Rhetorical Fallacies In The Crucible

869 Words2 Pages

In the play The Crucible many characters use different rhetorical fallacies, and one of those characters being Reverend Hale. Hale comes is as an expert on witchcraft to help this small village in their new found problem. He interviewed everyone had made an allegation against people in the village and everyone who was said to be involved with witchcraft. When Reverend Parris comes to take Elizabeth Proctor into cusditoy after Abigail Williams says that Mrs. Proctors sprit was sent to stab her, Hale says, “Nonsense! Minister, I have myself examined Tituba, Sarah Good and numerous other that have confessed to dealing with the Devil. They have confessed it” (Miller 68). He is using the hasty generalization by drawing up a conclusion with insufficient He uses the emotional fallacy of the slippery slope which is when during an argument progresses it then leads to devastating consequences results. This happens to Procter when he attempts to get his wife out of prison. He tells the court about his sinful ways. “Gold help me, I lusted, and there is a promise in such sweat. But it is a whore’s venge-ance, and you must see it; I set myself entirely in your hands, I know you must see it now” (Miller 111). He put all of name on the line during his case with the court. He admits to breaking the seventh commandment which is a very big deal to people in the village; one must not commit adultery. However, he does not care about the repercussions as long as his wife is out of jail. To make sure his claim was true Danforth brings in his wife to validate his claim. If she told the court he cheated on her then she would be taken out of jail, but if she did not it would prove Abigail to be truthful. Being the good wife she is though, she attempts to save her husband’s name by lying in front of the court. Procter trying to prove his wife was a good woman evidently led her to more time in prison, tarnishing his name, and giving Abigail more

Open Document