Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to french revolution
Introduction to french revolution
Discuss the significance of the French revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to french revolution
The French Revolution is often portrayed as a valiant fight for liberty, fraternity, and equality, spearheaded by a group of famous enlightened leaders, and to an extent, this portrayal is accurate. However, this historical view of enlightened principles wielded by a select few, fails to incorporate the actions and feelings of the majority of the French population during the Revolution. While engaged and in agreement with the enlightenment movement, most Frenchmen during the revolution found themselves intimately more concerned with their own welfare, not the application of the famous concepts of liberty, fraternity, and equality to all. If via these notions their own freedom could be obtained, then so be it, however on the forefront of their agenda remained the destruction of the ruling classes, and their subsequent freedom from unfair exploitation by these classes. Abbe Sieyes What is the Third Estate, sums up these feelings perfectly, addressing enlightenment principles found in many other more famous French liberation documents, while simultaneously enveloping us in the mindset of Frances lowest and …show more content…
most populous class, the Third Estate. In 1789, with turmoil brewing in the French homeland, King Louis XVI made a desperate decision, declaring an edict calling for meeting of Frances Estates General.
Upon the lead up to this meeting, the issue of voting swept through France, as aristocrats and commoners alike, debated how votes should be decided at the Estates General, one per social class, or via a population. From this debate arose Abbe Sieyes’ What is the Third Estate, a fiery document aimed the both members of Frances Third Estate and its nobility alike. Focused on the Third Estates contribution to France, the documents readable nature turns it into a bold rallying cry for the Third Estate, as it demands the total abolishment of the privileged classes, going as far as to say the nation of France exists only within the population which contributes to society, that population being the Third
Estate. Throughout Sieyes work the idea of the Third Estate being the entirety of France is reiterated many times, often via the exploration of the Third Estates role within society. Through this exploration we see the document stray from its various more famous enlightened counterpart documents, as it takes on the very heart and soul of the revolution itself. While documents such as the Declarations of Rights of Man and Olympus De Gouges Declaration of the Rights of Women, embody the novelistic revolutionary ideas of the enlightenment, Abbes work finds a way to indirectly weave these concepts into a Third Estate perspective. Instead of focusing on noble grandiose ideas and concepts, Sieyes is able to apply simplified versions of these notions to the forefront issues facing Frances populous underprivileged Third Estate. Notions such as “in a society without separation of powers defined, no constitution exists at all,” seemed novelistic and inapplicable to the majority of Frenchmen during the revolution. In a time when living was made near impossible or at the very least miserable by the ruling classes, the applications of such enlightenment principles to individuals seemed a stretch at the least. Instead the majority of the revolutionary French found themselves more concerned with the own individual release from the oppressive and taxing demands of the powers above. This feeling, however often goes unwritten in the history books of today, as we reflect upon the revolution as whirlwind of blood and violence, surrounded by a beautiful explosion of enlightenment ideals. Straying from this commonality, Abbes Sieyes work, What is the Third Estate, helps us recapture the true nature of the French Revolution, as it flawlessly embodies the feelings of Frances most populous class, and the ensuing accurate nature of the bloody but enlightened French Revolution.
Sieyes also identifies the reality that if as a society if we were to remove the nobility that The Third Estate could in fact run on its own, if not “something less but something more”. In fact, society as a whole might actually go better without the two others but would cease to exists without The Third Estate. Sieyes actually goes as far to say that the nobility are a “burden for the nation and it cannot be a part of it.” Sieyes speaks to not only the social inequality between the classes but the lack of political representation of more than what is ninety percent of the population. Then nobility itself possess their own representation that was not appointed by the majority, who does not owe any powers to the people due to divinity, and finally it is foreign for the fact that it’s interests lie with private concern rather than public. In chapter two of What is the Third Estate Sieyes proclaims that up until now The Third Estate has been nothing and reform is coming. He says “Freedom does not derive from
Before the presence of equality came into play, some laws favored the rich over all others, and some only affected the poor; however, the growing middle class ended up being caught in the crosshairs of the two. During the Revolution, leaders went to protest this inequality, and in doing so went on to draw inspiration from the very ideas brought upon by Enlightenment thinkers, which in turn were the very building blocks of France’s 1789 Declaration of the Rights of
The French Revolution was a tumultuous period, with France exhibiting a more fractured social structure than the United States. In response, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen proposed that “ignorance, neglect, or contempt of the rights of man are the sole cause of public calamities, and of the corruption of governments” (National Assembly). This language indicates that the document, like its counterpart in the United States, sought to state the rights of men explicitly, so no doubt existed as to the nature of these rights. As France was the center of the Enlightenment, so the Enlightenment ideals of individuality and deism are clearly expressed in the language of the document. The National Assembly stated its case “in
Some people like Emmanuel Sieyès, middle-class writer who was taken by the Enlightenment ideas, believed that all of French Society lay on the backs of the third estate. On the contrary, Robespierre, the monarch at the time, believed that the third estate did not have the power to do anything important to society. The third estate had to pay taxes like the Gabelle and Taille while the first and seconds estates did not have to pay any taxes to the king. Also, the third estates had less of a representation in voting. The first and second estate could outvote the third estate every time and this was a huge inequality. The condition of the third estate was horrible but a good portion of this third estate was the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie had some wealth and social class, so they influenced the rest of the third estate about their rights, while also inspiring some lower clergies and provincial nobles and thus led to a group of rebellious people to fight the monarchy. This fight for political representation and political rights was only one cause of the French Revolution. Another causes lies in the French Monarchs: Louis XlV, Louis XV, and Louis XVl. When Louis XlV was ruling, the monarchy had unlimited power and was known as a
Technology has advanced a lot and has been greatly impacting our lives since the Industrial Revolution. The appearance of the mobile phone, the computer, and the tablets have all changed our ability to communicate with people around the world. Although technologies have greatly improved our lifestyle, they have brought many negative effects on our relationships and happiness as well, for instance distorting people's views on one another and bringing more loneliness to people's lives. Many people believe that benefited by social media platforms such as Facebook, it is now not necessary to talk to someone in person in order to effectively communicate with one and know one’s life. Others, however, believe that technology alone cannot replace
Before the French Revolution that occurred during the late 18th century, France was considered one of the most advanced and opulent countries in Europe. It was in the center of the Enlightenment era, a period of time from the 1600s to the 1800s that is considered today as one of the most significant intellectual movements in history by encouraging a new view of life. The age sparked hundreds of important thinkers such as Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, Thomas Paine, and Adam Smith. The Enlightenment was the fuel that sparked a worldwide desire to reshape and reconsider the ways that countries were governed. Limited monarchies, direct democracies, limited democracies, and absolute monarchies, among others, were many forms of government that were disputed by these thinkers. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, one the many significant Enlightenment thinkers, believed in a direct democracy, a system in which a country is governed by many, and where no one person has a considerable amount of power. This idea that citizens should receive independence and a voice would later stimulate the French and result in what is now k...
The French Revolution was a major transformation of the society and political system of France, lasting from 1789 to 1799. The social structure caused major segregation between each echelon, or Estate. There were many grievances among the Third Estate on the coming of the French Revolution. The Third Estate was made up by the merchants, peasants, laborers, and the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie was the prominent class that were able to address the Third Estate grievances. The Third Estate’s grievances were unequal taxation, financial problems, and food scarcity.
Each social class in France has its own reasons for wanting a change in government. The aristocracy was upset by the king’s power, while the Bourgeoisie was upset by the privileges of the aristocracy. The peasants and urban workers were upset by their burdensome existence. The rigid, unjust social structure meant that citizens were looking for change because “all social classes.had become uncomfortable and unhappy with the status quo.” (Nardo, 13)
This investigation plans to explore the multiple political parties that existed during the French Revolution and how their doctrines reflected that of the citizens of the French Empire, from 1789 to 1799. This paper will focus upon the ideas of egalitarianism, or the belief in equality.
Sieyes and other deputies of the Third Estate sought major reform for the French Government. During this time, the developing world was in a scramble for rapid adjustment and the people of France began seeking a voice in their government. In What is the Third Estate, a pamphlet critiquing the French political and social order, Sieyès lists out the numerous faults associated with the current French political environment. Firstly, Sieyès seeks to demonstrate that the Third Estate is “everything,” and should be treated as such (Hunt 65). Sieyès exemplifies that the Third Estate is “19/20ths” of the French population and is furthermore, burdened with all the immensely difficult work that the French government refuses to carry out (Hunt 65). According to Sieyès, the Third Estate: the people and backbone of France are the individuals responsible for the success of France, not the government officials. On this, Sieyés writes, “The Third
Liberté, égalité, fraternité, this was the motto of the French Revolution. It was coined by Pierre Leroux in 1838. The years 1779-1789 saw everything from the first constitution of France being drawn up, to the “Reign of Terror” in which the symbolic guillotine proved to be both the judge and the executioner. The Revolution initially started in an attempt to make the king answer to the people, in an attempt to overthrow the absolutist role and in an attempt to gain equality in all areas including taxation. The financial crisis was a burden to heavy to bear for the Third Estate. The people grew hungry which swiftly turned to rage. The lack of results led to the end of the monarchy and the execution of both King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette. However, despite the bloodshed, the ideals that the French were fighting for were alive in their hearts. Liberty is the freedom to think or act without being constrained by necessity or force. In France, people were seeking liberty from the tyrannical rule of the monarch in which the Queen was using taxes to endow herself in riches. The second ideal, equality, consists of rights, treatment, quantity, or value equal to all others in a specific group. This meant getting rid of the hierarchical system and ensuring that nor the Church or nobles were exempt from taxation. The last ideal, brotherhood, means a group of people with feelings of friendship and mutual support between them. The French lacked this during the Revolution. Civil disobedience was present and very few showed camaraderie towards one another. Ten years of hardship, striving towards one common goal, sacrificing thousands of lives the French achieved what they set out to do. With great willpower and with the help of a benefac...
They were only two percent of France’s population, but owned twenty percent of the land. They paid no taxes (Krieger 483). The third estate accounted for ninety-eight percent of France’s population. The third estate was divided into three groups; the middle class, known as the bourgeoisie, the urban lower classes, and the peasant farmers. The third estate lost about half their income in taxes.
The Third Estate consisted of everyone else, the pheasants, farmers, landless labourers, serfs and the emerging middle class called the bourgeois. 80% of the population was rural and were very highly taxed by the king, like the rest of the Third Estate.... ... middle of paper ... ... Overall, the weakness and indecisive actions of France's monarch, King Louis XVI, did not make those serving him respect or be loyal to him and his choices.
A small number of people said that the Third Estate, that which was drawn from the towns, should have power to equal the other Estates. Clubs of the bourgeoisie. the middle class, were formed, proclaiming, "Salus populi lex est. " It was a simple cry meaning "the welfare of the people is law." To these people, Estates General was like a pair of shoes that no longer fit.
Member of third estate: It will not be one person who rules, but the people of France, who will select the men they will be represented by-