Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legacy of Alexander the great
The life and times of Alexander the great
Legacy of Alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legacy of Alexander the great
1.What kind of society was the kingdom of Macedonia before Alexander? Do you think the differences of Macedonian social and political organization from those found in the Greek world were a factor in the successes of Philip II, Alexander III and the Successors?
Within the limited space here, this essay mainly focuses on two the main factors contribute to the successes of Philip II, Alexander III and the Successors notably, the foundations laid by Philip and the social and political differences between city-states of Greece and the kingdom of Macedonia. Before Alexander III, Macedonia was already ruled by a monarchy and the kingdom of Macedonia was already in the midst of great change. The kingdom of Macedonia stems from the ancient Brygian
…show more content…
Before Alexander III, Macedonia was already in the midst of great change. Philip II who managed to unify his country and then, by 339 BCE, had gained domination over all Greece by military and diplomatic means, thus laying the foundations for its expansion under his son Alexander III the Great. When Philip II was born in 382, Macedonia was not a very strong power. After Philip II sought internal peace in his state, Macedonia had witnessed considerable changes in diplomacy, bribery, and military action to make the states of Greece affirm his superiority. In order to defeat his neighbor countries, Alexander’s father king Philip II, developed the kingdom’s economy, politics and army, cooperated with martial alliances, giving him a united Hellenic League finally. It is worthy to point out that the army of the Kingdom of Macedonia at that time was among the greatest military forces of the ancient world. Philip II of Macedonia developed this formidable army in the initial stage after he reorganized the Macedonian army. The king was expected to demonstrate his ability in these activities to show he was a Macedonian man's man capable of heading the state. The pursuit of invasion do not change over the course of Macedonian monarchy, because they would never be satisfied with any of the acquisitions had made. Furthermore, for Macedonian aristocrats like Alexander, they pursuit conquest through military action. In a word, Philip II of Macedonia has forged a powerful state which had a profound effect for the following generations. Philip II laid a solid foundation for the career of Alexander, giving him a united Hellenic
Alexander adopted Persian governing practices, but he had little use for Persian culture. According to his Greek biographer Plutarch, he considered himself "a governor from God and a reconciler of the world." He hoped that Greek culture would, through his actions, permeate all of Asia, inspiring its peoples to pursue virtue, excellence, and truth. This heroic idealism blended with practicality in his plan to develop the Tigris, Euphrates, and Indus rivers as commercial waterways linking all of Asia These undertakings promised to be long and difficult, however, and Alexander was an impatient man. His soldiers' unwillingness to proceed past the Indus was a great disappointment to him, for which he compensated by throwing his own festivals and celebrations. Alexander showed early leadership qualities. When King Phillip invaded Thrace, he left Alexander in charge of Macedonia at the age of 16. During his father's absence, one of the Thracian tribes, the Maedi, rebelled. Alexander was able to mobilize an army and put down the rebellion. In 336 B.C, Alexander's father was assassinated, putting Alexander on the throne at the age of 20. Shortly after this, Alexander left Macedonia with his armies to put down rebellions in the countries of Illyria, Thrace and Greece, all of which had previously been conquered by King Phillip. Alexander then moved his armies into Asia Minor and began to conquer the peoples there. Among the countries conquered by Alexander were Syria, Phoenicia and
The son of Philip II, Alexander the Great, will become the conqueror of the western world. Alexander received the Macedonian empire when his father passed, he was only twenty at the time. As soon as he had the power of the Macedonian army, several lightning fast campaigns led them into the west and north. Next, he compelled the city-states that rebelled against the League of Corinth. This action demonstrated how Alexander punished disloyalty [Martin 244]. Alexander was able to keep his rule on the territories he conquered by rewarded the cities who recognized his powers and punished the individuals that betrayed his trust or ambitions. The power he possessed depended on his superior force and his unwillingly desire to use it [Martin 245]. The
Bury, J. B.; Russell Meiggs (2000). A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great
Alexander the Great was the son of Philip Macedonia. Alexander the Great was a big admirer of Greek culture during his time. During Alexander the Great time in history he spread the Greek culture through the Middle East and North Africa. Alexander the Great past away at an early age and after his death the Greeks took over the Romans.
The Macedonian army, under the rule of Alexander the Great, was the most successful army around at that time. Alexander’s father, King Philip the 2nd was the first ruler of Macedonia. At first, Macedonia played no role in Greek history. It was just a tiny
Alexander the Great is undoubtedly one of the most famous leaders and Kings in our history. This one man miraculously led his armies into countless battles and created an empire nearly as large as the Roman Empire. Men and women all over the world have clearly heard of the amazing things that Alexander accomplished in his times; however, the question of whether his deeds were heroic or villainous still remains. To answer this question, Alexander the Great was unmistakably a villain.
The Hellenistic culture was founded from the Hellenic culture. The Hellenic culture was born with Philip of Macedon. Philip of Macedon was a king in Macedonia at the beginning of the fourth century. Philip was known for his great organizational skills and his prowess in battle as a warrior. Philip had a dream of making an empire and surpassing everyone’s expectations he succeeded. It took seven years for Philip to unite the once Greek city-states into a unit, but once he gained control of them he had a battle tested army. Philip of Macedon led his army into Asia Minor and defeated the Persian army. The defeat of the Persian army brought the collapse of the Persian Empire which was unimaginable because at the time Persia ruled the world. Unfortunately, as Philip turned to conquer the rest of the world he died. Luckily he left behind a son.
Alexander’s first battle came when he was only sixteen. Philip, his father had gone away on a campaign and left Macedonia u...
Macedonia.org, History of. Alexander the Great Alexander of Macedon biography: King of Macedonia and Conqueror of Persian Empire. 2001-2013. Document. 11 October 2013.
Morris, Ian. Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Print.
Duiker, William J, and Jackson J Spielvogel. "The Rise of Macedonia and the Conquests of Alexander." World History. Ed. Nance Blaine, et al. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Clark Baxter and Suzanne Jeans, 2010. 117-126. Print.
Even though Alexander III of Macedonia, more commonly known as Alexander the Great, only lived to be 32 years old, his accomplishments were so vast it would be impossible to capture them all in a 3-hour Hollywood film. The well-known director, Oliver Stone, spent years studying Alexander and dreaming of making an epic film about his life. Stone's 2004 film, Alexander, was met with reviews that made it sound as if it was mediocre or disappointing, but the problem with it is that in the era of exciting action-driven Hollywood films, Alexander asks viewers to go deeper than they are accustomed. The length of the film was considered too long, but the history of Alexander is so huge that it is actually too short. Since Alexander lived more than 2300 years ago, and much of the information on Alexander's life has been lost over time, it seems to me that Alexander accurately depicts the historical era, Alexander's relationships, battle scenes and the different cultures involved in Alexander's conquests.
Philip II spend the earliest years of his reign working to expand Macedonia’s control over surrounding regions by securing the Paionians and Thracian border and dominating regions such as Amphipolis, the Illyrians and the Pydna. These conquests would have been an important part of Philip’s legitimizing of his rule, and it would have been equally as important for him to maintain these new territories. Since Philip had expanded further south, this placed his domain closer to the Hellenistic city-states. Therefore the numerous Social and Sacred wars created an instability that could threaten his territory. In particular The Third Sacred War could have been a threat to this, yet it also acted as an ideal opportunity for Philip to gain control within Greece and attempt creating Pan-Hellenic
Alexander the Great is deserving of his name in a sense of battle. Alexander is undeserving of this title in the sense of respect and kindness for his people and other city-states. Alexander was not shy when it came down to war, he was ready to go whenever even if his military was not or did not agree with him.
One monarchy, which is characterized by the rule of one person, in ancient Greece was Macedonia. This region was