Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Paul and the rise of Christianity
What influence did Paul have on Christianity
Importance of lukes gospel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
True Grace of God
A Background Study of Peter’s First Epistle and the Preparation of Five Texts for Expository Sermons
Peter was an apostle of Jesus Christ; he was brought to Jesus by his brother Andrew and became one of Jesus’ first disciples1. He became a prominent member of the 12 disciples, being with James and John a member of the innermost circle around Jesus. He served at times as a spokesman for the group2 and he was with Jesus on the mount of transfiguration3.
The first Epistle of Peter most commonly known as First Peter. Authorship of this book has traditionally been attributed to the Apostle Peter simply because it bears his name and identifies him as the author 4. Although the text does indicate that Peter wrote the epistle due to the language, dating, style and structure some scholars have challenged the Apostle Peter’s authorship. Many scholars are convinced that Peter was no the author because he had no formal education in philosophy nor an advanced knowledge of the Greek language. Scholar Graham Stanton rejects Peterine authorship because he says that 1 Peter was most likely written during the reign of Domitian in AD 81, which is when he believes widespread Christian persecution began, which is long after the death of Peter5. This theory has been abandoned as of late because the described persecution within the work does not necessitate a time period outside of the period of Peter.
There are also theories that support Peterine authorship one theory is “ secretarial hypothesis”, which suggests that 1 Peter was dictated by Peter and was written in Greek by his secretary , Silvanus (5:12)6.
1. John 1:40-42
2. Matthew 16:15-16
3. Matthew 17:1,2
...
... middle of paper ...
...Stay self-controlled and alert.
Main point: Stand fast in God’s grace
Bibliography
Stanton, Graham. Eerdmans Commentary of the Bible. Wm.B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2003
Elliot, John. 1 Peter: Anchor Bible Commentary. Yale University Press. 2001.
Travis B. Williams (1 November 2012). Persecution in 1 Peter: Differentiating and Contextualizing Early Christian Suffering. BRILL. pp. 28–. ISBN 978-90-04-24189-3. Retrieved 1 April 2013
http://www.biblestudytools.com/1-peter/
First Peter: Introduction, Argument, and Outline. https://bible.org/book/export/html/1362
Carson, D. A., and Douglas J. Moo. An introduction to the New Testament. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 2005
Henry, Matthew, and Martin H. Manser. The new Matthew Henry Commentary: the classic work with updated language. Abridged ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 2010.
The authorship of First Peter seems very obvious, but according to commentary from Edward Gordon Selwyn there is definite room for discussion. Peter is written in the prelude to chapter one, but in the final greetings in chapter five, help from Silas is mentioned. There are many different parts of the book that confirm Peter as the main author though. In chapter five, verse one, the author states that he was a "witness of Christ's sufferings," in which Peter witnessed all that Jesus endured. The author exhorts the elders in chapter five, verse two, to tend to God's flock that is under them. Peter could be saying this in reference to the instance when Jesus was speaking to him in John chapter 21 about feeding His lambs and taking care of His sheep. These are just a couple of statements that would be "quite natural" for Peter to make in his writing (Kelcy 8). The other possibility in the authorship of First Peter is that Silas, also known as Silvanus, helped write the book as an amanuensis. With Peter's lack of formal schooling, some scholars say that Silvanus must have had a part in the...
Brown, David, D, D. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible. John. Crosswalk Inc. 1996.Byzantine Greek Translation of the Book of John.Harris, Hall. Commentary on the Gospel of John. Biblical Studies Press. 1996. Henry, Matthew. Matthew Henry Complete Commentary. www.biblestudytools.net1996.Johnson, Barton W. People's New Testament Commentary. Crosswalk Inc. 1999. www.biblestudytools.net.1999.Bryant, Beauford. Krause, Mark. The College Press NIV Commentary John. College Press. 1998.
Silva, Moisés. Philippians. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2005.
The letter of Ephesians is the tenth book in the New Testament, its authorship is attributed to Paul after his conversion from a persecutor of Christians to apostle. The legitimacy of his authorship is still debated by scholars. Harold Hoehner in his book “Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary,” lists a number of reasons why many scholars reject Paul as the author. But, for the purposes of this exegetical Paul is considered the author of the letter.
"It appears, that of all the apostle John was especially favoured with our Lord's regard and confidence, so as to be called the disciple whom Jesus loved" (Peoples Bible-John 1). Even though John loved his leader so much, he still ran away like the other disciples did when Jesus was arrested. John was still their when Jesus had his trial and was crucified. Jesus also in trusted John with the care of his mother. John was there with Jesus when he would perform all of his great miracles. On of the famous lines from John is "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (Peoples Bible- John 6). John was the spiritual evangelist. John and his brother James were called the Sons of Thunder.
This section is one of the most difficult to interpret and translate in the entire New Testament, but it must be viewed and understood in the context of the book of 1 Peter and the entire Bible. We have broken verses 13-22 into two sections for the purpose of this essay, but when Peter wrote them, they were not sections, but a whole thought. He is simply continuing the thoughts of the 5 verses we just discussed. He says in verse 17 it is better to suffer for doing what is right than for doing what is wrong, and continues in verse 18 with the example Christ set by suffering unjustly for God's glorious purposes. His victory came through unjust suffering. Verse 18 is the doctrinal justification for verses 13-17, and is the finale to Peter's section on the unjust suffering of believers. This doctrinal justification is what gives the believer confidence in the face of persecution. Knowing Christ's suffering led to His victory gives assurance to believers that their suffering will a...
New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997. Osborne, Grant R. Revelation. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2002.
Wenham, G.J., Moyter, J.A., Carson, D.A. and France, R.T., eds. New Bible Commentary. Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 1998.
Mark was Peter's son (I Peter 5:13, possibly spiritual son), who wrote down what Peter said about who Jesus was, what He did, where He went and what happened; Mark's gospel is therefore Peter's account, an eye-witness account, written down by Mark.
Bruce, F.F.. The Epistle of Paul to the Romans. (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1983)
However, the essay will start by looking at who the authors of these letters were. Looking at the authors of both the letters of II Peter and Jude, helps in showing the letters similarities. The author of the letter of II Peter was Simon Peter, one of the twelve apostles of Jesus Christ. We know from what the Bible tells us that Peter was close to Jesus, and he was also the first to get the revelation of who Jesus really was, (Matthew 16:16). The author of the letter of Jude was Jude the brother of James.
...Peter with the rest of the disciples, and not that of the “over exalted” view some people of the time had created.
Carson, D, & Moo, D. (2005) An introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
The General Epistles give the reinforcement needed to sustain faith in Christ, the tools needed to decipher a false teacher, and to encourage our love and commitment to one another. The General Epistles are a vital lesson for all of us today and they are still relevant in today’s society. The scenarios are a little different but the general application of the overlying lesson is still relevant. The General Epistles tell us that our faithfulness in God will be rewarded, we will be granted eternal life that was made possible through our Lord Jesus
The social history of the early Christian church is closely related to the kinds of documents and the secular, cultural context that was around at the time. Paul was highly influential on early Christian theology as was other people that wrote under his name. Three canonized works have classically been attributed to Paul, but are now known to be forgeries: 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, and Titus. These books are known as “The Pastorals” and they are different from Paul’s authentic works in many fundamental ways. In order to see the historical context in which these letters were written, we must first understand the social history of Christian theology at the time. We will present the social history and changes to early Christian theology that occurred in the time that spans the writing of 1 and 2 Corinthians to the writings of the Pastorals.