More handpicked essays just for you.
Women's movement history
Essay on women empowerment through education
Essay on women empowerment through education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Academic Selves by Mary Pipher Academic Selves by Mary Pipher is an incredibly interesting, well-thought out essay that uses statistics, anecdotes, and examples to prove the author’s points and ideas. Specifically, this support can be found within the use of a comparison and contrast model. Pipher uses this technique to compare the academic life of girls and boys, describing both situations eloquently and thoroughly. This gives the reader the chance to really see the difference between the two situations, and to receive a greater understanding of the issues at hand. Specific examples, such as how boys are told that they’re “smart, if they’d just settle down and do their work”, while girls are told “perhaps you’re just not good at this”, or …show more content…
anecdotes such Pipher lying to her highschool boyfriend about her good grades so he wouldn’t feel bad really serve to drive her points home. Through her use of actual situations, studies, and quotations, Pipher is able to give proof and evidence that denounce any possible argument before it happens. By doing this, Pipher has created a well-written essay, giving support and backing everything she says, while still presenting her information in an engaging and interesting way. Pipher’s method of imparting information to the reader is both interesting and important.
The issues her essay deals with, off the negative effects on females in school systems, is a very “hot” topic, that is often ignored by many people. Many males take issues of female equality as a direct attack against themselves, and some females are against any idea that females struggle with or can not do something. Therefore, in attempting to explain the issue and information she has found, Pipher has to be almost casual and impartial with her presentation of knowledge. She does this by, unlike most essays, not having a conclusion. Nowhere is a “wrapping up” paragraph concluding her ideas, leading a call to arms, or directing the reader as to their next action, opinion, or feeling. This leaves the essay open-ended to the reader, a helpful aspect no matter whom the reader is. By presenting her knowledge and then stopping, Pipher gives the reader a chance to come to their own conclusions, create their own ideas, and discover the truth of what she has said in their own way at their own pace. In many cases this could be an interesting and successful technique, but with Pipher’s topic it is especially skillful, and almost a
necessity.
Through the article, "How the School Shortchange Boys," by Gerry Garibaldi implies that the school setting has experienced a transformation towards feminization. In the past, the child faced numerous conditions that vindicated her trouble in a male dominated society. However, after the deceitful discharge processes, the woman was finally free and all institutions welcomed her input seeking to create a fair society. According to Garibaldi (2006), the modern school setting deprives the boy child freedom to interact and relate in a natural environment (Garibaldi 54). Girls are kind, complacent, understanding and conform to salient regulations without emphasis. With these elements, girls comply with school regulations delivering assignments on time. The boy child is inquisitive, rational and desires logical explanations explaining the reason behind every instruction. The modern school setting does shortchange boys as it creates an unequal platform where teachers favor girls and victimize boys because of their inherent traits.
Moreover, education can also be halted due to ones gender. This is so in the case of Carrie Bishop. Because she is female, her father will not pay for nursing school. If not for Miles, Carrie's liberal brother and graduate of Berea College, she would have stayed at home and become the traditional homemaker. Another way her education was stunted is not due to anyone persons prevention but by her own personality and physical appearance.
He discusses the differences between boys’ and girls’ behavior in academics, “girls suppress ambition, boys inflate it” (432). Kimmel believes that girls do better in some academic areas, and males do better in others. He provides a logical explanation for rising test scores of girls compared to boys. Kimmel states, “Girls are more likely to undervalue their abilities, especially in the more traditionally “masculine” educational arenas such as math and science. Only the most able and most secure girls take courses in those fields.
He tells us that when he was in school he and another student met with a tutor every week, after reading each of their paper’s the tutor would then tell them “in blistering detail” what each of them should have taken from the readings and written without showing any “delicate concern” to their feelings (3610). In contrast, his daughter, Frances will participate “in discussion groups with professors and teaching assistants, all of whom have been trained in sensitivity and diversity (3611).”
Brooks argues that male and female brains work and experience things differently. He suggests that this theory is also the reason as to why young girls are surpassing their male counterparts in school settings. He incorrectly assumes that by separating males and females, males will be allowed to break free from gender stereotypes. Brooks strengthens his argument with results of brain research on sex differences. But, Brook’s argument is unpersuasive. He categorizes all young males, and suggest that single sex-schools are the best solution for them. He wants to apply a black-and-white solution to something that is just not that simple. While Brooks uses comparisons and surveys to convince the reader, his argument simply does
Sommers begins her view on girls scouring higher than boys by expressing that girl students are moving ahead of boys. She appeals to the mournful emotions of the audience that she and many researchers get to the bottom of what the scores are between the two genders. She joins in this time of expressing in order to explain “scholars should be more concerned about the boys who never show up for the tests they need if they
Through the thirty four page analysis, Lanser invokes her audience to consider the influences of gender practices taken into account by writing styles, sexual oppression, the feminine consciousness, and political privileges.
Throughout the texts we have read in English thus far have been feminist issues. Such issues range from how the author published the book to direct, open statements concerning feminist matters. The different ways to present feminist issues is even directly spoken of in one of the essays we read and discussed. The less obvious of these feminist critiques is found buried within the texts, however, and must be read carefully to understand their full meaning- or to even see them.
...alized that “a girl was not, as [she] had supposed, simply what [she] was; it was what [she] had to become” she was starting to admit defeat, and then finally when she begins to cry, it is here that the narrator understands that there is no escape from the pre-determined duties that go along with the passage of a child into being a girl, and a girl into a woman, and that “even in her heart. Maybe it (her understanding that conforming is unstoppable) was true”
“In the United States and several other countries, women now actually surpass men in educational achievements” (Josh, “Harvard Summer School”). Some women are more educated and qualified for most
Encouraging girls to go to college and grad school en masse is one of the biggest mistakes America has ever made. The flood of girls into universities is not only in part responsible for the current economic crisis, it’s made it increasingly difficult—if not impossible—for both girls and men to fulfill their natural roles. At the same time higher education has been degraded by so many unqualified girls getting accepted into college, those girls have seen their egos unjustifiably boosted by their degrees, making them unsuitable to be wives and mothers.
Colleges and schools where both females and males are educated together are termed to be “coeducational.” Long previous to our modern day society, segregating male and female in education systems was considered the “norm.” During these traditionally dominant ancient times, coeducation was prevalent in Europe and the idea of integrating such unique groups became such a phenomenon. This widespread of coeducation was eventually developed in American countries and has grown to be a universally accepted mode of education. Not only was this idea “new” and “innovative,” but it also crossed the line of our ancestor’s valued practice of tradition. Although this system went against what tradition honored, this new system of education generated comradery between individuals of the opposite sex and has knowledged them of skills one was unable to exercise in a single-sex educational environment. Coeducation, being the more modern system of education, has caused single-sex systems to become more outdated and inconvenient to society’s evolving standards. Exposure to the opposite sex introduces students life skills vital to a professional workfield thus, it shows males and females the importance of maintaining a symbiotic relationship and how they benefit from one another. Schools worldwide should consider the practice of educating students of both sexes in the same educational institution to allow for opportunity for one to build character in accordance to our evolving society and acquire flexibility in social skills.
In contrast to the general representation of women, the math teacher at the end of the movie makes a powerful statement by teaching the youngsters a lesson: the fact that girls mistreat each other makes it acceptable for men to do so. However, her declaration still gives men a higher position since she’s implying that girls should be solidary to fight men’s
In Alice Munro’s short story “Boys and Girls,” our narrator is a young farm girl on the verge of puberty who is learning what it means to be a “girl.” The story shows the differing gender roles of boys and girls – specifically that women are the weaker, more emotional sex – by showing how the adults of the story expect the children to grow into their respective roles as a girl and a boy, and how the children grow up and ultimately begin to fulfill these roles, making the transition from being “children” to being “young adults.”
The young girl in the story is struggling with finding her own gender identity. She would much rather work alongside her father, who was “tirelessly inventive” (Munro 328), than stay and work with her mother in the kitchen, depicted through, “As soon as I was done I ran out of the house, trying to get out of earshot before my mother thought of what to do next” (329). The girl is torn between what her duties are suppose to be as a woman, and what she would rather be doing, which is work with her father. She sees her father’s work as important and worthwhile, while she sees her mother’s work as tedious and not meaningful. Although she knows her duties as a woman and what her mother expects of her, she would like to break the mould and become more like her father. It is evident that she likes to please her father in the work she does for him when her father says to the feed salesman, “Like to have you meet my new hired man.” I turned away and raked furiously, red in the face with pleasure (328-329). Even though the young girl is fixed on what she wants, she has influences from both genders i...