Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land is many things at once: a science fiction epic, a tale of spiritual awakening, and critical commentary on politics, religion, and media. It tells the story of Valentine Michael Smith, a human who was brought to Earth in early adulthood, after being born on the planet Mars. The novel describes Smith’s early interactions with his new environment, and the way he struggles to understand the social mores and prejudices of human nature. Using the knowledge he gains on Earth and his background from Mars, Smith is able to change the lives of several people around him, transforming terrestrial culture based on his fundamental beliefs.
As the novel begins, Heinlein introduces the media satire that recurs throughout
…show more content…
the book. An example of this occurs when a film executive disguised as an orderly attempts to coerce Smith into selling his life story and titling it “I was a Prisoner on Mars” (Heinlein 27). However, Smith was never a prisoner, even resisting his transportation from Mars back to Earth. The impersonator only chose this title for public appeal, and intends to make a basic exploitation film out of Smith’s extraordinary and unique story. The filmmaker’s treatment of Smith also illustrates the way in which humans attempt to take advantage of Smith at his arrival. Having been raised on Mars and unable to fully adjust to Earth’s atmosphere, Smith does not have the capacity to understand his environment. The captain of the expedition that brought Smith to Earth states, “He thinks like a Martian, he feels like a Martian...his body, unbearably compressed and weakened by the strange shape of space on this unbelievable place…feeling it [his arrival] with mind-shaking pain” (Heinlein 20). Furthermore, Smith is not yet able to completely interpret the human language, as shown when the narrator says, “Smith used English as one might use a code book, with tedious and imperfect translation for each syllable” (Heinlein 22). However, this does not stop others from using Smith for their benefit, shown first by scientists who say that Smith “is a veritable treasure trove of scientific information,” and by the media, who ask Smith to sign a contract when he is not capable of making an informed decision (Heinlein 19). At this point, Smith makes his first connection with a human being. When Jill Boardman, a nurse, offers Smith water, he mistakes it for “the water ritual,” a spiritual rite in which two souls grow closer. The process of “water-sharing” forms a strong, unbreakable bond between Jill and Smith, establishing Jill as an important influence in Smith’s life. Jill’s involvement in Smith’s development reveals another theme of the novel: the way that wealth leads to corruption. Unwittingly, Smith had inherited the fortunes of all the Envoy crew members, and, by a legal precedent known as the Larkin Decision, had become the owner of the planet Mars. Smith’s political importance and titanic financial worth make him a prized target to many powerful people, who do not hesitate to sabotage him of his wealth. This greed leads to violence later in the novel, when Ben Caxton, a friend of Jill’s, is kidnapped and injured, and Jill and Smith are forced to flee into hiding. The first chapters also show the radical contrast between Martian and human civilization, as Smith says that “his thought, pure Martian abstraction from half a million years of wildly alien culture, traveled so far from any human experience as to be utterly untranslatable” (Heinlein 22). Not only does Smith differ in the way he thinks, but also in the way he is able to control himself physically, as he can force his body to enter a state of “hibernation” when in distress. As the novel continues, it is revealed that Martian civilization does not include the concept of gender, as Smith had never before seen or heard of a female person. His naïveté is further demonstrated in the way he interacts with other people, as they immediately perceive him as a child. For example, Jill refers to him as “The poor baby! The poor, poor, infant!” (Heinlein 55). This statement also shows that humans underestimate the intelligence and the capabilities of the Martian race, while Smith develops into a powerful and influential force as the novel progresses. As Smith continues to interact with Jill, Heinlein further establishes the importance of the water ritual, and the binding connection that is formed between “water brothers.” As Smith sees Jill for a second time, he is immediately filled with pleasure and purpose, obeying her without question.
He expresses an unwavering trust in Jill, and cherishes her opinions and her value in him. He states that he was “more distressed than was possible...because of some shameful lack or failure,” after Jill did not express the sufficient “joyful fullness” upon interacting with him (Heinlein 80). Through Smith’s conversations with Jill, Heinlein explores one significant Martian idea with the introduction of the Martian word “grok.” Without explanation, “grok” begins to appear in descriptions of Smith’s thought processes. Using context, the reader is able to infer that to “grok” something means to comprehend it profoundly. By using a word that is alien, yet makes sense in context, Heinlein starts to simulate a Martian mindset for the …show more content…
reader. Within this Martian mindset lies the attitude that death is something accepted and appreciated.
Martians believe that death, or discorporation, is something that is voluntary and necessary. The race is not troubled or afraid of death, as they believe that the essence of a person is completely separate from their body. This mentality is shown shown when Smith says, “fear of death was an idea utterly beyond him...he would cherish it and try to grok” (Heinlein 87). The Martian society also commonly eats their dead, treating lost loved ones as food, rather than partaking in burial. Although this practice seems horrendous to Smith’s “water brothers” at first, they begin to accept the process as they learn Smith’s belief in separation of body and
spirit. In Part II of the novel, Heinlein begins to criticize three of the broad targets of his satire: politics, religion, and capitalism. He creates a disharmony between the political authority of the characters and their superficial motivations. For example, Joseph Douglas, the most politically powerful man on Earth, does not make any important political decisions in his administration. He delegates these tasks to his wife—not because he has faith in her political wisdom, but because he is afraid to argue with her. This fear is shown when Douglas says, “Agnes should have seen how easily he was frightened, then she wouldn’t talk that way” (Heinlein 100). Meanwhile, Agnes, his wife, bases the political decisions she makes on astrology, a “science” that is dependent on religion and superstition. Vesant, the astrologer, who is indirectly making political decisions that will affect the lives of billions, does not have the unadulterated commitment to her studies that one would hope. Instead, she is motivated by wealth, investing money she makes from clients, such as Agnes, into the stock market. Although society is founded upon institutions, this situation reveals the fact that these institutions are dangerously dependent on each other. The political leader of the world is driven by fear of his wife, who is influenced by a devotion to religious science, as interpreted for her by a women driven by her fixation with her finances.
Tracy K. Smith’s “Life on Mars” is a collection of poetry dealing mainly in the search for a sense of purpose and the nature of people. The books is something of an elegy as a whole with many poems pertaining to death and the author’s struggle with the loss of her father. The poems are at once poignant and gentle in tone and leave questions than can only be answered in multiple readings. The book is segmented in four parts that travel through different topics and types of poetry. The mood ranges from passionate accounts of Orwellian politics to soft recollections of a lovers embrace; throughout the book Smith brings in references to pop culture, science, and technology that incorporate seamlessly with her words.
Dr. Strangelove is a 1964 black comedy satire film about nuclear war between the USSR and the USA. It has received many awards including #26 on the American Film Institute’s top 100 movies list and a 99% favorable rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The film begins with General Jack D. Ripper putting his base on high alert and ordering his bomber wing to preemptively drop nuclear bombs onto the Soviet Union. His second in command, Mandrake, tries to stop him after finding out the Pentagon ordered nothing and finds out that Ripper is insane in thinking the Soviets are trying to poison the American water supply. The Pentagon finds out and tries to stop it but they could not find the three digit code in time to stop the planes. General Turgidson recommends
“How to poison the earth” by Linnea Saukko can be seen in two different aspects. The first one would be by looking at it in a literal way, in which it will make it a very harsh, inhumane and cold text. On the other hand, it could be seen as a satire, sarcastic and ironic text in which Saukko expects to catch the reader’s attention. Saukko exaggerates the sarcasm, and satire in her writing in order to make the readers realize and understand the main purpose of her essay, which is to warn readers about threats to the future of our planet.
The essay “A Modest Proposal” written by Johnathan Swift takes a satirical view on how to solve the starvation issue in Ireland. Swift suggests an obviously satirical solution of eating children around the age of one. He used irony, ambiguity, and ethos to emphasize the satirical nature of the essay and present a captivating idea to the audience.
Stanley Kubrick’s sexual parody, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, illustrates an unfathomed nuclear catastrophe. Released in the midst of the Cold War, this 1964 film satirizes the heightened tensions between America and Russia. Many sexual insinuations are implemented to ridicule the serious issue of a global nuclear holocaust, in an effort to countervail the terror that plagued America at that time. Organizing principles, such as Kubrick’s blunt political attitudes about the absurdity of war and the satirical genre, are echoed by the film style of his anti-war black comedy, Dr. Strangelove.
Throughout Marilynne Robinson’s works, readers are often reminded of themes that defy the status quo of popular ideas at the time. She explores transience and loneliness, amongst other ideas as a way of expressing that being individual, and going against what is deemed normal in society is acceptable. Robinson utilizes traditional literary devices in order to highlight these concepts.
“Into The Wild” by John Krakauer is a non-fiction biographical novel which is based on the life of a young man, Christopher McCandless. Many readers view Christopher’s journey as an escape from his family and his old life. The setting of a book often has a significant impact on the story itself. The various settings in the book contribute to the main characters’ actions and to the theme as a whole. This can be proven by examining the impact the setting has on the theme of young manhood, the theme of survival and the theme of independent happiness.
The main character is completely alienated from the world around him. He is a black man living in a white world, a man who was born in the South but is now living in the North, and his only form of companionship is his dying wife, Laura, whom he is desperate to save. He is unable to work since he has no birth certificate—no official identity. Without a job he is unable to make his mark in the world, and if his wife dies, not only would he lose his lover but also any evidence that he ever existed. As the story progresses he loses his own awareness of his identity—“somehow he had forgotten his own name.” The author emphasizes the main character’s mistreatment in life by white society during a vivid recollection of an event in his childhood when he was chased by a train filled with “white people laughing as he ran screaming,” a hallucination which was triggered by his exploration of the “old scars” on his body. This connection between alienation and oppression highlight Ellison’s central idea.
In today’s world, we live in a society where we are subjected to follow rules, which are placed upon us by the society. Many people are faced with the dilemma of whether or not to follow the ideals of other people, or pursue their ideals and go against the prevailing conventions. In “Selections from Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, the author talks about a man named McCandless who went into the Alaskan wilderness in order to find his true self. His journey was also to escape from the societal norms of society. A person who goes into the wilderness believes that they can live their life with brute simplicity. This gives them little to no time with the complicated problems of modern society. Likewise, in “Waiting for a Jew” by Jonathan Boyarin, the author talks about one’s aspiration to find their identity and purpose in the community. He conveys that religious places, like shul, allow an individual to develop a cross- cultural self. The desires and expectations placed upon us by the society shape our strategies of personal identity; therefore, instilling fears that cause us to identify in opposition to our prevailing conventions.
Irony is a beautiful technique exercised to convey a message or call a certain group of people to action. This rhetorical skill is artfully used by Jonathan Swift in his pamphlet “A Modest Proposal.” The main argument for this mordantly ironic essay is to capture the attention of a disconnected and indifferent audience. Swift makes his point by stringing together a dreadfully twisted set of morally untenable positions in order to cast blame and aspersions on his intended audience. Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” employs despicably vivid satire to call for change in a world of abuse and misfortune.
In conclusion, Burroughs presents two Martian races that are largely different to validate that all races are created equal and the differences in abilities result from cultural disparities. Burroughs’ focus on race in this novel is critical as it serves as a reaction against the biological racism fueled by eugenics in the 20th
The people in a society are often a product of the presiding government’s policy. In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, many of the citizens are artificially made and act like robots. However, in a reservation next to the new world, there exists a boy named John who was born and raised like a human. John is excited to go the new world because he believes that life will be better there. When John enters the new world, he sees many abnormalities that go against his beliefs, and the citizens call him a savage because he is not one of them. By juxtaposing John, the so-called savage, against the “refined” society, Huxley demonstrates the extreme extent of humankind 's atypical actions under the subjugation of a totalitarian government.
Even though Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb screened in the midst of the sobering Cold War, critics were keen on praising the film for its mastery of humor applied to such a sensitive matter. The film is exceedingly loaded with metaphors, innuendos, and allusions that nothing can be left undissected or taken for face value; the resulting effect is understood to be part of Kubrick’s multifarious theme. Kubrick has stated that what began as a “the basis for a serious film about accidental war ” eventually birthed an absurd and farcical classic comedy. The director fuses together irony, satire, and black humor to create a waggish piece but most of all the situation of the times and its gravity is the essence of what the audience finds so hilarious . Using caricatures rather than characters, exaggerated script, and sexual undertones, Kubrick manifests to the audience their own predicament and just how ridiculous it is to even consider brinksmanship as a means to preserve the American lifestyle.
In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the author depicts a collective society in which everyone has the same values and beliefs. From a young age, the people in the World State’s civilization are conditioned to believe in their motto of “Community, Identity, Stability.” Through hypnopaedia, the citizens of the World State learn their morals, values, and beliefs, which stay with them as they age. However, like any society, there are outsiders who alienate themselves from the rest of the population because they have different values and beliefs. Unfortunately, being an outsider in the World State is not ideal, and therefore there are consequences as a result. One such outsider is John. Brought from the Savage Reservation, John is lead to conform to the beliefs of the World State, thus losing his individuality, which ultimately leads him to commit suicide. Through John and the World State populace as an example, Huxley uses his novel to emphasize his disapproval of conformity over individuality.
In the United States, there are certain inalienable rights granted to all. As the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen colonies states, "among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."(Jefferson, 1787, Declaration of Ind., Pg. 1) These rights are not "special rights." While the U.S. government cannot hold back upon these rights, it does have the power to ratify and enforce laws that will enable or restrict its citizens' use of them.