A Women Who Went To Alaska Analysis

Today I am going to be explaining how the three different point of views or P.O.V the narrators in three different stories all about unfairness to the miners during the gold rush or the late eight-teen-hundreds though. Mainly I'm going to be mentioning the character's narrators background, family, and their opinions. For opinions I'm going to be talking about if they thought the rules where to strict or just right.

The first story I'm going to talk about is The Klondike gold rush and how this narrator affects it is going to be Klondike gold rush. In this story the P.O.V is third person but the main character talks about their opinion on the laws and the weather conditions the miners were in the narrator says and how hard it was to get or find any gold when mining "it was impossible to dig in the winter when temperatures could reach -60°F" so the story is mainly based on the narrators' opinion.

The next story I'm going to be talking about is A Women Who Went To Alaska. This story is mainly about the narrators' or characters' opinion too. The narrator talks about the effect of the gold mine on the growth of the country she lives in. And how people try and lie about how much money they get from mining gold because ten-percent of the money goes to the Canadian government and

The main character or narrator talks about all his dads experience with the gold rush. His father experienced a lot of sights he would definitely remember. But the real on that stood out to him was when he was waiting in a line like he had never seen before even through his memory loss issues he would remember this magnificent site. He would have to pack for forty degree weather which was hard to be in as cold as it was plus you have to wait very long says the narrator. I am assuming the narrator is the main characters' son because the narrator refers to the main character as (my