Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of task oriented leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of task oriented leadership
First, there are many advantages as well as disadvantages in the relationship- oriented leader and the task-oriented leader. Both types of leaders can be effective with the right teams of people and the right atmosphere. All businesses are looking for that right person to be productive, self-motivated, and driven to get the job completed. There will never be two people who do the job the same way. However, the better you are at getting the job completed in a timely matter the better off you will be in your standings at your place of employment.
A task-oriented leader is someone that can focus on a number of tasks while focusing on the things necessary to achieve as well as complete the task. They are not concerned with the people at the place
They want to help others get things completed, solved, and work things out with everyone. This is why many people prefer working with them because they honestly care about others and their feelings. The con on being a relationship – oriented leader is “the negatives of task-oriented leadership are that it can lead to a lack of employee autonomy and creativity, which can result in low morale in the office. When an employee has to work under very strict deadlines and excessive task orientation, it can bring the company culture down. Employees who are self-motivated tend to rebel in this type of environment. The lack of creativity under excessively task-oriented management can have a negative effect on a company’s products as well, since it tends to deaden innovation. When a manager is too task-oriented, the cons can sometimes outweigh the positives.” Many people seem to want to work well with others in the
Deadlines are critical, and social interaction should not get in the way of work completion. The relational leader usually puts interaction and group harmony above deadlines or efficiency. While work must be completed, he is more likely to set aside a group activity time or team-building exercises.” This may be accepted my many people, but most prefer not to be s stressed out and pushed to their maximum limits daily. People like to have a schedule and know their deadlines and not be surprised with last minute
Another difference between these two leaderships is self-development. Self-development is a continuous process, and most leaders consider it being a key to successful leadership.
Leaders are actively on targeting goals and objectives for the people who work for them. In management, many goals are established by staffs and carried out by the managers themselves. Leaders will act to develop in more creative ways solve the problems; keep on going and with new missions. Managers will continue to do whatever is necessary work to accomplish the tasks and usually to get the job done without taking on too much risk or moving forward. The leader's instinct is to take risks instead and to challenge that task holding back by people and think of new ideas within an organization. Leaders more concerned on relationship between staffs, they promote the good staff, help them to develop, and move forward. Managers assign people, focus on personnel issues; and focus on how the job task get done, how they solve it, and how are they finished. (Rashid A., A., 2007).
...ram, I have also learned that it takes a combination of leadership styles and taking scenarios case by case to perform as an effective leader. My preferences would be a combination of transformational and transactional leadership. Since I work in processing, the transactional part of my leadership will have to be there, but I would strive to add leading with integrity, a shared vision, and being humble among staff members. I hold myself accountable just as I would with other team members. I understand that this approach will not always work, because situations will change and call for different types of leadership, but for the most part a combination of transactional and transformational leadership would be the most effective in the majority of situations at work.
Systematic research on leadership began in the early 1930s (House & Aditya, 1997). Researchers were interested in identifying leadership traits that might differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Despite of devoting so much effort to this area, only a few leader traits were found to be positively related to leadership effectiveness such as intelligence and Self-confidence.(Mann, 1959).After this leadership researchers turned their attention to leaders’ behavior. Two types of leadership behavior were identified in different studies (1) Initiating structure that includes task related behaviors such as organizing work, defining role responsibilities, and setting up work activities. (2) Consideration includes relationship oriented behaviors such as building trust, respect, and liking between leaders and followers. The University of Michigan group also identified two types of leadership behaviours. (1)Production orientation means that how much leader is concerned with achieving organizational goals and tasks and (2) employee orientation means that how much followers’ needs are important to leader (House & Aditya, 1997). (Song Heyi and Mao Na Guo Dan, 2007) inspect the relationship between the traits and the performance of the leader in different organizational cultures and found that in today’s dynamic world the negative traits are directly related to the performance, leaders play significant role in every organization. As the competition between the service oriented organizations is very high and continuous change is needed here and growth of these organizations where the only possibility to survive successfully is due to the effective and productive leadership. Leadership is process of social interaction where leaders try...
32). Ultimately, these leaders are able to tie together career aspirations with personal goals in addition to developing long-term plans in order to reach long-term goals (Money-Zine, 2016). Leaders who use this style provide feedback to their workers in addition to being experts on delegating assignments in order to finish tasks in a timely manner. Overall, leaders who use this style have a genuine interest in helping others succeed (Money-Zine, 2016). There are many benefits when using a coaching leadership style such as the positive workplace environment, employees know exactly what is expected of them, and the one-on-one style helps to develop individuals in order to improve their performance and to reach their goals. In terms of negative aspects of this style it not only takes time but it also takes patience in part by the leader. This style of leadership can also backfire if employees feel they are being “micromanaged” as this undermines their self confidence (Murray,
...r whole effort into it and they give above and beyond because they want the result to be good for results matter. The leader generates work that meet commitment and generate results that surpass and go above and beyond the normal requirement (Lord & Maher, 1991).
Based on Burns (1978) there are two types of basic leadership styles, transformational and transactional. Transactional leaders are in contact with an individual for an exchange that will occur between them while transformational leaders motivate and connect with their followers
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
The path-goal theory is derived from the expectancy theory and contains four types of leadership behaviors: directive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented (Whitener, 2007). Directive leaders provide clear task instructions, timeline for task completion, and standards of expectancy and how to accomplish the task (Northouse, 2010). Supportive leaders are friendly and approachable, treat followers as equals, and attempt to make the work pleasurable for the follower (Whitener, 2007). A participative leader shares decision making with followers and integrates their suggestions and feedback into the task goals (Northouse, 2010). Finally, achievement-oriented leaders challenge followers to achieve excellence by encouraging them to work at the highest level of achievement possible (Northouse, 2010).
In conclusion, transactional and transformational leadership can be merged or used individually depending on various circumstances. However, they are partially correlated. In order to make the best use and get the desirable results out of these principles, leaders should attain a deep understanding of each theory as they are dissimilar in conducting. Moreover, an appropriate balance should be considered if leaders aim to integrate them together. In my point of view, either stand alone or combination usage would benefit to any organizations if the application of leaders was taken in proper situations.
When a task is successful, however, task-motivated leader is comfortable with particulars and with checking routine events (Fiedler & Chemers, 1984). Leaders who have high LPC scores rate their least-preferred coworker relatively positive, describing that person as loyal, sincere, warm, and accepting; they are relationship motivated. Relationship motivation means that interpersonal relations are the main motivator for the person (Navanhandi,
This method implies that leaders and follower have combine motives that can be beneficial to both parties. When theses task are assigned, there is a designed reward or punishment for the followers. This method of leadership can also be associated with managing in a sense. Transactional leadership in a sense is like management in that it does not look to inspire or promote change, it is in fact more about ensuring a particular process, and procedure meets the desired results.
For example, if all the factors are high or low, a task-centered leader would be
I agree that both of these aspects are very important to being a successful leader, but I often find it difficult to have the right balance of both. I believe that I am more task-oriented than I am relationship-oriented. I like to achieve the best results possible and I like to set high standards for those that I am working with. When someone that I am working with is clearly upset or bothered, I will step in and try to resolve the issue. I do this so that we
By allowing for employees to be increasingly engaged in workplace activities, they are then given the opportunity to develop new skills. Most leaders also encourage for employees to participate in team building activities so that any employee would be more comfortable and have stronger chemistry when working with other members of their respective departments, and with other employees in the company as a whole. Leaders are capable of motivating their subordinates through a series of actions, such as words of encouragement, acts of appreciation, and allowing for employee involvement in key decision making processes in the company. For instance, leaders who appreciate, constantly encourage and assist in the improvement of the tasks performed by their subordinates will be able to build a strong and healthy employer-employee relationship. This good relationship instils the traits of confidence in employees and motivates them to enhance their performance. Excellent leaders commonly try to develop a dialogue or establish open communication with their subordinates. Employees who are well