Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of suffering in christianity
Suffering, death and resurrection of Christ
The concept of suffering
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of suffering in christianity
In 1 Peter, “suffering” comes from the Greek term πάσχω. The basic definition to understand here, is that πάσχω means being affected in a certain way. It is important to understand that πάσχω unlike our modern term for suffering, does not necessarily carry with it the idea of pain, or discomfort. There is one definition for πάσχω with several potential meanings splitting off from it. The definition is that, which is to be deeply moved on an emotional level, or to have undergone a sensible occurrence. This can be a good thing or a bad thing. In a good way, it might mean to have good results, or experience favorable circumstances. In another sense, it may mean literal suffering, or having an unfavorable encounter. This word may also directly …show more content…
Each of these occurrences will be observed, and identified. Definitions will be provided as the needed. 1 Peter 2:19, 2:20, 2:21, 2:23, 3:14, 3:17, 3:18, 4:1 (2x), 4:15, 4:19, and 5:10 each refer to the term πάσχω as a verb, and are translated to “suffering” in the New American Standard Version, except for 3:18. 3:18 speaks of Christ dying for our sins, but instead of using suffer, the translators chose to use “death”. However, in staying consistent with not only TDNT, but also the pattern of translation, the word should still be “suffer.” While it remains true that Christ did experience death for our sins, which is indeed a form of negative πάσχω, the Greek Biblical text does not support this term. Christ “suffered” for sins once for all.
1 Peter 1:11 is the first time that the term πάσχω is used in 1 Peter. It has a special lemma which is πάθημα, a noun. This term carries with it the idea of suffering, or calamity (Liddell πάθημα). 4:13, 5:1, and 5:9 each follow accordingly with 1:11.
1 Peter 3:8 gives the only appearance of an adjective in the Book of 1 Peter. Its lemma is συμπαθής. It means to be sympathetic (Swanson συμπαθής). This is a unique example of πάσχω being used in a non-negative sense, as per the earlier definition in the
…show more content…
While opinions may differ, it would seem that 1 Peter 3:14 most accurately describes Peter’s purpose for this term. Here, Peter is instructing the reader to suffer for righteousness, to not fear intimidation, and not to be troubled. This verse’s primary purpose is to teach how one should act when faced with adversity. As a Christian, it is inevitable that one will eventually suffer for the fact of being a Christian. Doing the right thing will result in suffering, which does not seem fair. It must be understood that if you sign an alliance with God, then the world, and Satan will declare war on you. You will face battles on more than just one front as your work to not only defend your righteousness, but also liberate others’ hearts from the occupational forces of Satan, and his many legions. The Bible lists four major fronts that the Christian will need to engage. Satan, demons, wicked men, and his own brethren who have been misled will work to destroy the Christian’s righteousness. Yet, it is expressed explicitly that the Christian is not to be afraid of these
In the "great works" of ancient Greece and of Christianity, suffering alone is portrayed as something to be feared. Both Homer's Odyssey and the Gospel of Matthew contend that suffering is virtually unbearable when the sufferer has not outside support. If, however, the tormented can find support from others, these teachings continue, suffering becomes more tolerable. Both agree that we wish to find supporters when we are tormented. Unfortunately, these sources diverge on how one finds such support. Homer teaches that one can find support by knowing that all of mankind suffers together, ultimately tormented by the gods. The Gospel of Matthew, however, teaches that by placing faith in God, the tormented can find support from God. More, it teaches that God hears the calls for help from humans and, if asked in true faith, will give support to all sufferers.
He was a man who “provided the perfect atoning sacrifice for the sins of all mankind, thus making the crucifix, or cross, one of the defining symbols of Christianity” (Fairchild). Jesus was pinned on a cross and took on the burden of sins of the world in order to relieve humanity of all suffering. Although Jesus experienced momentous amounts of agony during this process, he was successful in appeasing the suffering of the Christian community, ultimately resulting in a positive outcome of relief for future generations of people. The well-being of one was sacrificed for the progression of many, making a reasonable case for the justification of Jesus’s actions. Suffering is not all bad the way that we perceive it to be and the amount that we suffer is largely based on our own emotional will to endure pain and seek personal and communal benefit from our own agony. Jesus can be said to have tolerated an unimaginable quantity of emotional suffering through displacing the sins of the world onto himself. On the other hand, his will to withstand this suffering and reasons backing his sacrifice diminished the pain that he underwent. Humans suffer so that we can improve our own lives and utilize our experiences to prevent the suffering of others who have not yet taken part in the misery that we
In transition, the last two lines of the verse “Be of sin the double cure; Save from wrath and make me pure.” (850), are very significant. They capture the fulfillment of Old Testament prophesies and refer to what is often called the double imputation. In this, our sins were laid upon the pure, unblemished Christ, which he then in turn absorbed the punishment of God’s wrath for the sake of mankind. The relationship between Toplady’s concepts and biblical verse are once again evident in this encounter. Referring back to the Bible for an explanation, the first book of Peter reads: Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, having dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. (The Holy Bible, 1 Pet. 2:24) This passage correspondingly defines double imputation as being a justification by grace through faith alone. Therefore, loosely translated,
to state suffering as the entirety of the first noble truth, is not enough because the expression of
“The greatest evil is physical pain.” Saint Augustine understood that experiencing pain is horrific, and most would agree. However, it is perhaps emotional pain, rather than physical, that causes the most damage. Whether physical or emotional, painful experiences are upsetting at best, and in severe cases, they can be life-changing. Pain is a feeling of distress that is often an underlying problem or symptom of an illness.
Paul has three terms that he wrote in 2:5-11 that are not found anywhere else in the entire Bible. The three words are “nature” (morphe), “something to be grasped” (harpagmon) and “exalted…to the highest place” (hyperpsoo). Now why would Paul use these words only here while he does in fact discuss these same ideas just with different word choice? The answer is because Paul most likely did not compose these verses. It would be similar to a pastor today quoting the famous hymn “how deep the fathers love for us” which has many verbs, nouns and pronouns that most likely would never be used elsewhere.
In Iyer’s article he comments on how suffering is handled in different situations and he goes into different explanations on how suffering could be interpreted. One example he gave was using a Buddhist interpretation, “Wise men in every tradition tell us that suffering brings clarity, illumination; for the Buddha, suffering is the first rule of life, and insofar as some of it
Suffering is undergoing pain, hardships,or distress. Weather suffering is taken place internally or externally, it is being experienced in everyone’s own well-being. In the Odyssey, Odysseus and his wife, Penelope, both suffer in different ways. Furthermore, Penelope suffers more than Odysseus as she has to battle her struggles mentally rather than physically.
The concept of suffering plays an important role in Christianity, regarding such matters as moral conduct, spiritual advancement and ultimate destiny. Indeed an emphasis on suffering pervades the Gospel of Mark where, it can be argued, we are shown how to "journey through suffering" (Ditzel 2001) in the image of the "Suffering Son of Man" (Mark 8:32), Jesus Christ. Although theologians have suggested that Mark was written to strengthen the resolve of the early Christian community (Halpern 2002, Mayerfeld 2005), the underlying moral is not lost on a modern reader grappling with multifarious challenges regarding faith in the face of suffering. In his article "A Christian Response to Suffering", William Marravee (1987) describes suffering as an "experience over which we men and women continue to stumble and fall". The way we view God is crucial to the way we view suffering according to Marravee, who delineates the disparity between a view of God as an ‘outsider’ and the biblical image of God – where God is an ‘insider’ who suffers with us in our struggle. This essay seeks to explain the Christian view of suffering and the purpose suffering can have in our lives.
Even upon the menservants and the maidservants in those days, I will pour out my spirit” (Acts 2:17–21). In this setting, πᾶσαν σάρκα refers to every human, and, in this case explicitly regardless of age, gender, and socio-economic class. The second occurrence belongs to a quotation from Psalms 16:8–11, in which king David says—according to Peter in Acts, with reference to Jesus—that his heart rejoiced, and his glory/tongue was glad, and his flesh [σάρξ/בָּשָׂ֑ר] would also rest in hope (see Acts 2:26). This series of Hebrew idioms refers to functions and expressions of the person, as aspects of the living person in a social context. The heart is the person (who rejoices), the tongue is the person (who is
As previously, stated God uses difficult situations as a way to improve the relationship we have with Him. Why suffering though? Frederick Sontag wrote in his book that evil or suffering are the best circumstances in which to find a God, unlike times where everything goes well
This great suffering will be brought upon those who have not sought God for repentance for their sin (Rev. 16:10. However, will God allow those who have been faithful to Him to suffer through these terrible events, or will He save them from the tribulation? There are three main views scholars hold and they deal with the role Christians will have in the tribulation. Pretribulationism, Midtribulationism, and Posttribulationism each show when the church will be raptured from the earth. Some factors that contribute to each of these views are the immanence of Christ, the nature of judgments brought upon the earth, and the textual evidence for the church’s presence in the tribulation.
According to Brooks (2014), people seek happiness but indirectly obtain several tests that affects their emotions in many ways. Indeed, when people are is questioned about their past, memories coming back to her mind are often the most important positively as negatively. A positive event can be the birth of a child, success. In contrast, a negative event is often links to death, failure, a dismissal, and so on. Suffering or pain also gives us an outside perspective. Without a doubt, suffering makes us human we like it or not. For example, when a friend tells that she has failed an exam and we realize that we could get it easily, it is hard to understand exactly her emotion because we have never been in the situation. But when the same situation arises and you become the concerned, you understand the effect that this failure may have on you emotionally. In this sense, we understand that suffering makes people human because it helps them to be connected to a situation already happened before or which could happen in the future.
...ering is always going to be painful no matter if God is the one who is doing it to us or not. What we need to realize is that suffering with faith in God is much more justifiable than suffering without. In I Peter it says "However, if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name."(I Peter 4:16). So suffering as a Christian is all right because it means that you share an aspect of Christ's life, and you should continue to praise God. "So then, those who suffer according to God's will should commit themselves to their faithful Creator and continue to do good"(I Peter 4:19). This is our answer: Have faith in God, through the good times and especially the bad, for during the bad times is where our faith will truly be tested, and when the "Problem of human suffering" arises, it won't seem like much of a problem at all.
The Suffering, Death and Resurrection have significance for Christians. today, particularly in times of suffering and need. The suffering of Jesus supports us through our own suffering, as we know we are not. alone, Jesus suffered too. The death of Jesus tells us of our responsibilities, we too must endure our crosses and face our responsibility as Jesus did.