Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How to compare and contrast 2 leadership theories
How to compare and contrast 2 leadership theories
How to compare and contrast 2 leadership theories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How to compare and contrast 2 leadership theories
This paper will provide a comparison of leadership principles and concepts between the movies “Kelly’s Heroes” and “The Dirty Dozen.” Kelly’s Heroes is about a group of worn out infantry Soldiers that voluntarily put themselves back into the line of combat to liberate a fortune of 14,000 gold bars from behind the German lines. The commanding officer, CPT Maitland, is inattentive and privileged due to being the commanding general’s nephew. The two key non-commissioned offices, Big Joe and SGT Kelly, have to keep their Soldiers alive. The leadership of Big Joe (MSG) is put in question because SGT Kelly stumbles upon an officer in charge of transporting 14,000 gold bars behind the German lines. Kelly, behind Big Joe’s back, convinces the …show more content…
Soldiers to risk their lives on this adventure instead of going into reserve and temporary separation from combat. I chose Kelly’s Heroes because there are examples of both strong and weak leadership. Strong leadership style with Kelly and Big Joe working together; they effectively lead their team and meet their objectives. I see weak leadership style with CPT Maitland, who during a withdrawal engagement is involved in preparing a sailing boat for shipment to their headquarters and eventually back to the states. The Dirty Dozen involves 12 condemned and convicted Soldiers that get the opportunity to have their sentences commuted if they survive a suicide mission to kill several high-ranking German officers behind enemy lines.
I selected The Dirty Dozen because I found them on the same DVD and they are both great examples of the challenges of leadership. MAJ Reisman must take a group of criminals and make them Soldier’s again. This is extremely difficult because they do not trust each other, they do not trust Reisman, and some of them are looking for the first opportunity to escape. This is an extreme case in leadership because he has to get a dozen convicted Soldiers, many facing the death penalty, to work together as a …show more content…
team. In Kelly’s heroes, the unit is already a well-functioning machine; whereas there is no camaraderie between the men of The Dirty Dozen.
MAJ Reisman, with the help of his MP SGT Bowren, works to get the men into shape and act as a team. One method he uses is that if one of the ex-prisoners escapes, he will hold all the others accountable and return them to their cell and sentences. The team runs afoul of an arrogant airborne brigade commander, COL Breed, who uses his Soldiers to break into the dozen’s training compound. Without Reisman around, they are lined up and questioned, but they refuse to answer any questions. This is one of the first examples of unity that they show; where they refuse to answer the COL’s questions. MAJ Reisman arrives to sneak into camp and pull his weapon on the COL; this allows the dozen to disarm the COL’s men and get some revenge hits on the airborne Soldiers. This is also the first signs of respect they show the MAJ. COL Breed reported his side of what happened up the chain of command; from this, the generals were ready to dissolve the unit and return them to prison. MAJ Reisman, suggested that they prove their validity as a non-conventional force in an upcoming battle exercise. Using cunning and deceptive tactics, they are able to capture COL Breed without direct actions against his elite airborne units. This is an example that Reisman used unconventional tactics that his men felt appropriate to their former status as prisoners; this
solidified the men as a team. Kelly and Big Joe lead their men based on proven trust and a common goal. It does not matter to the unit if any of them die on this unauthorized mission because they would be subject to the same chances in normal combat. SGT Kelly uses his charisma and his ability to make deals with the division’s mortar NCOIC and a group of “hippie” Sherman tank crews to join in his plan to liberate the gold bars from the Germans. The leadership of Kelly and Big Joe are very similar as those of the MAJ Reisman, they used their rank to lead but more importantly, the confidence of their men felt towards them. They felt that the leaders had their best interest in mind while they were performing the mission. Many of the men from each movie died in action, but that did not affect their ability to control and lead their men. These two movies show great examples of leadership in combat. The Soldiers had confidence in their leaders because they were competent and valued each member of the unit. Leaders should not put themselves above their Soldiers; they should be willing to do the same things their Soldiers must go through. These two movies are great examples of leadership and I would recommend both. Kelly’s Heroes shows how the unit can react and overcome numerous obstacles and types of combat and pull through. The Dirty Dozen focuses on building team cohesion from individuals who are solely looking out for their best interest. In the process of training, the Soldiers build confidence and respect for authority that they had lost from being imprisoned.
... book to characters in other novels, you begin to see styles of leadership that are used and the effectiveness that they can have on a person’s character and ability to accomplish a mission. I feel as if a constant leadership style was put in charge from the beginning of their deployment that followed the standard that was necessary, then the soldiers would have been unable to commit the crimes they did during their deployment. On the flipside of that coin, I feel as if more competent leaders had existed through the tumultuous time of the deployment, they would have been able to adapt to the situation and control the soldiers they were responsible for no matter how difficult the deployment became. Despite the fact that 11 of 33 original 1st platoon leaders were removed by the end of the deployment a strong leader duo could have prevented the actions that took place.
Hull, Bradley Z., and Scott J. Allen. 2012. "Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: An Explanation and Case Study." Journal of Leadership Education 245-262.
Black Hearts is a great example of the reality on how severe bad leadership skills can ripple throughout a unit and impact its overall mission. This book serves as a guide for future leaders of America and will set the examples of what not to do in leadership positions. The lessons we can take from these soldiers can help us as potential leaders to become more competent and effective. The fact that this book focused on the hardships, poor decisions and sound judgment of the soldiers it helped emphasize on what was not the best choice of action and leaves a moment for you as the audience to think how you would of done it better. So right or wrong there was a lesson to be learned and the book did a good job including the reader. This book puts you in the shoes of a small group of soldiers from the 502nd Infantry Regiment and gives you an up close and personal take on the experience of the soldiers, from the bottom of the the ranks all the way up to the commander. 502nd Bravo Company 1st platoon deployed in the fall of 2005 into one of the most dangerous battle zones in Iraq known as the “Triangle of Death”. Thrown into the heartland of a growing insurgency, with undefined goals and a shortage of manpower, Bravo Company began piling up casualties at an alarming rate. They suffered many losses, as well as mental anguish. Because of the long and tragic deployment, a collapse in leadership began to unfold causing one of the most tragic, brutal, and infamous deployments in U.S Army history. There were many reasons that caused the deconstruction of leadership, and eventually, the actions of the soldiers accompanied by the lack of control, lead to the rape and murder of an innocent Iraqi girl and her family. This is a story about character...
LM01, Ethical Leadership. (2012). Maxwell Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC)
This discussion will focus on leadership as described by Robert Dees in The Resilience Trilogy, Resilient Leaders text. The points made in the book can be personally related. The three most important concepts learned from chapter 1 and 2 are tribulation, risk management, and selflessness. It is crucial for anyone is seeking to delve into leadership that everything will not happen as planned all the time. After a leader experience failure, knowing the avenues to take to regain a solid footing is also key to successful leadership. Often leaders who are unaware of available resources fold and give up. In the military profession, when someone gets knock down they get up brush themselves off and get back in the fight.
Leadership can come in many forms and from many perspectives. In the heat of combat, the leadership from a Navy Seal is much different than that of a leader in a high school dorm. Through reading Extreme Ownership I found how leadership completely changes depending on the perspective. Leadership in combat is completely dependent on quick, decisive execution, whereas leadership in the dorm is more dependent on taking time to work with everyone before arriving at a solution.
Military leadership is always an important factor in war. Good commanders will accomplish the goals of their side, while inferior generals will only hinder performance and fail their leader. However, not all great generals are victorious. Victories depend heavily on the availability of resources. Leadership does not relate to the supplies one has to draw from, but instead to the personal traits of the man himself.
In the movie ‘Remember the Titans’, there are many management concepts covered throughout the movie and he is the agent in the movie. The players on the Titans are the targets of the influence. ‘Remember the Titans’ is the perfect movie for Exam 3. It covers many topics that were on the exam, and this class has given me a different way of looking at the movie. I have seen the movie many times, but I never looked at it from a management perspective. It now makes sense to me to look at a football team, or any other type of sports team, from a management point of view.
Leadership is contagious throughout the world and most importantly in the Army. It is not just my view, but of all leaders, at all levels, that organizations are responsible for setting conditions that lead to long-term organizational success. As I reflect on my experiences, through experience and observation, I realize how my values, beliefs, and perspectives about leadership continuously evolve over time. Recognizing these changes over time helps me better understand that people in organizations have different perspectives in life. This leadership narrative serve as important guiding principles for how I will lead at the organizational level and represents my thought, values and beliefs.
As our forefathers before us stated, ‘‘No one is more professional than I. I am a Noncommissioned Officer, a leader of soldiers. As a Noncommissioned Officer, I realize that I am a member of a time honored corps, which is known as “The Backbone of the Army (“The NCO Creed writing by SFC Earle Brigham and Jimmie Jakes Sr”). These words to Noncommissioned Officer should inspire us to the fullest with pride, honor, and integrity. The NCO creed should mean much more than just words whenever we attend a NCO’s school. For most of us this is what our creed has become because we learn to narrate or recite. The military from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard has an overabundance of NCOs who fall under their pay grade of E-5, E-6 and etc. Yet somehow there still not enough leaders. I believe that the largest problem afflicting the military today is our lack of competent leaders, ineffective leader development, and how we influence our subordinates under us who are becoming leaders.
Once planted in the minds of individuals, ideas have a remarkable ability to grow with the strength and speed of the most powerful pathogens – possessing equal communicability as they spread to proximal centers of consciousness. How can this characteristic of ideas be utilized to benefit society? In the film Twelve Angry Men, we see a situation where Juror Eight – equipped with all the autonomy and wisdom of an ideal leader – appeals to logos in an attempt to promote the consideration of an idea, which he has planted in the minds of an otherwise unanimous jury; this idea being the mere possibility of innocence in the conviction of a boy charged with patricide. Ideally, leaders will possess an ability to transcend the allure of groupthink so prevalent in collective decision-making. However, when not coupled by the proper corresponding actions, such transcendental thoughts never become bigger than the brain-cells that they occupy. As Juror Eight leads his associates to consider the uncertainty of the case, we see an important skill in leadership: the ability to recognize disparity in individual cognition. Juror Eight appeals to this variance in thought patterns by guiding his peers through a journey of personal evaluation – allowing them to reach conclusions on their own, rather than explicitly dropping their minds into the terminal of his own logic.
Snider, D. M. (2008). Dissent and strategic leadership of the military professions. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
You get the glorious movie that is Top Gun. I can’t watch this movie without reciting a large majority of the lines, much to the annoyance of the people watching with me. Trying to explain to a civilian about the culture of the military can be hard enough. Hell, explaining the language alone can leave people more confused than when you started. However, what people do understand is that there are certain archetypes and leadership roles that mirror the civilian world. Using specific military movies and some of their characters as a template, we can start to bridge the gap of understanding that exists today so that the next time you are talking about a “Maximus-type leader” to a civilian friend, they won’t look at you like you are crazy.
This essay is going to outline the different academic perspectives to support the argument that heroic leadership in a business context, which emerged towards the end of the 19th century, has led to unfair successor announcements and an unhealthy biased decision-making - outcome attribution ratio resulting in unfair, unnatural and useless business leadership environments in today’s society. Nonetheless, today’s leadership delivers a foundation to eventually transition to a more natural, inclusive and useful form of it. In chapter 1 the focus is on the unnatural aspects regarding attribution of business outcomes and the negative impact this has on the leadership style of a manager. While chapter 2 explains the incentivizing of leaders
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.