Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the Mongol empire
The Mongols Interaction with Europe
The rise and fall of the Mongol Empire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the Mongol empire
In my opinion, I think the Barbarians were barbaric. Because of the reported deaths, the size of the empire, and the laws/punishments they had. Some of this information is quite frightening. The deaths in Mongol, there were a lot. The numbers are high for the reported deaths. And the way they killed was nostalgic. “ Year-1220, Place-Bukhara, Reported deaths-30,000, and Source- Juvaini… Year-1221, Place- nishapur, reported deaths- 1,747,000, Source- Persian chronicler” (Document 4,Juvaini). That is a jurassic jump in the number of reported deaths. Now, the way they killed was bad also. “They severed the heads of the slain fro their bodies and heaped them up in piles, keeping those of the men separate from those of the women and children.”(Document 4,Juvaini). I couldn’t believe what it would be like back then to ever witness that, or see that many people dead. The size of the empire is really amazing. It covers almost all of Asia. “ Conquerors- Genghis Khan (1162-1227), Square miles covered- 4,860,000”(Document 1,Various sources). That is a huge chunk of land. They had all of that land at their disposal. It makes you wonder what the citizens felt, and what they thought about the empire. …show more content…
Especially on adultery. “ Whosoever commits adultery will be executed, whether or not they have previous convictions” (Document 10, Ratchnevsky). Adultery was a serious crime back then. “If a woman who is captured by a Mongol has a husband no one will enter into a relationship with her. If an Unbeliever(i.e. a Mongol) desires a married woman he will kill the husband and then have relations with the woman “ (Document 10,Juvaini). That’s just a bad thing. Kill the husband so you can have the woman, you basically have to watch your back if you have a
All in all, the acts of murder, the boys acting in an uncivilized manner, and most importantly, the lack of obeying the rules, all act upon savagery in all different ways.
The people that the Mongol Empire overthrew were the only ones to suffer under Genghis Khan’s homicidal ways. Khan’s army was forcibly traumatized under maniacal methods as well: “Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten. [...] When they are in battle, if one or two or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of a hundred are all put to death, if they do not flee too. [...] Likewise if one or two or more go forward boldly to the fight, then the rest of the ten are put to death if they do not follow and, if one or more of the ten are captured, their companions are put to death if they do not rescue them.” (doc B) Every group of ten was expected to perform at a homog...
Rossabi, Morris. "Life in China Under Mongol Rule: Religion." The Mongols in World History | Asia
There is no document of civilization which is not at the same time a document of barbarism. Walter Benjamin, "Theses On The Philosophy Of History," 256.
When the word “Mongol” is said I automatically think negative thoughts about uncultured, barbaric people who are horribly cruel and violent. That is only because I have only heard the word used to describe such a person. I have never really registered any initial information I have been taught about the subject pass the point of needing and having to know it. I felt quite incompetent on the subject and once I was given an assignment on the book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Age, I was very perplexed for two reasons. One I have to read an outside book for a class that already requires a substantial amount of time reading the text, and secondly I have to write a research paper in History. I got over it and read the book, which surprisingly enough interested me a great deal and allow me to see the Moguls for more than just a barbaric group of Neanderthals, but rather a group of purpose driven warriors with a common goal of unity and progression. Jack Weatherford’s work has given me insight on and swayed my opinion of the Mongols.
So the main problem of the essay must be seen in the opinion of what is barbarous and his thesis is that these people are not more barbarous than his own countrymen. He says it is just a matter of interpretation and the solution to his problem must be, that men often call that barbarism what is not common to them. So the tribe sees the "civilized" nation as strange and maybe barbarous and the other way around. My own opinion is that barbarism is a matter of definition indeed but there are certain things that can generally be seen as barbarous no matter in which culture, such as inequality between people that leads to the dying of the poorer ones or as corruption and being ruled by thoughts of money. There can probably be found something barbarous in every nation and tribe.
...se and the Empire. Perhaps barbarism is unltimately necessary as attaining the needs may mean doing so at any means necessary. The Mongols were barbaric in the sense that in their conquest it was inevitable that many were slaughtered, kidnapped, and stole.
Our fore fathers experienced the cruelty of barbarians. Barbarians are members of a people considered by those of another nation or group to have a primitive civilization. They were of a fierce, brutal, and cruel person. The ugly side of the barbarians are there cruelty, insensitive, uncultured person and uncaring nature. The best adjective that I can think of to describe them is to call them a boor. They burned homes and left children and families homeless time and time again.
Map number one on page 2 of Jack Weatherford’s “Genghis Kahn and the Making of the Modern World” (Weatherford, J. McIver.) we learn that in year 1200 the Mongolian homeland was small in area, approximately 200 X 200 square miles in diameter. Two main features are shown on the map, Mt Burkhan Kaldun in the upper northeastern area and the city of Avarga located on the River Kherlen in southeastern area of the map. Map number two on page 80 (Weatherford, J. McIver.) shows the expanded Mongolian Empire in the year 1260 stretching from the Sea of Japan west to the Black Sea. The 1260 Mongolian Empire incorporates Moscow, Kiev and the Caspian Sea. The
First, the barbarians were a pagan group spread across Germany and Central of Europe. They were dangerous and violent group of people. Charlemagne wanted them to stop destroying his city and stealing all the food from his people. It took Charlemagne thirty-two years to conquer the barbarians, and under his ruled the barbarians would have protection, food, and shelter. The
The word “savage” can have multiple meanings. When Edgarian is describing her experiences with her brother and sister she also uses the term barbaric. This leads the reader to believe the children and wild and crazy. Edgarian states “being left alone by adults to be our fully barbaric selves, we also had a great deal of fun and mischief.” (Edgarian) In this day and age one might wonder where are the children’s parents? But the author leads the reader to believe that the children were left alone to keep themselves entertained and to take care of one another and stay out of trouble. Parents seemingly were not as worried about their children as they are today, and did not
The first thing that comes to most people's minds when they hear the word mongols is cruel, selfish, and merciless people. Also another great word to describe the mongols is barbaric. There is a ton of evidence to support these thoughts.
“‘I know quite well,’ replied the Emperor, ‘that your advice is extremely good. But unfortunately we Mongols are brought up from childhood to shoot arrows and ride.’” (92)
.... Upon his death “he ruled from the Pacific to Caspian which is known to be four times the size of Alexander the Great, two times the size of the Roman Empire, and larger than any nation except Russia” (Man 260). Genghis Khan’s sons would continue the conquest doubling the empire land including many new countries. The death of Genghis Khan’s son Ogedei would cause rivalry over who was going to be the next successor which causes an even greater rift in the khans who already had troubles before their father’s death. The governments the khan’s rule over had become unstable and the natives rebel and took back their land. The last of the khans were either assassinated, had vanish, or had horrific deaths thus ending the reign the Mongol empire, largest expanses of land. Many lives were lost during these conquests and some lands were destroyed during these battles.
This story can be summarized by dividing the story into three major sections that represent a genealogy of the Genghis Khan ancestors, the lifestyle of Genghis Khan and the story of Genghis son and Ogodei his successor. This piece of early time’s literature was translated and edited by Jack Weatherford and it was not released until 16th February, 2010. The piece of work restores early history’s most prominent figures to the positions they rightfully deserves. It clears the picture of the nomadic lifestyle of the Mongols and it is rich with information regarding the society of the Mongols in the 12th and the 13th centuries” (Kahn, 2005).