Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contemporary issues in audit standards
Contemporary issues in audit standards
Contemporary issues in audit standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contemporary issues in audit standards
A qualified financial statement contains fair representations of an organization 's financial result, condition, and cash flow which is structured to ensure the organization is in compliance with GAAP . In the standard format, an organization should follow accounting principles to comply with internal accounting systems, disclosure rules, auditor oversight, and ethics, in the event, the above-mentioned principle does not meet, an audit failure may occur. An auditor failure may result as the request of clients and senior partners did not stand firm to refuse an unethical request from the clients. I will discuss a case of audit failure due to incompliance in the internal accounting system 's disclosure rule and firms ' right to refuse risky clients …show more content…
According to James R. Doty, PCAOB Chairman 's comment( Washington, 2012) on the E&Y and its partners case "These audit partners and Ernst & Young - the company 's outside auditor for more than twenty years - failed to fulfill their bedrock responsibility," (Washington, 2012) said James R. Doty, PCAOB Chairman " The auditor 's job is to exercise professional skepticism in evaluating a public company 's accounting and in conducting its audit to ensure that investors receive reliable information, which did not happen in this case" ( Washington, 2012). In the audits of Medicis 's Dec.31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 financial statements in connection with 2008 inspection of E&Y audits of Medicis( Washington 2012), the PCAOB Division of Registration and Inspection staff found E&Y 's acceptance of the company 's accounting for its sales returns reserve questionable. E& Y indicated that Medicis 's reports for its sales returns are not conforming with the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the sales returns reserve was not evaluating accordingly, instead of at gross sales price, the returns were at the cost of replacing(Washington 2012). The Board also found that E&Y accepted the company 's reserve at replacement cost without support from audit evidence ( Washington
As a partner in the public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche. LLP. James, in this case, was responsible for this violation. First, James was no on the basis of full inspection of the subsequent discovery existing at the date of the auditor 's report. Second, he did not detect and address problems regarding Ligand Pharmaceuticals ' exclusion of certain types of returns from the evaluation of future returns. Last but not least, he did not adequately perceive the reasonableness of Ligand’s estimates of future product
According to PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3520 a registered public accounting firm and its associated persons must be independent of the firm's audit client throughout the audit and professional engagement period. Independence is required for all audit engagements. The auditor must be independent of an entity when performing an engagement according to General Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Independence is very significant to the audit profession, because the primary purpose of an audit is to provide financial statement users with reasonable assurance an on whether the financial statements are presented fairly. The auditor’s report gives credibility to an entity financial statement and without an auditor’s report the financial statement would be consider worthless. Reliance on management for the fair presentation of a financial statement would often result with a bias and impressive financial statements that doesn’t reflect a true picture of the entity’s financial position. An auditor’s independence should not in anyway be influenced by any relationship between their client and
Individual Article Review Lily Cobian LAW/421 March 31, 2014 Ramon E. Ortiz-Velez Individual Article Review Introduction My article review is based on Sarbanes-Oxley and audit failure, a critical examination why the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was established and why it is not a guarantee to prevent failure of audits. Sarbanes-Oxley Act talks about scandals of Enron which occurred in 2001 and even more appalling the company’s auditor, Arthur Anderson, found guilty of shredding company documents after finding out Enron Company was going to be audited. The exorbitant amounts of money auditors get paid to hide audit discrepancies was also beyond belief. The article went on to explain many companies hire relatives or friends to do their audits, resulting in fraud, money embezzlement, corruption and even the demise of companies. Resulting in the public losing faith in the accounting profession, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act passed in 2002 by congress was designed to restrict what company owners and auditors can and cannot do. From what I gathered in the article, ever since the implementation of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act there has been somewhat of an improvement but questions are still being asked as to why there are still issues that are not being targeted in hopes of preventing more audit failures. The article also talked about four common causes of audit failure: unintentional auditor mistakes, fraud, fatigue and auditor client relationships. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct clearly states an independent auditor because it produces a credible audit, however, when there is conflict of interest, the relation of a former employer, or a relative or even the fear of getting fire...
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a legislation aimed at increasing the accuracy of financial statements that were issued by companies that are publicly held (Livingstone, 2011). The passing of this act was a response to some of the financial malpractices that took place at companies such as WorldCom and Enron. According to Livingstone, making ethical decisions is critical because ethical lapses can lead to severe unforeseen consequences (Livingstone, 2011). This paper will discuss the effects of the Act on the audit committees of public company boards of directors as well as outside independent audit firms. The main advantages and disadvantages of the Act and recommendations of the changes that should be made to the act will also be included.
According to the conceptual framework, the potential users of financial statements are investors, creditors, suppliers, employees, customers, governments and agencies, and the general public (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006). The primary users are investors, creditors, and those who advise them. It goes on to define the criteria that make up each potential user, as well as, the limitations of financial reporting. The FASB explicitly states that financial reporting is “but one source of information needed by those who make investment, credit, and similar resource allocation decisions. Users also need to consider pertinent information from other sources, and be aware of the characteristics and limitations of the information in them” (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2006). With this in mind, it is still particularly difficult to determine whom the financials should be catered towards and what level of prudence is necessary for quality judgment.
Michele will know when accountability is presence because she will see it on the floor. She will see the nurses practicing taking EBP and applying to their care. In a similar manner, Michele will also see accountability when they come to the follow-up quality improvement meetings and contribute on how the changes are going. In addition, depending on what EBP the unit decided to institutes Michele will be able to see data that backs up the nurses have been accountable.
The ethical dilemma in this case is one that Daniel Potter is faced with. Daniel is a staff
According to the article authored by Mark Rupert, what are the seven best practices in the roles and responsibilities of an internal audit function?
A standard audit procedure includes the examining of the financial statements prepared in the light of relevant accounting and reporting standards and evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. On the other hand, internal control over financial reporting is a standard procedure by which assurance is provided regarding the reliable preparation of financial statements and their presentation for external purposes in accordance with financial standards. The firm conducted the audit in accordance with the rules which were in compliance with the statute. After conducting the audit, the firm was of the opinion that the company effectively maintained all
In order to maintain the auditor’s integrity, objectivity, and independence, auditing standards have been issued for measuring of the quality of the auditor’s performance. Auditing standards are general guidelines to aid auditors in fulfilling their professional responsibilities in the audit of financial statements. They include consideration of professional qualities such as competence and independence, reporting requirements and evidence. (Soltani, 2007)
One of the foremost problems facing the accounting profession today is the loss of respect that faces accountants in light of recent accounting scandals. In order to regain lost respect in the accounting profession an accountant must have integrity and ethics that are above and beyond the norm. This fact is true whether the accountant works for a business entity or for a government entity. In either situation the accountant is responsible for remaining steadfast, not only in professional behavior, but in personal behavior as well. In recent years, accountants have come under fire by the general public for unethical decisions, a reputation that, although only a few individual accountants were guilty, the entire profession was found guilty of, in the court of public opinion. Now, the accounting profession must be far more diligent in governing themselves, and in assuring those dependent upon their decisions, that they are above reproach. This is especially true of those accountants responsible for government funds, which can be scrutinized by the public. The public seem to have set more rigorous standards than business investors, of what is proper use of the funds available. They will not tolerate waste or misappropriation of funds and demand complete accountability. Accountants must stand ready, willing, and able to answer any and all questions that may be put forth, and be able to prove that the decisions that have been made were correct and proper. This includes not only following the letter of the law, but avoiding any decisions that, while being legal, would not be totally ethical and above board. An accountant is trusted with confidential information which must remain confidential, unless it has led or could possibly lead to illegal activity, in which case, of course, the information, must be reported immediately to the proper authority.
Audit procedures are a set of detailed instructions written to obtain sufficient audit evidences to perform the company’s audit report. Audit procedures must be carefully planned and written because it is used as the guidelines to collect audit evidences.
The audit is prepared and conducted annually while the review is conducted quarterly or mostly when need be. Ernst & Whinney failure to conduct an audit and opt for a review therefore implied the above differences. It is clear that the review was not comprehensive to provide enough information about ZZZZ Best Company financial statements. It can be argued that Ernst & Whinney did want to get into deeper details of ZZZZ Best Company because of the many complic...
New auditing standards require members of the audit team to discuss the potential for material misstatement due to fraud. This discussion should include an exchange of ideas or “brainstorming” among the audit team members about (1) how and where they believe that an entity’s financial statements might be susceptible to material misstatement due to fraud, and (2) how management could perpetrate and conceal fraudulent financial reporting. The brainstorming can take place during audit planning or during any part of the auditors’ information gathering (and members of the audit engagement are expected to communicate about fraud risk factors throughout the audit until its completion).
In 1973, there was a project initially commissioned by the Executive Committee of the American Accounting Association. The intention of that project was to ‘write a statement that would provide the same type of survey and distillation of current thinking on accounting theory as A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory (ASOBAT) provided in an earlier decade.’(p.ix) In 1977, Committee on Concepts and Standards for External Financial Reports wrote this book in response to that project. This book consists of five chapters. I would lay more emphasis on analyzing chapter 3 because I think these issues still apply in today’s accounting profession.