A Rhetorical Analysis Of FX Porn

In today’s time, films have been so much more than high priced motion pictures. Films are the back bone to our weekends, first dates, and so much more. With that being said, there are large expectations for new movies that come out and the first impression can be the difference in audiences everywhere deeming these films “good” or “bad”. In the article “FX Porn” David Foster Wallace argued that a “good” film follows a strategic cycle, he claimed that this is a well thought out process that has been critiqued to the “T” and is used by many people in the movie industry today. This cycle consists of having likeable actors, simple plots, and lots of advanced editing, per Foster Wallace these are the characteristics that we base our opinions of films off. Forster Wallace says, “What they really are is half a dozen or so isolated, spectacular scenes — scenes comprising maybe twenty or thirty minutes of riveting, sensuous payoff — strung together via another sixty to ninety minutes of flat, dead, and often hilariously insipid narrative.” As a movie watcher, these elements are great pluses to movies, but the standards that we base our opinion on should not be limited to such simple aspects. Audiences are constantly putting films in the

same category and I feel that it takes away from the process that writers go through to provide us with entertainment in different genres. Every movie is different and the standards of these movies should vary based off the message and the goal that the director is trying to display.
Like it or not, everything is held to the same standard and although movies are in different genres the judging of the films aren’t. Many movie watchers tend to classify and judge movies by the same criteria and it is slowly tarnishing the art of film making. Movies are made by a certain strategic process so you can surely believe that the critiquing of these films are the same way. As Megan S. Conklin explained it, “Watching movies is fun, but critiquing movies is a more complex endeavor.” No one watches to figure out the goal or message of a film, viewers are watching for the big action scenes and famous cast actors. That is the standard that movies have been set upon and it slowly taking over. There must be a barrier set to differentiate between the goals that directors are trying to accomplish. There are many benefits to setting different standards and I think that if we start one movie at a time we can bring life back to the film industry.
No movie that is release is ever the same, therefore the standards of judging these films should be different based off the content that movie is providing. The film industry set up genres based on the similarities in either the narrative elements or the emotional response to the film. With the ability to categorize their work director can accomplish something different whether that be relating to a certain crowd, telling a story, or even just making something for the pure excitement of fans. As explained by Phillip Congleton “Genre is a very important component of film. It defines what the general direction the plot line will go and allows you to prepare yourself for that film.’’ Genres are the standard of content that is provided but, it isn’t the standard of what we should base our opinions off. The film industry knew that there would be a division within, so they classified films so the audience could possibly know what to expect. It is a must to know what you are getting into before you watch a movie because that is a big part of the total movie experience. If you don’t know what you’re watching, you certainly won’t like it.
When putting a certain stigma on things we tend to miss out on the benefits of what it could possible provide for us.

This holds true to how we view movies, we are too busy bashing the film because it isn’t what we’re used to, we turn a blind eye to the message that it is relaying. As blogger Robert Frost explained, “Film is art. Film is commerce. Film is spectacle. Film is documentarian. Film is protest. Film is stimulus. Film is conversation. Film is amusement.” We get so much from films whether it be an entertainment piece, short story, or “work of art” and we just take advantage of it. if this aspect of films keep getting ignored directors will feel that it isn’t a priority and there will be no substance to what we are

watching.
Believe it or not, the benefits of enjoying a movie and not holding them to one specific standard are abundant. First off, it will open your mind to new things making you unprejudiced to other genres of movies. With a clear view on things this could bring a new light into the movie watching experience, letting the watcher enjoy movies more because they aren’t comparing it to something else. In turn, this would let the viewer understand the plot, theme, and most importantly the message that the movie is relaying. When it’s all said and done an individual will like what they want but, this one change in their movie critiquing could show them difference in an entertainment piece and a work of art.