Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How is data analysis important to researchers
Research paper on how understanding dna advances medicine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How is data analysis important to researchers
Advanced analytics are used improve decision-making, employing digital technologies to retool manufacturing, and harnessing mobile capabilities to improve marketing, to name just a few (Ringel, et al, 2015). On 23 January 2018, I came across an article about a 23andme. 23andme is a DNA Genetic Testing and Analysis Company that was founded in 2006 by Anne Wojcicki, Linda Avey, Paul Cusenza (Seife, 2013). The founders of the company have used technology to innovate selling genetic information to society. Individuals pay to the company to the engendered technology to provide information to gain knowledge about family members. The company advertises how the genetic testing can help you learn more about your ancestors and health conditions. Consequently,
The PBS documentary “Nova – Cracking Your Genetic Code” tells about the genome sequencing technology: its current possibilities, advantages, disadvantages and future potential. The system became cheaper, faster and more available since the first human genome was fully sequenced in 2000. Modern companies use the technology to provide clients with the information about their genes and impacts they can have on owners’ health. Hospitals can provide more accurate diagnosis and personalized treatments with the aid of the genome sequencing. The video shows several examples of these benefits. But it mentions concerns about the quality of services, risks of exaggerated
Chris Crutcher, author of the short story “Fourth and Too Long”, demonstrates how important it is for players and coaches to have a mutual respect for each other on and off of the field. Over the course of the story, the main character, Benny struggles to find respect for himself as well as the coaches of his high school football team. Identically, the coaches lack respect for him as well. Benny woods is being penalized from playing football due to the length of his hair and his decision not to cut it. In the 1960’s long hair was said to have represented being a member of the hippie community. “It sends a message that the rest of the team can do any damn thing they want. First it’s the hair, then...who knows what”(160) is what Coach Greene
In "thinking outside the idiot box", Dana Stevens responds to Steven Johnson's New York Times article in which Johnson believes that watching television makes you smarter. Indeed, Steven Johnson claimed that television shows have become more and more complex over the years in order to follow the viewers need for an interesting plot instead of an easy, linear story. However, Dana Stevens is opposed to this viewpoint. Stevens is not against television, he does not think it makes you smarter nor that it is poisenous for the brain, he simply states that the viewer should watch television intelligently. That is to say that, viewers should know how much television they should watch and what to watch as well.
Personally as i watched this Video I thought it would be so amazing if someone found a way so we can view our possible threats to our lives but with good point of views also come with some negative point of views. The reason why i think this would be a great advancements in our everyday lives is because it could potentially lead us to a cure to cancer if we could figure out what's exactly causing it, then maybe we could find a way to reverse it. I also think this gives us a heads up on what might be coming our way in the future and gives us some time to figure out how to make it so it doesn't happen. I also think this knowing your genetic code could be harmful to people's living habits, expenses and to their love ones. I feel as if people learned they were for instance were going to only live till they were 50 because of a disease they would live life carefully and take their time with a grain of salt versus if someone where to find out they wouldn't have any problems they wouldn't care what they ate or how much they spend or even how much time they have with their loved ones because they knew that nothing bad would come to them. I think this future technology is definitely something to think about and also something that could possibly change the world for good or bad, so whoever holds all this information needs to decide
The more we know about genetics and the building blocks of life the closer we get to being capable of cloning a human. The study of chromosomes and DNA strains has been going on for years. In 1990, the Unites States Government founded the Human Genome Project (HGP). This program was to research and study the estimated 80,000 human genes and determine the sequences of 3 billion DNA molecules. Knowing and being able to examine each sequence could change how humans respond to diseases, viruses, and toxins common to everyday life. With the technology of today the HGP expects to have a blueprint of all human DNA sequences by the spring of 2000. This accomplishment, even though not cloning, presents other new issues for individuals and society. For this reason the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) was brought in to identify and address these issues. They operate to secure the individuals rights to those who contribute DNA samples for studies. The ELSI, being the biggest bioethics program, has to decide on important factors when an individual’s personal DNA is calculated. Such factors would include; who would have access to the information, who controls and protects the information and when to use it? Along with these concerns, the ESLI tries to prepare for the estimated impacts that genetic advances could be responsible for in the near future. The availability of such information is becoming to broad and one needs to be concerned where society is going with it.
...ience excited for the future of society. By appealing to pathos to create excitement for the progression of society and fear of genetic diseases that are eliminable, Stock encourages the reader to embrace genetic modification.
In the movie Gattaca, a futuristic world is illustrated where people have the opportunity to choose the exact personality traits, physical features, and abilities their baby will have. One scene in the movie shows how DNA can be used to test for one’s inclination towards disease, as well as personality. This brings up several ethical issues about investigating others’ DNA, and brings up the question: “Is this a violation of privacy?”
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
Genetic testing today is done on animals, humans and even plants. Most of our meats and fast food restaurants meats are genetically altered weather its processed or using modified feed or food to build up the animal. Some people believe that genetic engineering has gone to far and that there Is no need for it. Ronnie Cummins director of the Organic Consumers Association says “There’s no good reason to do it, he opposes all genetically modified organisms.“Does it increase the quantity of food? No. Does it make crops use less pesticides? No. Does it make animals healthier, happier? No.” A policy that doesn’t require labeling undermines the confidence in the technology. It looks like they’ve got something to hide,” says Margaret Mellon, the director of the food and environment program for the Union of Concerned Scientists. Both bring up good points which leads to the question why do they still do it. A case in which genetic testing of a embryo was helping Amanda Baxley and her unborn find out if she carried a rare neurological disease that had stalked her family for generations. Genetic testing of embryos has been around for more then a decade. This kind of testing is used more to fin...
In today’s world, people are learning a great deal in the rapidly growing and developing fields of science and technology. Almost each day, an individual can see or hear about new discoveries and advances in these fields of study. One science that is rapidly progressing is genetic testing; a valuable science that promotes prevention efforts for genetically susceptible people and provides new strategies for disease management. Unnaturally, and morally wrong, genetic testing is a controversial science that manipulates human ethics. Although genetic testing has enormous advantages, the uncertainties of genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life, and thereby result in psychological burden, discrimination, and abortion.
Bishop, J.E. (1984, September 12). Predictive probes: scientists are focusing on genes predisposing people to illnesses --- new methods will facilitate prevention but will raise ethical, legal questions --- should employers be told?. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved January 22, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.edmc.edu/docview/397923305/142BF1EC4C524F61E66/128?accountid=34899
Case of UK Genetic Knowledge Parks." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 19.2 (2007): 189-204. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 21 Apr. 2011.
Genetic testing using saliva is a common method used by companies to help clients get their genetic information (Chiappin, Antonelli, Gatti, & Elio, 2007). One of the companies involved in the biomedical research is 23andme. The company uses spit-technology where the customers receive spit collection material and submit their saliva for DNA testing (Erin, 2008). Once they receive the saliva, they go ahead and break the cells to get to the DNA which they subsequently use to extract the genetic information (Kaufman, Azcuy, Varnell, Sloop, Thompson & Hill, 2005)
ONE HOUR LATER, at 5:15 in the morning, Kim picked up her cell to call Eugene when he entered carrying a bag of groceries. The strikingly good-looking twenty-six-year old from the east coast grinned as he noticed the scowl on Kim’s face, he had to know something was terribly wrong, but didn’t.