Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on adnan is innocent
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on adnan is innocent
Based on information provided by Sarah Koenig’s podcast, Serial, Hae Min Lee is killed by Adnan Syed, he yet says he didn’t murder her. Adnan is convicted of committing homicide, which he didn’t do, should not be in jail. This is for 3 main accounts; if something important happens a person remembers that day, Jay knew where Hae’s car was, and by how Sarah and her friend go by the day Jay described. First of all, if something monumental happens a person remembers the day it happened. In contrast, Adnan didn’t remember January 13. Yet, Jay remembers close to everything which points an arrow in his direction. However, Adnan says he didn’t ask Hae for a ride, but witnesses say he did. We can point that at Adnan for lying, but he may have failed
This reason makes sense because Asia and even a friend of hers claim that they saw and even spoke to Adnan that day and at that time Hae was murdered. This part of the story is when Asia found out Adna was arrested so she wrote him a letter explaining what she remembered about seeing him that day and time. This is from the letter “Im not sure if you remember talking to me in the library january 13’th,but I remember”. This means Adnan is innocent because he was not murdering Hae at the time he was at the library. Therefore Adnan is innocent because Asia’s letters prove that he was at the library at the time Hae was
In Episode 8 of Sarah Koenig’s podcast, Serial, Koenig claims that Jay isn’t a reliable enough source of information for the state to find Adnan guilty of the murder. She argues that there are too many inconsistencies in the story that he has told police over and over, and that there are too many problems in the story that the police use against Adnan.
In, episode 4 of Serial, Sarah Koenig tells the listeners that Jay showed the police where Hae's car was dumped after her murder. This is significant in determining that Jay was deeply involved in Hae's murder because up until that point, the police were not aware of the car's location. Another piece of evidence that Jay was involved in her murder was when Jenn, Jay’s friend, told the police that she helped him get rid of his clothing and drive him to where he ditched the shovels so he could clean them off. An innocent person doesn’t get rid of stuff that could be deemed evidence. An innocent person also doesn’t know where a dead girl’s car was
based on the story of one witness, Adnan’s friend Jay, who testified that he helped
Jay describes his active-involvement with Adnan in the crime. If Jay tells us the truth, he brings Adnan to school, holds onto Adnan’s cellphone and car so he could pick Adnan up when Adnan calls; picks Adnan up after he committed the murder, cruises around with Adnan, and brings Adnan to track practice. Additionally, Jay cruises around with Adnan in the afternoon, accompanies Adnan to LeakIn park and aids Adnan in digging the hole to bury Hae. Which criminal incriminates oneself? When Jay speaks about picking up Adnan he says: “I noticed that Hae wasn't with him. I parked next to him. He asked me to get out the car. I get out the car. He asks me, am I ready for this? And I say, ready for what? And he takes the keys. He opens the trunk. And all I can see is Hae's lips are all blue, and she's pretzeled up in the back of the trunk. And she's dead.” Jay goes to pick up Adnan from the actual murder and describes the episode in detail. Jay uses short sentences for dramatic effect, and speaks confidently, which is unusual when incriminating
There is no qualified proof that proves that Adnan killed hae. There is no DNA taste made in the rope and a bottle found near the
This then led to Adnan’s parents coming to the school and embarrassing him in front of everybody by yelling at him and dragging him out (Koenig, “The Breakup”). I’m not sure if Adnan was embarrassed, but I know I sure would’ve been. One other example, for this reason, is that Adnan was mad because he thought Hae moved on from him too quickly, like she didn’t even give him another chance for anything. Which is true, at least from what I think. Right after Hae had broken up with Adnan, she started to see this other guy from work, Don (Koenig, “The Breakup”).
In “The Ways We Lie,” by Stephanie Ericsson, she defines various types of lying and uses quotations at the beginning of each description as a rhetorical strategy. Throughout the reading she uses similar references or discussion points at the beginning and ending of each paragraph. Most believe lying is wrong, however, I believe lying is acceptable in some situations and not others when Stephanie Ericsson is asked, “how was your day.” In “The Ways We Lie,” she lies to protect her husband’s feelings, therefore, I think people lie because they are afraid of the consequences that come with telling the truth.
People face ethical dilemmas every day. But it is perhaps, most prevalent in the law enforcement profession. Law enforcement officers face ethical dilemmas constantly. Some of the ethical issues that police face each day are: racial profiling, officer discretion, police officer loyalty, police officer abuse, and interrogatory deception. This paper will discuss the purpose of interrogatory deception, ways in which it is used, some of the current debates over the practice, and a landmark ruling in the Miranda case of 1966 which attempted to cease the use of intimidation and coercion practices of the police.
Through out history people have been influenced by what they want to hear and the way a current trend is happening. The evolution of mankind has drifted towards a different society than what we where born to sustain. We are emotionally driven human beings that want to feel accepted by the rules of society. Sometimes an individual can confuse actions or emotions towards trying to fulfill the standards society has imposed. I have analyzed two articles that incorporate how a society reacts towards integrity as well as honesty and the belief that an individual in order to be a part of society one must comply with the standards that are set. As I began to interpret what Stephen L. Carter explained in “The Insufficiency of Honesty” I examined they
There were not enough evidence for Adnan to be accused for the murder of Hae min lee first of all what jay has said does not match up and most of all the timing Adnan had to have in order to actually kill Hae. He could have not killed Hae in such a short amount of time of 21 minutes. The evidence that could have helped a lot would’ve been a DNA test to have proof whether he was guilty or not, but since it was in 1999 they still did used DNA as an evidence. Jay has been constantly changing the story which makes it a little bit stranger of why would he keep on
Though there are some aspects to Adnan Syed that point to him being the murderer of Hae Min Lee, an immense amount of verification supports his innocence and refutes the evidence held against him, showing that he is innocent. There were many points to the story of the murder that showed Adnan to be guilty, but through Jay’s inconsistent story, the incorrect and impossible timeline and the alibis, Adnan’s innocence shines through. Jay’s story was very detailed and he did have a lot of evidence that suggest Adnan is guilty. He could prove a lot of things and had an overall long and vivid explanation of the whole day. However, he became more and more unreliable when he changed his story multiple times and switched up his facts. Also, he mixes
(a) Prosecutors have nearly limitless discretion in the most critical matters they must consider, yet they are held to very high ethical standards.
Asia says that she saw Adnan in the library that day, Adnan says he can’t remember where he was, Jay changes his story, Jen tells a different story from Jay, and it just keeps going. Adnan has no believable motive. The state says that Adnan hadn’t moved on from Hae and killed her out of pride. This is very hard to believe for several reasons. Adnan had moved on to Nisha and was calling her a lot since her number was saved as number one on his phone. Also, the window of time that Adnan had to pull off the murder was so slim and had no room for error. That means that he would have had to practice the route over and over again. Adnan would have had to be stewing with his emotions and hate toward Hae, but all of his friends never saw him as vindictive or angry leading up to Hae’s disappearance. The only evidence that he could be a psychopath who fooled everyone is the fact that he stole money when his was young from the mosque. People with antisocial personality disorder, more commonly psychopaths, do have trouble with the law when they are young. However, since it is an isolated incident and no one else in his life has described Adnan as violent or causing trouble, I highly doubt he is a psychopath. The motive just isn’t believable enough to convince me that Adnan could have planned and executed the
Everyday there is a new report of crime, a victim with whom we share similarities; it is a story that thrives on each of our deepest fears and puts us on the lookout for those who might make us the next victim. False media images and one’s ability to fear the unknown reinforce stereotype threats and cause people to feel threatened in safe environments simply due to the presence of a person of a different people group. It is illogical and even harmful to be anxious around people of different ages, races, or genders than yourself.