Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of communication in decision making process
Decision making management approach
Approach to decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Applying Decision Making Techniques to Identify Solutions How will the South Pacific Logistics and Transportation Company establish a greater and profitable presence on the Island of Kava? Considering all the physical, environmental and socio-economical issues previously discussed, how can a decision be made that will provide the best solution for both the corporation, its stakeholders and the community in which they operate? There are several tools and techniques available to guide decision makers during the analysis and evaluation process in order to reach the best possible decisions. One of this tools or techniques available during the decision making process is brainstorming. This technique can be used to produce a list of possible solutions and alternatives to the problem. During brainstorming “it is useful to have experienced people to help with this part of the (decision making) process, but new people, even complete rookies can bring an insight to creating alternatives that might be missed by others who are steeped in the tradition of how they do things now” (Langdon, K. 2001,p.33). Brainstorming can be followed by multi-voting which can be used to reduce a long list of ideas and assign priorities quickly, with a high degree of team agreement in order to identify the most important items on a list. This technique is also known as importance weighting. This group technique or group think could be used for a more detailed approach to generate, clarify, and evaluate a long list of ideas, problems, or issues in order to effectively prioritize the items on this list. The South Pacific Logistics and Transportation Company can also use this consensus style decision making so that the entire group ca... ... middle of paper ... ...measure the amount and levels of involvement and communication necessary to implement the decisions taken. Moreover, all stakeholders concern must be taken into account. These actions will help ensure that implementation actually occurs. (Langdon, K., 2001). References Emstthal, H. (2002, March). Deciding how to decide. Association Management. 54(3), p.42 (4). Retrieved on 05 May, 2009 form ProQuest database. E-Library, University of Phoenix. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?sid=4&vinst=PROD Langdon, K. (2001). Chapter 3: Creating options. Smart Things to Know About Decision Making, 1e. John Wiley & Sons, p. 42. Retrieved on 05 May, 2009 from eBook Library, University of Phoenix, eResource, MGT/350, Critical Thinking: Strategies In Decision Making. http://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content
2. Alterative Solutions – Before this class when faced with a problem I would usually go with the first solution that seemed to fix the situation. However, establishing specific evaluation criteria is essential when valuing the merits of a potential solution. If a solution does not fit the criteria, it will not be successful. Judging alternatives through the same criteria allows you to produces the optimal solution and eliminate awful ones. When facing a strategic problem this process will be fundamental in making a
Identifying stakeholders and collaborators is the second step to the “Nine Step Stairway to Effective Evaluation”. Although all steps are essential, this is probably the most important because an extensive review of who is involved and who will be affected by the evaluation is identified (DiClemente et al., 2013). Once identified, it is critical to note that there may be needs or issues that may need to be addressed from all those involved so it would behoove one to be open to suggestions. Bottom line is to collaborate (DiClemente et al., 2013).
Rather, the goal of action research is that in involving all stake holders affected by the problem a situation appropriate solution can be implemented. Involving all stakeholders is essential in action research because it empowers participants to be active contributors to the improvement of their lives.(Stringer, 2014) Stringer (2014) explains that if there is no change as a result of action research then it should be considered unsuccessful. Thus, action research can become a continuous cycle of researching, implementing solutions and researching again based on the results. (Stringer,
Explain the importance of defining the objectives, scope and success criteria of the decisions to be taken
Group Decision Support System, or GDSS, is “an interactive, computer- based system that helps a team of decision-makers solve problems and make choices. GDSS are targeted to supporting groups in analyzing problem situations and in performing group decision-making tasks” (Power 2005). Group Decision Support Systems are designed to help groups in meetings reach a consensus. “The fundamental goal of a GDSS is to support collaborative work activities such as idea creation, message exchange, project planning, document preparation, mutual product creation and joint planning and decision making”(Steinfeld, 1990, p. 174)
Thinking critically and making decisions are important parts of today’s business environment. It is important to understand how the decision making process works and the steps involved. The nine steps of the decision making process are: identifying the problem, defining criteria, setting goals and objectives, evaluating the effect of the problem, identifying the causes of the problem, framing alternatives, evaluating impacts of the alternatives, making the decision, implementing the decision, and measuring the impacts. (Decision, 2007.) By using various methods and tools to assist in making important business decisions an individual can ensure the decisions they make will be as successful as possible. In this paper it will be examined how the decision making process can be followed using various tools and techniques to make successful business decisions by using these same tools and techniques during a thinking critically business scenario. The paper will also discuss how different tools and techniques could have been used to make different, yet still successful decisions.
Make the decision through the integration of ideas and data, and negotiation and prioritization of ideas
Problem solving and decision-making are fundamental in all managerial activities. Although these defining characteristics of management can be used interchangeably, current literature makes a comprehensible delineation between the two. Problem solving can be defined as a mental process and is part of a larger process that begins with identifying the problem and ends by assessing the efficiency of the solution. Decision-making is also considered a mental process and identifies several alternative scenarios before making a final selection. For the purpose of this analysis, I will discuss the similarities and differences of problem solving and decision-making. I will also explain the steps of the decision-making process and discuss the different decision-making approaches.
When an organization is looking for new creative ideas, they should ask their employees. The employees of the organization have an in depth look and are more understanding to the needs of the organization because it is where they work and are involved. Managers can call on a group of employees and together, they can come up with solutions for the organization. “Group decision making is a type of participatory process in which multiple individuals acting collectively, analyze problems or situations, consider and evaluate alternative courses of action, and select from among the alternatives a solution or solutions” (Group Decision Making, n.d.,para.1).
In thinking and decision making, it will be analyzed on three different types of thinking styles. The three thinking styles analyzed are Creative thinking, Logical thinking, and Persuasive thinking. These three thinking styles are some of the many important styles used in a workplace. Creative, logical, and persuasive is a great mix of thinking styles that helps a company becomes very successful in completing a job task. The three different types of thinking will be spoken of on how they each affect the critical thinking process. There will also be examples of each team member workplace decision making process that highlights the three different types of thinking. Thinking and decision making is most important to a company to work towards success. There are so many styles, but which ones work best for you and your group? You will examine the situation and analyze what steps to take to work with what styles work best to succeed.
An employee does an unsatisfactory job on an assigned project. Explain the attribution process that this person's manager will use to form judgments about this employee's job performance.
Making decisions is an important part of our everyday life. Decisions define actions and lead to the achievement of goals. However, these depend on the effectiveness of the decision-making process. An effective decision is free from biases, uncertainties, and is deeply dependent on information and critical thinking. Poor decisions lead to the inability to achieve set objectives and could lead to losses, if finance is a factor. Therefore, it is important to contemplate about quality and ways to achieve it in decision-making, which is the focus of this paper. The purpose is to look into the needs of decision-making, including what one should do and what one should not do.
Decision making is one of the most important aspects in life and work because of its strong link to success and effectiveness. Actually, successful people achieve their goals in life and work through effective and efficient decision making. The decision making process is usually guided by an individual’s beliefs, values, and attitudes as well concepts. While a person can use various concepts in making decisions, they should be very careful to select a concept that is effective and contributes to huge success. Nonetheless, these concepts exist to help an individual become a better decision maker in the world around him/her.
This makes is challenging to develop creative alternates to solutions and meet participate objectives.
The increasing complexity of problems has necessitated new approaches to problem solving. As such, industries that have been using traditional problem-solving structures such as those in the engineering, building, and construction have had no choice but to review their working practices. Elliman and Orange (2000, p.345-360) suggested that systems methodology is the viable approach to facilitation of effective changes and improvement of work practices given that soft systems methodology can be used to stimulate debate and factor in the input of future participants. However, Green (1999, p.329-340) argued that the potential of soft systems to succeed depends on how early it is introduced in to the project. Problem solving can be done at individual or as a team. But how can we make teams work best? Such questions have attracted the interest of many scholars in various fields and so much has been invested in studying creativity, innovation, motivation, intelligence, and accelerated learning.