ucf

670 Words2 Pages

Over the past 5 decades, nurse practitioners have been utilized to deliver primary care, traditionally in underserved areas or to vulnerable populations. With the primary care physician workforce in decline it has been estimated, in 2020 we will see a shortage of nearly 45,000 primary care physicians. Currently, a nurse practitioners scope of practice varies widely state by state, many believe that drafting new laws to expand their scope of practice would help create a readily available supply of primary care providers to help combat the expected shortage. Considering the intensified demand for primary care physicians amid this shortage, there have been many diverse elements influencing the current workforce 10. Given the patient expansion happening in 2014 the current supply of primary care physicians will likely be unable to properly care for the needs of the country. The aging physician population only fuels the need for a fresh supply of providers. In particular “A December 2010 Council on Graduate Medical Education report estimated that there were 242,500 PCPs in the United States in 2010, and almost 25% (55,000) of them aged ≥ 56 years.” 10! As with everything, there is also a financial incentive for the medical student to avoid going into primary care. PCP’s earn approximately only 55% of what their medical specialty counter part earns 10. In 2010 we are expecting PCP’s, which currently number at 205,000 to increase to 220,800. Conversely, PCP demand is expected to grow from 212,500 to 241,200, with such a significant shortage, nurse practitioners are now in an exciting position. For the first time, NPs are now in position make change happen, and take their position in the medical field 10. Several additional factors have ... ... middle of paper ... ...cern is the need to revise state laws governing NPs. Drafting correct legislation to clarify a NPs scope of practice is absolutely necessary to increase primary care capacity. “In some states, NPs provide care without any involvement from a physician. In other states providing the same care requires that NPs collaborate or even be supervised by a physician”. These are fundamental services that states are restricting NPs from. In addition, twenty-seven states have no restrictions on diagnosing and treating, where twenty states only require writing documentation. The remaining states have requirements but, no written documentation is necessary. It is clear that certain states have taken the correct steps to create a favorable situation for NPs. While these states have taken great steps in helping expand PCPs, other states need to follow suit. Law follows practice.

Open Document