Explain Why Whale Hunting Should Be Banned

First, it would make the claim difficult to prove for the use of vague definition. The phrase “International law” is not very clear. What exactly is the “international law”? By “international” does it mean all the countries around the world? Is there only one specific law or many in the “international” section? Who exactly approves the “international law”, an “international” person? I for sure did not know that we even had an “international law”. As a matter of fact, I know that I am not the only one who does not know. Another is the lack of adequate support. The claim has no support, in other words, it does not go in deep why whale hunting should be banned. Should it be banned because it is animal cruelty? Or because there are fewer whales in the ocean? Lastly, conflict over beliefs. I believe that whale hunting should be banned, but not by the international law. There are other bigger problems that should become an “international law”. Underlying assumption assuming that everyone wants whale hunting to be banned. What if other people live from that like we live from cows, pigs, chickens. Also, there are another bigger situations that should become an “international law”.

f. Violence on television

It could be killing, raping, or hurting someone. The claim also uses underlying assumption. For the reason that is saying that children who watch more than four hours of violence produce violence. Is there a study that shows kids watching violence for four hours with the outcome of violent behavior? Also, the claim only states children, but couldn't it happen to any age? Also assuming that every child who watches television for four hours will be violent. What if it is fewer hours? What if it is not from watching violence on television. Conflict over beliefs, I do believe that children learn almost everything from television, but that does not mean that they are going to do some of the stuff that they