Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contributions of aboriginal peoples in canada
Contributions of aboriginal peoples in canada
How has colonialism impacted aboriginal peoples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contributions of aboriginal peoples in canada
Currently, Aboriginal peoples in Canada live in conditions of extraordinary poverty in a land of riches and wealth. Their are substandard and overcrowded, water often unsanitary and contaminated, population and in particular Aboriginal youth face staggering unemployment and rates of suicide, levels of health, income and education fall far below that of the rest of the country. With this being said after long years of oppression and discrimination, the Canadian government has made valiant efforts in the reconciliation of Aboriginal relations, however the resources and funds provided have proven to be insufficient, thus causing detrimental consequences.
Aboriginal people are struggling to improve their lives while re-discovering their traditional
…show more content…
values after years of oppression.. Aboriginal peoples have limited resources.
Only a small proportion of Canada's resource income has come back to Aboriginal people, most in the form of transfer payments such as social assistance. This has never been, and is not now, the choice of Aboriginal people. They want to free themselves from the destructive burden of welfare and dependency. But to do this they need to have back some of what was taken away. From forced relocations to the isolation of reserves, current Aboriginal people are rampantly struggling to fight for the life conditions they deserve. Current reserves do not only undermine the growing Indigenous populations but present housing conditions has caused unnecessary overcrowding, growth of mold and fungi; adding other detrimental risks of health conditions underlying Aboriginal peoples. According to Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) a process of building a dwelling consisting of three bedrooms is given a maximum of $296, 000. Rates varying by province, it can be suggested that this is simply not enough to build an adequate home. In addition within the restricted budget from government control, upon the delivery of wood and other production items, this does not include contracted workers or labour specialists that provide a faster rate of production and renovation of said funded housing. “There are never enough money to renovate houses, and the renovation itself takes long time because we don’t have very many skilled …show more content…
carpenters” Subsequently, with various evidence of insufficient funding and coverage, improper construction and structural damage of current houses are very lenient to the growing mold and fungi affecting all aspects of air and respiratory quality within Aboriginal reserves. A recent study of a reserve at Lac Brochet states that: 34% of the houses had visible mould in the crawlspaces and 44% had mould on the malls, ceilings or floors of the rooms on the main floor of the house. This is just an example out of many houses that contain underlying health risks towards Aboriginal people adding to their stellar prevalent rates of Tuberculosis and other respiratory diseases. As an environmental determinant of Tuberculosis transmission, poor quantity and quality housing not only facilitates the spread of Mycobacterium tuberculosis but also the growth of mold and fungi. Apart from deficient infrastructures and detrimental living conditions, another focus of attention is the lack of clean water; a necessity and basic human right that plagues the current state of Aboriginal reserves.
As of December 2017, prime minister Justin Trudeau has pledged to eradicate all drinking water advisories in First Nations communities by March 2021. He restates his belief that every person in Canada should be able to drink the water that comes out of their tap, but many communities are still waiting. With three years left and more than 60 communities still turning to alternative water sources for drinking, bathing and cooking, critics are weary about the pace and scope of work left to be done. As of Dec. 21, 2017 there were 67 long-term drinking water advisories in effect for public water systems managed by the federal government. These drinking water warnings have been in place for over a year. There are an additional 18 communities that are currently at risk of developing long-term drinking water advisories, meaning they’ve had water issues for between two and 12 months. Since forming government, the Liberals have lifted 32 drinking water advisories. However, 22 new advisories have been added in that time, according to the Indigenous and Northern Affairs department. Although the government has made some valid efforts, seemingly the amount of work that has been resolved does not take upon advancement of their project but instead it furthers them from
advancement and display their ignorance towards standard Aboriginal issues. False promises reiterated by the government is no stranger to Aboriginal peoples. In addition, in a recent report found by the he Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) has found that the money provided for this project will not be enough and is seemingly a billion dollar short. Depending on population growth, what they’ve planned to spend will only end up covering between 54 and 70 per cent of the cost needed. The issues with water in First Nations communities are complex, and different depending on where the communities are located and where they source the water from. For some, the water treatment plants aren’t sufficient to meet the needs of the community. In others there’s a lack of training to keep the plants humming, and sometimes, when little fixes are needed the federal government is slow to step in. Lastly, another prevalent issue that resurfaces around leading generation of Aboriginal youth is underfunded social work and low rates of completed education. Although Canada prides itself with the funded excellency of it’s public education, the disparity of education between Canada’s Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal people, displays significant evidence of casts a shadow over the country's otherwise excellent record. There are three kinds of First Nations education in Canada delivered to Aboriginal students. Federal schools that are controlled by Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC), provincial schools, and local schools operated by First Nations communities. Sixty-five percent of the 120,000 eligible on-reserve First Nations students attend the latter. The issue with the majority of these schools is that they are grossly underfunded. Paul Martin, a previous prime minister of Canada has states to the Toronto Star that “the per capita funding for a First Nations child going to elementary or high school is anywhere from 20 to 40 percent lower than what non-native kids get on a per capita basis.” Many of these schools aren't able to recruit and retain qualified teachers to work on remote and rural reservations, even though teachers can teach without a Bachelors of Education
Fleras, Augie. “Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Repairing the Relationship.” Chapter 7 of Unequal Relations: An Introduction to Race, Ethnic and Aboriginal Dynamics in Canada. 6th ed. Toronto: Pearson, 2010. 162-210. Print.
In this paper, I will consider James Tully’s argument for an element “sharing” in a just relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people of Canada. I will claim that “sharing” is one of principles to the relationship between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people who has connection with economic, political and legal relations. I will argue, that it is important to build “sharing” into a new, postcolonial relationship since it brings beneficial to country. I will also state proponent view with James Tully’s discussion that utilization of “sharing” to economic, political, and legal relations is essential to our society.
Canada likes to paint an image of peace, justice and equality for all, when, in reality, the treatment of Aboriginal peoples in our country has been anything but. Laden with incomprehensible assimilation and destruction, the history of Canada is a shameful story of dismantlement of Indian rights, of blatant lies and mistrust, and of complete lack of interest in the well-being of First Nations peoples. Though some breakthroughs were made over the years, the overall arching story fits into Cardinal’s description exactly. “Clearly something must be done,” states Murray Sinclair (p. 184, 1994). And that ‘something’ he refers to is drastic change. It is evident, therefore, that Harold Cardinal’s statement is an accurate summarization of the Indigenous/non-Indigenous relationship in
Throughout the history of Canada the indigenous population of the country have been voiceless. They have been both suppressed and oppressed by the Federal and various Provincial governments within Canada. Many organizations tried to provide a voice for the native population but failed in their attempt. These organizations eventually merged together to become what is now known as The Assembly of First Nations. The Assembly of First Nations gives voice to the issues and problems facing the different components of the aboriginal community in Canada.
Living in Canada, there is a long past with the Indigenous people. The relationship between the white and First Nations community is one that is damaged because of our shameful actions in the 1800’s. Unnecessary measures were taken when the Canadian government planned to assimilate the Aboriginal people. Through the Indian Act and Residential schools the government attempted to take away their culture and “kill the Indian in the child.” The Indian Act allowed the government to take control over the people, the residential schools took away their culture and tore apart their families, and now we are left with not only a broken relationship between the First Nations people but they are trying to put back together their lives while still living with a harsh reality of their past.
Aboriginals have lived various types of lives and in attempt to improve the lives of Canada’s Aboriginal people formed the Aboriginal self-government. Developing self-government for aboriginal peoples living in urban areas was not easy. The form of self-government varied across the country depending on the factors in each area or region. Some cities had existing aboriginal organizations providing a good basis upon which to build which made the self-government an easier thing to make. Despite the many challenges, self-government for aboriginal peoples living in urban areas is a concept that can be realized and can contribute to meeting the needs and aspirations of Canada’s Aboriginal peoples. Since the formation, the self-government has accomplished
The Indian act, since being passed by Parliament in 1876, has been quite the validity test for Aboriginal affairs occurring in Canada. Only a minority of documents in Canadian history have bred as much dismay, anger and debate compared to the Indian Act—but the legislation continues as a central element in the management of Aboriginal affairs in Canada. Aboriginal hatred against current and historic terms of the Indian Act is powerful, but Indigenous governments and politicians stand on different sides of the fence pertaining to value and/or purpose of the legislation. This is not shocking, considering the political cultures and structures of Aboriginal communities have been distorted and created by the imposition of the Indian Act.
Presently, access to programs and health care services is fragmented given the nature of the health care system for Aboriginal peoples (Wilson et al., 2012). The federal government is responsible for providing limited health services among Inuit living within traditional territories and status/registered Indians living on reserves (Chen et al., 2004). This responsibility is vested in the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch organizations to carry out protection activities and health promotion, and provide funding for community health programs in Inuit communities and reserves (Chen et al., 2004). Firstly, the complexity of the health care system for Aboriginal peoples has resulted in an unequal access to health services due to the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch program (FNIHB), which only applies to Inuit and Indians. Therefore, Metis and other Aboriginal peoples who do not qualify for registration under the Indian Act do not receive health services provided by FNIHB (Chen et al., 2004). Secondly, the transfer of responsibility to health boards, communities and other authorities has resulted in unequal supply of health services between territories and provinces, uneven distribution among communities, and leaves limited opportunity for increased funding (Loppie et al., 2009). It has also lead to controversy between various levels of government over the responsibility to pay for particular health services. Jurisdictional limitations, which have failed to recognize Metis identity and rights, have resulted in health disparities among the Metis population (Wilson et al., 2012). While the federal government recently decided to include Metis status in Aboriginal initiatives, the funding has not been equitable when compared to those of Inuit and First Nations or to the non-Aboriginal populations in Canada (Loppie et al., 2009). The Aboriginal health
The Indian Residential schools and the assimilating of First Nations people are more than a dark spot in Canada’s history. It was a time of racist leaders, bigoted white men who saw no point in working towards a lasting relationship with ingenious people. Recognition of these past mistakes, denunciation, and prevention steps must be taking intensively. They must be held to the same standard that we hold our current government to today. Without that standard, there is no moving forward. There is no bright future for Canada if we allow these injustices to be swept aside, leaving room for similar mistakes to be made again. We must apply our standards whatever century it was, is, or will be to rebuild trust between peoples, to never allow the abuse to be repeated, and to become the great nation we dream ourselves to be,
Despite the decreasing inequalities between men and women in both private and public spheres, aboriginal women continue to be oppressed and discriminated against in both. Aboriginal people in Canada are the indigenous group of people that were residing in Canada prior to the European colonization. The term First Nations, Indian and indigenous are used interchangeably when referring to aboriginal people. Prior to the colonization, aboriginal communities used to be matrilineal and the power between men and women were equally balanced. When the European came in contact with the aboriginal, there came a shift in gender role and power control leading towards discrimination against the women. As a consequence of the colonization, the aboriginal women are a dominant group that are constantly subordinated and ignored by the government system of Canada. Thus today, aboriginal women experiences double jeopardy as they belong to more than one disadvantaged group i.e. being women and belonging to aboriginal group. In contemporary world, there are not much of a difference between Aboriginal people and the other minority groups as they face the similar challenges such as gender discrimination, victimization, and experiences injustice towards them. Although aboriginal people are not considered as visible minorities, this population continues to struggle for their existence like any other visible minorities group. Although both aboriginal men and women are being discriminated in our society, the women tends to experience more discrimination in public and private sphere and are constantly the targeted for violence, abuse and are victimized. In addition, many of the problems and violence faced by aborigin...
With the increase in funding, Canadian poverty within Aboriginal society would greatly decrease. The Government should be “proactive in giving aboriginal people in remote communities the support they need to move to areas where they can find jobs and education” (End First). That way, adults would be able to increase their income in order to have a much more fulfilling lifestyle. It is not only adults who need the financial aid, but also the community and children. In order to help, the Canadian Government should make sure more money is being made available for the First Nation education, social interactions such as community centres, and way of living including: housing, roads and availability of healthy food items. “...The poverty rate of status First Nations children living on reserves was triple that of non-indigenous children” (Hildebrandt). Aboriginal children across Canada need the help of Canadian Government in order to lose this poverty and be able to move ahead. “Persistent disadvantages faced by Canada’s aboriginal peoples in regard to education, employment, health and housing are well-documented/the staggering poverty faced by indigenous children is preventable” (Hildebrandt). With enough Government funding, Native children would be able to get better education, social skills and understanding of their traditions and culture. Schools, community centres
However, Canada is working towards incremental equality when regarding this concept, which in turn, impacts reconciliation. The most universal outcomes of the physical environments of reserves are to do with substantial housing shortages and poor quality of existing homes. With the lack of affordable housing off reserves, there is overcrowding in First Nation communities, as well as homelessness for Aboriginals living in urban areas, (Reading & Wien, 2009, p.8). Homes that exist on reserves lack appropriate ventilation, which results in mold, which in turn can lead to severe asthma as well as allergies. Families on reserves do not have access to a fresh supermarket that carries nutritious foods because they live in a remote community. With this being said, health conditions may develop in Aboriginal peoples because of the lack of healthy, nutritious food. Canada is working towards equality within the physical environments as William F. Morneau (2016) describes, “Budget 2016 proposes to invest $8.4 billion over five years, beginning in 2016-17, to improve the socio-economic conditions of Indigenous peoples and their communities and bring about transformational change,” (“A Better Future for Indigenous Peoples,” 2016). All of these aspects play a key role in reaching reconciliation throughout
The over-representation of Aboriginal children in the Canadian Child Welfare system is a growing and multifaceted issue rooted in a pervasive history of racism and colonization in Canada. Residential schools were established with the intent to force assimilation of Aboriginal people in Canada into European-Canadian society (Reimer, 2010, p. 22). Many Aboriginal children’s lives have been changed adversely by the development of residential schools, even for those who did not attend them. It is estimated that Aboriginal children “are 6-8 times more likely to be placed in foster care than non-Aboriginal children (Saskatchewan Child Welfare Review Panel, 2010, p. 2).” Reports have also indicated that First Nations registered Indian children make up the largest proportion of Aboriginal children entering child welfare care across Canada (Saskatchewan Child Welfare Review Panel, p. 2). Consequently, this has negatively impacted Aboriginal communities experience of and relationship with child welfare services across the country. It is visible that the over-representation of Aboriginal children in the child welfare system in Canada lies in the impact of the Canadian policy for Indian residential schools, which will be described throughout this paper.
their lives and with no political voice. The mainstream view is that the indigenous people are in poverty because of their shortcomings. However, there are very few publications focused exclusively on the challenges that the indigenous people are facing. There are barely any found in the academic journals reviewed. They nearly ignored the existence of indigenous people and failed to deal with the issues they are facing in the society (Archambault, 2003: 17). Over time, they are being stereotyped as incompetents who are abusing our welfare system. Poverty and suffering are not the result of individuals, but rather the result of structural, social issues that
A few weeks ago, I had a conversation with a friend of mine who thought discrimination in the Aboriginal community was over. She went on to say that Aboriginal people in Canada were luckier than the rest of Canadian society, because they were “exempted from tuition.” Which is inaccurate. The Federal Government of Canada provides tuition, traveling costs and living expenses only to some Aboriginal students in Canada (Goar, 2012). Usually First Nations and Inuit Students are eligible. While Non-Status First Nations and Metis students were excluded of having their tuition and other services covered by the Federal Government (Goar, 2012). Discrimination is still an underlying issue in the Aboriginal community. 40% of women in Aboriginal communities over the age of twenty-five have not completed highschool (Cheshire, 2015) and half of the children living in Aboriginal communities live in poverty (Hildebrandt, 2013). Just because we do not hear or see of racism, discrimination and privilege at times, does not mean it is not