Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Team Dynamics And Decisions
Importance of team decision-making
How do team dynamics influence the decision-making process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Team Dynamics And Decisions
Communication and decision making is a big part of everyday business. Fred Luthans writes, “Both communication and decision making are dynamic, personal processes relevant to the social cognitive framework and the study of organizational behavior.” (Luthans, 2011, pg. 259) Communication and decision making are tied together. A person has to be able to interpret different types of communication in order to form a proper decision. Many companies have seen the benefit of people working in teams. They have redefined a number of jobs to be a team atmosphere to solve problems and to make decisions. Furthermore, Tim Barnett writes about the advantages of group decision making, “Group decision-making may also lead to a greater collective understanding of the eventual course of action chosen, since it is possible that many affected by the decision implementation actually had input into the decision.” (Barnett, 2016) A team of people has different perspectives that might be missed if different people are not involved in the process of making decisions. In this paper, I will discuss how diverse creative people, communication, and having a process can help generate more ideas with a group of people involved in decision making. Diversity and Creativity In order to have a group that generate more ideas, the group should be made up of diverse creative people from varying backgrounds. In this day and age, companies need creative people that can …show more content…
Group decision making has become the norm these days at work. There are several ways a group can generate more ideas than an individual by selecting diverse creative people, using open interactive communication, and selecting a process to use to develop a decision. In conclusion, a company will be wise to maintain an environment where their workers are empowered to make innovative decisions that will drive the company into future
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
The next stage of our group development was ‘storming’ where differences in opinion begin to arise (Tuckman and Jensen, 1977). The main issue we faced at this stage was contrasting opinions on what topic should be chosen as we could not find an area which all group members were satisfied with. In order to resolve this problem I suggested the group should have a vote on which topics we would be happy to work on, four of our six members voted for the same topic, and the two...
As the processes and systems used in business have become more complex, teams, not individuals, have become popular in many organizations. Teams are made up of individuals from an organization brought together to solve a problem, improve a process or implement a new process. “A major advantage that a team has over an individual is its diversity of resources and ideas” (Burns, 1995, p. 52). However, this diversity can cause conflict within the team. The success of the team is strongly influenced by the team’s ability to recognize the causes of, manage and resolve conflict.
Within the paper, both authors discuss how a leader or team can balance the need for open discussion early in the decision-making process with the need for unity at the end. By using an Inquiry style decision-making process, teams can openly express their own interest and ideas. The teams stay away from trying to persuade others to take any one individuals point of view, but to decide on what is the overall best course of action. This process allows the team to express their ideas without the bickering and fighting that comes with an Advocacy style process. The team stays unified and satisfied that their opinions were heard and put into consideration.
McShane, Steven, and Mary Ann Von Glinow. Chapter 8: Decision Making and Creativity. PRIMIS MNO 6202: Managing Organizations. 2004. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' Reprint of the book.
The purpose of creating teams is to solve a problem or issue through the use of diverse ideas and solutions. There are many times in life, whether at work or at school that one will encounter a diverse mix of personalities. Workplace diversity is everywhere, from the small corner business to the fortune 500 company, and is one of the most important challenges facing companies today. This mix of diverse personalities, gender, race, experience, and culture is what makes a team successful. This is an example of a heterogeneous team. On the other hand, a team with the same make-up, or homogeneous, has limitations on creativity, viewpoints and ideas. This paper will look at cultural diversity and demographic characteristics, specifically age, gender, expertise/ experience and how each plays an integral part in the construction of a high performance team.
Some of the characteristics seen in collaborative leadership are shared problem-solving and decision making. In order to come to a mutual decision between group members, the...
It is so important to have a diverse work group in order for my business to keep improving and getting more
Choosing a topic for this paper was very difficult. Many topics seemed very interesting, but after reviewing many topics the choice was clear. I also took into consideration the fact that we would be presenting these topics to the class. So, I choose the communication process. It is very important in management. Having been a manager for three years, I felt I would be able to explain this topic well to the class.
Groupthink One major contradictory force to effective work teams is the presence of the phenomenon of groupthink, which corrodes the decision-making abilities of a group. Robbins and Judge (2009) describe groupthink as “situations in which group pressures for conformity deter the group from critically appraising unusual, minority, or unpopular views” (p. 304). Group members feel compelled to kowtow to the conclusions of the majority or of those as seen as more popular or charismatic.
Individual members of the group bring with them different perceptions and thus offering a broader perspective to be considered. The course of action to be taken after the decision is made is enhances due to the collective understanding Greater commitment to decisions made as all members of the group have contributed to the decision made. The act of involving a group to decide will usher in a strong sense of team spirit between team members in the face of success or failure.
“Informal groups have a powerful influence on the effectiveness of an organization, and can even subvert its formal groups. But, the informal group’s role is not limited to resistance. The impact of the informal group upon the larger formal group depends on the norms that the informal group sets. So the informal group can make the formal organization more effective, too.” Informal groups can either be a manager’s best friend or worst enemy. Group Development: The Formation of Informal Work Groups Informal work groups are part of any working environment; how they form, the leadership within the group and how these groups communicate, follow the same basic model. “Groups are particularly good at combining talents and providing innovate solutions to possible unfamiliar problems.” “There are five stages of group development. The first is forming,which is where the group first comes together. Everyone is usually polite. Conflict is seldom voiced directly. Individuals will be guarded in their own opinions and reserved.” The second form of developmentis “storming a chaotic vying for leadership and trailing of group operates.” The third is norming as the second stage evolves the rules of engagement for the group becomes established, and the scopes of the group’s task or responsibilities are clear and agreed. Fourth is performing,not all groups reach this point. Everyone knows each other well enough to be able to work together. And the fifth stage is adjourning; this is about the completion and disengagement of the tasks and group members. The formations of informal work groups are employed by an organization to perform specific functions. Informal groups almost always arise ...
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
One of these innovative ways is using a work group. More organisations are now becoming global than ever, which means they rely on distributed teams to carry out certain tasks (Nedelko, Z, 2007). Although nowadays most jobs require a degree of individual and group work, it is left to the management to identify which method might be appropriate for the task (Belbin, M, 2007). In this essay I will be looking at how organisations can use work groups to their advantage, and the different factors that can affect a work group’s performance. In addition, I will also be discussing when it is appropriate to use work groups and individuals, and discussing whether an organisation can reply solely to work groups to be successful.
Communication is one of the most important factors in our lives. It dictates the relationships formed with the individuals in personal and professional lives. Effective communication provides a foundation for trust and respect to grow. It also helps better understand a person and the context of the conversation. Individuals often believe that their communication skills are much better than what they actually are. Communication appears effortless; however, much of what two people discuss gets misunderstood, thus leading to conflicts and distress. To communicate effectively, one must understand the emotion behind the information being said. Knowing how to communicate effectively can improve relationships one has at home, work and in social affairs. Understanding communication skills such as; listening, non-verbal communication and managing stress can help better the relationships one has with others.