek sources clearly identify the life of Alexander as the one which broaden our understanding about the heroes of the Ancient times. Plutarch parallel lives are one of the sources that equip classical study and any other studies with necessary details of how Alexander manifested his life as an Ancient Greek hero. However the invention of motion pictures (cinema) had created another dimension in analysing Life of Alexander. Firstly Robert Rossen released a life of Alexander a nearly half century ago, which did not make much effort addition to what literature has far reached, and it was argued that his film consist some inaccuracies. Oliver Stone, a screenwriter also wrote a Life of Alexander (2004-2005) and it reached its hype as a cinematic presentation and it also depicts nearly accurate historical information about the life of Alexander the great. Oliver Stone’s Life of Alexander remains the controversial presentation when studying the Life of Alexander. This short essay will critically investigate how Stone went about constructing his ‘biopic’ of Alexander, including a consideration of which episodes were included as well as those which were excluded. The definition of biopic can lay an important background on what Oliver Stone’s Life of Alexander is really about. In media terms ‘biopic’ is a word from ‘biographic’ and ‘picture’. This entails that the life of a person drawn from literature is converted to a motion picture to entertain, inform or otherwise provide a cinematic study of that person. Oliver Stone’s life of Alexander biopic fulfil these aspects but the debates revolving a... ... middle of paper ... ... a large amount of information which was going to make a film boring and change it nature. Stone made Alexander biopic as a film not documentary. So his work should be viewed as a film with feature of other films not a literature review with voice over and too long information. To conclude the essay it can be stated that biopics as the media presentation are minimized by history or literature to enjoy the way in they represent what they ought to. It is also important to bear in mind that screen writers need to refer in history and sometimes scientific finding to create a concrete and well informing screenplay. Stone can be said as the hero on his own by trying to create wonderful play without accepting more criticism from both historical and media sides but he used his own conscience and struggled to find what will enable his biopic to reach the stage its on today.

Show More
Related

  • Elia Kazan vs. The House Un-American Activities Committee

    2308 Words  | 5 Pages

    This point is illustrated by the heated controversy surrounding the director’s Lifetime Achievement Award, which was presented to him at the 1999 Academy Awards. Kazan’s importance to the world of cinema is undisputed, but Hollywood remains divided by a single political affair that took place over half a century ago. The Academy Award was therefore protested by some and supported by others. But should Elia Kazan still be regarded with such contempt by his peers and contemporary members of the Hollywood community? Should his legacy be based on this one transgression, rather than his long history of cinematic achievement? And has Kazan already put the entire subject to rest in On the Waterfront, perhaps the best work of his entire career? I hope to answer these questions in an essay that will discuss the t...

    Read More

  • Fallacies In Oliver Stone's JFK

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    This 1991 film caught the attention of many as historians continually questioned its historical inaccuracies. When confronted about the numerous amount of fallacies in his film Stone responds, “This isn't history, this is movie-making," "I'm not setting out to make a documentary," (Elaine Dutka qtd. in Oliver Stone's 'JFK' under fire..,

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Selfish

    1711 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and

    Read More

  • Lion Movie Belonging

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    First of all, a biographical film, or biopic is a dramatized version of a specific event that has happened in someone’s life (“Biopics films” 1). These are a sub-genre of a larger category, in this case, drama. One of the first biographical film documented was a 1900 film named, Joan of Arc, directed by Georges Méliès,

    Read More

  • V For Vendetta Movie Vs Book

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this day in age, it is very common to find films adapted from books. Many of those films do a very well in their adaptations, but some fall short. Since it was finished, and even before its release date, the V for Vendetta film has gained some controversy from its own author. But, although the film did not end up how Alan Moore, the author, would have wanted it, he did not contribute to the project, even so, the filmography very clearly kept with the original work and showed itself as a product of the time.

    Read More

  • The Important Places Analysis

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    In one particular scene, director was truly a great one, featuring special focus on his dad life and the Colorado River. It was so cool to highlights of the movie by one of his favorite poem written by his dad when he was born, the Important Place. Also, this film was a good length, not excessively long but long enough to tell the story. This is really important today there were no such unwanted scene in the film, which literary the most closely and accurately delivered. In my opinion, this film is forced to possess the characters of a great aspect, and turns to make for quite the adventurous. There was no special character encounter rather than his dad, learned something from the secret Colorado River. Another great aspect of the film was the special footage that were introduce in this film was an enjoyable aspect to be a good documentary film, and that’s how this film is different from the rest.

    Read More

  • Love is Close at Hand: The Age of Innocence

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    November 1998, written for FILM 220: Aspects of Criticism. This is a 24-week course for second-year students, examining methods of critical analysis, interpretation and evaluation. The final assignment was simply to write a 1000-word critical essay on a film seen in class during the final six-weeks of the course. Students were expected to draw on concepts they had studied over the length of the course.

    Read More

  • To Live: A Comparison of Themes and Symbolism in Zhang and Hua

    1638 Words  | 4 Pages

    This part is divided into two sub-topics. The first sub-topic offers a summary of the book and contains spoilers. The second sub-topic summarizes the film. Both summaries incorporate key events in both form...

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...

    Read More

  • Bill Nichols Chapter 1 Summary

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. The filmmaker was a hero who travelled far and wide to reveal hidden corners and remarkable occurrences that were part of our reality.

    Read More

  • Victory At Avalon Character Analysis

    512 Words  | 2 Pages

    Films are necessary in our time period because the human eye can articulate the message intended through sight allowing visual imagination to occur. In the book, world 2 by Max Brooks, he creates a character by the name Roy Elliot who was a former movie director. Roy Elliot manages to make a movie titled “Victory at Avalon: The Battle of the Five Colleges” and some how it goes viral. Similarly, Frank Capra’s film, “Why we Fight” expresses a sense of understanding the meaning of wars. Films do not inevitably portray truth because they display what the film director views as important and beneficial for people to know.

    Read More

  • Dividing The Spoils Book Review

    455 Words  | 1 Pages

    This historical record begins with the confusion around Alexander’s death. Rumors began about how he died and there was claims of assassination. There was no rightful heir, since both of Alexander’s children, Hercules and Alexander IV, were not full-blooded Macedonians. Perdiccas was

    Read More

  • Roger Ebert: Chicago Sun-Times By Siskel

    1454 Words  | 3 Pages

    This really gave an insight to what movie critics go through mentally when they are evaluating a movie. Some say that this helped movie producers get an inside edge on what they “should” produce for the audience and for the critics themselves. This changed the game for most producers, but his real impact was on the television screen.

    Read More

  • A Postmodern Take on a Hollywood Film Classic

    2878 Words  | 6 Pages

    Each chapter invents its own reality, a reality of the screen, of the movies, that is brought into closer contact by means of a literary text. The book as a whole, then, glorifies in the postmodern tradition multiple interpretations of reality. Movies themselves present alternative realities or interpretations of perceived realities, most often differing from our own individual constructions. Thus, by offering ...

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between Robert Wise And Snowden

    2047 Words  | 5 Pages

    This paper will compare directors Robert Wise and Oliver Stone, their styles, techniques, and overall message. Although both directors made films in different era’s, they both prompted the world to make a social and/or political change on some current issues of their time. Robert Wise’s production of West Side Story prompts audiences to leave racial prejudices behind, and Oliver Stone’s drama thriller Snowden prompts his audience to question their government, and decide if security is more important than freedom. Both directors use the technologies of their time to produce a compelling film that audiences would not only find entertaining but would prompt thought and self-reflection.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Oliver Stone's 'Life Of Alexander'

Open Document