Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hitler's rise and fall
Hitler's rise and fall
Hitler's rise and fall
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hitler's rise and fall
In this essay I am going to compare and contrast the rise to power of Adolf Hitler in
Germany (by 1933) and of Mao Zedong in China (by 1949). Whilst these two risings were similar in some aspects, such as the political and economic situation which existed in
Germany and in China as well as the propaganda techniques, used by both Hitler and Mao, there were major differences between them, such as the ideology of the dictators, the appeal they used for the people and the way they got into the power, in case of Hitler, through political manoeuvring and in case of Mao, by a civil war. The scope of the essay will be for
Germany the years when Weimar Republic was born in 1918, when the Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated, until 1933, when Hitler became the
…show more content…
One similarity between the rise to power of Hitler and Mao is that both countries –
Germany and China were in a state of disrepair before their rise to power, which largely contributed towards the rising to power by Hitler and Mao. One aspect of this is the fact that the most fruitful lands of both Germany and China were possessed by the foreigners, e.g. after the end of First World War, the Treaty of Versailles gave the region of Alsace-Lorraine to France, coal-producing area of Saar was put under the control of League of Nations and a large part of Eastern Prussia and the so-called Polish Corridor to Poland. In total Germany lost 13% of its European land and all its African colonies. This led to major dissatisfaction among the Germans, who believed that these lands should belong to the Germans. If in
Germany the sense of humiliation began after the loss of the First World War, China had experienced “100 years of humiliation”, after losing the “Opium Wars” in 1839-42 and in
1856-60, followed by a defeat by the Japanese in 1894. The so-called Port Treaties gave the prosperous regions in the hands of internationals, e.g. Shanghai was owned by Britain. This also led to the establishment of many warlords, who refused to obey the central
…show more content…
Another similarity between the rise to power of Hitler and Mao are the numerous coups and demonstrations both in Germany and in China, which followed the political humiliations, e.g. the Kapp Putsch, by ex-soldiers, known as the Freikorps in Germany and the patriotic march in Beijing and nation-wide demonstrations after the announcement of the Treaty of Versailles in China. This was creating instable situation in the countries, and the unsatisfied moods of people, led to two similar risings to take place in Germany and in China – Hitler attempted the Munich Putsch in 1923, which ended with him and his followers being imprisoned, and which persuaded Hitler later to seek other means of taking power, rather than armed revolution, and Mao in 1927 attempted the Autumn Harvest Uprising, which was successfully defeated by the GMD army, following the establishment of Jiangxi Soviet, and after which
Mao and his Army founder Zhu De changed from conventional to guerrilla warfare. So, we can see, how the coups and demonstrations led to the attempted overthrow of the government by Hitler and Mao, but after the failure of which, they turned to other types of struggle, in case of Hitler to political manoeuvring and in case of Mao to guerrilla
Consequently, no particular warlord was able to unify and stabilize China. A third reason was continued intervention of the foreign powers. Since the 19th century, the West had intervened in the affairs of China, forcing China to open up its ports and trade with them. Their exploitation caused many people to think lowly of the central government. Their continued presence after 1911 revolution caused a lot of resentment amongst the people.
This essay will concentrate on the comparison and analysis of two communist figures: Mao Zedong, leader of the Communist Party in China, and Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union. The main focus of this paper will be to explore each figure’s world view in depth and then compare and contrast by showing their differences and similarities. Joseph Stalin was a realist dictator of the early 20th century in Russia. Before he rose to power and became the leader of the Soviet Union, he joined the Bolsheviks and was part of many illegal activities that got him convicted and he was sent to Siberia (Wood, 5, 10). In the late 1920s, Stalin was determined to take over the Soviet Union (Wiener & Arnold, 1999).
Mohandas Gandhi and Mao Zedong were two great leaders who succeeded in many ways by their actions and decisions. Gandhi was an Indian leader and Mao a Chinese leader. However, their approach to success, peace, and ultimately, a revolution, was very different. Mao favored peace through violence, and Gandhi favored peace through non-cooperation and standing up for what is right. He also believed that these changes will be accomplished by “conscious suffering”, was the way he put it. However, despite their differences, these two leaders were similar too. They were both very charismatic leaders who successfully made it through their revolutions. Mao’s revolution led to change in class structure while Gandhi’s revolution involved India as a country, and he wanted people to realize that working together is a great way to gain independence. While Mao and Gandhi both believed that each of their countries have the need of independence, their views differed when it came to the use of violence, development towards the revolution, and their thoughts on a caste system.
At the end of the eighteenth century, China’s goods were much desired by Britain. However, the Chinese saw Europeans as savages and did not want to trade with them. During trade, there was an imbalance in China’s favor, because the Europeans were forced to buy Chinese goods using silver. The Western Imperialists began to grow opium poppies from in India, and then smuggle them into China. China soon became addicted to the drug and spent most of it’s money on the purchase of it from the Europeans and Americans. This shifted the balance of power to be in Europe’s favor.
Within Nazi government, Hitler acted as the final source of authority, which serves as evidence against the notion that Hitler was ‘weak’. Having consolidated power by 1934 Hitler was, at least theoretically, omnipotent, being Chancellor, Head of State and “supreme judge of the nation”. However, the notion that Nazi government systematically pursued the clear objectives of the Fuhrer is challenged by the reality of Nazi government structure. It has been widely accepted by historians that the Nazi State was a chaotic collection of rival power blocs. Mommsen’s explanation that this was the result of Hitler’s apathy towards government a...
One of the most important aspects of imperialism is the take over of government. The English accomplished this in several ways. Some of the “Unfair Treaties” forced the Chinese to allow the English ships into their ports and to allow them to have a major role in the trade market. The English wanted tea, porcelain, and silk from china. The Chinese however didn’t want to gods the English offered in return. The English began trading opium in return for the goods. Although it was illegal, many of the money hungry merchants excepted the opium in return for the things that were valuable to the English. Because of this, the first Anglo-Chinese war erupted. China underestimated the power of England and was defeated. At the end of the war, they were forced to sign the Treaty of Nanjing (1842). The treaty was one of the first treaties known as the “Unfair Treaties.” Under this treaty, china gave up the island of Hong Kong, abolished the licensed monopoly system of trade, granted English nationals exemption from Chinese laws, and agreed to give England whatever trading concessions that were granted to other countries then and later.
Many foreign powers ravaged China in search of wealth, brutally destroying land and violently fighting people. After much of the devastation, the Dynasty was ‘forced’ to acquiesce to the foreign powers (-only after they assured Cixi that her position and power would be held in place). The results of these was called the Boxer Protocol – which would later be considered one of the “Unequal Treaties.” Among the stipulations of the Boxer Protocol, China would have to pay an enormous amount of money, for indemnity, to about 14 countries (in different proportions). Furthermore, foreign powers were given the right to seize and inhabit certain places in China.
Support for the Nazi party was due to the growing belief that it was a
The Weakness of the Weimar Republic and Hitler's Rise to Power The question directly relates to the idea that the political power of a country can be taken over by ambitious people in different ways. From our knowledge we know there is three ways this can be done…by take over by force, also known as a 'coup d'etat', in a more democratic and just way or by a political deal. In the 1920's and the 1930's Hitler led a right wing political party and was seen by many as a dictator. He wanted to overthrow and control the German government and he tried all three of these ways in an attempt to do so, some methods were more successful than others.
...erty, social unrest, drug addictions, and government bankruptcy when foreign exploitation emerged. In spite of this, China by not being able to withstand western influence incorporated imperialism and obtained a modern military and technology from the favored nations. Albeit, the western powers forced imperialism to East Asia differently than the rest of the world. Modern East Asia still emerged with parts of its ancient culture still intact. The unequal treaties, extraterritoriality, and other forms of discriminatory decrees created the Westernization of China, Japan, and Korea and gave these nations hope for the future that Western dominance would soon pass.
More murderous than Hitler, more powerful than Stalin, in the battle of the Communist leaders Mao Zedong trumps all. Born into a comfortable peasant family, Mao would rise up to become China’s great leader. After leading the communists away from Kuomintang rule, he set out to modernize China, but the results of this audacious move were horrific. He rebounded from his failures time and again, and used his influence to eliminate his enemies and to purge China of its old ways. Mao saw a brighter future for China, but it was not within his grasp; his Cultural Revolution was not as successful as he had wanted it to be. Liberator, oppressor, revolutionary, Mao Zedong was the greatest emancipator in China’s history, as his reforms and actions changed the history of China and of the wider world.
That was one really bitter downfall for China. They basically had to pay for their own war for a total of $21 million and opium was still traded, not even stopped. I think Britain making those conditions was an act of karma for China’s part. Once the five new trading ports opened, China was confined to learning how to trade with the rest of the world. That was how China became what it is today, rich, powerful, and large.
MODERN HISTORY – RESEARCH ESSAY “To what extent was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian state in the period from 1934 to 1939?” The extent to which Nazi Germany was a totalitarian state can be classed as a substantial amount. With Hitler as Fuhrer and his ministers in control of most aspects of German social, political, legal, economical, and cultural life during the years 1934 to 1939, they mastered complete control and dictation upon Germany. In modern history, there have been some governments, which have successfully, and others unsuccessfully carried out a totalitarian state. A totalitarian state is one in which a single ideology is existent and addresses all aspects of life and outlines means to attain the final goal, government is run by a single mass party through which the people are mobilized to muster energy and support.
to the Treaty of Nanking creating new ports for foreigners and allowing them to live lives contrary to what was expected of the people of China. The Chinese man had become addicted and it was just getting easier for him to get the opium he needed to satisfy his need, but in order to attain the opium he was leaving behind everything that his country had taught him about his sense of self. The man was no longer the one that would be instilling the traditional Chinese values into the youth of his country; it would be the new foreigners like the British traders who had come to China to profit from the trade. The same traders who were selling the opium, that would have a greater influence on shaping China from a traditionally isolated country from foreign influence, to a country that would later become a major power in foreign trade and open to most foreign influence.
The Treaty of Nanking, also known as the treaty that ended the first war, was the first of the unequal treaties that China made. This treaty included the British taking control of parts of Hong Kong. Furthermore, British merchants, who had previously been allowed to trade at Guangzhou, were then granted access to trade at five “treaty ports”. The Treaty of Nanking was then followed up by another treaty, which stated that British Citizens shall be tried under British law, and that Britain shall be granted any rights that the Chinese had granted other countries (Boggs 1). The unfair treaties that were signed still have an effect today, because of China’s constant trading with foreign countries, and the western influence the British had on Hong