Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender roles in crime and punishment
Gender differences in crime essay
Effects of youth among crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender roles in crime and punishment
In regards to crime commission, there is one question that is often asked; Is the commission crime an adult phenomenon? The answer may not be so simple. For example, for those people whom are very technical argue that children (juveniles; people under age 18) do not commit crimes, they commit status offenses and delinquencies. However, there are occasions, when serious offenses are committed, when a juvenile is charged with a crime and tried as an adult. For the sake of argument, commission of delinquencies will be equated to the commission of crimes. Steffensmeier and Streifel, quoting Parmelee, Quetelet Sutherland and Cressey, state that “involvement in crime diminishes with age,” therefore, the older someone gets, the less likely there are to commit a crime (1991, pg. 869).
As argued many times, age is a factor in the commission of crime; however, does age and gender affect each other? According to Steffensmeier and Streifel (1991) there have been several arguments in regards to age, gender and crime. For example, some writers believe there is no difference between genders in different age groups, while others argue that there is a difference (Steffensmeier and Streifel, 1991, p. 869). “Bullying is a component of an antisocial, rule-breaking pattern of behavior” and is very “popular” amongst children, however, is it an indicator of adult crime (Sourander, Brunstein Klomek, Kumpulainen, Puustjärvi, Elonheimo, Ristkari, Tamminen, Moilanen, Piha, and Ronning, 2011, p. 1212)? Sourander, et al., also state that “studies have found a strong and consistent relationship between bullying and involvement in violent behaviors” (2011, p. 1212). The results of a study of 5,351 children included frequent bullies (9% of the sample were mal...
... middle of paper ...
... & Dhami, M. K. (2010). Effects of Offenders' Age and Health on Sentencing Decisions. Journal Of Social Psychology, 150(1), 77-97.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). CRIME AND DEVIANCE IN THE LIFE COURSE. Annual Review Of Sociology, 18(1), 63-84.
Semple, J. K., & Woody, W. (2011). Juveniles Tried as Adults: The Age of The Juvenile Matters. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 301-308.
Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Kumpulainen, K., Puustjärvi, A., Elonheimo, H., Ristkari, T., Tamminen, T., Moilanen, I., Piha, J., & Ronning, J. (2011). Bullying at age eight and criminality in adulthood: findings from the Finnish Nationwide 1981 Birth Cohort Study. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 46(12), 1211-1219.
Steffensmeier, D., & Streifel, C. (1991). Age, Gender, and Crime Across Three Historical Periods: 1935, 1960, and 1985. Social Forces, 69(3), 209-234.
Pyne, Derek. "When is it efficient to treat juveniles more leniently than adult offenders." Economic Government. Springer-Verlag, 20 July 2010.
As Laub and Sampson (2003) analyze crime over the life course, they highlight Terrie Moffitt’s theory and discuss the limitations of her developmental explanation. In Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, she acknowledges two categories of offenders...
Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1990). Crime and Deviance over the Life course: the salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55(5), 609-627.
Although the years since Smart’s study have seen much more interest in the study of female crime and deviance, many general theories in this area continue to neglect gender as a factor influencing criminality. This is despite the fact that official figures suggest that gender is perhaps the most significant single factor in whether an individual is convicted of crime. Any theories which fail to explain this relationship could therefore be seen as inadequate. OFFICIAL STATISTICS, CRIMINALITY AND GENDER Pollak – the ‘masked’ female offender – ‘chivalry’ thesis Writing in 1950, Otto pollak argued that official statistics on gender and crime were highly misleading.
Society offers different factors, like peer pressure or poor grades, which steer an individual to commit a crime (Einstadter, Werner and Stuart 2006). Indeed, there is an abundant relation between childhood experience of violence and unruly behavior and their adulthood behavior. This is a product of a social progress, where children become victims or eyewitnesses of certain criminal acts. Through social progress, some traits, which were not learned before, are recognized and slowly displayed, especially among children. For instance, children brought up in violence, either by being victims or eye witnesses of criminal acts, will display such behavior in their adulthood (Woolf, 2006). Therefore, people will commit different crimes depending in the environment in which they were
Although a juvenile has committed an adult crime which is punishable according to state or federal law, and must accept their role in the crime, it is not advantageous that they be sentenced to adult prison. This considers among other factors, safety in relation to mental, physical and emotional differences between a child and adult.
Several studies conducted to determine impacts of transfers of cases from juvenile courts to adult criminal courts for trial and potential sentencing indicate higher recidivism rates among the offenders. This is because of the notion the youth possess on the strictness on the adult courts. They believe trials on these courts end up in harsh punishment for offenders. In a way, adult punishments scare youth away from committing major crimes. However, studies show that short term punishments imposed on young offenders in adult courts propagates the offenders to commit even more crimes that are serious after their sentence terminates. This results from interactions with other crimes bearer behind bars who are convicted for far much worse crimes than they are. In addition the young offenders continued to commit crimes at a higher rate and more often than earlier on (Shari, page 1).
Farrington, David P. "Age and Crime." Crime and Justice 7 (1986): 189. JSTOR. Web. 11
Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult. Those who commit capitol crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Age should not be a factor in the case of serious crimes. Many people claim that the child did not know any better, or that he was brought up with the conception that this behavior is acceptable. Although there is some truth to these allegations, the reality of this social issue is far more complex. Therefore we ask the question, "Should childhood offenders of capitols crimes be treated as adults?"
References Glick, B. (1998) No Time to Play: Youthful Offenders in Adult Correctional Systems. American Correctional Association Wilkerson, I (1996) “Death Sentence at Sixteen Rekindles Debate on Justice for Juveniles.” New York Times, November Butts, J.A. and Snyder, H. (1997) “The Youngest Delinquents: Offenders Under the Age of 15,” Juvenile Justice Bulletin (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice) Lefevre, P.S., “Professor Grapples with Execution of Juveniles.” National Catholic Reporter Snyder, A. “Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders” (1997) National Center for Juvenile Justice
The United States has been affected by a number of crimes committed by juveniles. The juvenile crime rate has been increasing in recent years. Everyday more juveniles commit crimes for various reasons. They act as adults when they are not officially adults. There is a discussion about how juveniles should be punished if they commit heinous crimes. While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such.
According to Donna M. Bishop( 2003) of the University of Chicago criminal justice system “Transfer of juvenile defendants to criminal courts for adult prosecution has traditionally been justified on the grounds that the juvenile court is ill equipped to handle two classes of offenders. In cases of seriously violent crimes, the public has historically demanded heavy penalties that exceed the authority of the juvenile court (Tanenhaus, forthcoming). While commission of a repugnant act neither transforms a young o...
Kendall, D.E (2014). Deviance and Crime. Sociology in our times: the essentials (9th ed., pp. ).
Crime and criminalization can be ambiguous; crime is only crime until certain authorities deem the actions illegal. However, social inequalities can lead to increased crime rates, notions such as gender, age, race, and class influence crime and provide criminologist with the date to determine who is most likely to commit a crime and where.
Wright, J. P., Tibbetts, S. G., & Daigle, L. E. (2008). Criminals in the making: criminality across