15 Informal Fallacies

603 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Are stereotype hasty generalization

In the essay 15 Logical Fallacies You Should Know Before Getting into a Debate, by David Ferrer. The author’s thesis is “Here’s a list of the 15 informal fallacies you are most likely to encounter in discussion and debate”. The thesis gives me an idea of what the essay will be about. Ad homiens insult others and attack with words to win an argument or bring a person down. As straw man are easily defeated and the people causing this often times do not realize the hurt they do. Both ad homiens and straw man can be alike because they both can attack a person’s view, position, and insult them without doing so on purpose. Ignorance is the case of stating something’s true, then turning around and saying that it is not. For example, saying witchcraft is definitely real then without proof, switch your position and say witchcraft is not real because there is no evidence to prove this case. There is no knowledge behind it and no evidence to support the claim, therefore it is a he said she said type of deal. Dilemma based arguments try to limit the options a person might have but when there are many options out there they prefer to take the effortless …show more content…

Many people do this in their everyday life making up excuses for something that is not important and taking it to the extreme. Circular Arguments are saying something is true just because you say so, or something declares it is true because that is what it states. People assuming things quickly without questioning it first or researching information on it before deciding. Hasty Generalization is making a statement without enough evidence to support it, it is like casual fallacy, which is assuming with no evidence. These are both similar because they are making judgments without collecting the evidence to make the correct decision on the topic at hand. Both the casual and hasty fallacies make their assumptions based on what is in front of them in that

Show More
Related

  • 'The Birth Of Monsters' By Daniel Cohen's Argument?

    1360 Words  | 3 Pages

    For example, “A search for the beginning of the stories of the griffin (or gryphon), that fearsome half lion, half eagle, is typically tangled. Most of us probably became acquainted with the griffin through Alice in Wonderland” (Cohen 135). Here Cohen starts out the search of the birth of the many mythological tales, and he makes common ground with the movie Alice in Wonderland. The reason I see this as part of a Rogerian argument is because Cohen starts to state the upcoming of the search for the “birth of monsters,” then he finds that common ground with the readers which is Alice in Wonderland. Cohen uses that as evidence because more than likely he knows a majority of the readers have seen that movie, or at least have heard of it. And if he is able to make the readers think about it, then he’s off to a great start. But with any work of literature there can be logical fallacies within the authors writing. Cohen’s argument has the logical fallacy of the circular argument. A circular argument is when the author restates the argument throughout their essay, yet does not prove it. My reaction to Cohen’s essay is that he was constantly talking about how he’s trying to find “the birth of monsters” tales yet all that was brought up was different mythological creatures. In addition to that, I just felt like he was talking in circles just a little

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Fallacies In The Crucible

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    They have confessed it” (Miller 68). He uses the hasty generalization to draw up a conclusion with insufficient evidence. He uses the emotional fallacy of the slippery slope, which is when an argument progresses it then leads to devastating consequences. This happens to Procter when he attempts to get his wife out of prison.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Six-Legged Meat Of The Future

    1201 Words  | 3 Pages

    An example is “For instance, swine and humans are similar enough that they can share many diseases” (Dicke and Van Huis 345). The authors create a Hasty Generalization fallacy by concluding that because humans and swine are similar, they share diseases. Furthermore, this makes the audience feel lost because the authors do not provide evidence of how “swine and humans are similar” (Dicke and Van Huis 345). Similarly, the author says that “Because insects are so different from us, such risks are accordingly lowered” (Dicke and Van Huis 345). Again, the author fails to provide a connection between how the risk of getting an infection is lowered because humans and insects are different. The authors also create a Hasty Generalization fallacy because they conclude that the risk of humans getting infected is lowered just because insects and humans are different. In summary, the use of fallacies without providing evidence and makes the readers feel

    Read More

  • Philosphy: Fallacies: Ad Hominen and False Cause

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are reasoning fallacies that attempt to persuade by replacing argument and premise with humor and ridicule (Larson, C., 2013). This is used in health care campaigns and political health care reforms (Kurtzman, D.). Cartoonist Daniel Kurtzman used this in recent cartoon depicting President Obama as a physician (Kurtzman, D.). In the cartoon, he is giving a male baby boomer patient wearing a USA cap a shot from a bottle labeled “health care reform” (Kurtzman, D.). The humorous caption reads “either it will cure you or it will kill me” (Kurtzman, D.). This cartoon statement creates a “false dilemma” (Larson, C., 2013, p. 247). Others may use non sequitur where the flow of the argument does not flow and the message is not logical (Larson, C., 2013, p. 247).

    Read More

  • Commiting the Naturalistic Fallacy

    523 Words  | 2 Pages

    G.E. Moore in his work Pricipia Ethica outlines that something complex can be explained by specifying it basic properties (qtd. in Schroeder). In contrast, Moore explains that something simplistic cannot be explained further by using basic properties (qtd. in Schroeder). To try to explain something simplistic by basic properties would be to commit the naturalistic fallacy. The naturalistic fallacy is a fallacy because it is an error in definition and it is similar to the is-ought distinction.

    Read More

  • Unmasking Fallacies: Analyzing 'The DeVos Family Dynasty'

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    A fallacy is defined as a failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid, faulty reasoning, or a misleading or unsound argument. There are many kinds of fallacies and even websites devoted to describing the various kinds of logical fallacies. Fallacies, though, are slippery little fiends, which do not hesitate to creep in even where they are unwanted. No one wants their argument proved false, but careful, critical readers can spot these shifty deceivers. On the website of the Center for American Progress, there is an article – authored by Catherine Brown and Ulrich Boser – called “The DeVos Family Dynasty.” This article is a poor example of persuasive communication because there are many cases of ad hominem fallacy, the authors repeatedly

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Fallacies

    995 Words  | 2 Pages

    A fallacy that we experience on a daily basis is “everyone is doing this and that’s why I do the same” that’s a very common fallacy that we don’t only experience, we usually are the abusers too. A final example to illustrate more on fallacies is not getting to the point in a discussion or avoiding the point by changing the subject. Fallacies can be categorized into several types and under each type comes several different kinds of fallacies. Next are the Fallacies of Unclear Language, its obvious from the name what these fallacies are about. One of these fallacies is Vagueness where the wording is not clear enough or could be interpreted in different ways.

    Read More

  • Fallacies

    1581 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fallacies are all around us. Every time we turn on a TV, or a radio, or pick up a newspaper, we see or hear fallacies. According to Dictionary.com, a fallacy is defined as a false notion, a statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference, incorrectness of reasoning or belief; erroneousness, or the quality of being deceptive (www.Dictionary.com). Fallacies are part of everyday and become a staple in certain aspects of life. Political campaigns and reporters would be lost without the use of fallacies. Fallacies can be divided into two broad groups: fallacies of relevance and fallacies of insufficient evidence. Fallacies of relevance occur because the premises are logically irrelevant to the conclusion. Fallacies of insufficient evidence occur because the premises fail to provide sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, even though the premises may be logically relevant to the conclusion (Bassham, 2000). In this paper I will define three fallacies, explain their significance to Critical Thinking, and discuss their general application to Decision Making. The three fallacies I will discuss are Ad Hominem (attacking the person), Two Wrongs Make a Right, and Slippery Slope.

    Read More

  • The Consequences And Tragedy Of Ignorance In Oedipus The King

    1208 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not only does ignorance have a negative impact on people, it is also “the root and stem of all evil” (Plato), which can destroy a person. To start off, self-superiority can cloud a person’s judgment; making it evident that intelligence can easily be lost to arrogance. To add on, anger and the human tendency to make rash decisions can also contribute to ignorance, resulting in eventual downfall. Lastly, unconscious attempts to blind yourself from the truth can result in the committing of major sins. Tragedy occurs in “Oedipus the King” when ignorance causes disastrous events, proving that lack of knowledge can result in their misfortune.

    Read More

  • Ad Hominem Fallacy

    1619 Words  | 4 Pages

    As we know fallacies are used very often in our lives. Ad Hominem fallacy is not an exception. Lately, in Democrat's governor nominee election, I noticed an Ad Hominem fallacy happened between Phil Angelides and Steve Westley. They used each other personal life and their investments against each other instead of proving each other wrong by scientific proofs. The environment was the subject of many exchanges TV ads between them.

    Read More

  • Wimsatt And Beardsley The Intentional Fallacy Summary

    1598 Words  | 4 Pages

    2. Getting caught up in the “intentional fallacy” means that the critic becomes fixated on

    Read More

  • Logical Possibility vs Physical Reality: Debunking Fallacies

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    This week we covered a variety of different claims and a common fallacious argument used in their favour. Among the topics discussed were claims such as conspiracies, UFOs, homeopathy, Extra-Sensory Perception (ESP) and bigfoot.

    Read More

  • Informal Fallacies Research Paper

    666 Words  | 2 Pages

    Are informal fallacies important for us to understand today? Francis Bacon was one of the first people to speak no fallacies. Although he made no direct contributions towards today’s information on fallacies, he pointed to the idea that language may be a source of our mistaken ideas. Francis Bacon (1620) stated that, “words plainly force and overrule the understanding, and throw all into confusion, and lead men away into numberless empty controversies and ideal fallacies” (p. 43). We must understand fallacies in order to avoid Bacon’s “empty controversies” and “idle fallacies”. Fallacies will also help us understand the thought process behind logical reasoning and then how to recognize the flaws.

    Read More

  • Fallacies Essay

    2018 Words  | 5 Pages

    Fallacies reference to the weak arguments by learning or hearing some different terms could be an error. It is crucial to understand the concept of the logical fallacies, without understating the point of the arguments the arguments might turn to be weak instant of being persuasive. In order to attempting someone we need first to identify the problem and avoid the confusion. Most of the common argument are not strong and feeble to be the point. Sometimes the Fallacies argument can be persuasive at least to the casual reader or the listener. For example, the fallacious argument like newspaper or advertisements. Some argument could have strong or weak points, But it not necessary to be truth, the argument could be completely wrong but it 's has a point. The most important point is the value of the arguments also the quality of the arguments are needed to show that the arguments are accurate. For example, the media always have fallacious arguments, some of their points are really good and make so much sense. However, most of the rumors, starts by the broadcaster, and they are weak arguments, but some more rumors able to spread faster even when it is feeble and pity. There are five logical fallacies we were taking in the class.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of The Intentional Fallacy, by Wimsatt and Beardsley

    2297 Words  | 5 Pages

    In their essay, ‘The Intentional Fallacy’ (1946), William K. Wimsatt Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley, two of the most eminent figures of the New Criticism school of thought of Literary Criticism, argue that the ‘intention’ of the author is not a necessary factor in the reading of a text.

    Read More

More about 15 Informal Fallacies

Open Document