Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and limitations of different teaching styles/methods
The importance of Grammar in Language Teaching
Strengths and limitations of different teaching styles/methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With that being said, there are many approaches that teachers are able to take to teach their students in ways that they are able to obtain full knowledge of the subject, referring to grammar. “One way in which we might integrate grammatical systems with the teaching of formulaic sequences would be to first explicitly teach language in chunks and then later look at these as exemplars of particular aspects of grammar. (Jones, page 321)” I agree with the part that teaching formulated sequences in an explicitly manner is one of the best approaches to teaching the subject of grammar. The explicitly teaching manner is where the teacher teaches the subject straight to the point. This teaching strategy allows for a clearer understanding of the knowledge …show more content…
There are many approaches in regards to the teaching of grammar and not all of them are successful. The different approaches do derive from the way that teachers are taught to teach the subject and the way that they believe the subject should be taught. Teachers feel that certain approaches work better than others based on the success that their students have in their classroom. However, not every teacher takes that into consideration because they teach the way that they feel is best. I think that the most effective approaches to teaching grammar are the explicitly teaching method, linguistic perspective and traditional teaching methods. Those methods have successful outcomes the majority of the time and they make sure that the students are learning what they actually need to learn. It is crucial to focus on making sure that the students are learning every aspect of grammar rather than pieces and parts because it will affect their application and understanding of grammar as a whole. The different methods that are brought up throughout the paper allows for a better understanding of the methods that have been widely used by teachers and the reasons as to why they used those particular
The first principle Professor Ellis talks about is, “instruction needs to ensure that learners develop a rich repertoire of formulaic expressions and a rule base competence.” Here is where Professor Ellis talked about the Natives who use larger number of formulaic expression more than SLA. He also went on to explain how rote learned materials were internaliz...
When a student learns a new concept, that information is stored in one of two ways - linguistically or non-linguistically. Traditional instructional methods present new concepts linguistically to students; in other words, by having them read and/or listen to the information they are expected to learn. In the student’s long-term memory, that information would be formed in a fashion similar to a sentence. On the other hand, Non-linguistic r...
Children were taught to speak in a proper manner and because they were taught to speak correctly they wrote in a proper way as well. As technology evolved and texting came more profound grammar was becoming a lost art. In Dana Goldstein’s article ,‘Why Kids Can’t Write’, she talks about what teachers are doing about grammar. The teachers are not doing much about the grammar issue in schools.
Today, many classrooms in America are “inclusion” classrooms which means, that students with and without disabilities can learn together in one classroom (Inclusive Classroom: Definition, Strategies & Environment). It is often argued in classroom settings in regards to is it beneficial or not. The answer to that is not black and white. There are many contributing factors that go into that answer, some of which include, the age and gender of the student, type of school the student attends, what type of disability the student has, how severe the disability is, and what the school has to offer. As to any partisan social issue, there are many pros and cons that are constantly argued. Many government leaders, school board members, school
In the article, “Current Developments in Research on the Teaching of Grammar” by Hossein Nassaji and Sandra Fotos two main issues had been discussed. The first one is whether grammar teaching make any differences to language learning where the questions raised are whether grammar should be taught or not. The second issue is what kinds of grammar teaching have been suggested to facilitate second language learning. If grammar should be taught, how much and should it be implicit or explicit grammar teaching? Lastly, the article discussed on the current approaches to grammar teaching in which formal instruction can be integrated with communicative activities which are processing instruction, interactional feedback, textual enhancement, task-based
The lesson is designed to give implicit exposure of grammatical features to the students. In some sections of the lesson (e.g. warming up activity and transi...
As we can see from the interview, her approach follows this kind of sequence: explaining the grammar rules, doing exercises, checking the answers and elaborating the grammar rules again when students encounter difficulties. In short, the grammar instruction has been preformed as the three Ps— present, practice, and produce (Larsen-Freeman, 2009). As Miss Wong’s students, they are expected to master them by understanding the grammar rules without considering the c...
I found three resources to help me improve my grammar. The first was the website www.writingprogram.uchicago.edu. It gave quick guides on grammar rules. One of the quick guides was “The Grammar Handbook,” which explained the rules for grammar. For example, I have trouble with clauses in sentences, so I read the advice the site gave me. It was helpful in a way, but I liked my next source better. It was www.Grammarbook.com which gives several different quizzes that can be taken to check and see how well ones grammar is. After taking a test one gets a better understanding of what was done wrong, to which it is then explained in a way to be very helpful. I tried several of the quizzes, one of which was titled “The Effective Writing Quiz” that had fifteen questions about proper use of grammar. I had trouble recognizing a dangling modifier; avoiding the use of there is, there are, it is, it was and so on; and using an active voice. Because of this, I will be able to recognize these problems in my future writing. The textbook “The Little Seagull Handbook” also helped me understand “wordy phrases.” I tend to get wordy in my writing and I am going to try not to do that anymore with the help of this book. The resources I used for my trouble with grammar were very helpful, and I hope it will show in my writing going
A large part of an English teacher’s job deals with helping students find their own voices amidst the many teachings of their parents and peers. A student’s voice can be their values, their interests, and their perspectives of the world in which they live. Their voice can be their critical questioning of the many situations they face, whether in a text, the school cafeteria, or a park after school. It is the job of an English teacher to aid in finding this voice through their writing. It is by putting words and thoughts down on paper that a student can sometimes feel comfortable enough to take risks and find their true voices. Although traditional grammar instruction has long been thought to improve this skill, this is no longer the case. Instead, by providing a classroom environment in which students are immersed in classic literature from many genres including poetry, short stories, and novels, students will learn how to harness grammar for their own purposes of finding their voice in their writing.
In this course I experienced an important change in my beliefs about teaching; I came to understand that there are many different theories and methods that can be tailored to suit the teacher and the needs of the student. The readings, especially those from Lyons, G., Ford, M., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2011), Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le Cornu, R. (2007), and Whitton, D., Barker, K., Nosworthy, M., Sinclair, C., Nanlohy, P. (2010), have helped me to understand this in particular. In composing my essay about teaching methods and other themes, my learning was solidified, my knowledge deepened by my research and my writing skills honed.
It is not uncommon to say that grammar instruction plays an important role in language teaching. Regarding the status and importance of grammar teaching, a variety of opinions have been made. Batstone (1994) states that “language without grammar would be chaotic: countless words without the indispensable guidelines for how they can be ordered and modified” (p. 4). More vividly, Wang (2010) makes two similes. She compares grammar to the frame of a house, which is a decisive factor to ensure the solidness of it. Additionally, she regards grammar as a walking stick, whose function is to help and support students to learn English. Thus, the nature of grammar instruction manifests its own significance as it helps students enhance their overall language proficiency by integrating grammar into other aspects of learning, like listening, speaking, reading and writing.
The place of grammar has beenalso a matter of debatealong the history of second language teaching. Thornburry(2001) believes that grammar debate is the most important issue that has taken the effort and time of the linguists and practitioners.Many attitudes have been revealed within this debate. Some argues that grammar is a main item in teaching English language. This attitude is shown in the Grammar Translation Method. However, some linguists assume that learners of English shouldn't learn grammar. And this attitude is shown in Natural Approach and the Communicative Language Teaching.
According to Teodorescu (2010), English for Specific Purposes (ESP) came into existence soon after the Second World War as there was a huge expansion of science, technology, and business all over the world and it became essential to have an international language for specialists. Later on, ESP became so popular that it is an important branch of English Language Teaching (ELT). Therefore, ESP which has the subcomponent like English for Science and Technology (EST) and it is further minimized to English for Engineering. Adriana Teodorescu (2010).
While languages do essentially have the same building blocks, the arrangement of words can range. Some languages begin with clauses by naming a subject such as a noun, which would make it the topic of the sentence. However, other languages begin clauses with words that name the action in a specific sentence (Freeman & Freeman, 2014). For example, English syntax is different from Spanish syntax. This means that confusion may result for students whose L1 is Spanish. For example, in English “red shirt” is used, but in Spanish, the phrase is inverted to “shirt red”. This may result in non-standard syntax when Spanish learners speak or write English. Another difficulty may be faced if a student does not understand that a structured sentence is needed. A student may not see the purpose of saying “I want to get a dog” when simply the words “want dog” would suffice. The problem with this is because syntax is a part of grammar, there is a set of internalized rules that people acquire (Freeman & Freeman, 2014). Within time, students will discover that a full sentence is needed instead of just two words. However, this is something that cannot be simply taught, as a student requires this throughout time and
Recently, linguists and professionals in education have shifted away from viewing grammar through a traditional lens and have focused their attention more on the functional use of grammar. Functional grammar does not view language as simply a set of rules; instead, it focuses on the way language is put together so that meaning is communicated for a specific purpose. It is concerned with how the various bits of language in a text work together to fit varying ranges of cultural and social contexts. Unlike the prescriptive, traditional approach, functional grammar is a meaning-based, descriptive approach.