Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative effect of consumerism
Consumerism in the modern day
Consumerism in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The negative effect of consumerism
Adbusters Media Foundation:
An Active Space for Participation
We live in the age of consumerism; we are constantly surrounded by advertisements in our everyday environments. Through television, print, billboards, radio, the Internet and countless other mediums, it seems as though we cannot escape ads. We have become so accustomed to advertisements that most of the time we are unaware of the impact they can have on us. To help us become more aware of the effects of advertisements and consumerism, activist groups like Adbusters has helped bring more attention and awareness to how information and meaning gets generated and transmitted in our society today.
Adbusters is labeled as a media activist group, that is a non-profit organization that aims to change mainstream thinking by replacing these mainstream messages with alternative narratives through various communicative practices (The Canadian Press, 2011). Adbusters targets two main areas of resistance, capitalism and consumerism. It is dedicated to help us see the truth about our surroundings behind the shadows of advertisements and large corporations. Adbusters’ largest communicative medium is their magazine, Adbusters. Adbusters also challenges mainstream messages through a practice called culture jamming. By taking popular ads from the media Adbusters challenges corporations and mainstream media by interrupting the consumer experience by revealing the underlying message and meaning behind the ad. This essay will argue that through Adbusters’ communicative practices, like the use of technology, print media, culture jamming and campaigns, the media activist group is making a significant impact in moving people from spectators to actors by providing us with an alternative...
... middle of paper ...
...e in a world of advertising clutter: The case of adbusters. Psychology & Marketing: Wiley, 19(2), 127-148.
Sandlin, J. A. (2007). Popular culture, cultural resistance, and anticonsumption activism: An exploration of culture jamming as critical education. Wiley InterScience, 115, 73-82.
Sandlin, J. A., & Milam, J. L. (2008). “Mixing pop (culture) and politics”: Cultural resistance, culture jamming, and anti-consumption activism as critical public pedagogy. Wiley Periodicals Inc., 38(3), 323-350.
Sommer, J. (2012, December 22). The war against too much of everything. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/23/business/adbusters-war-against-too-much-of-everything.html?r=0
The Canadian Press. (2011, October 14). Adbusters founders cheer their occupy idea. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/adbusters-founders-cheer-their-occupy-idea-1.1063405
Advertisements are one of many things that Americans cannot get away from. Every American sees an average of 3,000 advertisements a day; whether it’s on the television, radio, while surfing the internet, or while driving around town. Advertisements try to get consumers to buy their products by getting their attention. Most advertisements don’t have anything to do with the product itself. Every company has a different way of getting the public’s attention, but every advertisement has the same goal - to sell the product. Every advertisement tries to appeal to the audience by using ethos, pathos, and logos, while also focusing on who their audience is and the purpose of the ad. An example of this is a Charmin commercial where there is a bear who gets excited when he gets to use the toilet paper because it is so soft.
... and others whom Levine treats are a different breed of reformers because they are concerned only indirectly with morality. But when Brown laments that today’s youth are intellectually wanting and have no connection with their cultural heritage, he uses bold phrases such as “junk food for the soul,” indicating that the erosion of appreciation for high culture is changing not only the common forms of entertainment but the character of today’s youth. Another parallel exists in Brown’s conception of culture and the Springhall’s reformers’ concept of morality as something that youth can access if they choose to break away from the evil influences of “mass” or “popular” culture – with the help, of course, of their moral or intellectual superiors, who long to inculcate their own (perhaps technologically or culturally outdated) ways of thinking into the next generation.
Adorno and Horkheimer (1975) used the expression ‘culture industry’ to describe the monopolisation of culture. “The entire practice of the culture industry transfers the profit motive naked onto cultural forms” (Adorno, 2001, P.99). Adorno and Horkheimer believed that Capitalism was mass-producing popular culture which was fuelling consumerist ideologies. It was demolishing the aesthetic values of art and art was no longer ‘arts for art’s sake’ and ‘purposelessness purposes’ prevailed (Held, 1980, P.93). Adorno (2001) argued that popular culture and art in capitalist societies were used for distraction and escapist purposes. The ‘Culture Industry’ was seen to assemble masses to participate in it’s ideology, which has profound social impacts. The monopolisation of culture exploits and manipulates mass population for social control and p...
In this essay I intend to explore what is meant by the terms popular culture and high culture. I will also look at how the relationship between these two terms has become distorted and blurred over time. In order to reinforce what I am saying about popular and high culture I will be using a range of examples from the music industry to show how the line between high culture and popular culture has become ambiguous. I will also call upon the work of John Storey to give my work an academic foundation. Although Storey is the main academic I will be looking at, I will also include references to a number of other academics who have written about popular culture and high culture.
Hollis, Nigel. "Why Good Advertising Works (Even When You Think It Doesn't)." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 31 Aug. 2011. Web. 02 Oct. 2014.
Cueva, Maya. "This Is Your Brain On Ads: An Internal 'Battle'" NPR. NPR, 14 June 2011. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
When Kalle Lasn and Bill Schmalz founded Adbusters, they thought long and hard of what Adbusters stood for and what they wanted their identity to be recognized as: “We [the Adbusters] are a global network of artists, activists, writers, pranksters, students, educators and entrepreneurs who want to advance the new social activist movement of the information age. Our aim is to topple existing power structures and forge a major shift in the way we will live in the 21st century.” (Adbusters.org) Essentially, Adbusters defines itself through two central ethical commitments. First, the ongoing protest against mass media/advertisements in society that inhibit our public sphere and brainwash consumers. The second is against the over spending consumers and corporations which together, have dramatically eaten up our natural resources and compromised our environment.
Adbusters has faced many challenges throughout its existence. Many of these challenges stem from the fact that they are a non profit organization, Kalle Lasn did a sit down with reporter Erin Middlewood discussing the financial woes of Adbusters: "We were losing circulation," says Kalle Lasn, Adbusters' co-founder, publisher, and editor-in-chief. "The Internet was eating into our sales. We were swimming in red ink," Lasn said. "I was having to borrow money to keep the place going. It felt like we were sort of fading." (Middlewood 32) As a organization that preaches for consumers to stop spending and save money, it proved hard for them to raise money and awareness at the time. They obtain funds by people subscribing to the magazine, donating
In the article “Commodity your Dissent” author Thomas Frank discusses the idea of counterculture and has a posture that counterculture along the years has made an impact not just on society, but on consumer society. Thomas explains that during the 1950s, the idea of counterculture started to spark with portraits of “correctness and sedate music, sexual repression, deference authority, Red Scares, and smiling white people standing politely in line to go to church” (Thomas Frank 164). Explaining that, it was the usual and only way to act for the America population at the time.
As Gore Vidal once said: “The genius of our ruling class is that it has kept a majority of the people from questioning the inequity of a system where most people drudge along, paying heavy taxes for which they get nothing in return” (Vidal, N/A). In our society, the ruling ideas are easily believed and taken as “true.” Advertisements sell ideas and lifestyles rather than objects; people consent to the ruling ideas which in turn make them less of an individual. Although we may live in a culture industry that controls what people believe is right or wrong, there is always a struggle for power. According to C. Wright Mills and Nina Eliasoph, in order to create a struggle and challenge the ruling ideas, developing a “sociological imagination” is crucial. The ruling ideas work by creating notions of our culture and giving one false needs which in turn help maintain the status quo.
The term ‘Popular Culture’ was developed by Adorno and Horkheimer who describe it as a form of cultural expression associated with the common ‘people.’ The term is contextual and is always evolving within social situations. Storey (1998, pp. 6) describes it as an “arena of consent and resistance…not a sphere where socialism, a socialist already fully formed – might be simply ‘expressed’. But it is one of the places socialism might be consituted.” Popular culture is something that produces meaning, and is symbolic with human nature. This includes how we live, what we like and why we like it. Danesi (2012, pp. 2) describes Popular Culture as a system for human beings that specify all forms expressive, intellectual, ritualistic and communicative
A balanced look at the arts and popular culture will quickly reveal that they are also sites of domination and oppression where citizens are misled and their interests distorted; where various undemocratic ends are pursued, often successfully; where the possibility of resistance is systematically erased; and where the notion of authenticity is hopelessly obfuscated. The arts and popular culture represent a terrain in which new spaces can be opened for political action. By cultivating the imagination, citizens can increase their capacity to understand that they share the world with others who are different from
Advertising." Current Issues: Macmillan Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2013.
Advertising has been defined as the most powerful, persuasive, and manipulative tool that firms have to control consumers all over the world. It is a form of communication that typically attempts to persuade potential customers to purchase or to consume more of a particular brand of product or service. Its impacts created on the society throughout the years has been amazing, especially in this technology age. Influencing people’s habits, creating false needs, distorting the values and priorities of our society with sexism and feminism, advertising has become a poison snake ready to hunt his prey. However, on the other hand, advertising has had a positive effect as a help of the economy and society.
“The average family is bombarded with 1,100 advertisements per day … people only remembered three or four of them”. Fiske’s uses an example of kids singing Razzmatazz a jingle for brand of tights at a woman in a mini skirt. This displayed to the reader that people are not mindless consumers; they modify the commodity for their use. He rejects that the audiences are helpless subjects of unconscious consumerism. In contrast to McDonald’s, Fiske’s quoted “they were using the ads for their own cheeky resistive subculture” he added. He believed that instead of being submissive they twisted the ad into their own take on popular culture (Fiske, 1989, p. 31)