Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is psychometric testing effective as part of the job selection process
Is psychometric testing effective as part of the job selection process
Factors that affect the usefulness of interviews
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction On this paper we are going to discuss the effectiveness of the interview as a method of selection. However we are also going to look at the problems facing the interviews, and also how we can improve them. They are so many types of interviews that the employers can use to interview people, for example screening interviews. These interviews are conducted in person, over the phone, or via video. Another example of an interview is one on one interview which involves face to face talking and also focuses on questions to assess the interviewee skills and knowledge. However there is also another type of an interview which is panel interview. These involve three or more people, or it’s more like group interview were they …show more content…
While Armstrong (2006) described an interview as a conversation with a purpose. He went ahead and explains it is a conversation because candidates are able to talk freely with their interviewers about themselves, their experience and their careers. We agree on both of them because interview is truly more like obtaining information from the interviewee, and it is involved in a conversation as Amstrong said in 2006. Advantages of interview Through the interview, both parties will have some advantages and they are as follows.
Interviews allow more focused discussions and follow up questions. Armstrong (2006) stated that interview is a conversation with a purpose. It is conversation because people get to interacting to each other; the interviewees might be talking about their experience, career objectives, their strength and weakness and the interviewers get to know if the competences match the job. However he also stated that interviews also provide a valuable opportunity for an exchange of information, which will enable both parties to make a
…show more content…
Organisations can use psychometric tests, they are designed to asses an individual’s reasoning abilities or to be able to check out their behavioural responses to a variety of situations. By testing a candidate in these areas, you can compare their score and the results can support their decision making process during recruitment. Organisations can also use application forms, whereby the form states the questions related to the requirement of the job i.e. questions on the skills and experiences required for the position. A lot of organisations tend to use application form as a method of selection; however they tend to use the same application form for many different positions rather than creating an application form which questions the skill, competencies and knowledge required for the advertised job. Organisation should always use different types of method of selection because it’s good they will able to obtain a lot of information from the candidate hence they will able to know him or her better. On the other hand they might get information that the organisation will be able to benefit from it and therefore they might
Discuss the differences between the terms interview and interrogation. Interviewing is talking to people, who are not suspects in a crime but who knows something and knows who is involved in the crime. Also getting their information, and asking questions to them, and knowing when to translate or interpret. The main people involved when getting information at a crime scene is the witnesses, criminal and the accuser (Orthman, Hess, 2013). Interrogation questioning of the suspects, once the suspect is known of their identity and where they reside the person who is the participant of the crime could make a statement, confession, refusal, corroborated with self-supporting documentation that could yield a guilty allegation or it could gather a determining guilt (Orthman, Hess, 2013).
Interviews are very popular among most individuals especially researchers and scholars as they attempt to obtain information and data from an interviewee. However, there are many factors that influence the interview and which determines its success or failure. Often, the interviewer takes charge of the situation, and they have the sole responsibility of asking the questions while the interviewee provides an explanation or an answer to the question asked. As a result, an interview can be defined as a consultation or a discussion in person through which information and data are exchanged regarding a particular phenomenon event with the intention of establishing the interviewee’s position. It is easy to tell the mood and success of the interview
There are several phases of the motivational interviewing known as: engaging, focusing, evoking, and planning. Each step builds upon one another and are viewed in a stair step sort of representation. The steps are completed in this manner in order to build a strong foundation (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).
The interview is one of the most critical parts to successful police work, there are many things to take into consideration before beginning an interview, such as preparation, barriers to communication, listening, verbal and non-verbal communication, proxemics, and the location. An interview is usually the first opportunity for the officers to gather facts and information about the occurrence. Throughout the analysis of the following interview between an elderly lady that was assaulted and an interviewing officer, I am going to demonstrate the interviewer’s strengths, weaknesses, the pros and cons of the interview, the seven steps of a successful interview, and some suggestions the interviewer can better from for future interviews.
I will explain these features as follows: the first one is the combining structure with flexibility is one of the key features of in-depth interview and the researcher will have some sense of the themes which they wish to discover and interviews will be normally based on some form of topic guide (or interview agenda) setting out the key topics and issues to be covered during the
The qualitative interview offers researcher an opportunity to convey a conversational situation to discover the participants’ personal experience from the interviewer’s perspective and expressed in their own words. According to Seidman (2006), the interviewing conversations conducted in a qualitative research are based on the interaction between the interviewers and interviewees thereby generating/collecting effective research data. Kvale (1996) also states that interview just reflects another form of social interaction that relies on interviewee’s personal status and characteristics. He suggests such personal elements are potentially to affect the generated data and data analysis. Hence, it is essential for the interviewers to structure purposive conversations that are able to guide the interviewees to answer the questions in depth from the expected perspectives.
...onal communicator is making the most of my preparation. By being as ready as I can with both intriguing questions and an extensive knowledge about the topic, I will be able to maximize the potential of my interview and get the greatest amount of information. During the interview, I can let the questions and conversation develop more. If I ask some general questions and have some powerful follow-up questions, I will be able to get in to deeper conversations about than I would have just by asking a general question and dragging on some points about it. All in all, this was a great experience for me as I got to learn a lot from my interview. I was able to un cover both my skills and weaknesses as an interviewer and build upon them for my next interview. Additionally, I gained some great connections that could further help me on my path to success sometime down the road.
Due to time restrictions, panel members were normally unable to meet in advance, so they build up their own self-sufficient interview questions. Although the principal chaired the interviews, they were rarely conceded out in an identical manner and there was no high level of uniformity with the questions. No official scoring system was used...
There are many aspects that make up a successful interview or interrogation. An investigator does not become a skilled interviewer or interrogator over night. Training and experience are vital to becoming skilled at interviewing and interrogation. Experience is the best teacher, conducting interviews and interrogations is the only way to become more skilled. In this paper I will explain all the aspects that make up a successful interview. I will also explain the difference between an interview and an interrogation.
According to Noe (2012), most experts believe that the most important human resource decision makes by a leader is deciding who to hire. Manager manages the recruitment and selection process. Selection for the best candidates for the job is very important in an organization because the performance always depends on employees, the recruiting and hiring is costly and the legal obligations like mismanaging hiring has legal consequence. The main aim of employee selection is to achieve person-job fit which is identifying the knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs), and competencies that are central to performing the job. The objective of effective selection is to decide who the right people are, by matching individual characteristics (ability, experience, and training) with the requirements of the job (DeRue & Morgeson, 2007; Kristof -Brown, Zimmermam, & Johnson, 2005). The manager will do checking for reliability and validity of the interviewer. In PPNJ Poultry & Meat Sdn Bhd, the people who manage the recruitment and selection process is the Human Resource department or staffs.
Unfortunately, the development of screening tools in the selection process is not valued enough in many companies. The main goal is the selection process is to hire the best candidate that fits the job duty and or culture of the company. It is extremely important companies make the right use of selection tolls and develop them effectively.
Psychometric tests are designed to measure the behaviour and capabilities of possible employees. (Johnstone, 1999). Employers use these tests to measure two categories of qualities – abilities and preferences (Mills et al., 2011). This provides an effective and efficient way to find the best person for the job as the tests give a true reflection of how an employee can accomplish assigned tasks which is completed online as part of the application process. Candidates are chosen for the next stage of the process through the comparison of test scores, resulting in grouping candidates into high and low percentile scoring categories. The higher scoring applicants are put through to the next stage of the process. This would normally be the interviewing stage. The lower scoring applicants would be declined. This is a form of filtering down the number of applicants, although the interviewing stage provides the means of selection, despite its subjectivity the tests provide a uniform set of standards to measure one candidate objectivity against another (Johnstone,1999). Psychometric
During the interview phase the content and purpose of the interview is covered and the gains are achieved. To improve the effectiveness of the exploration phase, several interviewing skills are implemented incl...
Therefore, being nervous is normal, but in order to have a good interview, the candidate must practice. The candidate could ask someone from his or her network to conduct an interview, but a person who has experience is preferable. Also, recording the interview will help to catch any possible mistakes, body language, tone
...n process is very important for an organization to hire new members, as employees need to select the right person to do the right job. Therefore, employees need to read through applicant’s document and qualifications, hence organize an interview to be more close with the applicant, to know more about the applicants, see if they are suitable for the job position. Selection process can help the employees not to make wrong decisions, this is a good opportunities to assess skills, aptitude and abilities. (John, 2007)