Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive And Negative Impacts Of Whaling
Negative consequences of native indians
Positive And Negative Impacts Of Whaling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive And Negative Impacts Of Whaling
The Makah tribe wants to hunt gray whales, which is a significant part of their culture, as evidenced by most, if not all, of their traditional dances, songs, and arts reference gray whales and the ritual hunt of them. The Makah, for about seventy years, agreed to temporarily stop hunting gray whales due to how close they were to becoming extinct, but now that they have officially been taken off of the endangered species list, the Makah wish to once again take up their yearly hunt. Many on the anti-whaling side oppose the hunt, because of concerns that the hunt will either push the gray whales back into the endangered or vulnerable species list or that the Makah hunter won't have any way to tell if the whale they kill comes from a year round …show more content…
The government has already had some very poor relations with tribes and how they deal with with the subject of native rights and land ownership. When the Makah tribe originally agreed to the treaty that would give up most of their lands to the United States government, they rejected one of the usual offerings of a reservation, a school, or a doctor, as they just wanted assurance that their right to fish and hunt whales in the Neah Bay would not be infringed upon. If they were permanently denied the right to hunt whales by the government, it could have serious impacts on social relations between the United States government and all tribes within America, not just the Makah tribe. This is not to mention whether allowing or disallowing the Makah Whale hunt will set a precedent about how all other native groups, both in the United States and elsewhere, will go about requesting the right to hunt whales, such as native tribes in Alaska and Russia, who require whale meat for sustenance. There are also groups who are watching the controversy very closely in order to gage their own rights to whale and what the social and international reaction is like in regards to whale hunting for …show more content…
Both the Makah tribe and the people who oppose the hunt have very real and valid concerns about whether or not the hunt should be continued. Disallowing it could step on the rights of native tribes and create a negative rapport between the government and native peoples, but allowing it to happen could have possibly serious effects on the environment and and set a precedent for tolerance of whale hunting. I do not believe there is one right answer that is satisfying for all groups. Creating a positive dialogue between people and allowing native cultures to flourish and come into the modern world and not be oppressed by governments is something that should be encouraged. In order for this, the hunt would probably have to happen. I also believe that the Makah should be limited in how many and how frequently they may hunt gray whales and that assistance should be given in choosing a whale, to avoid choosing one from a specific pod that is limited in number or one from a migrating pod that might affect the environment. Helping the Makah tribe to pick out a whale would also prevent the social ramifications of the Makah accidentally hunting a whale that people living near the coast would have become familiar with and would protest the killing of. The Makah tribe technically only requires one whale a year to satisfy their traditions and keeping the number of whales they are allowed to kill low would discourage
The right to hunt is the law. The twenty-ninth Article states, "...securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others..." If this is the law then it can not be infringed. With this there really is no question of big game hunting. These rights are personal rights of the citizens of the United States. Parents can choose what they want for there own children and let them do what they desire, and if that desire is hunting then let it be. When other people who oppose hunting try and stop this freedom then they are the ones at fault and are doing wrong by infringing on the rights of others. These actions are illegal and should be taken care of. In C M Dixon's article, "The Banning of Hunting is an Affront to Freedom," he stated that, "He has never heard of hunters violating the just requirements of public order or general welfare" (2). From the hunting experiences that I have had I agree with this statement one hundred percent.
The mosh is an awesome place in Downtown Jacksonville; where everyone can learn some interesting facts about our city, how the body works , what animals are in the ocean and etc. I visited the Timucua Indian exhibit; I learned a lot of intriguing information that I didn’t know before. I learned how the Timucua Indians first came about, how the Indians lived and survived during this time period. This exhibit also showed me how the Indians looked and the way they did things. Being able to learn about the Timucua Indians is so fascinating to me.
The Kiowa’s people were a great warrior culture society that roamed the plains before the arrival of the Europeans. The Kiowa’ Indian tribe formed an alliance with neighboring tribes and dominated the western plains for decades. In their native tongue they called themselves, ” Ka’gwa” which meant the “Principle People”. Before the intervention of European cultures they were known as the, ”People with large tipi flaps”. The Kiowa expanded their territories through out the southern plains, which is known as modern day Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado and Texas. The mid-1900 century the Kiowa Indian tribe had several treaties with the United States, but it was the Medicine lodge treaty with the southern plains tribes that relocated the Kiowa’s into reservation located in present day Oklahoma. The Kiowa’s were known amongst other tribe as the large tipi flap people and their tipi art displayed battle emblems of Kiowa war society members. It was with horses came abundance of buffalo hide and larger tipis for the nomadic tribe, and with more hide came excellent craftsmanship. The first documented Spaniard to arrive into the southern plains was Don Juan de Onate, He gives his description of what he saw according to Peter Nabokov and Robert Easton book titled, Native American Architecture, which states the following,” fifty tents of tanned hides, very bright red and white in color and bell-shaped, with flaps and opening and built as skillfully as any house in Italy.” (Nabokov and Easton 1989) During Don Juan de Onate expedition to Eastern New Mexico he encountered tipis and described how Native tribes utilized dogs to transport their belongings. With the arrival of Spaniards in the mid-fifteenth century also came horses, which revol...
...he Bowhead the Inupiaq will lose their way of life. The whale serves many purposes now just as it did in the early years. These natives respect, understand and follow the ways to protect the whales from extinction, just as Robert Higgs quoted about the fish "When the Indians had obtained enough fish they would remove the weirs from the river in order that the fish they did not need could go upstream and lay their eggs so that there would be a supply of fish for future years."
Games seem to bring out the joy and fun in the tribe. It also seems to bring people together. Mythologies or myths, also seem to bring people together by storytelling. Two very different concepts but one very similar idea of social connection. Some of the games that were played in the Wailaki tribe are “Tylnla, Kaidlte, and Neitltechat” (26). Tylnla was kind of played like a modern day, guess which hand the coin is in. It was titled the “grass game” (26). Instead of a coin they used “wood” which was “wrapped” in “grass” (26). The game was played with “fifteen to twenty men” (26). They would play in a group id “two” and “stretched” their “hands” out (26). Then they would guess “which hand” and the loser would be considered “killed” (26). Both
Hunting is a passion for millions of Americans across the United States and without it who knows what the current deer population would be. With the white tailed deer having few predators and a large habitat to thrive in it is important to keep the tradition of hunting going. Besides, the real problem Anti-hunters should be focusing on is the growth of cities and communities because they are what truly hurts the deer population. As long as deer hunting safety remains under control and the deer population stays in tacked, there should be no reason to end future hunts for Americans. To conclude, it is true that many people don’t believe in the ethics of hunting and that is alright, because regardless of how they feel hunting is here to stay for many years to
The Apache were a very interesting group of Indians. The name Apache means “enemy” when translated. Many neighboring tribes feared them. They were located in Texas and the New Mexico Desert, and you can still find reservations there today.
Sea Shepherd Conservation Society "The Makah Whale Hunt" 02 Online. Internet 3 Febuary 2003. Available www:seashepherd.org/media_info/asp.
... In the debate over the ethics of whaling and its regulation since the formation of the IWC, widely diverse arguments have been made concerning the legitimacy of the whaling enterprise and the economic, ethical, and practical aspects of international regulation. Different views of ecology, culture, and legitimacy as they pertain to a valued resource and its exploitation for human purposes. While it is safe to say one must preserve the historical and cultural value of whaling nations and nations around the world, it can also be said of animals. While many nations continue to cling to their cultural ancestry, background of whaling, and the right for scientific research, it is proven that such human endeavors must be carefully and faithfully regulated.
The topic of whale meat has continuously been polemic. Opinions were positively divided once the International Whaling Commission (IWC) regulated business whaling. IWC introduced a moratorium on searching gamete, hump back, gray whales, and plenty of additional, a lot of to the dismay of Japan and
There are many reasons why whaling is hazardous to the ocean’s ecosystem. The idea of killing mammals for profit has the same consequences as trophy hunting for animals in Africa. It portrays a negative example for humans . In addition, shipping the meat to other countries for greedy companies is disgraceful. Many popular scientific websites such as National Geographic say that “ they are slaughtered for commercial gain.” However, scientific evidence has already proved that is still not profitable. According to a recent national article, one man named Kristjan Loftson does it purely out of tradition for a big propaganda agenda ( National Geographic, 01,16, page ). People claim this is done for science. However, after another global ban, experts are saying it is done purely for money and cruelty. According to a major campaigner, “the International Fund for Animal Welfare” went as far as doing DNA tests to see what was responsible for recent whale beachings. Due to these facts, Japan’s own Ministry of Agriculture is stepping up. They have plans to file proposals for recent research along with the government ( IFAW, n.d. Parah 5). Have the facts finally persuaded like Japan and Iceland to cut back?
The definition of whaling is the practice or industry of hunting and killing whales for their oil, meat, or whalebone. The act of hunting and killing whales is starting to affect the opinions of a portion of the citizens in the countries where whaling is practiced where others support whaling because of the huge role it plays in the history and culture of their country. Whaling was once considered a business for countries including Canada, the Faroe Islands, Greenland, Iceland, Indonesia, Japan, Norway, Philippines, Russia, South Korea, and the United States. The whale populations as a whole have severely decreased due to the hunting of these species that began around 3000 BC.
After 12 years of business a sushi “Hump” restaurant has been closed for serving illegal whale meat (Barboza). The meat from endangered species cannot be sold legally or served in the United States. The whale meat is sold as a delicacy. It is more than likely that this is the real reason for whale hunting. Could you imagine going to your favorite restaurant and finding out you are being served an endangered species such as whale meat?
phrase “International law” is not very clear. What exactly is the “international law”? By “international” does it mean all the countries around the world? Is there only one specific law or many in the “international” section? Who exactly approves the “international law”, an “international” person? I for sure did not know that we even had an “international law”. As a matter of fact, I know that I am not the only one who does not know. Another is the lack of adequate support. The claim has no support, in other words, it does not go in deep why whale hunting should be banned. Should it be banned because it is animal cruelty? Or because there are fewer whales in the ocean? Lastly, conflict over beliefs. I believe that whale hunting should be banned, but not by the international law. There are other bigger problems that should become an “international law”. Underlying assumption assuming that everyone wants whale hunting to be banned. What if other people live from that like we live from cows, pigs, chickens. Also, there are another bigger situations that should become an “international law”.
I don’t agree with the Norwegian or Japanese position regarding non-endangered species of whales as a culture exemption. Many nations have strange habit and culture is the reason for that, so we can accept and respect other’s culture as long as it doesn’t affect on something that could make a problem for others. Today we can hear about annual celebration for some Iranian people all over the world, and that is a sad day for them, so they start to hit them self’s tell they bleed in this celebration, as it is a culture habit (a day of mourning & annual celebration of Muharram, 2016). This culture habit is not accepted by most of us,