More handpicked essays just for you.
Professionalism and teaching and learning
The concept of professionalism
Professionalism and teaching and learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Professionalism and teaching and learning
In this case the student Al-Dabagh wanted to sue the University because they refused to give him his degree. Al-Dabagh was a good student on paper but he was accused of sexual harassment towards his classmates. The university decided that this guy could not receive a degree from them because he did not follow the schools core competencies. The Circuit judge decided that the university was not giving Al-Dabagh his diploma only based on lack of professionalism and that the student could of misinterpreted what that meant. The judge was in favor of Case Western Reserve University to give the student his degree. That decision was appealed by the U.S court of appeals. The Court of appeals decided that the university had a very direct code of conduct
Ward’s request unethical and Mrs. Ward’s unwillingness to change her position necessitated an informal review. That review included the academic supervisor along with the practicum supervisor and the student. Offered to the student were three options: complete a remediation plan, resign from the Counseling program, or request a university formal review. The university’s Formal Review Committee consisting of one student and two professors, all from the Counseling Department and one professor from the Education Leadership Department, determined she violated the university’s code of ethics and therefore was dismissed her from the Counseling Program. The dismissal led to the first court case, Ward v. Willbanks. The trial court ruled in favor of Eastern Michigan University (EMU) through summary judgment. Mrs. Ward appealed the case to the state appellate court, who reversed the decision and returned the case to the lower court for adjudication. Judicial adjudication was avoided, however, as the university settled with Mrs. Ward with a monetary payment and the removal of the expulsion from her
Since Southeastern Community College receive federal funds, Davis filed suit in North Carolina Federal District Court, alleging her dismissal was a violation of 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Rehabilitation act of 1973 acts to protect discrimination agents students or employees "otherwise qualified handicapped individual solely by reason of his handicap.” In addition the act states that “no otherwise qualified individual with a disability . . . Shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any
The federal court rejected dismissed Franklin’s case, because Title IX did not allow for monetary relief, The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the court’s
The school appealed this decision and brought it to the Supreme Court to argue their case on October 12th 1977. The Supreme Court upheld the California Supreme Court's decision with a 5-4 vote. The Court also ruled that the special-admissions program constituted reverse discrimination and was therefore illegal. The Court also said that schools could continue to look at race as a factor when accepting applicants, but they could not set up a quota system or look at race as the only deciding factor.
Board of Education (1954). In the Constitution it?s found in the 14th Amendment, Equal Protection Clause, which prohibits any state from denying equal rights to any person and equal protection of the laws. In a 5-4 decision, delivered by Justice Sandra Day O?Conner they argued that under Title IX Jackson had the right to pursue his case in court (Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2015c). The majority was lead to believe and ruled that it was intentional retaliation of the Birmingham Board of Education to fire Jackson from his position in the school (Mahon, 2015). Concurring opinion was stated by O?Connor and the dissenting opinions were stated by Thomas (Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education,
Many Supreme Court cases in the United States have reassured its citizens’ rights. One of those cases was that of the 1965 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case. This case was about five students who were suspended from school for wearing black armbands. Should the students have been suspended? The Tinker v. Des Moines case was a very controversial Supreme Court case in which the right to freedom of speech and expression for students in public schools was violated.
The court case Cleveland Board of Education V. LaFleur challenged the maternity policy regarding teachers having to go on unpaid leave involuntarily for 4-5 months due to their pregnancy. Jo Carol LaFleur and Ana Elizabeth Nelson whom were both teachers working under the Cleveland Board of Education when these issues occurred that lead to their decision of filing a suit against the board. They mainly hoped to be able to still continue their teaching well after the 5 month mark that the policy required them to leave. Failure to comply with these rules would have lead to their dismissal of their position or re-employment is not guaranteed. The Supreme Court ruled that the Cleveland Board of Education policy violated and went against the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. This case was very significant in which it preserved the rights of teachers, especially women.
Bennett, A., & Brower, A. (2001). ’THAT’S NOT WHAT FERPA SAYS!’: THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT GIVES DANGEROUS BREADTH TO FERPA IN ITS CONFUSING AND CONTRADICTORY FALVO V. OWASSO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DECISION. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, 2, 327.
The court case of Edgewood ISD et al. v. Kirby et al., was a landmark court case that disputed the equality of Texas’ finance policy for public schools’ districts. Landmark court cases involve public rights and liberties which, the Texas Supreme Court decides whether an existing government law is constitutional. The outcome of the Texas Supreme Court ruling on landmark cases effects the lifestyle for all Texas citizens. In Edgewood ISD et al. v. Kirby et al., the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Funds organization (MALDEF) represented the lower-class people. (MALDEF) sued William Kirby, the commissioner of education, for unequal treatment towards lower income school districts. The organization claimed Kirby’s
In Goss v. Lopez, a student sued because an Ohio law allowed a school principal to suspend a student for 10 days or more with only a simple 24-hour notice to parents. The court ruled that this was a violation of a student’s 14th amendment due process clause rights because students were not given a due process hearing. In Dixon v. Alabama, a federal appellate court affirmed same standard in higher education by maintaining that a public college or university cannot expel a student without a hearing.
In Woodlock v. Orange, the school counselor, known as N.W., was advocating for systemic change on behalf of her special education students. This was well within the code of ethics. N.W. was repeatedly expressing her concerns to the administrative intern and principal. Her primary concern was a lack of certified gym and art instructors, which violated state special education mandates and the children’s IEPs. She raised other safety concerns to the administration with little to no response. She began to document all of her interactions with the administration, leading to a written reprimand issued to her by the principal. This reprimand stated that N.W. was “taking it upon yourself t...
For example, the Plessy v. Ferguson case, “equal but separate” brought up to the courts because of the railroad cars; they would still be separated by color but provided the same essential elements. People need to be aware of the educational rights so that they will not take them for granted to appreciate the struggles that came along with it. An example is the Little Rock Nine, integration was approved and nine black students were to attend an all-white school in Little Rock, Ark. they were blocked from entering the school by the Ark. Governor at the time; President Eisenhower sent National Guard troops to intervene the integration but a federal judge granted injunction against
The Persian painter Kamal al-Din Bihzad was known as "the wonder of the age" (Roxburgh, Persian 179). Not much known about his life, but still Bizhad is considered one of the two greatest Persian painters of all time, second only to the legndary Mani (Bahari 16). He was called by court chroniclers of the Safavids, Ottomans, and Mughals the "Unique One of the Age" or "Master of the Age." These kinds of titles were not something royal writers of the three greatest powers of sixteenth-century Islamic Asia bestowed lightly. (Barry133) Why is Bihzad so highly praised? What properties of his work make his paintings so appealing? What characteristics of his style and techniques raise Bihzad above all other Persian painters?
In class, we read the official Supreme Court documents associated with the case Gratz v. Bollinger, including the consenting and dissenting opinions of the court. The case explores the role of Affirmative Action in college admission at the University of Michigan. Essentially, the University of Michigan was awarding a certain number of points to each applicant to their school. During their admissions processes, they would add a certain amount of points to an applicant if the applicant was from an underrepresented ethnic group. The Center for Individual Rights contacted two white students who had been denied from the college and brought their case to court, where they sued the University for racial discrimination. Ultimately, because of a technicality, the plaintiff lacked standing.
A major controversy in the Islamic philosophy in its early centuries regarded the condition of the universe as either created or eternal. Aristotle had claimed that the universe should be considered as eternal, because for him time and motion are functions of each other, and before the creation of the universe there was motion, because motion needs a universe to occur. Because there is no motion/movement, time does not exists, and thus no time where the universe was created, furthermore, on Neoplatonic progress of such a theory, the course of creation appears eternal itself, since the universe exists due to the continuous discharge from the greatest degrees of reality down to the universe, and does not make any sense for one to ask when the process began. This paper will analyze Al-Ghazali’s argument on the eternity of the world, as found in his first areas of debate with philosophers and evaluated against Ibn Rushd’s answers, as well as present a personal view on the most proficient argument.