Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theoretical framework dominos
Systems analysis and design
Literature review on training
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theoretical framework dominos
Accidents is defined as an unplanned and undesired circumstances resulting in injuries, fatalities and loss or damage of property or assets(safety.ILO, 2011). Accidents are much deeper and beyond the older clichés, accounting to bad luck or fate, almighty’s work or simply being at wrong place at wrong time. But, in todays scientific world it is neither perceived as fate nor as deity’s work but a social problem resulting from a chain of undesired events. Preventing accidents is very arduous task without knowledge of accident phenomenon and the study in the field of accident phenomenon has been very diverse but a basic question has always been raised as why does accident occur? Can there be some common pattern to it? To unravel these mysteries and predict and prevent accidents several theories and model has been postulated in the past and recent times with each having some explanatory and predictive values.
Some of the major theories are:
• Domino theory
• Human factor theory
• Accident/incident theory
• Epidemiological theory
• Systems theory
• Energy release theory
• Behavior theory
• Swiss cheese theory
• Drug and accident causation
• Management failure and accident causation
(SafetyInstituteofAustralia, 2012)
Domino theory
Heinrich’s version of Domino theory was one of the earliest proposed Domino theory on accident causation model by W.H.Heinrich in 1931. He described accident as an multifactorial chain of discrete events and presented a series of dominoes and exhibit how series of dominoes topples simultaneously when one of them tumbles down. He proposed sequence of 5 factors that would prompt the next step of toppling the dominos lined up in a row (HW Heinrich, 1980). The sequence is 1.inju...
... middle of paper ...
...events in acute care.
Oakley, J. S. Using Accident Theories to Prevent Accidents.
Rasmussen.J. (1997). RISK MANAGEMENT IN DYNAMIC SOCIETY:A MODELLING PROBLEM.
Reason, J. (2000). Human error: models and management. British Medical Journal.
safety.ILO, E. o. o. h. a. (2011). Theory of accident causes.
SafetyInstituteofAustralia. (2012). Models of Causation: Safety.
Salmon, P. M., Cornelissen, M., & Trotter, M. J. (2012). Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Safety Science, 50(4), 1158-1170.
U.S.NRC. (2014). Backgrounder on the Three Mile Island Accident.
Underwood, P., & Waterson, P. (2014). Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: A comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 68, 75-94.
...ility of the experimental method is somewhat limited in that some outcomes cannot generalize into real world outcomes. The design method used was also expensive, since there are several pieces of equipment and tools that were required to complete the study. Further, the reliability of the study is limited in that it failed to identify and analyze the relative import of other factors that could lead to fatal accidents, such as localized infrastructure deficiencies. (DAlessio, Stolzenberg and Terry, Clinton, 1999).
To answer the first question one must see where we were, where they were, and what projections did they set for a 6 year projection goal. Abbott case study updated version 2012, or even now 2013 percentage rates. In 2013, Abbott global vehicle accidental rate had improved by 6 percent from the 2012 rate, to 4.8 accidents per million miles driven (Abbott, 2013). The long t...
According to “A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis…”, both authors stated that HFACS was developed based off from the Swiss Cheese model to provide a tool to assist in the investigation process to identify the probable human cause (Wiegmann and Shappell, 2003). Moreover, the HFACS is broken down into four categories to identify the failure occur. In other words, leading up to adverse events the HFACS will identify the type error occur.
fault, and say that it is the fault of the operator? Engineers must be careful
Causal determinism is the concept that preceding causes give rise to everything which exists such that reality could be nothing but what it is. Science depends on this idea as it aims to find generalisations about the conjunction of certain causes and effects and thus hold some power of prediction about their future co-occurrence. However, in human interaction people assume each other to be responsible for their acts and not merely at the whim of causal laws. So the question which troubles philosophers is whether causation dictates entirely the course of human action or whether we as agents possess some free will. I will argue that free will is an inescapable illusion of the mind, something which never did nor ever could exist under causal determinism.
United States of America. Department of Transportation. FAA. Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: A Comprehensive, Fine-Grained Analysis Using HFACS. FAA, July 2006. Web. 22 Mar. 2014. .
A.P. HERSMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. HART, and ROBERT L. SUMWALT. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), 6 May 2010. Web. 19 July 2010. .
Accident:Toward a Quantitative Case Analysis." Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2.3 (1989): 167-177. Business Source Complete. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
This theory is the most complex of the three, but is also fairly simple. The Social- Technical theory tries to describe the accident by using all variables as possible cause of failure. This theory looks into the design of the product, how the product I intended to be used and how the workers are trained to use it, but also the actual implementation of the product. Also this type of accident theory looks into the social aspect of the work environment. Looking into the employees ' motivation such as, whether the workers are overworked and tired if they 're busy with other tasks and are unable to focus solely on the task at hand, also a possibility is if the worker has distractions outside of work at home, and finally it could also look into if the worker actually is properly trained and is proficient and knowledgeable about what they are doing. Along with analyzing all the other aspects Social- Technical also looks at the design process the methods used to produce the product, the materials used in the process, and finally the regulations behind the production of the
Humans take risks every day. Canadian statistics show that during the year 2010 there were approximately 123, 141 car accidents in which 2000 people had to suffer from death(1). Every
This term paper reviews the three most common catagories of aviation accident causes and factors. The causes and factors that will be discussed are human performance, environmental, and the aircraft itself. Although flying is one of the safest means of transportation, accidents do happen. It is the investigators job to determine why the accident happened, and who or what was at fault. In the event of an accident, either one or all of these factors will be determined as the cause of the accident. Also discussed will be one of the most tradgic plane crashes in aviation history and the human factors involved.
The pick-up bounced jarringly down the old dirt road. The driver sat up straight in the front seat, checking over her shoulder every few seconds to make sure that her cargo hadn't fallen out.
In the past, the term "accident" was often used when referring to an unplanned, unwanted event. To many "accident" suggests an event that was random, and could not have been prevented. Since nearly all work site fatalities, injuries, and illnesses are preventable, OSHA suggests using the term "incident" investigation. An incident usually refers to an unexpected event that did not cause injury or damage this time but had the potential. "Near miss" or "dangerous occurrence" are also terms for an event that could have caused harm but did not.
Although workplace accidents are very common, the majority of them can be prevented. As a company, you are obliged by the law to protect your employees, so it is important to take the necessary actions that will minimize the risk of accidents (Intelligent HQ, 2015).
The human factor is a major cause behind traffic accidents (Åberg, 2001 ) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Driving practice, for example, driving in a high speed increases the fatality risk of a traffic accident (Garvill, Marell, & Westin, 2003). Traffic safety experts argues that fast drivers may not get the time to respond to unpredictable driving emergencies that would escalate the probabilities of traffic crashes (Farmer, Retting, & Lund, 1999). The number of road traffic accidents increase by 46% when the speed increases from 50 km/h to 55 km/h (Nilsson, 2000). An estimation given by the Swedish National Road Administration (1999) in M., Warner, and Aberg (2005) if a crash occurs by a car that is travelling at the speed of 50 km/h, 70 pedestrians