Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal opinions on abstinence education
Teenage pregnancy crime stats
Abstinence plus sexual education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal opinions on abstinence education
[First Slide]
For my course project I decided to research teen pregnancy, and how sex education in different states affects the teen pregnancy and teen birth rates. With my research I came to believe that abstinence only education is ineffective at preventing pregnancy.
[Thesis]
Teen abstinence programs neglect to teach teens about their bodies and sexual reproduction, as they typically just focus on the religious ideology of saving sex for marriage. Refusing to teach about contraception and sexual health can lead to unwanted pregnancies and contraction of STDs that can be left untreated because of a fear of judgement. Shame and fear tactics are also commonly used in abstinence only education, and this leads to insecurity and oftentimes slut
…show more content…
States that are darker orange have higher pregnancy rates than lighter orange. As you can see, 4/6 of the states with the highest pregnancy rates stress abstinence and are not required to teach about contraception. In 2010 the highest state was New Mexico with 80 pregnancies per 1,000 girls, with Mississippi and Texas following close behind. As you can see on the map, 2 of those states stress abstinence and do not discuss any form of contraception with students. The correlation is obvious and shows that abstinence only education is ineffective
[Quote]
Now I know that some of you probably are thinking, “well if they didn’t want a child, then they shouldn’t of had sex.” And I agree with you, practicing abstinence is the only way to 100% prevent any chance of pregnancy and stds, and if you practice abstinence then great for you, do what you want with your body.
[Quote continued]
The thing is though, practicing abstinence is different than teaching it, though. These abstinence only education programs do not actually prevent teens from being sexually active, or even delay it. Teens still have sex, just they don’t have proper knowledge about how to be
…show more content…
This is not appropriate for a public school setting, as one of our biggest founding principles was to separate church and state. Shame is also used against students, especially girls. Have you ever heard of the “flower” metaphor? This is the idea that a girl’s virginity is like a delicate flower, and every time you have sex a petal falls off or is damaged, until the flower is ugly or unlovable. There are many similar metaphors, ranging from the flower to comparing sexual activity to a cup of backwashed water. This just teaches girls that they are worthless and dirty if they’ve had sex, and promotes guys to slut shame
“The federal definition of an eligible abstinence-only education program is one that: has as its exclusive purpose, teaching the social, physiological, and health gains to be realized by abstaining from sexual activity; teaches abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected standard for all school age children; teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and other associated health problems, teaches that sexual activity outside of the context of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects; teaches that bearing children ...
Office of Adolescent Health), there is still plenty to be done about sex education and youth pregnancy prevention in this country. Part of the cause of this is the fact that much of sex education in this country provides little to no information about birth control, condoms, and things of that nature. Because of this, in places like Texas, where 75% of the sex education is abstinence-only (Web. Sex Education in Texas Public Schools), there was a 30-39% teen birth rate (Web. Office of Adolescent Health). This shows that despite the abstinence-only education students are getting in school, they still need to know how to have safe sex, because they are clearly still having
Abstinence only education programs have caused many issues in today's world. Some parents love the idea of teaching their children on how not to have intercourse before getting married. The opposition would say that abstinence-only Ed increase the rate of teen pregnancy and STDs. It is very rare when somebody agrees on the abstinence only program but there are some studies out there that explain how it is effective. Its also explains on how it all began to change through out the years. According to CNN abstinence only education programs are more effective than sex education courses for keeping students in middle school from having sex in a two year period. A study was established by the Arches of Pediatric and Adolescence of Medicine, it indicated that about one-third of the pre teens and young teen students received an 8 hour lesson over abstinence only and had intercourse two years later after taking that class. But mostly everybo...
Kayla Bell writes, in the article Abstinence Is Only Sure Way to Prevent Pregnancy, STDs, that Roslyn Murphy, the mother of an 11 year old boy, believes that she and her husband should be the ones to tell their son what is right and wrong. Murphy said "As a parent, I need to teach my children about sex education, and biblically, I believe in what God is saying -- to reiterate the reasoning for not having sex." While many studies prove that this method is ineffective, advocates who are pro-abstinence stand by their decision and have statistics of their own to point out. For example, a study conducted in 2010 found that a third of the six and seventh graders who participated in abstinence-only education reported that they had sex two years later. About half of the other students who did not partake in the course reported having sex in the same time period, but the two groups' reported the use of condoms were the same (Bell).
STIs or Sexually Transmitted Infections is a major reason for Abstinence because if you don’t communicate with your partner and they don’t give you the lowdown about themselves and you have sex which all ends up in you having a STI then that’s your fault because you choose that you were ready but your partner and you didn’t get tested so one of you ended up with AIDS and there is no going back for that. STI’s are important in being Abstinence because nobody wants to hear from the doctor
Comprehensive programs teach about the importance of abstinence, but unlike the conservative program, it also teaches the importance of contraceptives to practice safe sex. (Malone) There is no way to completely stop teenagers from sex because it is always out there and it is inevitable. It is better to teach kids and teens how to be safe if they are in a situation. The only problem with these programs is they are not highly
Written by Kathrin F. Stranger-Hall and David W. Hall, the article “Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S.” argues that comprehensive sex education is more effective in lowering teen pregnancy rates than abstinence only sex education. As clearly stated by the authors, the claim of the article is that “abstinence-only education does not reduce teen pregnancy rates.” (Stanger-Hall 10) This point is worth arguing because sex education is expected to decrease the number of teenage pregnancies in the United States. If schools across the nation are only lecturing students on how to save sex for marriage, there is no education on having safe sex if they so choose to do. The authors define
Stanger-Hall, K. & Hall, D. (2011). Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates: Why We Need Comprehensive Sex Education in the U.S. PLoS ONE 6(10).
“10,000 young people contract a Sexually Transmitted Disease, more than 2,400 teens became pregnant and about 48 contract HIV” (Ballard and Ginsburg). Teens should know the risk of STD’s that can occur to them along with the tragic physical and emotional cost. No teen should find themselves in a situation where they feel uneducated or unprepared on the subject of sexual relations. Abstinence education will help give a better understanding to the many pro and cons that come with sex. Many times when the topic is not covered, it results in negative outcomes due to the lack of knowledge. Abstinence education and providing condoms should be allowed in today's society to help give students a better understanding so they are prepared to make make
An abstinence-only sex ed course teaches about not having sex outside of marriage. It often excludes many other types of sexual and reproductive health education, such as safe sex, birth control, and comprehensive sex education. Abstinence education teaches children to abstain from sexual activity and that this is the only guaranteed way to avoid sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or diseases (STDs) and pregnancy. Its explains to students that this is the standard by which to live in the United States. Katherin F. Stranger Hall stated in one of her studies that "abstinence-only education as a state policy is ineffective in preventing teenage pregnancy and may be contributing to the high teenage pregnancy rates in the U.S.
According to Advocates of Youth “In December 2004, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform released a report showing that 80 percent of the most popular abstinence-only education programs use curricula that distort information about the effectiveness of contraceptives, misrepresent the risks of abortion, blur religion and science, treat stereotypes about girls and boys as scientific fact, and contain basic scientific errors.” Also among youth participating in “virginity pledge” programs, researchers found that 88% broke the pledge and had sex before marriage. Now that you’ve heard about how poorly our current programs teach children about sexual education, let me give you just a few statistics on how well a more comprehensive program educated students. The National Survey of Family Growth found that teens who received Comprehensive Sexual Education, the amount of pregnancies in ages 15-19 dropped 50%. Researcher Douglas Kirby for the National Campaign to End Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy examined studies of prevention programs which had a strong experimental design and used appropriate analysis. Two-thirds of the 48 comprehensive sex ed programs studied had positive effects. 40% delayed sexual initiation, reduced the
“Abstinence is clearly the only foolproof way to prevent pregnancy”, said Dayna Henry, an assistant professor in kinesiology and health education at Southern Illinois University in Edwardsville. “But programs that don’t teach teens anything are misguided. Students who go through abstinence programs have sex anyway”, stated Henry, “but they don’t have the information and the skills they need to protect themselves.” Abstinence only education disregards the basic human rights of our youth, and lacks the appropriate, accurate, and just principles of sex education; especially because the main purpose is to advertise that other than until marriage, students must not in any way, talk
My reasoning behind this is just because they are being taught abstinence does not mean that is what they are doing. It is better to teach them how to protect themselves if they are doing it, than to just tell them to not have sex. Without full and accurate information, the sexual active teens cannot protect themselves. “The main difference between abstinence-based and comprehensive approaches to sex education is that comprehensive approaches do not focus either solely or so closely on teaching young people that they should abstain from sex until they are married. Although they do explain to young people the potential benefits of delaying having sex until they are emotionally and physically ready, they also make sure that they are taught how to protect themselves from infections and pregnancy when they do decide to have sex.” (Forrest, Simon). In other words, courses that are not just abstinence-only will not only focus on trying to get students to not have sex. The general sexual education courses will teach the students that waiting will be beneficial, but if they are not waiting the courses will teach them how to stay
Even though teen pregnancy rates have recently declined in the United States, we still have the highest rate in the entire nation. Reports recently show that 18-19 year olds reported having ever had sex and when they did, they would use contraceptive or other methods. Not only is sex education giving teens the knowledge of their sexuality and health, but also it is giving them the knowledge on how to practice safer sex and pregnancy prevention. Sex educators can teach abstinence but for some teens they will not practice it, which is why they need to be informed and taught on how to stay
My high school did not really do much for sexual education. There was an optional health class that was offered, but there were never enough people that wanted to take it so most of the time, they did not have the class. In both biology and anatomy, there was one day that nurses from the local hospital would come in and talk about STDs but that was the only time in high school. Although I think that teaching high schoolers about STDs is important, these talks seem to attempt to scare teens into not having sex. In eighth grade, there is a mandatory health class where they teach about sexual education and STDs. This class was an abstinence-only program and was very insistent that being abstinent was the only way to be. It was also a joke at my