Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of discipleship in jesus' disciples
The ministry and contribution of Apostle Peter
Impact of discipleship in jesus' disciples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of discipleship in jesus' disciples
Chapter 15 of the Book of John This chapter takes place in the upper room in Jerusalem. This was during the Passover feast, though some scholars say otherwise. Jesus was speaking only to the disciples. The first part of the chapter is devoted to the analogy of the vineyard and it's branches. The second part is talks about the future relationship with the "world". This is an important chapter, which deals with not only relationship with Jesus and the Father, but also with the outside community.1. "I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. egw eimi h ampeloV h alhqinh kai o pathr mou o gewrgoV estiThe scene must be kept in mind. The Lord and his disciples had just eaten the last supper. He had said, "Arise, let us go forth" (John 14:31). They had risen, but were still standing in the room. On the table, from where they had just risen, was the "fruit of the vine,"(wine) and the Lord had said he would never drink it again upon the earth. (Matthew 26:7) (Johnson)There are numerous Old Testament passages, which refer to Israel as a vine: Ps. 80:8-16, Isaiah. 5:1-7, Jeremiah. 2:21, Ezekiel. 15:1-8, 17:5-10, 19:10-14, and Hosiah 10:1. The vine became symbolic of Israel, and even appeared on some coins issued by the Maccabees. The Old Testament passages which use this symbol appear to regard Israel as faithless to why and/or the object of severe punishment. Ezek. 15:1-8 in particular talks about the worthlessness of wood from a vine (in relation to disobedient Judah). A branch cut from a vine is worthless except to be burned as fuel. This appears to fit more with the statements about the disciples than with Jesus' description of himself as the vine.Ezek. 17:5-10 contains vine imagery that refers to a king of the house of David, Zedekiah, who was set up as king in Judah by Nebuchadnezzar. Zedekiah allied himself to Egypt and broke his covenant with Nebuchadnezzar (and therefore also with God), which would ultimately result in his downfall (17:20-21). Ezek. 17:22-24 then describes the planting of a cedar sprig, which grows into a lofty tree, a figurative description of Messiah. But it is significant that Messiah himself is not described in Ezekiel 17 as a vine, but as a cedar tree. The vine imagery here applies to Zedekiah's disobedience.Jesus' description of himself as the "true Vine" is to be seen against this background, but it ... ... middle of paper ... ... epect the holy spirit to assume their designasted tasks of being a witness for Jesus. (Bryant)27. And you also must testify, for you have been with me from the beginning. kai umeiV de martureite oti ap archV met emou esteThe apostles had been "with him from the beginning," and knew all the facts. If he was true, they knew it; if he stilled the waves and raised the dead, they knew it; if he rose from the tomb, they knew it. (Acts 1:21,22) They bore witness to him by word and left their words to us. They bore witness by life, gave up all for him and died for their testimony. Such testimony is the strongest human testimony ever offered to any fact. (Johnson) Bibliography Brown, David, D, D. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible. John. Crosswalk Inc. 1996.Byzantine Greek Translation of the Book of John.Harris, Hall. Commentary on the Gospel of John. Biblical Studies Press. 1996. Henry, Matthew. Matthew Henry Complete Commentary. www.biblestudytools.net1996.Johnson, Barton W. People's New Testament Commentary. Crosswalk Inc. 1999. www.biblestudytools.net.1999.Bryant, Beauford. Krause, Mark. The College Press NIV Commentary John. College Press. 1998.
Carson, D. A. New Bible Commentary: 21st Century Edition. 4th ed. Leicester, England; Downers Grove, IL: Inter-Varsity Press, 1994.
According to the Gospel of Thomas, the disciples first asked Jesus what the kingdom of heavens represented. In response, Jesus said that the kingdom represented a grain of mustard seed, as it is smaller than all other seeds, but it puts forth an enormous foliage and provides shade for the birds of heaven (Thomas 36:26-29). In similar fashion, the parable of the mustard seed in Matthew states how the mustard seed is one of the smallest seeds, representative of a small beginning. But it also grows to be something larger; a great ending (Matthew 13:31-32). Again we can see a parallel in Mark, as Jesus asks a rhetorical question of what does the kingdom represent? He then says how the mustard seed is one of the smallest seeds, but becomes the greatest of all shrubs providing the most shade (Mark 4:30-32). Lastly, the New Testament makes reference to the parable of the mustard seed in the book of Luke. Although this account is much briefer, only really allowing for the conclusion that a mustard seed will grow into something remarkable (Luke 13:18-19). While the language of each gospel differs, they each allow for readers to believe that even the smallest of seeds, can grow into something much greater than what it was in the beginning. It can be believed that the Jesus of Nazareth told this because it is mentioned in not only two, but
was taken out of class after suspected of committing two break-in robberies. Investigator DiCostanzo did not read him the Miranda Warnings and did not call a legal guardian to be present during questioning. J.D.B instantly denied his involvement, but after DiCostanzo warned that he may face juvenile detention, he confessed. After the confession DiCostanzo told him he could refuse to answer any further questions and leave. “J.D.B nodded and provided further detail, including information about the location of the stolen items. Eventually J.D.B wrote a statement, at DiCostanzo’s request” (J.D.B. v. North Carolina) it was after the confession that DiCostanzo told J.D.B that he could refuse any further questions, but he hadn’t told him this previously. Following the questioning J.D.B. was charged for breaking and entering, and
It was later decided that even though Lujan’s Miranda rights were violated, it was a harmless error due to the fact that he confessed in court to the murders. “However, the state court reached this decision by failing to apply the Supreme Court 's holding in Harrison v. United States” (McMahon, 2013). The case finally ended when the Ninth Circuit applied what was taken from Douglas v. Jacquez and modified the conviction. “The district court may provide the state court with the option to modify the conviction, but the district court erred in concluding second-degree murder was the appropriate modification” (McMahon, 2013). The case of Lujan v. Garcia was one where a man’s Miranda rights were violated due to an inadequate reading of the warnings which changed the outcome of the case. In conclusion, Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 [1966]) case is a prominent case in history that resulted in rights that are still used today. The Miranda rights are a part of the core of the current United States criminal justice system. They have a huge influence on the way police officers and other law enforcement workers operate with regards to custodies and interrogations. Despite the Miranda rights being so important, there are still times in which someone’s Miranda rights can be violated such as during the Lujan v. Garcia case. A violation of the Miranda rights can change the outcome of a court case. The rights given during the Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 [1966]) as a result of the case are what has had a great influence on the criminal justice system
... asked how the crowed would be feed, one response was to go into the market to buy the food that was needed. But noticing that there were two problems one, having to deal with lack of food, and the other lack of finance left, the disciples in a state of dumbfounds. Instead of looking to the one who was and is a problem solver. This signifies Jesus power over food.
The last way that Jesus demonstrated His discipleship was in the way he took care of people’s spiritual needs. The first time we see this is in Mark 1:21-28. In these verses Jesus is i...
Since it was impossible to tell if he knew his rights, Ernesto Miranda solidified the 5th amendment when his court conviction was over-turned in 1966 (McBride)”, which has effected every aspect of arrest ever since, by establishing rights of the accused and responsibilities of law enforcement officers (McBride). Miranda was arrested early march 3rd 1963. (McBride)” He was found guilty of rape and kidnapping (McBride). The women he had allegedly raped, said she was a virgin, which was disproved in trial (1966). The main piece of evidence was Miranda’s verbal and written confessions (McBride). The confessions were obtained during a 3-hour interrogation in which Miranda had no communication with an attorney (McBride). During this interrogation he was also falsely told he had been positively identified (1966). His conviction was over-turned in 1966 (McBride). The conviction was overturned when the Supreme Court ruled that his confession was obtained unconstitutionally (McBride). Something needed to change.
The spies went during the time of the first grape harvest, and brought back a branch with "one cluster of grapes" (Numbers, Ch.13, Line 23), together with some pomegranates and figs. They tell Moses that the land is rich, and the walls of the towns are unfortified. However, while Joshua and Caleb argue that the land is abundant and is "floweth with milk and honey" (Numbers, Ch.13, Line 27), the other spies say that strong and evil men inhabit it, which causes the Israelites to want to return to Egypt. The Lord talks to Moses and says he will kill all the Israelites. Moses pleads with God, saying that others would think badly of God for leading his people to the wilderness and abandoning them there.
The Parable of the Sower is one of seven parables in Matthew, chapter thirteen that was from familiar ideas and sources, and natural to men. (Broadus, 285) It was normal to see a farmer sowing grain in Galilee. The "truth" is this parable was designed to teach. The varied types of soil are the emphasis in this parable, rather than that of "the sowing of the seed ("word," v.19) of the kingdom." "Jesus called it 'the parable of the sower' because it was a sower who inspired the lesson." (Hobbs, 164) The sower is a Christian teacher or Christ, "but not a prominent figure in the parable." The seed stands for "Christian truth, 'the word of the kingdom', or 'word of God,' because when implanted in the heart and conscience, it grows, develops, and brings forth spiritual fruit. (Dummelow, 672)
"Behold, a sower went forth to sow; 4: And when he sowed, some seeds fell by the way side, and the fowls came and devoured them up: 5: Some fell upon stony places, where they had not much earth: and forthwith they sprung up, because they had no deepness of earth: 6: And when the sun was up, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away. 7: And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them: 8: But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold. 9: Who hath ears to hear, let him hear" (Matt. 13).
The Bible as a whole is all about Jesus. For those who believe in Him, he is the pivotal character in all of scripture. While the Bible contains much about Jesus, John 17-21 highlights the climax of all scripture, which is his death, burial, resurrection and an opportunity for people to know the truth (John 18:37, NIV). This is why it is important to study this particular passage. For my essay I will give an indication of the settings, and indication of the main conflicts driving the plot and the extent to which those conflicts are resolved, observations on how Jesus is portrayed and the role of the other characters in providing a context for Jesus’ interactions with others, a statement on how this passage
Holy Bible: Contemporary English Version. New York: American Bible Society, 1995. Print. (BS195 .C66 1995)
Conventional interpretation of the text regarding Luke 5:33-39 has widely been deduced as a series of parables whose meaning spoke to the New covenant as the “new wine” and the Old covenant as the “old wine”. This was true even though the recitation of these parables follows Jesus being questioned concerning the fasting practices of the Pharisees and John the Baptist and his disciples, as compared with the lack of fasting by Jesus and his disciples. In the discussion that follows, I contend the interpretation of the text of Luke 5:33-39 is better read as the parables of Jesus, in which he examines the implications and comparisons between John the Baptist, and himself.
The New Testament consists of 27 books and 260 chapters. The first chapters of scripture we will observe is Matthew 13:3-23; Mark 4:3-25: and Luke 8:5-18. These scriptures inform us of the “Parable of the Sower”, “Still other seed fell on good soil, where it produced a crop—a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown. Whoever has ears, let them hear.” (Mt. 13:8-9) We will, in addition, discuss the family of Jesus, His disciples, religious leaders, and the crowds.
Oaks, the seed is the “word of God” or the “Word of the kingdom, the thorns are the cares of the world, the good ground is the word of the gospel, and the roots represent out spiritual roots. He says that, “It is up to each of us to set the priorities and to do the things that make our soil good and our harvest plentiful.” He says that the seeds in the stony ground with no roots is when people are not truly concerted to the gospel of Jesus Christ and can easily wither away when oppositions come. He continues by saying the seeds in the thorns is when the riches of the world deceit us. Lastly, he discusses the good ground, how we need to set priorities and make our harvest good and plentiful. Jesus explained that “the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience” (Luke 8:15). We accomplish this by doing the small and simple things daily such as praying and reading our